Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Research in Cardiology 5/2022

Open Access 01-05-2022 | Cardiomyopathy | Original Paper

Catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardia in patients with and without structural heart disease: insights from the German ablation registry

Authors: Charlotte Eitel, Hüseyin Ince, Johannes Brachmann, Karl-Heinz Kuck, Stephan Willems, Stefan G. Spitzer, Juergen Tebbenjohanns, Leon Iden, Florian Straube, Matthias Hochadel, Jochen Senges, Roland R. Tilz

Published in: Clinical Research in Cardiology | Issue 5/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Aim

To compare patient characteristics, safety and efficacy of catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) in patients with and without structural heart disease (SHD) enrolled in the German ablation registry.

Methods and results

From January 2007 until January 2010, a total of 12,536 patients (37.2% with known SHD) were enrolled and followed for at least one year. Patients with SHD more often underwent ablation for atrial flutter (45.8% vs. 20.9%, p < 0.001), whereas patients without SHD more often underwent ablation for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (30.2% vs. 11.8%, p < 0.001) or atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (9.1% vs. 1.6%, p < 0.001). Atrial fibrillation catheter ablation procedures were performed in a similar proportion of patients with and without SHD (38.1% vs. 36.9%, p = 0.21).
Overall, periprocedural success rate was high in both groups. Death, myocardial infarction or stroke occurred in 0.2% and 0.1% of patients with and without SHD (p = 0.066). Major non-fatal complications prior to discharge were rare and did not differ significantly between patients with and without SHD (0.5% vs. 0.4%, p = 0.34). Kaplan–Meier mortality estimate at 1 year demonstrated a significant mortality increase in patients with SHD (2.6% versus 0.7%; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Patients with and without SHD undergoing SVT ablation exhibit similar success rates and low major complication rates, despite disadvantageous baseline characteristics in SHD patients. These data highlight the safety and efficacy of SVT ablation in patients with and without SHD. Nevertheless Kaplan–Meier mortality estimates at 1 year demonstrate a significant mortality increase in patients with SHD, highlighting the importance of treating the underlying condition and reliable anticoagulation if indicated.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Katritsis DG, Boriani G, Cosio FG et al (2018) European heart rhythm association (EHRA) consensus document on the management of supraventricular arrhythmias, endorsed by Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and Sociedad Latinoamericana de Estimulacion Cardiaca y Electrofisiologia (SOLAECE). Eur Heart J 39:1442–1445PubMed Katritsis DG, Boriani G, Cosio FG et al (2018) European heart rhythm association (EHRA) consensus document on the management of supraventricular arrhythmias, endorsed by Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and Sociedad Latinoamericana de Estimulacion Cardiaca y Electrofisiologia (SOLAECE). Eur Heart J 39:1442–1445PubMed
2.
go back to reference Brugada J, Katritsis DG, Arbelo E et al (2020) 2019 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with supraventricular tachycardia. The task force for the management of patients with supraventricular tachycardia of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 41:655–720CrossRef Brugada J, Katritsis DG, Arbelo E et al (2020) 2019 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with supraventricular tachycardia. The task force for the management of patients with supraventricular tachycardia of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 41:655–720CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Brachmann J, Lewalter T, Kuck KH et al (2017) Long-term symptom improvement and patient satisfaction following catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardia: insights from the German ablation registry. Eur Heart J 38:1317–1326CrossRef Brachmann J, Lewalter T, Kuck KH et al (2017) Long-term symptom improvement and patient satisfaction following catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardia: insights from the German ablation registry. Eur Heart J 38:1317–1326CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Morka A, Sledz J, Deutsch K et al (2019) Feasibility and performance of catheter ablation with zero-fluoroscopy approach for regular supraventricular tachycardia in patients with structural and/or congenital heart disease. Medicine 98:e17333CrossRef Morka A, Sledz J, Deutsch K et al (2019) Feasibility and performance of catheter ablation with zero-fluoroscopy approach for regular supraventricular tachycardia in patients with structural and/or congenital heart disease. Medicine 98:e17333CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Diaz-Infante E, Macias Gallego A, Ferrero De Loma-Osorio A (2012) Spanish catheter ablation registry. 11th official report of the Spanish Society of Cardiology Working Group on electrophysiology and arrhythmias (2011). Rev Esp Cardiol 65:928–936CrossRef Diaz-Infante E, Macias Gallego A, Ferrero De Loma-Osorio A (2012) Spanish catheter ablation registry. 11th official report of the Spanish Society of Cardiology Working Group on electrophysiology and arrhythmias (2011). Rev Esp Cardiol 65:928–936CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kesek M (2009) Ablation procedures in Sweden during 2007: results from the Swedish catheter ablation registry. Europace 11:152–154CrossRef Kesek M (2009) Ablation procedures in Sweden during 2007: results from the Swedish catheter ablation registry. Europace 11:152–154CrossRef
7.
go back to reference O’hara GE, Philippon F, Champagne J et al (2007) Catheter ablation for cardiac arrhythmias: a 14-year experience with 5330 consecutive patients at the Quebec Heart Institute, Laval Hospital. Can J Cardiol 23:67B-70BCrossRef O’hara GE, Philippon F, Champagne J et al (2007) Catheter ablation for cardiac arrhythmias: a 14-year experience with 5330 consecutive patients at the Quebec Heart Institute, Laval Hospital. Can J Cardiol 23:67B-70BCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Olivotto I, Cecchi F, Casey SA et al (2001) Impact of atrial fibrillation on the clinical course of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation 104:2517–2524CrossRef Olivotto I, Cecchi F, Casey SA et al (2001) Impact of atrial fibrillation on the clinical course of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation 104:2517–2524CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Wilke I, Witzel K, Munch J et al (2016) High incidence of de novo and subclinical atrial fibrillation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and cardiac rhythm management device. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 27:779–784CrossRef Wilke I, Witzel K, Munch J et al (2016) High incidence of de novo and subclinical atrial fibrillation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and cardiac rhythm management device. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 27:779–784CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Santangeli P, Di Biase L, Themistoclakis S et al (2013) Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: long-term outcomes and mechanisms of arrhythmia recurrence. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 6:1089–1094CrossRef Santangeli P, Di Biase L, Themistoclakis S et al (2013) Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: long-term outcomes and mechanisms of arrhythmia recurrence. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 6:1089–1094CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Eitel C, Ince H, Brachmann J et al (2019) Atrial fibrillation ablation strategies and outcome in patients with heart failure: insights from the German ablation registry. Clin Res Cardiol 108:815–823CrossRef Eitel C, Ince H, Brachmann J et al (2019) Atrial fibrillation ablation strategies and outcome in patients with heart failure: insights from the German ablation registry. Clin Res Cardiol 108:815–823CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Wasmer K, Hochadel M, Wieneke H et al (2019) Long-term symptom improvement and patient satisfaction after AV-node ablation vs. pulmonary vein isolation for symptomatic atrial fibrillation: results from the German Ablation Registry. Clin Res Cardiol 108:395–401CrossRef Wasmer K, Hochadel M, Wieneke H et al (2019) Long-term symptom improvement and patient satisfaction after AV-node ablation vs. pulmonary vein isolation for symptomatic atrial fibrillation: results from the German Ablation Registry. Clin Res Cardiol 108:395–401CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Marrouche NF, Brachmann J, Andresen D et al (2018) Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation with heart failure. N Engl J Med 378:417–427CrossRef Marrouche NF, Brachmann J, Andresen D et al (2018) Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation with heart failure. N Engl J Med 378:417–427CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kuck KH, Merkely B, Zahn R et al (2019) Catheter ablation versus best medical therapy in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure: the randomized AMICA trial. Circulation 12:e007731PubMed Kuck KH, Merkely B, Zahn R et al (2019) Catheter ablation versus best medical therapy in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure: the randomized AMICA trial. Circulation 12:e007731PubMed
Metadata
Title
Catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardia in patients with and without structural heart disease: insights from the German ablation registry
Authors
Charlotte Eitel
Hüseyin Ince
Johannes Brachmann
Karl-Heinz Kuck
Stephan Willems
Stefan G. Spitzer
Juergen Tebbenjohanns
Leon Iden
Florian Straube
Matthias Hochadel
Jochen Senges
Roland R. Tilz
Publication date
01-05-2022
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Clinical Research in Cardiology / Issue 5/2022
Print ISSN: 1861-0684
Electronic ISSN: 1861-0692
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-021-01878-z

Other articles of this Issue 5/2022

Clinical Research in Cardiology 5/2022 Go to the issue