Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 8/2020

01-08-2020 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine

Arthroscopic repair of partial-thickness articular surface rotator cuff tears: single-row transtendon technique versus double-row suture bridge (transosseous equivalent) fixation: results from a prospective randomized study

Authors: Manuel Zafra, Pilar Uceda, Francisco Muñoz-Luna, Rafael C. Muñoz-López, Pilar Font

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 8/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this prospective study was to compare the clinical and structural findings following the arthroscopic repair of partial-thickness (exceeding 50%) articular-sided rotator cuff tears using either a single-row or a double-row suture bridge fixation.

Materials and methods

Fifty patients were included in this study. The patients were randomly placed into two groups: 25 underwent the single-row (Group I) and 25 a double-row suture bridge fixation (Group II). The clinical outcomes were assessed using ASES and Constant shoulder scores, both preoperatively and at the end of follow-up. The pain level was evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS), preoperatively, at 6 months and at the end of follow-up. All patients underwent preoperative MRI to identify the rotator cuff tear, and postoperatively at 12 months to evaluate tendon integrity.

Results

The average follow-up was 32.5 months. The mean ASES scores increased from 35.9 to 96.7 in Group I and from 35.3 to 93.4 in Group II; the mean Constant shoulder scores increased from 55.6 to 97.8 in Group I and from 57.5 to 97.3 in Group II. There were no significant differences between the two groups. The average preoperative pain level decreased from 7.4 to 3 at 6 months and to 0.4 at the end of the Group I; and from 7.6 to 3 at 6 months and 0.8 in Group II. There was no significant difference between the two groups. At 12 months, the MRI assessments showed two retears in Group I (8%) and one retear in Group II (4%).

Conclusion

Arthroscopic repair of partial-thickness articular rotator cuff tears that exceed 50% of tendon thickness with a single-row transtendon repair or double-row suture bridge provides functional improvement and pain relief regardless of the repair technique used. There were no differences in clinical results between both techniques.

Level of evidence

Level II; prospective comparative study.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Ellman H (1990) Diagnosis and treatment of incomplete rotator cuff tears. Clin Orthop Relat Res 254:64–74 Ellman H (1990) Diagnosis and treatment of incomplete rotator cuff tears. Clin Orthop Relat Res 254:64–74
7.
go back to reference Yamamaka K, Matsumoto T (1994) The joint side tear of the rotator cuff. A follow up study by arthrography. Clin Orthop Relat Res 304:68–73 Yamamaka K, Matsumoto T (1994) The joint side tear of the rotator cuff. A follow up study by arthrography. Clin Orthop Relat Res 304:68–73
10.
go back to reference Itoi E, Tabata S (1992) Incomplete rotator cuff tears. Results of operative treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 284:128–135 Itoi E, Tabata S (1992) Incomplete rotator cuff tears. Results of operative treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 284:128–135
21.
go back to reference Lyons TR, Savoie FH 3rd, Field LD (2001) Arthroscopic repair of partial-thickness tears of the rotator cuff. Arthroscopy 17:219–223CrossRef Lyons TR, Savoie FH 3rd, Field LD (2001) Arthroscopic repair of partial-thickness tears of the rotator cuff. Arthroscopy 17:219–223CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Arthroscopic repair of partial-thickness articular surface rotator cuff tears: single-row transtendon technique versus double-row suture bridge (transosseous equivalent) fixation: results from a prospective randomized study
Authors
Manuel Zafra
Pilar Uceda
Francisco Muñoz-Luna
Rafael C. Muñoz-López
Pilar Font
Publication date
01-08-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 8/2020
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03387-6

Other articles of this Issue 8/2020

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 8/2020 Go to the issue