Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 12/2016

01-12-2016 | Orthopaedic Surgery

Do cobalt and chromium levels predict osteolysis in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty?

Authors: Lisa Renner, Tom Schmidt-Braekling, Martin Faschingbauer, Friedrich Boettner

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 12/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Serum metal ions are part of the regular follow-up routine of patients with metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties (MoM-THA). Increased cobalt levels have been suggested to indicate implant failure and corrosion.

Questions

(1) Is there a correlation between the size of the osteolysis measured on a CT scan and metal ion levels? (2) Can metal ion levels predict the presence of osteolysis in MoM-THA? (3) Are cobalt and chromium serum levels or the cobalt-chromium-ratio diagnostic for osteolysis?

Materials and methods

CT scans of patients (n = 75) with a unilateral MoM-THA (Birmingham Hip System, Smith & Nephew, TN, USA) implanted by a single surgeon were reviewed to determine the presence of osteolysis. Statistical analysis was performed to detect its association with metal ion levels at the time of the imaging exam.

Results

The incidence of osteolysis was the same in men and women (35.6 vs 35.7 %). The cobalt-chromium-ratio correlates with the size of the osteolysis on the CT scan and the femoral component size in the overall study population (p = 0.050, p = 0.001) and in men (p = 0.002, p = 0.001) but not in women (p = 0.312, p = 0.344). The AUC for the cobalt-chromium-ratio to detect osteolysis was 0.613 (p = 0.112) for the overall population, 0.710 for men (p = 0.021) and 0.453 (p = 0.684) for women. The data suggest that a cut off level of 1.71 for the cobalt-chromium-ratio has a sensitivity of 62.5 % and specificity of 72.4 % to identify male patients with osteolysis.

Conclusions

The disproportional increase of cobalt over chromium, especially in male patients with large component sizes can not be explained by wear alone and suggests that other processes (corrosion) might contribute to metal ion levels and might be more pronounced in patients with larger component sizes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bolland BJ et al (2011) High failure rates with a large-diameter hybrid metal-on-metal total hip replacement: clinical, radiological and retrieval analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(5):608–615CrossRefPubMed Bolland BJ et al (2011) High failure rates with a large-diameter hybrid metal-on-metal total hip replacement: clinical, radiological and retrieval analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(5):608–615CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Langton DJ et al (2011) Accelerating failure rate of the ASR total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(8):1011–1016CrossRefPubMed Langton DJ et al (2011) Accelerating failure rate of the ASR total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(8):1011–1016CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Daniel J et al (2014) Results of Birmingham hip resurfacing at 12 to 15 years: a single-surgeon series. Bone Joint J 96-B(10):1298–1306CrossRefPubMed Daniel J et al (2014) Results of Birmingham hip resurfacing at 12 to 15 years: a single-surgeon series. Bone Joint J 96-B(10):1298–1306CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference National Joint Replacement Registry Australian Orthopaedic Association, Metal on Metal Total Conventional Hip Arthroplasty Supplementary Report. 2014: Australia National Joint Replacement Registry Australian Orthopaedic Association, Metal on Metal Total Conventional Hip Arthroplasty Supplementary Report. 2014: Australia
5.
go back to reference De Smet K et al (2008) Metal ion measurement as a diagnostic tool to identify problems with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(Suppl 4):202–208CrossRefPubMed De Smet K et al (2008) Metal ion measurement as a diagnostic tool to identify problems with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(Suppl 4):202–208CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Bosker BH et al (2015) Pseudotumor formation and serum ions after large head metal-on-metal stemmed total hip replacement. Risk factors, time course and revisions in 706 hips. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135(3):417–425CrossRefPubMed Bosker BH et al (2015) Pseudotumor formation and serum ions after large head metal-on-metal stemmed total hip replacement. Risk factors, time course and revisions in 706 hips. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135(3):417–425CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Cooper HJ et al (2012) Corrosion at the head-neck taper as a cause for adverse local tissue reactions after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94(18):1655–1661CrossRefPubMed Cooper HJ et al (2012) Corrosion at the head-neck taper as a cause for adverse local tissue reactions after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94(18):1655–1661CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Bayley N et al (2015) What are the predictors and prevalence of pseudotumor and elevated metal ions after large-diameter metal-on-metal THA? Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(2):477–484CrossRefPubMed Bayley N et al (2015) What are the predictors and prevalence of pseudotumor and elevated metal ions after large-diameter metal-on-metal THA? Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(2):477–484CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Latteier MJ et al (2011) Gender is a significant factor for failure of metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 26(6 Suppl):19–23CrossRefPubMed Latteier MJ et al (2011) Gender is a significant factor for failure of metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 26(6 Suppl):19–23CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Carr AM, DeSteiger R (2008) Osteolysis in patients with a metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. ANZ J Surg 78(3):144–147CrossRefPubMed Carr AM, DeSteiger R (2008) Osteolysis in patients with a metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. ANZ J Surg 78(3):144–147CrossRefPubMed
11.
12.
go back to reference Kurtz S et al (2005) Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(7):1487–1497PubMed Kurtz S et al (2005) Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(7):1487–1497PubMed
13.
go back to reference Lombardi AV et al (2015) Large-diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: dislocation infrequent but survivorship poor. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(2):509–520CrossRefPubMed Lombardi AV et al (2015) Large-diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: dislocation infrequent but survivorship poor. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(2):509–520CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Hayter CL et al (2012) MRI findings in painful metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199(4):884–893CrossRefPubMed Hayter CL et al (2012) MRI findings in painful metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199(4):884–893CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Bosker BH et al (2012) High incidence of pseudotumour formation after large-diameter metal-on-metal total hip replacement: a prospective cohort study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94(6):755–761CrossRefPubMed Bosker BH et al (2012) High incidence of pseudotumour formation after large-diameter metal-on-metal total hip replacement: a prospective cohort study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94(6):755–761CrossRefPubMed
16.
17.
go back to reference Hart AJ et al (2014) Surveillance of patients with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing and total hip prostheses: a prospective cohort study to investigate the relationship between blood metal ion levels and implant failure. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(13):1091–1099CrossRefPubMed Hart AJ et al (2014) Surveillance of patients with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing and total hip prostheses: a prospective cohort study to investigate the relationship between blood metal ion levels and implant failure. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(13):1091–1099CrossRefPubMed
18.
19.
go back to reference U.S. Food and Drug Administration, General Recommendation for Orthopaedic Sugeons after Metal-on-Metal Hip Replacment Surgery (Follow-up) (2015) U.S. Food and Drug Administration, General Recommendation for Orthopaedic Sugeons after Metal-on-Metal Hip Replacment Surgery (Follow-up) (2015)
22.
23.
go back to reference Waldstein W, Schmidt-Braekling T, Boettner F (2014) MRI does not detect acetabular osteolysis around metal-on-metal Birmingham THA. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134(7):1009–1015CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Waldstein W, Schmidt-Braekling T, Boettner F (2014) MRI does not detect acetabular osteolysis around metal-on-metal Birmingham THA. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134(7):1009–1015CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Fehring TK et al (2015) Cobalt to Chromium ratio is not a key marker for adverse local tissue reaction (ALTR) in metal on metal hips. J Arthroplasty 30(9 Suppl):107–109CrossRefPubMed Fehring TK et al (2015) Cobalt to Chromium ratio is not a key marker for adverse local tissue reaction (ALTR) in metal on metal hips. J Arthroplasty 30(9 Suppl):107–109CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Do cobalt and chromium levels predict osteolysis in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty?
Authors
Lisa Renner
Tom Schmidt-Braekling
Martin Faschingbauer
Friedrich Boettner
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 12/2016
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-016-2565-y

Other articles of this Issue 12/2016

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 12/2016 Go to the issue