Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 2/2014

01-02-2014 | Trauma Surgery

Understanding osteoporosis and fractures: an introduction to the use of qualitative research

Authors: A. Hoang-Kim, E. Schemitsch, J. E. M. Sale, D. Beaton, K. Warmington, A. V. Kulkarni, S. Reeves

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 2/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Qualitative research has been recognized in recent years as a field of inquiry used to understand people’s beliefs, attitudes, behaviors, culture or lifestyle. While quantitative results are challenging to apply in everyday practice, the qualitative paradigm can be useful to fill in a research context that is poorly understood or ill-defined. It can provide an in-depth study of interactions, a way to incorporate context, and a means to hear the voices of participants. Understanding experiences, motivation, and beliefs can have a profound effect on the interpretation of quantitative research and generating hypotheses. In this paper, we will review different qualitative approaches that healthcare providers and researchers may find useful to implement in future study designs, specifically in the context of osteoporosis and fracture.

Methods

We will provide insight into the qualitative paradigm gained from the osteoporosis literature on fractures using examples from the database Scopus. Five prominent qualitative techniques (narratives, phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography, and case study) can be used to generate meanings of the social and clinical world.

Discussion and conclusion

We have highlighted how these strategies are implemented in qualitative research on osteoporosis and fractures and are anchored to specific methodological practices. We focus on studies that explore patient psychosocial experiences of diagnosis and treatment, cultural boundaries, and interprofessional communication. After reviewing the research, we believe that action research, that is not frequently used, could also effectively be used by many professions to improve programs and policies affecting those dealing with osteoporosis issues.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Rabar S, Lau R, O’Flynn N et al (2012) Risk assessment of fragility fractures: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 345:e3698PubMedCrossRef
2.
Marsh D, Akesson K, Beaton DE et al (2011) Coordinator-based systems for secondary prevention in fragility fracture patients. Osteo Int 22:2051–2065CrossRef
3.
Papaioannou A, Morin S, Cheung AM et al (2010) 2010 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary. CMAJ 182:1864–1873PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
4.
Schurman L, Bagur A, Claus-Hermberg H et al (2013) Guidelines for the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, 2012. Medicina (B Aires) 73:55–74
5.
Boonen S, Wahl DA, Nauroy L et al (2011) Balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty in the management of vertebral compression fractures. Osteoporos Int 22(12):2915–2934PubMedCrossRef
6.
Audran M, Jakob FJ, Palacios S et al (2013) A large prospective European cohort study of patients treated with strontium ranelate and followed up over 3 years. Rheumatol Int. doi:10.​1007/​s00296-012-2594-y
7.
8.
von der Linden P, Gisep A, Boner V et al (2006) Biomechanical evaluation of a new augmentation method for enhanced screw fixation in osteoporotic proximal femoral fractures. J Orthop Res 24:2230–2237PubMedCrossRef
9.
Wylie CD (2010) Setting a standard for a ‘silent’ disease: defining osteoporosis in the 1980s and 1990s. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 41:376–385PubMedCrossRef
10.
Sale J, Gignac A, Hawker G et al (2011) Decision to take osteoporosis medication in patients who have had a fracture and are ‘high’ risk for future fracture. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12:92PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
11.
Gooberman-Hill R, Fox R (2011) What can qualitative approaches bring to trauma outcome research? Injury. Int J Care Injured 42:321–323CrossRef
12.
Kuper A, Reeves S, Levinson W (2008) An introduction to reading and appraising qualitative research. BMJ 337:404–407
13.
Morse JM (2003) A review committee’s guide for evaluating qualitative proposals. Qual Health Res 13:833–851PubMedCrossRef
14.
More J, Field PA (1995) Qualitative research methods for health professionals, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
15.
Patton MQ (2002) Variety of qualitative inquiry in qualitative research and evaluation methods, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
16.
Berger PL, Luckmann T (1966) The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Doubleday, Garden City
17.
Creswell JW (2007) Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks
18.
19.
Ballard K (2002) Understanding risk: women's perceived risk of menopause-related disease and the value they place on preventive hormone replacement therapy. Fam Pract 19(6):591–595PubMedCrossRef
20.
Berlin Hallrup L, Albertsson D, Bengtsson Tops A, Dahlberg K, Grahn B (2009) Elderly women's experiences of living with fall risk in a fragile body: a reflective lifeworld approach. Health Soc Care Commun 17(4):379–387
21.
Borkan JM, Quirk M, Sullivan M (1991) Finding meaning after the fall: injury narratives from elderly hip fracture patients. Soc Sci Med 33(8):947–957PubMedCrossRef
22.
Congdon JG (1994) Managing the incongruities: The hospital discharge experience for elderly patients, their families, and nurses. App Nurs Res 7(3):125–131PubMedCrossRef
23.
de Souza LB, da Silva Mazeto GMF, Bocchi SCM (2010) Self-managing osteoporosis treatment for well-being recovery mediated by the (in)visibility of the disease signs. [Autogerindo o tratamento da osteoporose no regaste do bem-estar, mediado pela (in)visibilidade de indicadores da doença] Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem 18(3):398–405
24.
Dickinson A, Horton K, Machen I, Bunn F, Cove J, Jain D, Maddex T (2011) The role of health professionals in promoting the uptake of fall prevention interventions: a qualitative study of older people's views. Age Ageing 40(6):724–730PubMedCrossRef
25.
Doherty D, Glover J, Davies S, Johnson T (2004) Preventing hip fracture in care homes 1: views of residents and staff. Br J Nurs (Mark Allen Publishing) 13(21):1242–1248
26.
Erol M (2011) Melting bones: The social construction of postmenopausal osteoporosis in turkey. Soc Sci Med 73(10):1490–1497PubMedCrossRef
27.
Green EE, Thompson D, Griffiths F (2002) Narratives of risk: women at midlife, medical 'experts' and health technologies. Health Risk Soc 4(3):273–286CrossRef
28.
Helm T, Dickerson AE (1995) The effect of hand therapy on a patient with a colles' fracture: a phenomenological study. Occup Ther Health Care 9(4):69–77PubMed
29.
Hicks E, Sims-Gould J, Byrne K, Khan KM, Stolee P (2012) “She was a little bit unrealistic”: choice in healthcare decision making for older people. J Aging Stud 26(2):140–148CrossRef
30.
Hjalmarson HV, Margaretha Strandmark K (2012) Forming a learning culture to promote fracture prevention activities. Health Educ 112(5):421–435
31.
Hjalmarson HV, Strandmark M, Klässbo M (2007) Healthy risk awareness motivates fracture prevention behaviour: a grounded theory study of women with osteoporosis. Int J Qual Stud Health Well Being 2(4):236–245
32.
Huang T, Acton, GJ (2009) Ways to maintain independence among taiwanese elderly adults with hip fractures: a qualitative study. Geriatr Nurs 30(1):28–35PubMedCrossRef
33.
Jeng C, Yang S, Chang P, Tsao L (2004) Menopausal women: perceiving continuous power through the experience of regular exercise. J Clin Nurs 13(4):447–454
34.
35.
Kastner M, Li J, Lottridge D, Marquez C, Newton D, Straus SE (2010) Development of a prototype clinical decision support tool for osteoporosis disease management: a qualitative study of focus groups. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 10(1)
36.
Koskenniemi J, Suhonen R (2010) A phenomenology-based content analysis on the experiences of older hip fracture patients and their next of kin on dignity in an acute hospital. Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs 14(4):222CrossRef
37.
Li H, Shyu YL (2007) Coping processes of taiwanese families during the postdischarge period for an elderly family member with hip fracture. Nurs Sci Quart 20(3):273–279
38.
Löfgren S, Hansson J, Øvretveit J, Brommels M (2012) Context challenges the champion: improving hip fracture care in a swedish university hospital. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 25(2):118–133PubMedCrossRef
39.
Long AF, Kneafsey R, Ryan J (2003) Rehabilitation practice: Challenges to effective team working. Int J Nurs Stud 40(6):663–673PubMedCrossRef
40.
Luptak M (2006) End-of-life care preferences of older adults and family members who care for them. J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care 2(3):23–44PubMedCrossRef
41.
Martin LL, Barkan H (1989) Clinical communication strategies of nurse practitioners with patients. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 1(3):77–83CrossRef
42.
Mauleon AL, Palo-Bengtsson L, Ekman S (2007) Patients experiencing local anaesthesia and hip surgery. J Clin Nurs 16(5):892–899PubMedCrossRef
43.
McKenna J, Ludwig AF (2008) Osteoporotic caucasian and south asian women: a qualitative study of general practitioners’ support. J Roy Soc Promot Health 128(5):263–270CrossRef
44.
McMillan L, Booth J, Currie K, Howe T (2012) A grounded theory of taking control after fall-induced hip fracture. Disabil Rehabil 34(26):2234–2241PubMedCrossRef
45.
46.
Meadows LM, Mrkonjic LA, O’Brien MD, Tink W (2007) The importance of communication in secondary fragility fracture treatment and prevention. Osteoporos Int 18(2):159–166PubMedCrossRef
47.
Nahm E, Resnick B, Orwig D, Magaziner J, DeGrezia M (2010) Exploration of informal caregiving following hip fracture. Geriatr Nurs 31(4):254–262
48.
49.
Pownall E (2004) Using a patient narrative to influence orthopaedic nursing care in fractured hips. J Orthop Nurs 8(3):151–159CrossRef
50.
Robinson SB (1999) Transitions in the lives of elderly women who have sustained hip fratures. J Adv Nurs 30(6):1341–1348PubMedCrossRef
51.
Sale JEM, Beaton DE, Bogoch ER, Elliot-Gibson V, Frankel L (2010) The BMD muddle: the disconnect between bone densitometry results and perception of bone health. J Clin Densitom 13(4):370–378PubMedCrossRef
52.
Sale JEM, Beaton DE, Sujic R, Bogoch ER (2010) ‘If it was osteoporosis, i would have really hurt myself’. Ambiguity about osteoporosis and osteoporosis care despite a screening programme to educate fragility fracture patients. J Eval Clin Pract 16(3):590–596PubMed
53.
Sale JEM, Gignac MA, Frankel L, Hawker G, Beaton D, Elliot-Gibson V, Bogoch E (2012) Patients reject the concept of fragility fracture—a new understanding based on fracture patients’ communication. Osteoporos Int 23:2829–2834
54.
Santy J (2001) A phenomenological study of pain following fractured shaft of femur. J Clin Nurs 10(4):521–527PubMedCrossRef
55.
Schoenberg M, Shiloh S (2002) Hospitalized patients’ views on in-ward psychological counseling. Patient Educ Couns 48(2):123–129PubMedCrossRef
56.
Shawler C (2007) Empowerment of aging mothers and daughters in transition during a health crisis. Qual Health Res 17(6):838–849PubMedCrossRef
57.
Shawler C (2006) The empowerment of older mothers and daughters: rehabilitation strategies following a hip fracture. Geriatr Nurs 27(6):371–377PubMedCrossRef
58.
Taylor NF, Barelli C, Harding KE (2010) Community ambulation before and after hip fracture: a qualitative analysis. Disabil Rehabil 32(15):1281–1290PubMedCrossRef
59.
Toscan J, Mairs K, Hinton S et al (2012) Integrated transitional care: patient, informal caregiver and health care provider perspectives on care transitions for older persons with hip fracture. Int J Integr Care 12:e13 (epub)
60.
Vik K, Lilja M, Nygård L (2007) The influence of the environment on participation subsequent to rehabilitation as experienced by elderly people in norway. Scand J Occup Therap 14(2):86–95PubMedCrossRef
61.
Vik K, Nygrd L, Lilja M (2009) Encountering staff in the home: three older adults’ experience during six months of home-based rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 31(8):619–629PubMedCrossRef
62.
Volkman JE, Parrott RL (2012) Expressing emotions as evidence in osteoporosis narratives: effects on message processing and intentions. Human Commun Res 38(4):429–458CrossRef
63.
Wilkins S (2001) Women with osteoporosis: strategies for managing aging and chronic illness. J Women Aging 13(3):59–77PubMedCrossRef
64.
Williams M (2010) The patient’s experience in a plaster cast. Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs 14(3):132–141CrossRef
65.
Willson H (2000) Factors affecting the administration of analgesia to patients following repair of a fractured hip. J Adv Nurs 31(5):1145–1154PubMedCrossRef
66.
Polkinghorne DE (1989) Phenomenological research methods. In: Valle RS, Halling S (eds) Existential-Phenomenological Perspectives in Psychology. Plenum Press, New York pp 41–60
67.
Spiegelberg H (1970) On some human uses of phenomenology. In: Smith FJ (ed) phenomenology in perspective. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague
68.
69.
Strauss AL, Corbin J (1990) Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage, Newbury Park, CA
70.
Strauss AL, Corbin J (1994) Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of qualitative research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
71.
Strauss AL, Corbin J (2008) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
72.
Strauss AL (1987) Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRef
73.
Glaser BG (1994) More grounded theory: a reader. Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA
74.
Charmaz K (2006) Constructing grounded theory. Sage, London
75.
Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (2003) Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
76.
Turner BA (1981) Some practical aspects of qualitative data analysis: one way of organizing the cognitive processes associated with the generation of grounded theory). Qual Quant 15:225–247CrossRef
77.
78.
Sanday PR (1983) The ethnographic paradigm. In: Van Maanen J (ed) Qualitative methodology. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, pp 19–36
79.
Spradley J (1980) Participant observation. Holt, New York
80.
Gomm R, Hammersley M, Foster P (2000). Case study method. Sage, London, Thousand Oaks, California
81.
Stake R (1995) The art of case study research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
82.
Whyte WF (ed) (1989) Action research for the twenty-first century: participation, reflection, and practice. Special issue of American Behavioral Scientist, vol 32 (5 May/June)
83.
Mills GE (2000) Action research: a guide for the teacher researcher. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
84.
Kemmis S, McTaggart R (1982) The action research planner, Deakin University Press, Victoria
85.
Metadata
Title
Understanding osteoporosis and fractures: an introduction to the use of qualitative research
Authors
A. Hoang-Kim
E. Schemitsch
J. E. M. Sale
D. Beaton
K. Warmington
A. V. Kulkarni
S. Reeves
Publication date
01-02-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-013-1799-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2014

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 2/2014 Go to the issue

Orthopaedic Surgery

Artificial total disc replacement versus fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine

The effect of gentamicin in irrigating solutions on articular infection prophylaxis during arthroscopic ACL reconstruction

Trauma Surgery

Methodological challenges in the use of hip-specific composite outcomes: linking measurements from hip fracture trials to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Framework

Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine

Lateral ligament reconstruction with allograft in patients with severe chronic ankle instability

Osteoporotic Fracture Management

Key outcomes are usually not reported in published fracture secondary prevention programs: results of a systematic review

Orthopaedic Surgery

Posttraumatic and postoperative osteomyelitis: surgical revision strategy with persisting fistula