Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 3/2016

01-09-2016 | Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Obstetric risk factors for umbilical cord prolapse: a nationwide population-based study in Japan

Authors: Junichi Hasegawa, Tomoaki Ikeda, Akihiko Sekizawa, Isamu Ishiwata, Katsuyuki Kinoshita, On behalf of Japan Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Tokyo, Japan

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 3/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To demonstrate the clinical course and the obstetric risk factors for umbilical cord prolapse.

Methods

The clinical course of reported cases of umbilical cord prolapse that occurred in Japan between 2007 and 2011 was retrospectively analyzed. The obstetric risk factors for umbilical cord prolapse were investigated by a nationwide population-based case-cohort study.

Results

Three hundred and sixty-nine cases (0.018 %) of fore-lying/prolapsed umbilical cord in 2,037,460 deliveries were analyzed. Most cases of fore-lying umbilical cord were diagnosed by an ultrasound scan (78 %), whereas umbilical cord prolapse was most frequently diagnosed by an internal examination (63 %). Umbilical cord prolapse was found to be significantly associated with the following factors: multiple pregnancy [odds ratio (OR) 3.57; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 2.60, 4.90], non-vertex presentation (OR 4.67; 95 %CI 3.73, 5.86), preterm labor (OR 2.28; 95 %CI 1.83, 2.83), premature rupture of membranes (OR 3.84; 95 %CI 3.10, 4.77), prolapsed amniotic bag (OR 12.31; 95 %CI 9.00, 16.85), polyhydramnios (OR 2.89; 95 %CI 1.49, 5.61), and a birth weight of <2500 g (OR 2.26; 95 %CI 1.84, 2.79).

Conclusion

The current study is the largest in Japan to demonstrate the obstetric clinical course and risk factors associated with umbilical cord prolapse. Prolapsed amniotic bag, labor and rupture of membrane during premature period, and fetal abnormal presentation induced by multiple pregnancy, and polyhydramnios were high risk situation for umbilical cord prolapse.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kahana B, Sheiner E, Levy A, Lazer S, Mazor M (2004) Umbilical cord prolapse and perinatal outcomes. Int J Gynaecol Obstet Off Organ Int Fed Gynaecol Obstet 84:127–132CrossRef Kahana B, Sheiner E, Levy A, Lazer S, Mazor M (2004) Umbilical cord prolapse and perinatal outcomes. Int J Gynaecol Obstet Off Organ Int Fed Gynaecol Obstet 84:127–132CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Usta IM, Mercer BM, Sibai BM (1999) Current obstetrical practice and umbilical cord prolapse. Am J Perinatol 16:479–484CrossRefPubMed Usta IM, Mercer BM, Sibai BM (1999) Current obstetrical practice and umbilical cord prolapse. Am J Perinatol 16:479–484CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Critchlow CW, Leet TL, Benedetti TJ, Daling JR (1994) Risk factors and infant outcomes associated with umbilical cord prolapse: a population-based case-control study among births in washington state. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:613–618CrossRefPubMed Critchlow CW, Leet TL, Benedetti TJ, Daling JR (1994) Risk factors and infant outcomes associated with umbilical cord prolapse: a population-based case-control study among births in washington state. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:613–618CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Huang JP, Chen CP, Chen CP, Wang KG, Wang KL (2012) Term pregnancy with umbilical cord prolapse. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 51:375–380CrossRefPubMed Huang JP, Chen CP, Chen CP, Wang KG, Wang KL (2012) Term pregnancy with umbilical cord prolapse. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 51:375–380CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Holbrook BD, Phelan ST (2013) Umbilical cord prolapse. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 40:1–14CrossRef Holbrook BD, Phelan ST (2013) Umbilical cord prolapse. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 40:1–14CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Boyle JJ, Katz VL (2005) Umbilical cord prolapse in current obstetric practice. J Reprod Med 50:303–306PubMed Boyle JJ, Katz VL (2005) Umbilical cord prolapse in current obstetric practice. J Reprod Med 50:303–306PubMed
7.
go back to reference Koonings PP, Paul RH, Campbell K (1990) Umbilical cord prolapse. A contemporary look. J Reprod Med 35:690–692PubMed Koonings PP, Paul RH, Campbell K (1990) Umbilical cord prolapse. A contemporary look. J Reprod Med 35:690–692PubMed
8.
go back to reference Hasegawa J, Sekizawa A, Ikeda T, Koresawa M, Ishiwata I, Kawabata M, Kinoshita K (2015) Group: Japan Association of O, Gynecologists (in press) Clinical risk factors for poor neonatal outcomes in umbilical cord prolapse. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 16:1–5 (Epub ahead of print) Hasegawa J, Sekizawa A, Ikeda T, Koresawa M, Ishiwata I, Kawabata M, Kinoshita K (2015) Group: Japan Association of O, Gynecologists (in press) Clinical risk factors for poor neonatal outcomes in umbilical cord prolapse. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 16:1–5 (Epub ahead of print)
9.
go back to reference Hasegawa J, Sekizawa A, Ikeda T, Koresawa M, Ishiwata I, Kawabata M, Kinoshita K, Group: Japan Association of O, Gynecologists (2015) The use of balloons for uterine cervical ripening is associated with an increased risk of umbilical cord prolapse: population based questionnaire survey in Japan. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 15:4CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hasegawa J, Sekizawa A, Ikeda T, Koresawa M, Ishiwata I, Kawabata M, Kinoshita K, Group: Japan Association of O, Gynecologists (2015) The use of balloons for uterine cervical ripening is associated with an increased risk of umbilical cord prolapse: population based questionnaire survey in Japan. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 15:4CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Hayashi M, Nakai A, Satoh S, Matsuda Y (2012) Adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies may be related to maternal factors associated with infertility rather than the type of assisted reproductive technology procedure used. Fertil Steril 98:922–928CrossRefPubMed Hayashi M, Nakai A, Satoh S, Matsuda Y (2012) Adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies may be related to maternal factors associated with infertility rather than the type of assisted reproductive technology procedure used. Fertil Steril 98:922–928CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Unno S, Masuzaki H, Kanayama N, Kubo T, Fujimori K, Matsuda Y (2013) Report of perinatology committee. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Jpn 65:1377–1387 Unno S, Masuzaki H, Kanayama N, Kubo T, Fujimori K, Matsuda Y (2013) Report of perinatology committee. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Jpn 65:1377–1387
12.
go back to reference Murphy DJ, MacKenzie IZ (1995) The mortality and morbidity associated with umbilical cord prolapse. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 102:826–830CrossRefPubMed Murphy DJ, MacKenzie IZ (1995) The mortality and morbidity associated with umbilical cord prolapse. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 102:826–830CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Katz Z, Lancet M, Borenstein R (1982) Management of labor with umbilical cord prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 142:239–241PubMed Katz Z, Lancet M, Borenstein R (1982) Management of labor with umbilical cord prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 142:239–241PubMed
Metadata
Title
Obstetric risk factors for umbilical cord prolapse: a nationwide population-based study in Japan
Authors
Junichi Hasegawa
Tomoaki Ikeda
Akihiko Sekizawa
Isamu Ishiwata
Katsuyuki Kinoshita
On behalf of Japan Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Tokyo, Japan
Publication date
01-09-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3996-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 3/2016 Go to the issue