Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Research in Cardiology 9/2015

01-09-2015 | Original Paper

Transradial left ventricular endomyocardial biopsy: assessment of safety and efficacy

Authors: Tim G. Schäufele, Raphael Spittler, Artemisia Karagianni, Peter Ong, Karin Klingel, Reinhard Kandolf, Heiko Mahrholdt, Udo Sechtem

Published in: Clinical Research in Cardiology | Issue 9/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

We aimed at assessing the safety and efficacy of a systematic transradial approach for left ventricular endomyocardial biopsy using a new hydrophilic sheathless guiding catheter.

Methods and results

Forty-two consecutive patients were included. The transradial success rate was 98 % (41 of 42). In one case, cross over to femoral access due to irreversible spasm of the right radial artery was necessary. No radial spasm was observed in the other 41 patients. Depending on the indication, several other procedures, such as coronary angiography or ventricular angiography, were additionally performed through the same transradial access site. Median fluoroscopy time was 7.9 min. The mean dose area product was 1867 cGy × cm2. All biopsy samples were graded as good or excellent quality. No patient had any complications. Immediate post-procedural ambulation could be achieved in all patients. Radial artery patency was confirmed by duplex sonography 24 h after removal of the guide.

Conclusion

The present study demonstrates safety and efficacy of a systematic transradial access for left ventricular EMB using a highly hydrophilic sheathless guiding catheter. This is of clinical importance since this new technique may overcome critical limitations of the common approach.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ardehali H, Howard DL, Hariri A, Qasim A, Hare JM, Baughman KL, Kasper EK (2005) A positive endomyocardial biopsy result for sarcoid is associated with poor prognosis in patients with initially unexplained cardiomyopathy. Am Heart J 150(3):459–463CrossRefPubMed Ardehali H, Howard DL, Hariri A, Qasim A, Hare JM, Baughman KL, Kasper EK (2005) A positive endomyocardial biopsy result for sarcoid is associated with poor prognosis in patients with initially unexplained cardiomyopathy. Am Heart J 150(3):459–463CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Austin BA, Duffy B, Tan C, Rodriguez ER, Starling RC, Desai MY (2009) Comparison of functional status, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic parameters to mortality in endomyocardial-biopsy proven cardiac amyloidosis. Am J Cardiol 103(10):1429–1433CrossRefPubMed Austin BA, Duffy B, Tan C, Rodriguez ER, Starling RC, Desai MY (2009) Comparison of functional status, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic parameters to mortality in endomyocardial-biopsy proven cardiac amyloidosis. Am J Cardiol 103(10):1429–1433CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Baccouche H, Mahrholdt H, Meinhardt G, Merher R, Voehringer M, Hill S, Klingel K, Kandolf R, Sechtem U, Yilmaz A (2009) Diagnostic synergy of non-invasive cardiovascular magnetic resonance and invasive endomyocardial biopsy in troponin-positive patients without coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 30(23):2869–2879CrossRefPubMed Baccouche H, Mahrholdt H, Meinhardt G, Merher R, Voehringer M, Hill S, Klingel K, Kandolf R, Sechtem U, Yilmaz A (2009) Diagnostic synergy of non-invasive cardiovascular magnetic resonance and invasive endomyocardial biopsy in troponin-positive patients without coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 30(23):2869–2879CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Frustaci A, Pieroni M, Chimenti C (2002) The role of endomyocardial biopsy in the diagnosis of cardiomyopathies. Ital Heart J 3(6):348–353PubMed Frustaci A, Pieroni M, Chimenti C (2002) The role of endomyocardial biopsy in the diagnosis of cardiomyopathies. Ital Heart J 3(6):348–353PubMed
6.
go back to reference Yilmaz A, Kindermann I, Kindermann M, Mahfoud F, Ukena C, Athanasiadis A, Hill S, Mahrholdt H, Voehringer M, Schieber M et al (2010) Comparative evaluation of left and right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy: differences in complication rate and diagnostic performance. Circulation 122(9):900–909CrossRefPubMed Yilmaz A, Kindermann I, Kindermann M, Mahfoud F, Ukena C, Athanasiadis A, Hill S, Mahrholdt H, Voehringer M, Schieber M et al (2010) Comparative evaluation of left and right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy: differences in complication rate and diagnostic performance. Circulation 122(9):900–909CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Cooper LT, Baughman KL, Feldman AM, Frustaci A, Jessup M, Kuhl U, Levine GN, Narula J, Starling RC, Towbin J et al (2007) The role of endomyocardial biopsy in the management of cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association, the American College of Cardiology, and the European Society of Cardiology Endorsed by the Heart Failure Society of America and the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 28(24):3076–3093CrossRefPubMed Cooper LT, Baughman KL, Feldman AM, Frustaci A, Jessup M, Kuhl U, Levine GN, Narula J, Starling RC, Towbin J et al (2007) The role of endomyocardial biopsy in the management of cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association, the American College of Cardiology, and the European Society of Cardiology Endorsed by the Heart Failure Society of America and the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 28(24):3076–3093CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, Niemela K, Xavier D, Widimsky P, Budaj A, Niemela M, Valentin V, Lewis BS et al (2011) Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet 377(9775):1409–1420CrossRefPubMed Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, Niemela K, Xavier D, Widimsky P, Budaj A, Niemela M, Valentin V, Lewis BS et al (2011) Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet 377(9775):1409–1420CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Rao SV, Cohen MG, Kandzari DE, Bertrand OF, Gilchrist IC (2010) The transradial approach to percutaneous coronary intervention: historical perspective, current concepts, and future directions. J Am Coll Cardiol 55(20):2187–2195CrossRefPubMed Rao SV, Cohen MG, Kandzari DE, Bertrand OF, Gilchrist IC (2010) The transradial approach to percutaneous coronary intervention: historical perspective, current concepts, and future directions. J Am Coll Cardiol 55(20):2187–2195CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Rao SV, Ou FS, Wang TY, Roe MT, Brindis R, Rumsfeld JS, Peterson ED (2008) Trends in the prevalence and outcomes of radial and femoral approaches to percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 1(4):379–386CrossRefPubMed Rao SV, Ou FS, Wang TY, Roe MT, Brindis R, Rumsfeld JS, Peterson ED (2008) Trends in the prevalence and outcomes of radial and femoral approaches to percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 1(4):379–386CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Cheaito R, Benamer H, Hovasse T, Tritar A, Hage F, Garot P, Lefevre T, Unterseeh T, Chevalier B, Morice MC et al (2014) Feasibility and safety of transradial coronary interventions using a 6.5-F sheathless guiding catheter in patients with small radial arteries: A multicenter registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Cheaito R, Benamer H, Hovasse T, Tritar A, Hage F, Garot P, Lefevre T, Unterseeh T, Chevalier B, Morice MC et al (2014) Feasibility and safety of transradial coronary interventions using a 6.5-F sheathless guiding catheter in patients with small radial arteries: A multicenter registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
12.
go back to reference Gilchrist IC, Kharabsheh S, Nickolaus MJ, Reddy R (2002) Radial approach to right heart catheterization: early experience with a promising technique. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 55(1):20–22CrossRefPubMed Gilchrist IC, Kharabsheh S, Nickolaus MJ, Reddy R (2002) Radial approach to right heart catheterization: early experience with a promising technique. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 55(1):20–22CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Sueda S, Ochi N, Kawada H, Matsuda S, Hayashi Y, Tsuruoka T, Uraoka T (1999) Frequency of provoked coronary vasospasm in patients undergoing coronary arteriography with spasm provocation test of acetylcholine. Am J Cardiol 83(8):1186–1190CrossRefPubMed Sueda S, Ochi N, Kawada H, Matsuda S, Hayashi Y, Tsuruoka T, Uraoka T (1999) Frequency of provoked coronary vasospasm in patients undergoing coronary arteriography with spasm provocation test of acetylcholine. Am J Cardiol 83(8):1186–1190CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Moss AJ, Zareba W, Hall WJ, Klein H, Wilber DJ, Cannom DS, Daubert JP, Higgins SL, Brown MW, Andrews ML (2002) Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 346(12):877–883CrossRefPubMed Moss AJ, Zareba W, Hall WJ, Klein H, Wilber DJ, Cannom DS, Daubert JP, Higgins SL, Brown MW, Andrews ML (2002) Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 346(12):877–883CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Bardy GH, Lee KL, Mark DB, Poole JE, Packer DL, Boineau R, Domanski M, Troutman C, Anderson J, Johnson G et al (2005) Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med 352(3):225–237CrossRefPubMed Bardy GH, Lee KL, Mark DB, Poole JE, Packer DL, Boineau R, Domanski M, Troutman C, Anderson J, Johnson G et al (2005) Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med 352(3):225–237CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Swedberg K, Komajda M, Bohm M, Borer JS, Ford I, Dubost-Brama A, Lerebours G, Tavazzi L (2010) Ivabradine and outcomes in chronic heart failure (SHIFT): a randomised placebo-controlled study. Lancet 376(9744):875–885CrossRefPubMed Swedberg K, Komajda M, Bohm M, Borer JS, Ford I, Dubost-Brama A, Lerebours G, Tavazzi L (2010) Ivabradine and outcomes in chronic heart failure (SHIFT): a randomised placebo-controlled study. Lancet 376(9744):875–885CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Romagnoli E, Biondi-Zoccai G, Sciahbasi A, Politi L, Rigattieri S, Pendenza G, Summaria F, Patrizi R, Borghi A, Di Russo C et al (2012) Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 60(24):2481–2489CrossRefPubMed Romagnoli E, Biondi-Zoccai G, Sciahbasi A, Politi L, Rigattieri S, Pendenza G, Summaria F, Patrizi R, Borghi A, Di Russo C et al (2012) Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 60(24):2481–2489CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Kristic I, Lukenda J (2011) Radial artery spasm during transradial coronary procedures. J Invasive Cardiol 23(12):527–531PubMed Kristic I, Lukenda J (2011) Radial artery spasm during transradial coronary procedures. J Invasive Cardiol 23(12):527–531PubMed
19.
go back to reference Moyer CD, Gilchrist IC (2005) Transradial bilateral cardiac catheterization and endomyocardial bioposy: a feasibility study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 64(2):134–137CrossRefPubMed Moyer CD, Gilchrist IC (2005) Transradial bilateral cardiac catheterization and endomyocardial bioposy: a feasibility study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 64(2):134–137CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Burke RJ (2005) Hospital restructuring stressors, support, and nursing staff perceptions of unit functioning. Health Care Manag (Frederick) 24(1):21–28 Burke RJ (2005) Hospital restructuring stressors, support, and nursing staff perceptions of unit functioning. Health Care Manag (Frederick) 24(1):21–28
21.
go back to reference De Rosa S, Torella D, Caiazzo G, Giampa S, Indolfi C (2014) Left radial access for percutaneous coronary procedures: from neglected to performer? A meta-analysis of 14 studies including 7,603 procedures. Int J Cardiol 171(1):66–72CrossRefPubMed De Rosa S, Torella D, Caiazzo G, Giampa S, Indolfi C (2014) Left radial access for percutaneous coronary procedures: from neglected to performer? A meta-analysis of 14 studies including 7,603 procedures. Int J Cardiol 171(1):66–72CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Kotowycz MA, Dzavik V (2012) Radial artery patency after transradial catheterization. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 5(1):127–133CrossRefPubMed Kotowycz MA, Dzavik V (2012) Radial artery patency after transradial catheterization. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 5(1):127–133CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Transradial left ventricular endomyocardial biopsy: assessment of safety and efficacy
Authors
Tim G. Schäufele
Raphael Spittler
Artemisia Karagianni
Peter Ong
Karin Klingel
Reinhard Kandolf
Heiko Mahrholdt
Udo Sechtem
Publication date
01-09-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Clinical Research in Cardiology / Issue 9/2015
Print ISSN: 1861-0684
Electronic ISSN: 1861-0692
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-015-0844-1

Other articles of this Issue 9/2015

Clinical Research in Cardiology 9/2015 Go to the issue