Top

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Published in:

01-03-2012 | Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Anal incontinence and quality of life following obstetric anal sphincter injury

Author: Ranitha Kumar

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 3/2012

Abstract

Purpose

The objective of our study was to identify the number of women who have long-term ano-rectal symptoms following primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) and the effect on their quality of life. We also wished to determine the impact of the injury on decision for future pregnancies and mode of delivery in subsequent pregnancies.

Methods

A cohort of women who sustained OASI in 2004 in Ninewells Hospital were contacted (minimum 4 years post-repair). They were sent a questionnaire about incontinence of flatus, solid stools, liquid stools, severity of incontinence, quality of life, decision for future pregnancy and mode of delivery in subsequent pregnancy.

Results

70/4,245 (1.7%) women sustained OASI. 42/70 (60%) women responded to the questionnaire. 15/41 (37%) experienced anal incontinence. 8/15 (53%) women had to alter their lifestyle due to their symptoms. Women who were asymptomatic had a median visual analogue score of 0.5 (range 0–4) and women who were symptomatic had a median score of 3.5 (range 2–8). 12/41 (29%) decided against further pregnancies and 8 of them were symptomatic (p 0.015). 16/41 women (39%) did not have any further pregnancy following OASI and 9 of them (56%) had anal incontinence. Of the 25 women who did have further pregnancies, 6 women (24%) had anal incontinence. 19 of them were asymptomatic. (p = 0.03). 5 out of the 6 symptomatic women had elective caesarean sections.

Conclusions

Long-term outcomes following OASI are not encouraging. A significant number of women decided against further pregnancy and most symptomatic women that have further pregnancy opt to deliver by caesarean section.

Available only for authorised users

Swash M (1993) Faecal incontinence. BMJ 307:636–637PubMedCrossRef

Third- and Fourth-degree perineal tears (2007) Management RCOG Green Top Guideline number 29. March 2007

Thacker SB, Banta HD (1983) Benefits and risks of episiotomy: an interpretative review of the English language literature, 1860–1980. Obstet Gynecol Surv 38:322–338PubMedCrossRef

Pinta TM, Kyalanpaa ML, Salmi TK, Teramo KA (2004) Primary sphincter repair: are the results of the operations good enough? Dis Colon Rectum 47:18–23PubMedCrossRef

De Leeuw JW, Struijk PC, Vierhout ME, Wallenburg HCS (2001) Risk factors for third degree perineal ruptures during delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 108(4):383–387CrossRef

Venkatesh KS, Ramanujam PS, Larson DM, Haywood MA (1989) Anorectal complications of vaginal delivery. Dis Colon Rectum 32:1039–1041PubMedCrossRef

Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Thomas JM, Bartram CI (1993) Anal sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med 329:1905–1911PubMedCrossRef

Donnelly V, Fynes M, Campbell D, Jognson H, O’Connell PR, O’ Herlihy C (1998) Obstetric events leading to anal sphincter damage. Obstet Gynaecol 92:955–961CrossRef

Faltin DL, Boulvain M, Irion O, Bretones S, Stan C, Weil A (2000) Diagnosis of anal sphincter tears by postpartum endosonography to predict faecal incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 95:643–647PubMedCrossRef

10.

Sultan AH, Kamn MA, Hudson CN, Bartram Cl (1994) Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair. BMJ 308:887–891PubMedCrossRef

11.

Goffeng AR, Andersch B, Anderson M, Berndtsson I, Hulten L, Oresland T (1998) Objective methods cannot predict anal incontinence after primary repair of extensive anal tears. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Scand 77:439–443CrossRef

12.

Fitzpatrick M, Behan M, O’Connell PR, O’ Herlihy C (2000) A randomised clinical trial comparing primary overlap with approximation repair of third degree obstetric tears. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:1220–1224PubMedCrossRef

13.

Sangalli MR, Floris L, Faltin D, Weil A (2000) Anal incontinence in women with third or fourth degree perineal tears and subsequent vaginal deliveries. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 40(3):244–248PubMedCrossRef

14.

Pretlove S, Thompson PJ, Toozs-Hobson PM, Radley S (2004) The first 18 months of a new perineal trauma clinic. J Obstet Gynaecol 24:399–402PubMedCrossRef

15.

Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, Kane RL, Mavrontonis C, Thorson AG, Wexner SD, Bliss D, Lowry AC (2000) Fecal incontinence quality of life scale: quality of life Instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 43:9–16 discussion 16-7PubMedCrossRef

16.

Haadem K, Ohrlander S, Lingman G (1988) Long term ailments due to anal sphincter rupture caused by delivery—a hidden problem. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 27:27–32PubMedCrossRef

17.

Crawford LA, Quint EH, Pearl ML, DeLancey JO (1993) Incontinence following rupture of the anal sphincter during delivery. Obstet Gynaecol 1:527–531CrossRef

18.

Poen AC, Felt-Bersma RJ, Strijers RL, Dekker GA, Cuesta MA, Meuwissen SG (1998) Third-degree obstetric perineal tear: long-term clinical and functional results after primary repair. Br J Surg 85:1433–1438PubMedCrossRef

19.

Samarasekera DN, Bekhit MT, Wright Y, Lowndes RH, Stanley KP, Preston JP, Preston P et al (2008) Long-term anal continence and quality of life following postpartum anal sphincter injury. Colorectal Dis 10(8):793–799PubMedCrossRef

20.

Bravo Gutierrez A, Madoff RD, Lowry AC, Parker SC, Buie WD, Baxter NN (2004) Long-term results anterior sphincteroplasty. Dis Colon Rectum 47:727–731PubMedCrossRef

21.

Williams A, Lavender T, Richmond MD, Tincello D (2005) Women’s experiences after a third-degree obstetric anal sphincter tear: a qualitative study. Birth 32(2):129–135PubMedCrossRef

22.

Byrd LM, Hobbiss J, Tasker M (2005) Is it possible to predict or prevent or prevent third degree tears? Colorectal Dis 7(4):311–318PubMedCrossRef

23.

Fornell EU, Matthiesen L, Sjodahl R, Berg G (2005) Obstetric anal sphincter injury ten years after: subjective and objective long term effects. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 112(3):312–316CrossRef

24.

Fynes M, Donnelly V, Behan M, O’Conell PR, O’Herlihy C (1999) Effect of second vaginal delivery on anorectal physiology and faecal incontinence: a prospective study. Lancet 354:983–986PubMedCrossRef

25.

de Leeuw JW, Vierhout ME, Struijk PC, Hop WCJ, Wllenburg HCS (2001) Anal sphincter damage after vaginal delivery: functional outcome and risk factors for fecal incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80:830–834PubMedCrossRef

26.

Sultan AH, Thakar R (2002) Lower genital tract, anal sphincter trauma. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynecol 16:99–115CrossRef

Title: Anal incontinence and quality of life following obstetric anal sphincter injury
Author: Ranitha Kumar
Publication date: 01-03-2012
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-2003-x

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

Anal incontinence and quality of life following obstetric anal sphincter injury

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Uterine perforation with omentum incarceration after dilatation and evacuation/curettage: magnetic resonance imaging findings

Clinicopathologic insight of simultaneously detected primary endometrial and ovarian carcinomas

Endometrial/uterine corporeal volume ratio (EV/UCV) as predictor of malignancy in women with postmenopausal bleeding

The value of laparoscopy alone or combined with hysteroscopy in the treatment of interstitial pregnancy: analysis of 22 cases

Cervical sarcoma botryoides and ovarian Sertoli–Leydig cell tumor: a case report and review of literature

Intra-operative frozen section analysis of common iliac lymph nodes in patients with stage IB1 and IIA1 cervical cancer