Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 2/2018

01-02-2018 | Knee Arthroplasty

Sagittal magnetic resonance imaging-scan orientation significantly influences accuracy of femoral posterior condylar offset measurement

Authors: Peter Balcarek, Ali Seif Amir Hosseini, Ulrike Streit, Tobias Franz Brodkorb, Tim Alexander Walde

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 2/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In total knee arthroplasty the femoral posterior condylar offset (PCO) may serve as a potential branch for correct femoral component positioning. The technique of adjusting the sagittal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-scan on which it is measured has not been investigated in previous literature, but may be subject to variances due to knee joint positioning or axial localizer scan angulation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of simulated femur rotation on the accuracy of PCO measurement.

Materials and methods

Ten asymptomatic knee joints underwent MRI investigations. A sagittal plane perpendicular to the transepicondylar axis was defined as the true-sagittal plane (tsP). Sagittal images were reformatted in the tsP and angulated by 5° and − 5° in medial and lateral direction. In total each knee received three scans in 0°, 5° and − 5° axial localizer scan angulation. Medial and lateral PCO measurement was performed in each MRI-scan angulation.

Results

Simulated external rotation decreased medial PCO size by 1.7 mm (95% CI 0.5994–3.127) (p = 0.012), and simulated internal rotation increased medial PCO size by 2.1 mm (95% CI 1.142–2.994) (p = 0.001). Lateral PCO size increased by 1.9 mm (95% CI 0.5660–3.412) and decreased by 2.1 mm (95% CI 1.142–2.994) with simulated external and internal rotation, respectively (p = 0.011; p = 0.0007).

Conclusion

This study shows the high sensitivity of medial and lateral PCO measurements to small changes of MRI axial localizer scan angulations simulating minor degrees of internal or external femur rotation. Thus, absolute PCO values should be interpreted with caution if the sagittal image acquisition is not standardized.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bellemans J, Banks S, Victor J, Vandenneucker H, Moemans A (2002) Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty. Influence of posterior condylar offset. J Bone Jt Surg Br 84:50–53CrossRef Bellemans J, Banks S, Victor J, Vandenneucker H, Moemans A (2002) Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty. Influence of posterior condylar offset. J Bone Jt Surg Br 84:50–53CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Massin P, Gournay A (2006) Optimization of the posterior condylar offset, tibial slope, and condylar roll-back in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21:889–896CrossRefPubMed Massin P, Gournay A (2006) Optimization of the posterior condylar offset, tibial slope, and condylar roll-back in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21:889–896CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Malviya A, Lingard EA, Weir DJ, Deehan DJ (2009) Predicting range of movement after knee replacement: the importance of posterior condylar offset and tibial slope. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:491–498CrossRefPubMed Malviya A, Lingard EA, Weir DJ, Deehan DJ (2009) Predicting range of movement after knee replacement: the importance of posterior condylar offset and tibial slope. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:491–498CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Onodera T, Majima T, Nishiike O, Kasahara Y, Takahashi D (2013) Posterior femoral condylar offset after total knee replacement in the risk of knee flexion contracture. J Arthroplasty 28:1112–1116CrossRefPubMed Onodera T, Majima T, Nishiike O, Kasahara Y, Takahashi D (2013) Posterior femoral condylar offset after total knee replacement in the risk of knee flexion contracture. J Arthroplasty 28:1112–1116CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Weinberg DS, Streit JJ, Gebhart JJ, Williamson DF, Goldberg VM (2015) Important differences exist in posterior condylar offsets in an osteological collection of 1058 femurs. J Arthroplasty 30:1434–1438CrossRefPubMed Weinberg DS, Streit JJ, Gebhart JJ, Williamson DF, Goldberg VM (2015) Important differences exist in posterior condylar offsets in an osteological collection of 1058 femurs. J Arthroplasty 30:1434–1438CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Voleti PB, Stephenson JW, Lotke PA, Lee GC (2014) Plain radiographs underestimate the asymmetry of the posterior condylar offset of the knee compared with MRI. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:155–161CrossRefPubMed Voleti PB, Stephenson JW, Lotke PA, Lee GC (2014) Plain radiographs underestimate the asymmetry of the posterior condylar offset of the knee compared with MRI. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:155–161CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Voleti PB, Stephenson JW, Lotke PA, Lee GC (2015) No sex differences exist in posterior condylar offsets of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473:1425–1431CrossRefPubMed Voleti PB, Stephenson JW, Lotke PA, Lee GC (2015) No sex differences exist in posterior condylar offsets of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473:1425–1431CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Cinotti G, Sessa P, Ripani FR, Postacchini R, Masciangelo R, Giannicola G (2012) Correlation between posterior offset of femoral condyles and sagittal slope of the tibial plateau. J Anat 221:452–458CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cinotti G, Sessa P, Ripani FR, Postacchini R, Masciangelo R, Giannicola G (2012) Correlation between posterior offset of femoral condyles and sagittal slope of the tibial plateau. J Anat 221:452–458CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Frosch S, Brodkorb T, Schüttrumpf JP, Wachowski MM, Walde TA, Stürmer KM, Balcarek P (2014) Characteristics of femorotibial joint geometry in the trochlear dysplastic femur. J Anat 225:367–373CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Frosch S, Brodkorb T, Schüttrumpf JP, Wachowski MM, Walde TA, Stürmer KM, Balcarek P (2014) Characteristics of femorotibial joint geometry in the trochlear dysplastic femur. J Anat 225:367–373CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Wernecke GC, Seeto BG, Chen DB, MacDessi SJ (2016) Posterior condylar cartilage thickness and posterior condylar offset of the femur: a magnetic resonance imaging study. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 24:12–15CrossRef Wernecke GC, Seeto BG, Chen DB, MacDessi SJ (2016) Posterior condylar cartilage thickness and posterior condylar offset of the femur: a magnetic resonance imaging study. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 24:12–15CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Johal P, Hassaballa MA, Eldridge JD, Porteous AJ (2012) The posterior condylar offset ratio. Knee 19:843–845CrossRefPubMed Johal P, Hassaballa MA, Eldridge JD, Porteous AJ (2012) The posterior condylar offset ratio. Knee 19:843–845CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Matziolis G, Brodt S, Windisch C, Roehner E (2017) Changes of posterior condylar offset results in midflexion instability in single-radius total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137:713–717CrossRefPubMed Matziolis G, Brodt S, Windisch C, Roehner E (2017) Changes of posterior condylar offset results in midflexion instability in single-radius total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137:713–717CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Hanratty BM, Thompson NW, Wilson RK, Beverland DE (2007) The influence of posterior condylar offset on knee flexion after total knee replacement using a cruciate-sacrificing mobile-bearing implant. J Bone Jt Surg Br 89:915–918CrossRef Hanratty BM, Thompson NW, Wilson RK, Beverland DE (2007) The influence of posterior condylar offset on knee flexion after total knee replacement using a cruciate-sacrificing mobile-bearing implant. J Bone Jt Surg Br 89:915–918CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ishii Y, Noguchi H, Takeda M, Sato J, Toyabe S (2013) Posterior condylar offset does not correlate with knee flexion after TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:2995–3001CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ishii Y, Noguchi H, Takeda M, Sato J, Toyabe S (2013) Posterior condylar offset does not correlate with knee flexion after TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:2995–3001CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Clarke HD (2012) Changes in posterior condylar offset after total knee arthroplasty cannot be determined by radiographic measurements alone. J Arthroplasty 27:1155–1158CrossRefPubMed Clarke HD (2012) Changes in posterior condylar offset after total knee arthroplasty cannot be determined by radiographic measurements alone. J Arthroplasty 27:1155–1158CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Thienpont E, Schwab PE, Cornu O, Bellemans J, Victor J (2017) Bone morphotypes of the varus and valgus knee. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137:393–400CrossRefPubMed Thienpont E, Schwab PE, Cornu O, Bellemans J, Victor J (2017) Bone morphotypes of the varus and valgus knee. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137:393–400CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Callaghan JJ, O’rourke MR, Saleh KJ (2004) Why knees fail: lessons learned. J Arthroplasty 19(4 Suppl 1):31–34CrossRefPubMed Callaghan JJ, O’rourke MR, Saleh KJ (2004) Why knees fail: lessons learned. J Arthroplasty 19(4 Suppl 1):31–34CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Sharkey PF, Lichstein PM, Shen C, Tokarski AT, Parvizi J (2014) Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today—has anything changed after 10 years? J Arthroplasty 29:1774–1778CrossRefPubMed Sharkey PF, Lichstein PM, Shen C, Tokarski AT, Parvizi J (2014) Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today—has anything changed after 10 years? J Arthroplasty 29:1774–1778CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM (2002) Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:7–13CrossRef Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM (2002) Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:7–13CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lakstein D, Zarrabian M, Kosashvili Y, Safir O, Gross AE, Backstein D (2010) Revision total knee arthroplasty for component malrotation is highly beneficial: a case control study. J Arthroplasty 25:1047–1052CrossRefPubMed Lakstein D, Zarrabian M, Kosashvili Y, Safir O, Gross AE, Backstein D (2010) Revision total knee arthroplasty for component malrotation is highly beneficial: a case control study. J Arthroplasty 25:1047–1052CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Asano T, Akagi M, Nakamura T (2005) The functional flexion–extension axis of the knee corresponds to the surgical epicondylar axis: in vivo analysis using a biplanar image-matching technique. J Arthroplasty 20:1060–1067CrossRefPubMed Asano T, Akagi M, Nakamura T (2005) The functional flexion–extension axis of the knee corresponds to the surgical epicondylar axis: in vivo analysis using a biplanar image-matching technique. J Arthroplasty 20:1060–1067CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ, Thompson WH, Crossett LS (1993) Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 286:40–47 Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ, Thompson WH, Crossett LS (1993) Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 286:40–47
23.
go back to reference Whiteside LA, Arima J (1995) The anteroposterior axis for femoral rotational alignment in valgus total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 321:168–172 Whiteside LA, Arima J (1995) The anteroposterior axis for femoral rotational alignment in valgus total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 321:168–172
24.
go back to reference Walde TA, Bussert J, Sehmisch S, Balcarek P, Stürmer KM, Walde HJ, Frosch KH (2010) Optimized functional femoral rotation in navigated total knee arthroplasty considering ligament tension. Knee 17:381–386CrossRefPubMed Walde TA, Bussert J, Sehmisch S, Balcarek P, Stürmer KM, Walde HJ, Frosch KH (2010) Optimized functional femoral rotation in navigated total knee arthroplasty considering ligament tension. Knee 17:381–386CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Gungor HR, Ok N, Agladioglu K, Akkaya S, Kiter E (2014) Significance of asymmetrical posteromedial and posterolateral femoral condylar chamfer cuts in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:2989–2994CrossRefPubMed Gungor HR, Ok N, Agladioglu K, Akkaya S, Kiter E (2014) Significance of asymmetrical posteromedial and posterolateral femoral condylar chamfer cuts in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:2989–2994CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Kawahara S, Okazaki K, Matsuda S, Nakahara H, Okamoto S, Iwamoto Y (2014) Internal rotation of femoral component affects functional activities after TKA-survey with the 2011 Knee Society Score. J Arthroplasty 29:2319–2323CrossRefPubMed Kawahara S, Okazaki K, Matsuda S, Nakahara H, Okamoto S, Iwamoto Y (2014) Internal rotation of femoral component affects functional activities after TKA-survey with the 2011 Knee Society Score. J Arthroplasty 29:2319–2323CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Paternostre F, Schwab PE, Thienpont E (2014) The combined Whiteside’s and posterior condylar line as a reliable reference to describe axial distal femoral anatomy in patient-specific instrument planning. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:3054–3059CrossRefPubMed Paternostre F, Schwab PE, Thienpont E (2014) The combined Whiteside’s and posterior condylar line as a reliable reference to describe axial distal femoral anatomy in patient-specific instrument planning. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:3054–3059CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Ishii Y, Noguchi H, Takeda M, Ishii H, Toyabe S (2011) Changes in the medial and lateral posterior condylar offset in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 26:255–259CrossRefPubMed Ishii Y, Noguchi H, Takeda M, Ishii H, Toyabe S (2011) Changes in the medial and lateral posterior condylar offset in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 26:255–259CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Sagittal magnetic resonance imaging-scan orientation significantly influences accuracy of femoral posterior condylar offset measurement
Authors
Peter Balcarek
Ali Seif Amir Hosseini
Ulrike Streit
Tobias Franz Brodkorb
Tim Alexander Walde
Publication date
01-02-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2838-0

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 2/2018 Go to the issue