Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Research in Cardiology 7/2018

01-07-2018 | Original Paper

Heart failure and the discrepancy between trials of intensive blood pressure management: an analysis of individual patient data

Authors: Rahul Aggarwal, Haares Mirzan, Nicholas Chiu, Jackson Steinkamp

Published in: Clinical Research in Cardiology | Issue 7/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

ACCORD and SPRINT are the best randomized controlled trial data evaluating the effects of blood pressure targets below 140 mmHg. These trials had contradictory results regarding the benefits of intensive antihypertensive therapy. We investigate if this discordance was driven by SPRINT’s inclusion of Heart Failure in its primary outcome, as this is a parameter not included in ACCORD’s original primary outcome. This analysis helps to resolve a significant area of contention.

Methods

Individual patient data from 4733 participants in ACCORD were analyzed from time of randomization. All participants were diabetic and at increased cardiovascular risk. Participants were assigned to their original intervention, a standard blood pressure target of less than 140 mmHg or an intensive target of less than 120 mmHg. Primary composite outcome was defined as in SPRINT: a composite of first occurrence of myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, death from cardiovascular causes, and other acute coronary syndromes.

Results

Primary outcome was not significantly different between standard and intensive groups [HR: 0.89; 95% CI: (0.76–1.03); p = 0.108]. The primary composite outcome occurred in 370 participants in the standard group (15.6%) and 324 participants in the intensive group (13.7%), with an event rate of 3.38% per year for the standard group and 3.01% per year for the intensive group.

Conclusions

Differing results between ACCORD and SPRINT are not attributable to ACCORD’s exclusion of Heart Failure from its original primary outcome measurement. No significant differences in primary outcome were observed between intensive and standard blood pressure groups in the ACCORD patients under the SPRINT primary outcome definition. Caution should be taken in extrapolating the intensive blood pressure control benefits of SPRINT to the diabetic population.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Smulders YM, Muller M (2016) Blood pressure lowering for cardiovascular disease. Lancet 388:125–126CrossRefPubMed Smulders YM, Muller M (2016) Blood pressure lowering for cardiovascular disease. Lancet 388:125–126CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Vidal-Petiot E, Ford I, Greenlaw N et al (2016) Cardiovascular event rates and mortality according to achieved systolic and diastolic blood pressure in patients with stable coronary artery disease: an international cohort study. Lancet 388:2142–2152CrossRefPubMed Vidal-Petiot E, Ford I, Greenlaw N et al (2016) Cardiovascular event rates and mortality according to achieved systolic and diastolic blood pressure in patients with stable coronary artery disease: an international cohort study. Lancet 388:2142–2152CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Tobe SW, Izzo JL Jr (2016) Controversies in hypertension: is lower blood pressure always better? J Am Soc Hypertens 10:618–620CrossRefPubMed Tobe SW, Izzo JL Jr (2016) Controversies in hypertension: is lower blood pressure always better? J Am Soc Hypertens 10:618–620CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Mahfoud F, Schmieder RE, Azizi M et al (2017) Proceedings from the 2nd European Clinical Consensus conference for device-based therapies for hypertension: state of the art and considerations for the future. Eur Heart J 38:3272–3281CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mahfoud F, Schmieder RE, Azizi M et al (2017) Proceedings from the 2nd European Clinical Consensus conference for device-based therapies for hypertension: state of the art and considerations for the future. Eur Heart J 38:3272–3281CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Sarafidis PA, Lazaridis AA, Ruiz-Hurtado G, Ruilope LM (2017) Blood pressure reduction in diabetes: lessons from ACCORD, SPRINT and EMPA-REG OUTCOME. Nat Rev Endocrinol 13:365–374CrossRefPubMed Sarafidis PA, Lazaridis AA, Ruiz-Hurtado G, Ruilope LM (2017) Blood pressure reduction in diabetes: lessons from ACCORD, SPRINT and EMPA-REG OUTCOME. Nat Rev Endocrinol 13:365–374CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Filippone EJ, Foy AJ (2016) Blood pressure management in the wake of SPRINT. Cleve Clin J Med 83:196–198CrossRefPubMed Filippone EJ, Foy AJ (2016) Blood pressure management in the wake of SPRINT. Cleve Clin J Med 83:196–198CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Krakoff LR (2016) A Tale of 3 Trials: ACCORD, SPRINT, and SPS3. What Happened? Am J Hypertens 29:1020–1023CrossRefPubMed Krakoff LR (2016) A Tale of 3 Trials: ACCORD, SPRINT, and SPS3. What Happened? Am J Hypertens 29:1020–1023CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference ACCORD Study Group, Cushman WC, Evans GW, et al (2010) Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 362:1575–1585CrossRef ACCORD Study Group, Cushman WC, Evans GW, et al (2010) Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 362:1575–1585CrossRef
9.
go back to reference SPRINT Research Group, Wright JT Jr, Williamson JD, et al (2015) A randomized trial of intensive versus standard blood-pressure control. N Engl J Med 373:2103–2116CrossRef SPRINT Research Group, Wright JT Jr, Williamson JD, et al (2015) A randomized trial of intensive versus standard blood-pressure control. N Engl J Med 373:2103–2116CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Weiss J, Freeman M, Low A et al (2017) Benefits and harms of intensive blood pressure treatment in adults aged 60 years or older: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 166:419–429CrossRefPubMed Weiss J, Freeman M, Low A et al (2017) Benefits and harms of intensive blood pressure treatment in adults aged 60 years or older: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 166:419–429CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Cushman WC, Whelton PK, Fine LJ et al (2015) SPRINT trial results. Hypertension HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.06722 Cushman WC, Whelton PK, Fine LJ et al (2015) SPRINT trial results. Hypertension HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.06722
12.
go back to reference Perkovic V, Rodgers A (2015) Redefining blood-pressure targets—SPRINT starts the marathon. N Engl J Med 373:2175–2178CrossRefPubMed Perkovic V, Rodgers A (2015) Redefining blood-pressure targets—SPRINT starts the marathon. N Engl J Med 373:2175–2178CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Mancia G The SPRINT trial: Cons. In: American College of Cardiology—Latest in Cardiology. Accessed 2 Dec 2015 Mancia G The SPRINT trial: Cons. In: American College of Cardiology—Latest in Cardiology. Accessed 2 Dec 2015
14.
go back to reference Thomopoulos C, Parati G, Zanchetti A (2016) Effects of blood pressure lowering on outcome incidence in hypertension. J Hypertens 34:613–622CrossRefPubMed Thomopoulos C, Parati G, Zanchetti A (2016) Effects of blood pressure lowering on outcome incidence in hypertension. J Hypertens 34:613–622CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Tschöpe C, Birner C, Böhm M et al (2018) Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: current management and future strategies: expert opinion on the behalf of the Nucleus of the “Heart Failure Working Group” of the German Society of Cardiology (DKG). Clin Res Cardiol 107:1–19CrossRefPubMed Tschöpe C, Birner C, Böhm M et al (2018) Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: current management and future strategies: expert opinion on the behalf of the Nucleus of the “Heart Failure Working Group” of the German Society of Cardiology (DKG). Clin Res Cardiol 107:1–19CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Bistola V, Simitsis P, Farmakis D et al (2018) Association of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist use and in-hospital outcomes in patients with acute heart failure. Clin Res Cardiol 107:76–86CrossRefPubMed Bistola V, Simitsis P, Farmakis D et al (2018) Association of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist use and in-hospital outcomes in patients with acute heart failure. Clin Res Cardiol 107:76–86CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Weir MR, Bakris GL (2010) Optimal blood pressure for a patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus: insight from the ACCORD study. Curr Hypertens Rep 12:313–315CrossRefPubMed Weir MR, Bakris GL (2010) Optimal blood pressure for a patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus: insight from the ACCORD study. Curr Hypertens Rep 12:313–315CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Heart failure and the discrepancy between trials of intensive blood pressure management: an analysis of individual patient data
Authors
Rahul Aggarwal
Haares Mirzan
Nicholas Chiu
Jackson Steinkamp
Publication date
01-07-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Clinical Research in Cardiology / Issue 7/2018
Print ISSN: 1861-0684
Electronic ISSN: 1861-0692
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-018-1218-2

Other articles of this Issue 7/2018

Clinical Research in Cardiology 7/2018 Go to the issue