Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Research in Cardiology 7/2017

01-07-2017 | Original Paper

Limits of the possible: diagnostic image quality in coronary angiography with third-generation dual-source CT

Authors: Marco M. Ochs, Fabian aus dem Siepen, Thomas Fritz, Florian Andre, Gitsios Gitsioudis, Grigorios Korosoglou, Sebastian Seitz, Yuriy Bogomazov, Christopher L. Schlett, Roman Sokiranski, Andre Sommer, Friedemann Gückel, Matthias Brado, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor, Johannes Görich, Matthias G. W. Friedrich, Hugo A. Katus, Sebastian J. Buss

Published in: Clinical Research in Cardiology | Issue 7/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The usage of coronary CT angiography (CTA) is appropriate in patients with acute or chronic chest pain; however the diagnostic accuracy may be challenged with increased Agatston score (AS), increased heart rate, arrhythmia and severe obesity. Thus, we aim to determine the potential of the recently introduced third-generation dual-source CT (DSCT) for CTA in a ‘real-life’ clinical setting.

Methods

Two hundred and sixty-eight consecutive patients (age: 67 ± 10 years; BMI: 27 ± 5 kg/m²; 61% male) undergoing clinically indicated CTA with DSCT were included in the retrospective single-center analysis. A contrast-enhanced volume dataset was acquired in sequential (SSM) (n = 151) or helical scan mode (HSM) (n = 117). Coronary segments were classified in diagnostic or non-diagnostic image quality. A subset underwent invasive angiography to determine the diagnostic accuracy of CTA.

Results

SSM (96.8 ± 6%) and HSM (97.5 ± 8%) provided no significant differences in the overall diagnostic image quality. However, AS had significant influence on diagnostic image quality exclusively in SSM (B = 0.003; p = 0.0001), but not in HSM. Diagnostic image quality significantly decreased in SSM in patients with AS ≥2,000 (p = 0.03). SSM (sensitivity: 93.9%; specificity: 96.7%; PPV: 88.6%; NPV: 98.3%) and HSM (sensitivity: 97.4%; specificity: 94.3%; PPV: 86.0%; NPV: 99.0%) provided comparable diagnostic accuracy (p = n.s.). SSM yielded significantly lower radiation doses as compared to HSM (2.1 ± 2.0 vs. 5.1 ± 3.3 mSv; p = 0.0001) in age and BMI-matched cohorts.

Conclusion

SSM in third-generation DSCT enables significant dose savings and provides robust diagnostic image quality in patients with AS ≤2000 independent of heart rate, heart rhythm or obesity.
Literature
4.
go back to reference Abbara S, Arbab-Zadeh A, Callister TQ et al (2009) SCCT guidelines for performance of coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3:190–204. doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2009.03.004 CrossRefPubMed Abbara S, Arbab-Zadeh A, Callister TQ et al (2009) SCCT guidelines for performance of coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3:190–204. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jcct.​2009.​03.​004 CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Abdulla J, Pedersen KS, Budoff M, Kofoed KF (2012) Influence of coronary calcification on the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 28:943–953. doi:10.1007/s10554-011-9902-6 CrossRefPubMed Abdulla J, Pedersen KS, Budoff M, Kofoed KF (2012) Influence of coronary calcification on the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 28:943–953. doi:10.​1007/​s10554-011-9902-6 CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
go back to reference Opolski MP, Kim W-K, Liebetrau C et al (2015) Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography angiography for the detection of coronary artery disease in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Clin Res Cardiol 104:471–480. doi:10.1007/s00392-014-0806-z CrossRefPubMed Opolski MP, Kim W-K, Liebetrau C et al (2015) Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography angiography for the detection of coronary artery disease in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Clin Res Cardiol 104:471–480. doi:10.​1007/​s00392-014-0806-z CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Smith SC, Patel MR, Kramer CM et al (2010) ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 4(407):e1–e407.e33. doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2010.11.001 Smith SC, Patel MR, Kramer CM et al (2010) ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 4(407):e1–e407.e33. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jcct.​2010.​11.​001
12.
go back to reference Layritz C, Muschiol G, Flohr T et al (2013) Automated attenuation-based selection of tube voltage and tube current for coronary CT angiography: reduction of radiation exposure versus a BMI-based strategy with an expert investigator. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 7:303–310. doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2013.08.010 CrossRefPubMed Layritz C, Muschiol G, Flohr T et al (2013) Automated attenuation-based selection of tube voltage and tube current for coronary CT angiography: reduction of radiation exposure versus a BMI-based strategy with an expert investigator. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 7:303–310. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jcct.​2013.​08.​010 CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ et al (1990) Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 15:827–832CrossRefPubMed Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ et al (1990) Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 15:827–832CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Leipsic J, Abbara S, Achenbach S et al (2014) SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary CT angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 8:342–358. doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2014.07.003 CrossRefPubMed Leipsic J, Abbara S, Achenbach S et al (2014) SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary CT angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 8:342–358. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jcct.​2014.​07.​003 CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Lee AM, Engel LC, Shah B et al (2012) Coronary computed tomography angiography during arrhythmia: radiation dose reduction with prospectively ECG-triggered axial and retrospectively ECG-gated helical 128-slice dual-source CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 6(172–183):e2. doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2012.04.003 Lee AM, Engel LC, Shah B et al (2012) Coronary computed tomography angiography during arrhythmia: radiation dose reduction with prospectively ECG-triggered axial and retrospectively ECG-gated helical 128-slice dual-source CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 6(172–183):e2. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jcct.​2012.​04.​003
19.
go back to reference Raff GL, Chinnaiyan KM, Cury RC et al (2014) SCCT guidelines on the use of coronary computed tomographic angiography for patients presenting with acute chest pain to the emergency department: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 8:254–271. doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2014.06.002 CrossRefPubMed Raff GL, Chinnaiyan KM, Cury RC et al (2014) SCCT guidelines on the use of coronary computed tomographic angiography for patients presenting with acute chest pain to the emergency department: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 8:254–271. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jcct.​2014.​06.​002 CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Deseive S, Pugliese F, Meave A et al (2015) Image quality and radiation dose of a prospectively electrocardiography-triggered high-pitch data acquisition strategy for coronary CT angiography: the multicenter, randomized PROTECTION IV study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 9:278–285. doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2015.03.001 CrossRefPubMed Deseive S, Pugliese F, Meave A et al (2015) Image quality and radiation dose of a prospectively electrocardiography-triggered high-pitch data acquisition strategy for coronary CT angiography: the multicenter, randomized PROTECTION IV study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 9:278–285. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jcct.​2015.​03.​001 CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Earls JP, Berman EL, Urban BA et al (2008) Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose. Radiology 246:742–753. doi:10.1148/radiol.2463070989 CrossRefPubMed Earls JP, Berman EL, Urban BA et al (2008) Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose. Radiology 246:742–753. doi:10.​1148/​radiol.​2463070989 CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Seiffert M, Ojeda F, Müllerleile K et al (2015) Reducing radiation exposure during invasive coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions implementing a simple four-step protocol. Clin Res Cardiol 104:1–7. doi:10.1007/s00392-015-0814-7 CrossRef Seiffert M, Ojeda F, Müllerleile K et al (2015) Reducing radiation exposure during invasive coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions implementing a simple four-step protocol. Clin Res Cardiol 104:1–7. doi:10.​1007/​s00392-015-0814-7 CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Limits of the possible: diagnostic image quality in coronary angiography with third-generation dual-source CT
Authors
Marco M. Ochs
Fabian aus dem Siepen
Thomas Fritz
Florian Andre
Gitsios Gitsioudis
Grigorios Korosoglou
Sebastian Seitz
Yuriy Bogomazov
Christopher L. Schlett
Roman Sokiranski
Andre Sommer
Friedemann Gückel
Matthias Brado
Hans-Ulrich Kauczor
Johannes Görich
Matthias G. W. Friedrich
Hugo A. Katus
Sebastian J. Buss
Publication date
01-07-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Clinical Research in Cardiology / Issue 7/2017
Print ISSN: 1861-0684
Electronic ISSN: 1861-0692
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-017-1077-2

Other articles of this Issue 7/2017

Clinical Research in Cardiology 7/2017 Go to the issue