Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 3/2014

01-03-2014 | Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Patient satisfaction with childbirth after external cephalic version

Authors: Gerhard Bogner, Barbara Eva Hammer, Christiane Schausberger, Thorsten Fischer, Klaus Reisenberger, Volker Jacobs

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 3/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To assess acceptance and impact of external cephalic version (ECV) for breech presentation at term on maternal satisfaction with childbirth.

Methods

Retrospective study on n = 131 women with breech presentation comparing maternal satisfaction after ECV and consecutive childbirth (n = 66; 50.4 % of these successful attempts in n = 33; 50 %) against the group without ECV and primary caesarean section (CS) (n = 65; 49.6 %) instead using a questionnaire.

Results

Women with successful ECV tolerated side effects of the intervention better than after unsuccessful ECV (pain, tocolytics, mental and physical state, for all p < 0.001). They were not more satisfied with childbirth than women who experienced an unsuccessful ECV (p = 0.37). However, they would undergo the procedure again (p = 0.003) and would recommend it to other women (p < 0.001). Only women with spontaneous vaginal deliveries after successful version were more satisfied with childbirth than women with planned CS (p = 0.05). Women with version attempts tend to perceive childbirth as being less problematic with fewer complications (9.5 vs. 19 %, p = 0.12). Unsuccessful ECVs had no negative impact on satisfaction with childbirth (p = 0.072).

Conclusion

Attempting ECV seems to be an option for increasing the rate of vaginal births with breech presentation without negative impact on maternal satisfaction regarding consecutive childbirth.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR, Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group (2000) Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomized multicentre trial. Lancet 356(9239):1375–1383PubMedCrossRef Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR, Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group (2000) Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomized multicentre trial. Lancet 356(9239):1375–1383PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Maier B, Georgoulopoulos A, Zajc M, Jaeger T, Zuchna C, Hasenoehrl G (2011) Fetal outcome for infants in breech by method of delivery: experiences with a stand-by service system of senior obstetricians and women’s choices of mode of delivery. J Perinat Med 39:385–390PubMedCrossRef Maier B, Georgoulopoulos A, Zajc M, Jaeger T, Zuchna C, Hasenoehrl G (2011) Fetal outcome for infants in breech by method of delivery: experiences with a stand-by service system of senior obstetricians and women’s choices of mode of delivery. J Perinat Med 39:385–390PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kotaska A, Menticoglou S, Gagnon R, Farine D, Basso M, Bos H, Delisle MF, Grabowska K, Hudon L, Mundle W, Murphy-Kaulbeck L, Ouellet A, Pressey T, Roggensack A (2009) Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. SOGC clinical practice guideline: vaginal delivery of breech presentation: No. 226. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 107:169–176PubMedCrossRef Kotaska A, Menticoglou S, Gagnon R, Farine D, Basso M, Bos H, Delisle MF, Grabowska K, Hudon L, Mundle W, Murphy-Kaulbeck L, Ouellet A, Pressey T, Roggensack A (2009) Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. SOGC clinical practice guideline: vaginal delivery of breech presentation: No. 226. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 107:169–176PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Grootscholten K, Kok M, Oei SG, Mol BW, van der Post JA (2008) External cephalic version-related risks: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 112:1143–1151PubMedCrossRef Grootscholten K, Kok M, Oei SG, Mol BW, van der Post JA (2008) External cephalic version-related risks: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 112:1143–1151PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Nassar N, Roberts CL, Barratt A, Bell JC, Olive EC, Peat B (2006) Systematic review of adverse outcomes of external cephalic version and persisting breech presentation at term. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 20:163–171PubMedCrossRef Nassar N, Roberts CL, Barratt A, Bell JC, Olive EC, Peat B (2006) Systematic review of adverse outcomes of external cephalic version and persisting breech presentation at term. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 20:163–171PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Larkin P, Begley CM, Devane D (2009) Women’s experiences of labour and birth: an evolutionary concept analysis. Midwifery 25:e49–e59PubMedCrossRef Larkin P, Begley CM, Devane D (2009) Women’s experiences of labour and birth: an evolutionary concept analysis. Midwifery 25:e49–e59PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Schindl M, Birner P, Reingrabner M, Joura E, Husslein P, Langer M (2003) Elective cesarian section vs. spontaneous delivery: a comparative study of birth experience. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 82:834–840PubMedCrossRef Schindl M, Birner P, Reingrabner M, Joura E, Husslein P, Langer M (2003) Elective cesarian section vs. spontaneous delivery: a comparative study of birth experience. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 82:834–840PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bogner G, Xu F, Simbruner C, Bacherer A, Reisenberger K (2012) Single institute experience, management, success rate and outcome after external cephalic version at term. Int J Gynecol Obstet 116:134–137CrossRef Bogner G, Xu F, Simbruner C, Bacherer A, Reisenberger K (2012) Single institute experience, management, success rate and outcome after external cephalic version at term. Int J Gynecol Obstet 116:134–137CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Dencker A, Taft C, Bergqvist L, Lilja H, Berg M (2010) Childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ): development and evaluation of a multidimensional instrument. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 10:81PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Dencker A, Taft C, Bergqvist L, Lilja H, Berg M (2010) Childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ): development and evaluation of a multidimensional instrument. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 10:81PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Rijnders M, Offerhaus Pien, Dommelen P, Wiegers T, Buitendijk S (2010) Prevalence, outcome, and women’s experiences of external cephalic version in a low-risk population. Birth 37:124–133PubMedCrossRef Rijnders M, Offerhaus Pien, Dommelen P, Wiegers T, Buitendijk S (2010) Prevalence, outcome, and women’s experiences of external cephalic version in a low-risk population. Birth 37:124–133PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Haines HM, Rubertsson C, Pallant JF, Hildingsson I (2012) The influence of women’s fear, attitudes and beliefs of childbirth on mode and experience of birth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 12:55PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Haines HM, Rubertsson C, Pallant JF, Hildingsson I (2012) The influence of women’s fear, attitudes and beliefs of childbirth on mode and experience of birth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 12:55PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Fischer T, Krause M, Feige A (1996) Breech presentation–information, anxiety and pattern of expectations of established obstetricians and pregnant patients. 2: results of a survey of women with breech presentation. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 200:61–65PubMed Fischer T, Krause M, Feige A (1996) Breech presentation–information, anxiety and pattern of expectations of established obstetricians and pregnant patients. 2: results of a survey of women with breech presentation. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 200:61–65PubMed
16.
go back to reference Wimmer-Puchinger B (1992) Pregnancy as a crisis: psychosocial conditions of complication in pregnancy. Springer, Berlin Wimmer-Puchinger B (1992) Pregnancy as a crisis: psychosocial conditions of complication in pregnancy. Springer, Berlin
17.
go back to reference Jally JE, Murtagh MJ, Macphail S, Thomson R (2008) More in hope than expectation: a systematic review of women’s expectations and experience of pain relief in labour. BMC Med 6:7CrossRef Jally JE, Murtagh MJ, Macphail S, Thomson R (2008) More in hope than expectation: a systematic review of women’s expectations and experience of pain relief in labour. BMC Med 6:7CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Waldenström U, Hildingsson I, Ryding EL (2006) Antenatal fear of childbirth and its association with subsequent caesarean section and experience of childbirth. BJOG 113:638–646PubMedCrossRef Waldenström U, Hildingsson I, Ryding EL (2006) Antenatal fear of childbirth and its association with subsequent caesarean section and experience of childbirth. BJOG 113:638–646PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lütje W (2007) What are the factors influencing satisfaction and experience after childbirth? Die Hebamme 20:44–51CrossRef Lütje W (2007) What are the factors influencing satisfaction and experience after childbirth? Die Hebamme 20:44–51CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Pang MW, Leung TN, Lau TK, Hang Chung TK (2008) Impact of first childbirth on changes in women’s preference for mode of delivery: follow-up of a longitudinal observational study. Birth 35:121–128PubMedCrossRef Pang MW, Leung TN, Lau TK, Hang Chung TK (2008) Impact of first childbirth on changes in women’s preference for mode of delivery: follow-up of a longitudinal observational study. Birth 35:121–128PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Christiaens W, Bracke P (2007) Assessment of social psychological determinants of satisfaction with childbirth in a cross-national perspective. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 7:26PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Christiaens W, Bracke P (2007) Assessment of social psychological determinants of satisfaction with childbirth in a cross-national perspective. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 7:26PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Fair CD, Morrison TE (2012) The relationship between prenatal control, expectations, experienced control, and birth satisfaction among primiparous women. Midwifery 28:39–44PubMedCrossRef Fair CD, Morrison TE (2012) The relationship between prenatal control, expectations, experienced control, and birth satisfaction among primiparous women. Midwifery 28:39–44PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Appelbaum RA, Straker JK, Geron SM (2000) Assessing satisfaction in health and long-term care. Springer Publishing, New York Appelbaum RA, Straker JK, Geron SM (2000) Assessing satisfaction in health and long-term care. Springer Publishing, New York
24.
go back to reference Salmon P, Miller R, Drew NC (1990) Womens’s anticipation and experience of childbirth: the independence of fulfilment, unpleasantness and pain. Br J Med Psychcol 63:255–259CrossRef Salmon P, Miller R, Drew NC (1990) Womens’s anticipation and experience of childbirth: the independence of fulfilment, unpleasantness and pain. Br J Med Psychcol 63:255–259CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Lavender T, Walkinshaw SA, Walton I (1999) A prospective study of women’s views of factors contributing to a positive birth experience. Midwifery 15:40–46PubMedCrossRef Lavender T, Walkinshaw SA, Walton I (1999) A prospective study of women’s views of factors contributing to a positive birth experience. Midwifery 15:40–46PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Hodnett ED (2002) Pain and women’s satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186:60–72 Hodnett ED (2002) Pain and women’s satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186:60–72
27.
go back to reference Chalmers B, Kaczorowski J, Darling E, Heaman M, Fell DB, O’Brien B, Lee L (2010) Maternity Experiences Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. Caesarean and vaginal birth in Canadian women: a comparison of experiences. Birth 37:44–49PubMedCrossRef Chalmers B, Kaczorowski J, Darling E, Heaman M, Fell DB, O’Brien B, Lee L (2010) Maternity Experiences Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. Caesarean and vaginal birth in Canadian women: a comparison of experiences. Birth 37:44–49PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Patient satisfaction with childbirth after external cephalic version
Authors
Gerhard Bogner
Barbara Eva Hammer
Christiane Schausberger
Thorsten Fischer
Klaus Reisenberger
Volker Jacobs
Publication date
01-03-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 3/2014
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-3007-5

Other articles of this Issue 3/2014

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 3/2014 Go to the issue