Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Research in Cardiology 12/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Spirometry | Original Paper

Effects of surgical and FFP2/N95 face masks on cardiopulmonary exercise capacity

Authors: Sven Fikenzer, T. Uhe, D. Lavall, U. Rudolph, R. Falz, M. Busse, P. Hepp, U. Laufs

Published in: Clinical Research in Cardiology | Issue 12/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Due to the SARS-CoV2 pandemic, medical face masks are widely recommended for a large number of individuals and long durations. The effect of wearing a surgical and a FFP2/N95 face mask on cardiopulmonary exercise capacity has not been systematically reported.

Methods

This prospective cross-over study quantitated the effects of wearing no mask (nm), a surgical mask (sm) and a FFP2/N95 mask (ffpm) in 12 healthy males (age 38.1 ± 6.2 years, BMI 24.5 ± 2.0 kg/m2). The 36 tests were performed in randomized order. The cardiopulmonary and metabolic responses were monitored by ergo-spirometry and impedance cardiography. Ten domains of comfort/discomfort of wearing a mask were assessed by questionnaire.

Results

The pulmonary function parameters were significantly lower with mask (forced expiratory volume: 5.6 ± 1.0 vs 5.3 ± 0.8 vs 6.1 ± 1.0 l/s with sm, ffpm and nm, respectively; p = 0.001; peak expiratory flow: 8.7 ± 1.4 vs 7.5 ± 1.1 vs 9.7 ± 1.6 l/s; p < 0.001). The maximum power was 269 ± 45, 263 ± 42 and 277 ± 46 W with sm, ffpm and nm, respectively; p = 0.002; the ventilation was significantly reduced with both face masks (131 ± 28 vs 114 ± 23 vs 99 ± 19 l/m; p < 0.001). Peak blood lactate response was reduced with mask. Cardiac output was similar with and without mask. Participants reported consistent and marked discomfort wearing the masks, especially ffpm.

Conclusion

Ventilation, cardiopulmonary exercise capacity and comfort are reduced by surgical masks and highly impaired by FFP2/N95 face masks in healthy individuals. These data are important for recommendations on wearing face masks at work or during physical exercise.
Literature
1.
go back to reference CDC (2020) Recommendation regarding the use of cloth face coverings, especially in areas of significant community-based transmission CDC (2020) Recommendation regarding the use of cloth face coverings, especially in areas of significant community-based transmission
2.
go back to reference ECDC (2020) Using face masks in the community—reducing COVID-19 transmission from potentially asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic people through the use of face masks ECDC (2020) Using face masks in the community—reducing COVID-19 transmission from potentially asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic people through the use of face masks
3.
go back to reference RKI (2020) Robert Koch-Institut: Mund-Nasen-Bedeckung im öffentlichen Raum als weitere Komponente zur Reduktion der Übertragungen von COVID-19. Strategie-Ergänzung zu empfohlenen Infektionsschutzmaßnahmen und Zielen (3. Update). Epid Bull 19:3–5. https://doi.org/10.25646/673CrossRef RKI (2020) Robert Koch-Institut: Mund-Nasen-Bedeckung im öffentlichen Raum als weitere Komponente zur Reduktion der Übertragungen von COVID-19. Strategie-Ergänzung zu empfohlenen Infektionsschutzmaßnahmen und Zielen (3. Update). Epid Bull 19:3–5. https://​doi.​org/​10.​25646/​673CrossRef
4.
go back to reference WHO (2020) Advice on the use of masksin the context of COVID-19 WHO (2020) Advice on the use of masksin the context of COVID-19
8.
go back to reference CDC (2019) Determination of particulate filter efficiency level of N95 series filters against solid particulates for non-powered, air-purifying respirators standard CDC (2019) Determination of particulate filter efficiency level of N95 series filters against solid particulates for non-powered, air-purifying respirators standard
12.
go back to reference Blocken BMF van Druenen T, Marchal T (2020) Towards aerodynamically equivalent COVID-19 1.5 m social distancing for walking and running Blocken BMF van Druenen T, Marchal T (2020) Towards aerodynamically equivalent COVID-19 1.5 m social distancing for walking and running
13.
20.
go back to reference Convertino VA, Cooke WH, Lurie KG (2005) Inspiratory resistance as a potential treatment for orthostatic intolerance and hemorrhagic shock. Aviat Space Environ Med 76(4):319–325PubMed Convertino VA, Cooke WH, Lurie KG (2005) Inspiratory resistance as a potential treatment for orthostatic intolerance and hemorrhagic shock. Aviat Space Environ Med 76(4):319–325PubMed
Metadata
Title
Effects of surgical and FFP2/N95 face masks on cardiopulmonary exercise capacity
Authors
Sven Fikenzer
T. Uhe
D. Lavall
U. Rudolph
R. Falz
M. Busse
P. Hepp
U. Laufs
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keyword
Spirometry
Published in
Clinical Research in Cardiology / Issue 12/2020
Print ISSN: 1861-0684
Electronic ISSN: 1861-0692
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-020-01704-y

Other articles of this Issue 12/2020

Clinical Research in Cardiology 12/2020 Go to the issue