Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

LIVE: Thursday 2nd May 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

Quality sleep is essential for health. But what happens to our brains when sleep patterns are disturbed? Join our experts to explore the interplay between sleep disruption and neurological diseases, and the questions that you need to be asking your patients to help you prevent the harmful effects of sleep deprivation.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 3/2018

01-03-2018 | Orthopaedic Surgery

Functional outcomes after removal of hardware in patellar fracture: are we helping our patients?

Authors: Arieh Greenberg, Assaf Kadar, Michael Drexler, Zachary T. Sharfman, Ofir Chechik, Ely L. Steinberg, Nimrod Snir

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Functional outcomes after Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF) of the patella are variable. Common complications of patella ORIF include persistent anterior knee pain, limited range of motion and symptomatic hardware. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if removal of hardware is beneficial to symptomatic patients after patellar fracture fixation.

Methods

Patients who presented to our institution between December 2006 and November 2014 with patella fractures treated with ORIF were eligible for inclusion. Patella ORIF was performed using (1) K-wires (KW) with a tension band construct or (2) Cannulated Screws (CS) with a tension band construct. Radiological analyses included (1) AO classification and (2) measurements of prominent hardware length. Patient medical charts were reviewed for demographic and intraoperative data as well as peri/postoperative complications. All patients completed the SF-12 score, visual analog scale, Kujala score, Lysholm score and questionaries’ regarding return to previous activity levels.

Results

Forty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria. The average time from fracture fixation to removal of hardware was 15.8 (SD ± 14.9) months. The mean follow-up was 43.1 (SD ± 27.1) months. Patella fixation was accomplished using tension band constructs with KW in 28 patients (59.5%) or with CS in 19 patients (40.5%). Patient reported quality of life and pain outcomes improved significantly after removal of hardware (p = 0.001, and p = 0.002 respectively). Functional outcome scores (Kujala and Lysholm) did not improve significantly after hardware removal in the KW or CS groups. Significantly more patients in the KW group returned to pre-injury activity (p = 0.005).

Conclusions

Hardware removal after patella ORIF significantly improves patient reported pain and quality of life outcomes but not functional outcomes. Patients should be counseled regarding the expected outcome of hardware removal following patella ORIF and diabetic patients should be given special consideration before undergoing this procedure.
Literature
1.
2.
3.
Yang NP et al (2010) Estimated prevalence of orthopaedic fractures in Taiwan—a cross-sectional study based on nationwide insurance data. Injury 41(12):1266–1272CrossRefPubMed
4.
5.
Gunal I et al (1997) Patellectomy with vastus medialis obliquus advancement for comminuted patellar fractures: a prospective randomised trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79(1):13–16CrossRefPubMed
6.
Szyszkowitz R (1991) Patella and Tibia. In: Manual of INTERNAL FIXATION: techniques recommended by the AO-ASIF Group. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 553–594CrossRef
7.
LeBrun CT, Langford JR, Sagi HC (2012) Functional outcomes after operatively treated patella fractures. J Orthop Trauma 26(7):422–426CrossRefPubMed
8.
Smith ST et al (1997) Early complications in the operative treatment of patella fractures. J Orthop Trauma 11(3):183–187CrossRefPubMed
9.
Petrie J, Sassoon A, Langford J (2013) Complications of patellar fracture repair: treatment and results. J Knee Surg 26(5):309–312CrossRefPubMed
10.
Lazaro LE et al (2013) Outcomes after operative fixation of complete articular patellar fractures: assessment of functional impairment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(14):e96 1–8CrossRef
11.
Kumar G et al (2010) Implant removal following surgical stabilization of patella fracture. Orthopedics 33(5)
12.
Carpenter JE et al (1997) Biomechanical evaluation of current patella fracture fixation techniques. J Orthop Trauma 11(5):351–356CrossRefPubMed
13.
Crossley KM et al (2004) Analysis of outcome measures for persons with patellofemoral pain: which are reliable and valid? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85(5):815–822CrossRefPubMed
14.
Nwachukwu BU et al (2017) Preoperative short form health survey score is predictive of return to play and minimal clinically important difference at a minimum 2-year follow-up after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 45(12):2784–2790CrossRefPubMed
15.
Wolfe F, Michaud K (2007) Assessment of pain in rheumatoid arthritis: minimal clinically significant difference, predictors, and the effect of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy. J Rheumatol 34(8):1674–1683PubMed
16.
Tashjian RZ et al Minimal clinically important differences (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for visual analog scales (VAS) measuring pain in patients treated for rotator cuff disease. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18(6):927–932
17.
18.
Garner MR et al (2015) Elective removal of implants after open reduction and internal fixation of Tibial Plateau fractures improves clinical outcomes. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135(11):1491–1496CrossRefPubMed
19.
Shibuya N et al (2013) Factors associated with nonunion, delayed union, and malunion in foot and ankle surgery in diabetic patients. J Foot Ankle Surg 52(2):207–211CrossRefPubMed
20.
Clement ND et al (2010) Does diabetes affect outcome after arthroscopic repair of the rotator cuff? J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(8):1112–1117CrossRefPubMed
21.
Simpson JM et al (1993) The results of operations on the lumbar spine in patients who have diabetes mellitus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75(12):1823–1829CrossRefPubMed
22.
Lingard EA et al (2004) Predicting the outcome of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-a(10):2179–2186CrossRefPubMed
23.
Kadar A et al (2015) Predictors for nonunion, reoperation and infection after surgical fixation of patellar fracture. J Orthop Sci 20(1):168–173CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Functional outcomes after removal of hardware in patellar fracture: are we helping our patients?
Authors
Arieh Greenberg
Assaf Kadar
Michael Drexler
Zachary T. Sharfman
Ofir Chechik
Ely L. Steinberg
Nimrod Snir
Publication date
01-03-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2852-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 3/2018 Go to the issue

Handsurgery

Biomechanical in vitro comparison of suture anchors for thumb UCL repair

Orthopaedic Surgery

Bleeding in primary shoulder arthroplasty

Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine

Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy in young patients with symptomatic discoid lateral meniscus: an average 10-year follow-up study

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Acknowledgement to Reviewers 2017

Orthopaedic Surgery

Comparison of the outcome between unilateral and bilateral open wedge high tibial osteotomy in the bilateral varus knees

Trauma Surgery

The nail–shaft-axis of the of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) is an important prognostic factor in the operative treatment of intertrochanteric fractures