Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Research in Cardiology 12/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | SARS-CoV-2 | Original Paper

31 days of COVID-19—cardiac events during restriction of public life—a comparative study

Authors: Manuel Rattka, Michael Baumhardt, Jens Dreyhaupt, Dietrich Rothenbacher, Kevin Thiessen, Sinisa Markovic, Wolfgang Rottbauer, Armin Imhof

Published in: Clinical Research in Cardiology | Issue 12/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Aims

The coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 outbreak led to the most recent pandemic of the twenty-first century. To contain spread of the virus, many nations introduced a public lockdown. How the pandemic itself and measures of social restriction affect hospital admissions due to acute cardiac events has rarely been evaluated yet.

Methods and Results

German public authorities announced measures of social restriction between March 21st and April 20th, 2020. During this period, all patients suffering from an acute cardiac event admitted to our hospital (N = 94) were assessed and incidence rate ratios (IRR) of admissions for acute cardiac events estimated, and compared with those during the same period in the previous three years (2017–2019, N = 361). Admissions due to cardiac events were reduced by 22% as compared to the previous years (n = 94 vs. an average of n = 120 per year for 2017–2019). Whereas IRR for STEMI 1.20 (95% CI 0.67–2.14) and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest IRR 0.82 (95% CI 0.33–2.02) remained similar, overall admissions with an IRR of 0.78 (95% CI 0.62–0.98) and IRR for NSTEMI with 0.46 (95% CI 0.27–0.78) were significantly lower. In STEMI patients, plasma concentrations of high-sensitivity troponin T at admission were significantly higher (644 ng/l, IQR 372–2388) compared to 2017–2019 (195 ng/l, IQR 84–1134; p = 0.02).

Conclusion

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and concomitant social restrictions are associated with reduced cardiac events admissions to our tertiary care center. From a public health perspective, strategies have to be developed to assure patients are seeking and getting medical care and treatment in time during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
15.
go back to reference Lipovetzky N, Hod H, Roth A et al (2007) Emotional events and anger at the workplace as triggers for a first event of the acute coronary syndrome: a case-crossover study. Isr Med Assoc J 9:310–315PubMed Lipovetzky N, Hod H, Roth A et al (2007) Emotional events and anger at the workplace as triggers for a first event of the acute coronary syndrome: a case-crossover study. Isr Med Assoc J 9:310–315PubMed
Metadata
Title
31 days of COVID-19—cardiac events during restriction of public life—a comparative study
Authors
Manuel Rattka
Michael Baumhardt
Jens Dreyhaupt
Dietrich Rothenbacher
Kevin Thiessen
Sinisa Markovic
Wolfgang Rottbauer
Armin Imhof
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Clinical Research in Cardiology / Issue 12/2020
Print ISSN: 1861-0684
Electronic ISSN: 1861-0692
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-020-01681-2

Other articles of this Issue 12/2020

Clinical Research in Cardiology 12/2020 Go to the issue