Top

International Journal of Colorectal Disease

Published in:

Open Access 01-11-2015 | Original Article

Persistent perineal morbidity is common following abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer

Authors: Dan Asplund, Mattias Prytz, David Bock, Eva Haglind, Eva Angenete

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 11/2015

Abstract

Purpose

Short-term complications related to the perineal wound after abdominoperineal excision (APE) are a well-known problem. Perineal morbidity in the longer term is an almost unexplored area. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to investigate the prevalence of perineal symptoms 3 years after APE for rectal cancer, to identify potential risk factors and to explore the relationship between perineal morbidity and global quality of life.

Method

All patients who underwent APE in Sweden between 2007 and 2009 (n = 1373) were identified through the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Surviving patients were contacted 3 years after surgery and asked about participation. A total of 545 patients completed a detailed questionnaire. Clinical data was collected from the registry and surgical charts.

Results

Perineal symptoms occurred in 50 % of all patients 3 years after APE and more frequently in women (58 vs. 44 %; p = 0.001). Delayed healing of the perineal wound (>4 weeks) occurred in 25 % of all patients and more frequently after extralevator APE (ELAPE) than after conventional APE (32 vs. 11 %, p < 0.001). Delayed healing was associated with an increased risk of more severe perineal symptoms (relative risk (RR) 1.50, 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) 1.09–2.05). Patients with more severe perineal symptoms (n = 129) had a significantly lower global quality of life as measured by EQ-5D visual analogue scale (VAS; median 75 vs. 83 points on the 100-point scale; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Persistent perineal symptoms are common after APE and may have an impact on patients’ quality of life. Delayed wound healing may be a risk factor for persistent symptoms. Further studies are needed to identify avoidable clinical factors for the development of persistent perineal morbidity.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier

NCT01296984

Angenete E, Correa-Marinez A, Heath J et al (2012) Ostomy function after abdominoperineal resection—a clinical and patient evaluation. Int J Colorectal Dis 27:1267–1274CrossRefPubMed

Asplund D, Haglind E, Angenete E (2012) Outcome of extralevator abdominoperineal excision compared with standard surgery: results from a single centre. Colorectal Dis 14:1191–1196CrossRefPubMed

Asplund D, Heath J, Gonzalez E et al (2014) Self-reported quality of life and functional outcome in patients with rectal cancer—QoLiRECT. Dan Med J 61:A4841PubMed

Brooks R (1996) EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 37:53–72CrossRefPubMed

Greenland S (2004) Model-based estimation of relative risks and other epidemiologic measures in studies of common outcomes and in case–control studies. Am J Epidemiol 160:301–305CrossRefPubMed

Ho VP, Lee Y, Stein SL et al (2011) Sexual function after treatment for rectal cancer: a review. Dis Colon Rectum 54:113–125CrossRefPubMed

Holm T, Ljung A, Häggmark T et al (2007) Extended abdominoperineal resection with gluteus maximus flap reconstruction of the pelvic floor for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 94:232–238CrossRefPubMed

Jorgren F, Johansson R, Damber L et al (2013) Validity of the Swedish Rectal Cancer Registry for patients treated with major abdominal surgery between 1995 and 1997. Acta Oncol 52:1707–1714CrossRefPubMed

Kasparek MS, Hassan I, Cima RR et al (2012) Long-term quality of life and sexual and urinary function after abdominoperineal resection for distal rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 55:147–154CrossRefPubMed

10.

Kreicbergs U, Valdimarsdottir U, Onelov E et al (2004) Talking about death with children who have severe malignant disease. N Engl J Med 351:1175–1186CrossRefPubMed

11.

Musters GD, Sloothaak DA, Roodbeen S et al (2014) Perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: a two-centre experience in the era of intensified oncological treatment. Int J Colorectal Dis 29:1151–1157CrossRefPubMed

12.

Omerov P, Steineck G, Runeson B et al (2013) Preparatory studies to a population-based survey of suicide-bereaved parents in Sweden. Crisis 34:200–210CrossRefPubMed

13.

Ortiz H, Ciga MA, Armendariz P et al (2014) Multicentre propensity score-matched analysis of conventional versus extended abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 101:874–882CrossRefPubMed

14.

Pachler J, Wille-Jorgensen P (2012) Quality of life after rectal resection for cancer, with or without permanent colostomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:CD004323PubMed

15.

Pahlman L, Bohe M, Cedermark B et al (2007) The Swedish rectal cancer registry. Br J Surg 94:1285–1292CrossRefPubMed

16.

Pickard AS, Neary MP, Cella D (2007) Estimation of minimally important differences in EQ-5D utility and VAS scores in cancer. Health Qual Life Outcomes 5:70PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

17.

Prytz M, Angenete E, Bock D et al. (2015) Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision for Low Rectal Cancer-Extensive Surgery to be Used With Discretion Based on 3-Year Local Recurrence Results: A Registry-based, Observational National Cohort Study. Annals of surgery

18.

Prytz M, Angenete E, Ekelund J et al (2014) Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) for rectal cancer-short-term results from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Selective use of ELAPE warranted. Int J Colorectal Dis 29:981–987PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

19.

Prytz M, Angenete E, Haglind E (2012) Abdominoperineal extralevator resection. Dan Med J 59:A4366PubMed

20.

Rabin R, De Charro F (2001) EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med 33:337–343CrossRefPubMed

21.

Steineck G, Bergmark K, Henningsohn L (2002) Symptom documentation in cancer survivors as a basis for therapy modifications. Acta Oncol 41:244–252CrossRefPubMed

22.

Steineck G, Helgesen F, Adolfsson J et al (2002) Quality of life after radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting. N Engl J Med 347:790–796CrossRefPubMed

23.

Welsch T, Mategakis V, Contin P et al (2013) Results of extralevator abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer including quality of life and long-term wound complications. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:503–510CrossRefPubMed

24.

West N, Anderin C, Smith K et al (2010) Multicentre experience with extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 97:588–599CrossRefPubMed

25.

West NP, Finan PJ, Anderin C et al (2008) Evidence of the oncologic superiority of cylindrical abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:3517–3522CrossRefPubMed

26.

Yu HC, Peng H, He XS et al (2014) Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes after extralevator abdominoperineal excision and standard abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 29:183–191CrossRefPubMed

27.

Zou G (2004) A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. Am J Epidemiol 159:702–706CrossRefPubMed

Title: Persistent perineal morbidity is common following abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer
Authors: Dan Asplund
Mattias Prytz
David Bock
Eva Haglind
Eva Angenete
Publication date: 01-11-2015
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 11/2015
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2328-1

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Persistent perineal morbidity is common following abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer

Abstract

Purpose

Method

Results

Conclusion

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Method

Results

Conclusion

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 11/2015

Endoscopic follow-up after surgery for colorectal cancer

Risk of readmission after laparoscopic vs. open colorectal surgery

Surgical outcomes and prognostic factors of emergency surgery for colonic perforation: would fecal contamination increase morbidity and mortality?

Anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery: are 75 % preventable?

Influence of gentamicin-coded PVDF suture material on the healing of intestinal anastomosis in a rat model

Laparoscopic resection with natural orifice specimen extraction versus conventional laparoscopy for colorectal disease: a meta-analysis