Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 5/2008

01-05-2008 | Original Article

Poor symptomatic relief and quality of life in patients treated for “solitary rectal ulcer syndrome without external rectal prolapse”

Authors: G. Meurette, L. Siproudhis, N. Regenet, E. Frampas, M. Proux, P. A. Lehur

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 5/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is a chronic disabling condition. Several therapeutic options have been advocated including conservative approaches and surgery, bringing into question their functional outcomes. This study aimed to assess treatment procedures on both anorectal complaints and quality of life (QoL) using standardised self-administered questionnaires.

Materials and methods

Forty-one patients who underwent treatments for SRUS in two referral centres were reviewed. A standardised self-administered questionnaire including incontinence (Cleveland Clinic), constipation (Knowles–Eccersley–Scott symptom, KESS) and gastrointestinal quality of life index validated scoring systems was mailed to each patient (median follow-up, 36 months). Correlation between treatment options, functional results and quality of life was analysed.

Results

The mean Cleveland Clinic and KESS scores were respectively 5.3 ± 5.8 (normal 0) and 19.1 ± 8 (normal <9). The mean QoL score reached 89 ± 28.8 (normal 125). A linear correlation between the QoL score and functional results was observed. There was no influence of treatment options on QoL results. A multivariate analysis identified five parameters predictive of a better QoL: presence of paradoxical puborectalis contraction, absence of descending perineum, absence of procidentia, age <40 and treatment exclusively based on laxatives.

Conclusion

Despite several therapeutic options including surgery, patients with SRUS still frequently complain of disturbed anorectal function and significant alteration of their QoL.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rutter KR, Riddel RH (1975) The solitary rectal ulcer syndrome of the rectum. Clin Gastroenterol 4:505–530PubMed Rutter KR, Riddel RH (1975) The solitary rectal ulcer syndrome of the rectum. Clin Gastroenterol 4:505–530PubMed
2.
go back to reference Rutter KR (1975) Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Proc R Soc Med 68:22–26PubMed Rutter KR (1975) Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Proc R Soc Med 68:22–26PubMed
3.
go back to reference Vaizey CJ, Van den Bogaerde JB, Emmanuel AV, Talbot IC, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA (1998) Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Br J Surg 85:1617–1623PubMedCrossRef Vaizey CJ, Van den Bogaerde JB, Emmanuel AV, Talbot IC, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA (1998) Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Br J Surg 85:1617–1623PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Morio O, Meurette G, Desfourneaux V, D’Halluin PN, Bretagne JF, Siproudhis L (2005) Anorectal physiology in solitary ulcer syndrome: a case-matched series. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1917–1922PubMedCrossRef Morio O, Meurette G, Desfourneaux V, D’Halluin PN, Bretagne JF, Siproudhis L (2005) Anorectal physiology in solitary ulcer syndrome: a case-matched series. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1917–1922PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Vaizey CJ, Roy AJ, Kamm MA (1997) Prospective evaluation of the treatment of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome with biofeedback. Gut 41:817–820PubMedCrossRef Vaizey CJ, Roy AJ, Kamm MA (1997) Prospective evaluation of the treatment of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome with biofeedback. Gut 41:817–820PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Malouf AJ, Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA (2001) Results of behavioural treatment (biofeedback) for solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum 44:72–76PubMedCrossRef Malouf AJ, Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA (2001) Results of behavioural treatment (biofeedback) for solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum 44:72–76PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Binnie NR, Papachrysostomu M, Clare N, Smith AN (1992) Solitary rectal ulcer: the place of biofeedback and surgery in the treatment of the syndrome. World J Surg 16:836–840PubMedCrossRef Binnie NR, Papachrysostomu M, Clare N, Smith AN (1992) Solitary rectal ulcer: the place of biofeedback and surgery in the treatment of the syndrome. World J Surg 16:836–840PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Tweedie DJ, Varma JS (2005) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic mesh rectopexy for solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Colorectal Dis 7:151–155PubMedCrossRef Tweedie DJ, Varma JS (2005) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic mesh rectopexy for solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Colorectal Dis 7:151–155PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Nicholls RJ, Simson JN (1986) Anteroposterior rectopexy in the treatment of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome without overt rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 73:222–224PubMedCrossRef Nicholls RJ, Simson JN (1986) Anteroposterior rectopexy in the treatment of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome without overt rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 73:222–224PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Marchal F, Bresler L, Brunaud L, Adler SC, Sebbag H, Tortuyaux JM et al (2001) Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: a series of 13 patients operated with a mean follow-up of 4.5 years. Int J Colorectal Dis 16:228–233PubMedCrossRef Marchal F, Bresler L, Brunaud L, Adler SC, Sebbag H, Tortuyaux JM et al (2001) Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: a series of 13 patients operated with a mean follow-up of 4.5 years. Int J Colorectal Dis 16:228–233PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Sitzler PJ, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ, McKee RF (1998) Long-term outcome of surgery for solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Br J Surg 85:1246–1250PubMedCrossRef Sitzler PJ, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ, McKee RF (1998) Long-term outcome of surgery for solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Br J Surg 85:1246–1250PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Shorvon PJ, McHugh S, Diamant NE, Somers S, Stevenson SW (1989) Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications. Gut 30:1737–1749PubMedCrossRef Shorvon PJ, McHugh S, Diamant NE, Somers S, Stevenson SW (1989) Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications. Gut 30:1737–1749PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Eypasch E, William JI, Wood-Dauphinee S, Ure BM, Schmulling C, Neugebauer et al (1995) Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index: development, validation and application of a new instrument. Br J Surg 82:216–222PubMedCrossRef Eypasch E, William JI, Wood-Dauphinee S, Ure BM, Schmulling C, Neugebauer et al (1995) Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index: development, validation and application of a new instrument. Br J Surg 82:216–222PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Slim K, Bousquet J, Kwiatkowski F, Lescure G, Pezet D, Chipponi J (1999) First validation of the French version of the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI). Gastroenterol Clin Biol 23:25–31PubMed Slim K, Bousquet J, Kwiatkowski F, Lescure G, Pezet D, Chipponi J (1999) First validation of the French version of the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI). Gastroenterol Clin Biol 23:25–31PubMed
16.
go back to reference Knowles CH, Eccersley AJ, Scott SM, Walker SM, Reeves B, Lunniss PJ (2000) Linear discriminant analysis of symptoms in patients with chronic constipation: validation of a new scoring system (KESS). Dis Colon Rectum 43:1419–1426PubMedCrossRef Knowles CH, Eccersley AJ, Scott SM, Walker SM, Reeves B, Lunniss PJ (2000) Linear discriminant analysis of symptoms in patients with chronic constipation: validation of a new scoring system (KESS). Dis Colon Rectum 43:1419–1426PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97PubMedCrossRef Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Larsen DR, Speckman PL (2004) Multivariate regression trees for analysis of abundance data. Biometrics 60:543–549PubMedCrossRef Larsen DR, Speckman PL (2004) Multivariate regression trees for analysis of abundance data. Biometrics 60:543–549PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Segal MR (1992) Tree structured methods for longitudinal data. J Am Stat Assoc 87:407–418CrossRef Segal MR (1992) Tree structured methods for longitudinal data. J Am Stat Assoc 87:407–418CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Bishop PR, Nowicki MJ (2002) Nonsurgical therapy for solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Curr Treat Option Gastroenterol 5:215–223CrossRef Bishop PR, Nowicki MJ (2002) Nonsurgical therapy for solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Curr Treat Option Gastroenterol 5:215–223CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Torres C, Khaikin M, Bracho J, Hua Luo C, Weiss E, Sands D et al (2007) Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: clinical findings, surgical treatment, and outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis 22:1389–1393PubMedCrossRef Torres C, Khaikin M, Bracho J, Hua Luo C, Weiss E, Sands D et al (2007) Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: clinical findings, surgical treatment, and outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis 22:1389–1393PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Poor symptomatic relief and quality of life in patients treated for “solitary rectal ulcer syndrome without external rectal prolapse”
Authors
G. Meurette
L. Siproudhis
N. Regenet
E. Frampas
M. Proux
P. A. Lehur
Publication date
01-05-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 5/2008
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-008-0445-9

Other articles of this Issue 5/2008

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 5/2008 Go to the issue

Letter to the Editor

Letter to the editor