Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 3/2016

01-03-2016 | Original Article

Management of postoperative bladder emptying after proctectomy in men for rectal cancer. A retrospective study of 190 consecutive patients

Authors: Cécile Bouchet-Doumenq, Jérémie H. Lefevre, Malika Bennis, Najim Chafai, Emmanuel Tiret, Yann Parc

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 3/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Evaluation of urinary drainage after rectal resection and identification of criteria associated with postoperative urinary dysfunction (UD). UD remains a clinical problem for up to two thirds of patients after rectal resection. Currently, there are no guidelines concerning duration or type of drainage.

Methods

One hundred ninety consecutive rectal resections (abdomino-perineal resection (APR = 47), mechanical coloanal anastomosis (MechCAA = 48), manual coloanal anastomosis (ManCAA = 47), colorectal anastomosis (CRA = 48)) in male patients were included. In patients with a transurethral catheterization (TUC), the drainage was removed at day 5. Patients with a suprapubic catheterization (SPC) underwent drainage removal according to the results of a clamping test at day 5. UD was defined as drainage removal after day 6 and/or acute urinary retention (AUR).

Results

Drainage types were SPC (n = 136, 72 %) and TUC (n = 54, 28 %). SPC was used more frequently after total mesorectal excision (TME) (APR, ManCAA, MechCAA) (83–92 %). Complications rates of SPC and TUC were 20 and 9 %. The clamping test was positive for 61 patients (48 %), and SPC was removed before/on POD6 without any episode of AUR. After TUC removal, two patients (4 %) had AUR. Seventy-two (38 %) patients had UD: 11 (6 %) were discharged with an indwelling catheter, and in 61 (32 %), the catheter was removed after day6. Three independent factors were associated with UD: diabetes (OR = 2.9 (1.2–7.7)), urological history (OR = 2.9 (1.2–7.6)), and TME (OR = 5.2 (2.3–13.5)).

Conclusion

The UD rate after surgery for rectal cancer was 38 %. The clamping test is accurate to prevent AUR after SPC removal. The three risk factors may serve to select good candidates for early catheter removal.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Alfonsi P, Slim K, Chauvin M et al (2014) French guidelines for enhanced recovery after elective colorectal surgery. J Visc Surg 151:65–79CrossRefPubMed Alfonsi P, Slim K, Chauvin M et al (2014) French guidelines for enhanced recovery after elective colorectal surgery. J Visc Surg 151:65–79CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Beaussier M, El’ayoubi H, Schiffer E et al (2007) Continuous preperitoneal infusion of ropivacaine provides effective analgesia and accelerates recovery after colorectal surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Anesthesiology 107:461–468CrossRefPubMed Beaussier M, El’ayoubi H, Schiffer E et al (2007) Continuous preperitoneal infusion of ropivacaine provides effective analgesia and accelerates recovery after colorectal surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Anesthesiology 107:461–468CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Bennis M, Parc Y, Lefevre JH et al (2012) Morbidity risk factors after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision and coloanal anastomosis: a retrospective series of 483 patients. Ann Surg 255:504–510CrossRefPubMed Bennis M, Parc Y, Lefevre JH et al (2012) Morbidity risk factors after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision and coloanal anastomosis: a retrospective series of 483 patients. Ann Surg 255:504–510CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Benoist S, Panis Y, Denet C et al (1999) Optimal duration of urinary drainage after rectal resection: a randomized controlled trial. Surgery 125:135–141CrossRefPubMed Benoist S, Panis Y, Denet C et al (1999) Optimal duration of urinary drainage after rectal resection: a randomized controlled trial. Surgery 125:135–141CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Burgos FJ, Romero J, Fernandez E et al (1988) Risk factors for developing voiding dysfunction after abdominoperineal resection for adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 31:682–685CrossRefPubMed Burgos FJ, Romero J, Fernandez E et al (1988) Risk factors for developing voiding dysfunction after abdominoperineal resection for adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 31:682–685CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Changchien CR, Yeh CY, Huang ST et al (2007) Postoperative urinary retention after primary colorectal cancer resection via laparotomy: a prospective study of 2,355 consecutive patients. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1688–1696CrossRefPubMed Changchien CR, Yeh CY, Huang ST et al (2007) Postoperative urinary retention after primary colorectal cancer resection via laparotomy: a prospective study of 2,355 consecutive patients. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1688–1696CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Chaudhri S, Maruthachalam K, Kaiser A et al (2006) Successful voiding after trial without catheter is not synonymous with recovery of bladder function after colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1066–1070CrossRefPubMed Chaudhri S, Maruthachalam K, Kaiser A et al (2006) Successful voiding after trial without catheter is not synonymous with recovery of bladder function after colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1066–1070CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Doeksen A, Gooszen JA, Van Duijvendijk P et al (2011) Sexual and urinary functioning after rectal surgery: a prospective comparative study with a median follow-up of 8.5 years. Int J Color Dis 26:1549–1557CrossRef Doeksen A, Gooszen JA, Van Duijvendijk P et al (2011) Sexual and urinary functioning after rectal surgery: a prospective comparative study with a median follow-up of 8.5 years. Int J Color Dis 26:1549–1557CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Gerstenberg TC, Nielsen ML, Clausen S et al (1980) Bladder function after abdominoperineal resection of the rectum for anorectal cancer. Urodynamic investigation before and after operative in a consecutive series. Ann Surg 191:81–86CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gerstenberg TC, Nielsen ML, Clausen S et al (1980) Bladder function after abdominoperineal resection of the rectum for anorectal cancer. Urodynamic investigation before and after operative in a consecutive series. Ann Surg 191:81–86CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Heald RJ (1995) Total mesorectal excision is optimal surgery for rectal cancer: a Scandinavian consensus. Br J Surg 82:1297–1299CrossRefPubMed Heald RJ (1995) Total mesorectal excision is optimal surgery for rectal cancer: a Scandinavian consensus. Br J Surg 82:1297–1299CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Jahn P, Beutner K, Langer G (2012) Types of indwelling urinary catheters for long-term bladder drainage in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10:CD004997PubMed Jahn P, Beutner K, Langer G (2012) Types of indwelling urinary catheters for long-term bladder drainage in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10:CD004997PubMed
12.
go back to reference Katsumi HK, Kalisvaart JF, Ronningen LD et al (2010) Urethral versus suprapubic catheter: choosing the best bladder management for male spinal cord injury patients with indwelling catheters. Spinal Cord 48:325–329CrossRefPubMed Katsumi HK, Kalisvaart JF, Ronningen LD et al (2010) Urethral versus suprapubic catheter: choosing the best bladder management for male spinal cord injury patients with indwelling catheters. Spinal Cord 48:325–329CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Lee SY, Kang SB, Kim DW et al (2015) Risk factors and preventive measures for acute urinary retention after rectal cancer surgery. World J Surg 39:275–282CrossRefPubMed Lee SY, Kang SB, Kim DW et al (2015) Risk factors and preventive measures for acute urinary retention after rectal cancer surgery. World J Surg 39:275–282CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Lim RS, Yang TX, Chua TC (2014) Postoperative bladder and sexual function in patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open resection of rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol 18:993–1002CrossRefPubMed Lim RS, Yang TX, Chua TC (2014) Postoperative bladder and sexual function in patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open resection of rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol 18:993–1002CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Maas CP, Moriya Y, Steup WH et al (1998) Radical and nerve-preserving surgery for rectal cancer in The Netherlands: a prospective study on morbidity and functional outcome. Br J Surg 85:92–97CrossRefPubMed Maas CP, Moriya Y, Steup WH et al (1998) Radical and nerve-preserving surgery for rectal cancer in The Netherlands: a prospective study on morbidity and functional outcome. Br J Surg 85:92–97CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference O’kelly TJ, Mathew A, Ross S et al (1995) Optimum method for urinary drainage in major abdominal surgery: a prospective randomized trial of suprapubic versus urethral catheterization. Br J Surg 82:1367–1368CrossRefPubMed O’kelly TJ, Mathew A, Ross S et al (1995) Optimum method for urinary drainage in major abdominal surgery: a prospective randomized trial of suprapubic versus urethral catheterization. Br J Surg 82:1367–1368CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Pocard M, Zinzindohoue F, Haab F et al (2002) A prospective study of sexual and urinary function before and after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer. Surgery 131:368–372CrossRefPubMed Pocard M, Zinzindohoue F, Haab F et al (2002) A prospective study of sexual and urinary function before and after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer. Surgery 131:368–372CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Ratnaval CD, Renwick P, Farouk R et al (1996) Suprapubic versus transurethral catheterisation of males undergoing pelvic colorectal surgery. Int J Color Dis 11:177–179CrossRef Ratnaval CD, Renwick P, Farouk R et al (1996) Suprapubic versus transurethral catheterisation of males undergoing pelvic colorectal surgery. Int J Color Dis 11:177–179CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Regenbogen SE, Read TE, Roberts PL et al (2011) Urinary tract infection after colon and rectal resections: more common than predicted by risk-adjustment models. J Am Coll Surg 213:784–792CrossRefPubMed Regenbogen SE, Read TE, Roberts PL et al (2011) Urinary tract infection after colon and rectal resections: more common than predicted by risk-adjustment models. J Am Coll Surg 213:784–792CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Sethia KK, Selkon JB, Berry AR et al (1987) Prospective randomized controlled trial of urethral versus suprapubic catheterization. Br J Surg 74:624–625CrossRefPubMed Sethia KK, Selkon JB, Berry AR et al (1987) Prospective randomized controlled trial of urethral versus suprapubic catheterization. Br J Surg 74:624–625CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Vandoni RE, Lironi A, Tschantz P (1994) Bacteriuria during urinary tract catheterization: suprapubic versus urethral route: a prospective randomized trial. Acta Chir Belg 94:12–16PubMed Vandoni RE, Lironi A, Tschantz P (1994) Bacteriuria during urinary tract catheterization: suprapubic versus urethral route: a prospective randomized trial. Acta Chir Belg 94:12–16PubMed
23.
go back to reference Zmora O, Madbouly K, Tulchinsky H et al (2010) Urinary bladder catheter drainage following pelvic surgery—is it necessary for that long? Dis Colon Rectum 53:321–326CrossRefPubMed Zmora O, Madbouly K, Tulchinsky H et al (2010) Urinary bladder catheter drainage following pelvic surgery—is it necessary for that long? Dis Colon Rectum 53:321–326CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Management of postoperative bladder emptying after proctectomy in men for rectal cancer. A retrospective study of 190 consecutive patients
Authors
Cécile Bouchet-Doumenq
Jérémie H. Lefevre
Malika Bennis
Najim Chafai
Emmanuel Tiret
Yann Parc
Publication date
01-03-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2471-8

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 3/2016 Go to the issue