Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Research in Cardiology 10/2015

01-10-2015 | Original Paper

The APPLE score: a novel and simple score for the prediction of rhythm outcomes after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

Authors: Jelena Kornej, Gerhard Hindricks, M. Benjamin Shoemaker, Daniela Husser, Arash Arya, Philipp Sommer, Sascha Rolf, Pablo Saavedra, Arvindh Kanagasundram, S. Patrick Whalen, Jay Montgomery, Christopher R. Ellis, Dawood Darbar, Andreas Bollmann

Published in: Clinical Research in Cardiology | Issue 10/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) occurs in up to 50 % of patients within 1 year after catheter ablation, and a clinical risk score to predict recurrence remains a critical unmet need. The aim of this study was to (1) develop a simple score for the prediction of rhythm outcome following catheter ablation; (2) compare it with the CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores, and (3) validate it in an external cohort.

Methods

Rhythm outcome between 3 and 12 months after AF catheter ablation were documented. The APPLE score [one point for age >65 years, persistent AF, impaired eGFR (<60 ml/min/1.73 m2), LA diameter ≥43 mm, EF < 50 %] was associated with AF recurrence and was validated in an external cohort in 261 patients with comparable ablation and follow-up.

Results

In 1145 patients (60 ± 10 years, 65 % male, 62 % paroxysmal AF) the APPLE score showed better prediction of AF recurrences (AUC 0.634, 95 % CI 0.600–0.668, p < 0.001) than CHADS2 (AUC 0.538) and CHA2DS2-VASc (AUC 0.542). Compared to patients with an APPLE score of 0, the odds ratio for AF recurrences was 1.73, 2.79 and 4.70 for APPLE scores 1, 2, or ≥3, respectively (all p < 0.05). In the external validation cohort, the APPLE score showed similar results (AUC 0.624, 95 % CI 0.562–0.687, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The novel APPLE score is superior to the CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores for prediction of rhythm outcome after catheter ablation. It holds promise as a useful tool to identify patients with low, intermediate, and high risk for AF recurrence.
Literature
1.
go back to reference D’Ascenzo F, Corleto A, Biondi-Zoccai G et al (2013) Which are the most reliable predictors of recurrence of atrial fibrillation after transcatheter ablation? A meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol 167:1984–1989CrossRefPubMed D’Ascenzo F, Corleto A, Biondi-Zoccai G et al (2013) Which are the most reliable predictors of recurrence of atrial fibrillation after transcatheter ablation? A meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol 167:1984–1989CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Canpolat U, Aytemir K, Yorgun H et al (2013) A proposal for a new scoring system in the prediction of catheter ablation outcomes: promising results from the Turkish Cryoablation Registry. Int J Cardiol 169(3):201–206CrossRefPubMed Canpolat U, Aytemir K, Yorgun H et al (2013) A proposal for a new scoring system in the prediction of catheter ablation outcomes: promising results from the Turkish Cryoablation Registry. Int J Cardiol 169(3):201–206CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Wojcik M, Berkowitsch A, Greiss H et al (2013) Repeated catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: how to predict outcome? Circ J 77:2271–2279CrossRefPubMed Wojcik M, Berkowitsch A, Greiss H et al (2013) Repeated catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: how to predict outcome? Circ J 77:2271–2279CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kornej J, Hindricks G, Kosiuk J et al (2014) Comparison of CHADS2, R2CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores for prediction of rhythm outcomes after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: the Leipzig Heart Center AF Ablation Registry. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 7:281–287CrossRefPubMed Kornej J, Hindricks G, Kosiuk J et al (2014) Comparison of CHADS2, R2CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores for prediction of rhythm outcomes after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: the Leipzig Heart Center AF Ablation Registry. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 7:281–287CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Camm AJ, Lip GY, De Caterina R et al (2012) 2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association. Eur Heart J 33:2719–2747CrossRefPubMed Camm AJ, Lip GY, De Caterina R et al (2012) 2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association. Eur Heart J 33:2719–2747CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kornej J, Kosiuk J, Hindricks G, et al (2015) Sex-related predictors for thromboembolic events after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: the Leipzig Heart Center AF Ablation Registry. Clin Res Cardiol [Epub ahead of print] Kornej J, Kosiuk J, Hindricks G, et al (2015) Sex-related predictors for thromboembolic events after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: the Leipzig Heart Center AF Ablation Registry. Clin Res Cardiol [Epub ahead of print]
8.
go back to reference Lip GY, Nieuwlaat R, Pisters R et al (2010) Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation. Chest 137:263–272CrossRefPubMed Lip GY, Nieuwlaat R, Pisters R et al (2010) Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation. Chest 137:263–272CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44:837–845CrossRefPubMed DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44:837–845CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference Tang RB, Dong JZ, Long DY et al (2012) Efficacy of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation beyond HATCH score. Chin Med J (Engl) 125:3425–3429 Tang RB, Dong JZ, Long DY et al (2012) Efficacy of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation beyond HATCH score. Chin Med J (Engl) 125:3425–3429
12.
go back to reference Chao TF, Tsao HM, Lin YJ et al (2012) Clinical outcome of catheter ablation in patients with nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation: results of 3-year follow-up. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 5:514–520CrossRefPubMed Chao TF, Tsao HM, Lin YJ et al (2012) Clinical outcome of catheter ablation in patients with nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation: results of 3-year follow-up. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 5:514–520CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Letsas KP, Efremidis M, Giannopoulos G et al (2013) CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores as predictors of left atrial ablation outcomes for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Europace. doi:10.193/europace/eut210 Epub ahead of printPubMed Letsas KP, Efremidis M, Giannopoulos G et al (2013) CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores as predictors of left atrial ablation outcomes for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Europace. doi:10.​193/​europace/​eut210 Epub ahead of printPubMed
14.
go back to reference National Kidney Foundation (2002) K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis 39:S1–S266 National Kidney Foundation (2002) K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis 39:S1–S266
15.
go back to reference Alberti KG, Zimmet P, Shaw J (2005) The metabolic syndrome—a new worldwide definition. Lancet 366:1059–1062CrossRefPubMed Alberti KG, Zimmet P, Shaw J (2005) The metabolic syndrome—a new worldwide definition. Lancet 366:1059–1062CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR et al (2005) Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement. Circulation 112:2735–2752CrossRefPubMed Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR et al (2005) Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement. Circulation 112:2735–2752CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The APPLE score: a novel and simple score for the prediction of rhythm outcomes after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation
Authors
Jelena Kornej
Gerhard Hindricks
M. Benjamin Shoemaker
Daniela Husser
Arash Arya
Philipp Sommer
Sascha Rolf
Pablo Saavedra
Arvindh Kanagasundram
S. Patrick Whalen
Jay Montgomery
Christopher R. Ellis
Dawood Darbar
Andreas Bollmann
Publication date
01-10-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Clinical Research in Cardiology / Issue 10/2015
Print ISSN: 1861-0684
Electronic ISSN: 1861-0692
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-015-0856-x

Other articles of this Issue 10/2015

Clinical Research in Cardiology 10/2015 Go to the issue