Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Child's Nervous System 9/2016

01-09-2016 | Original Paper

Delayed surgical repair of cranial burst fracture without strict dura closure: a prudent choice in selected patients?

Authors: Han-song Sheng, Nu Zhang, Jian Lin, Fen-chun Lin, Bo Yin, Mao-de Wang

Published in: Child's Nervous System | Issue 9/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

Surgical management of cranial burst fracture (CBF) usually involves craniotomy to remove the devitalized brain tissues, followed by watertight repair of dural tears. However, there were times when the dural tear was so extensive that a substantially large bone flap would have to be removed in order to expose the retracted dural margins before it could be repaired. In such cases, strict dural repair would incur a significantly higher risk of damages to the surrounding neural tissues and severe bleeding, especially when the fracture was in the vicinity of eloquent cortical areas and sinus. Basing on our own clinical experiences, we suggest strict dural closure is not mandatory for these selected patients.

Methods

A retrospective review of patients who underwent cranial surgery for CBF at our hospital was performed. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were performed to evaluate the extent of dural and brain laceration and the existence of extra-cranial cerebral tissues. Routine craniotomy was delivered to remove the lacerated brain tissues and evacuate the hematoma. The dural defect was only partially fixed with patient’s own tissues or artificial dura patch. Then the fractured bone flaps were restored using titanium micro plates and screws. Data including preoperative neurological status, surgery related complications, postoperative cranial fracture healing, and clinical outcomes were obtained through clinical and radiological examinations.

Results

From October 2004 to March 2013, a total of four patients diagnosed with CBF were treated by this dural closure sparing technique. Their average age was 18.4 months old and the average area of the skull defects was 91 cm2, with an average interval between primary injury and surgery of 13 days. The diagnosis of CBF was confirmed by intraoperative findings like extrusion of cerebral tissues out of the lacerated dura mater and skull defects. The postoperative courses were uneventful and all patients’ neurological functions improved after surgery. Postoperative three dimensional CT reconstruction of the cranial vault showed the skull fractures healed properly in all patients. No patient developed posttraumatic cerebrospinal fluid leak or epilepsy during the on average 24-month follow-up period.

Conclusions

In those selected cases of CBF in whom an extraordinary large craniotomy would be required to expose the entire retracted dura margins, given satisfactory evacuation of devitalized brain tissues and restoration of the bone flaps were achieved, we suggest strict dura closure is not compulsory.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ciurea AV, Gorgan MR, Tascu A, Sandu AM, Rizea RE (2011) Traumatic brain injury in infants and toddlers, 0-3 years old. J Med Life 4:234–243PubMedPubMedCentral Ciurea AV, Gorgan MR, Tascu A, Sandu AM, Rizea RE (2011) Traumatic brain injury in infants and toddlers, 0-3 years old. J Med Life 4:234–243PubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Donahue DJ, Sanford RA, Muhlbauer MS, Chadduck WM (1995) Cranial burst fracture in infants: acute recognition and management. Childs Nerv Syst 11:692–697CrossRefPubMed Donahue DJ, Sanford RA, Muhlbauer MS, Chadduck WM (1995) Cranial burst fracture in infants: acute recognition and management. Childs Nerv Syst 11:692–697CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Ellis TS, Vezina LG, Donahue DJ (2000) Acute identification of cranial burst fracture: comparison between CT and MR imaging findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21:795–801PubMed Ellis TS, Vezina LG, Donahue DJ (2000) Acute identification of cranial burst fracture: comparison between CT and MR imaging findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21:795–801PubMed
7.
go back to reference Matsuura H, Omama S, Yoshida Y, Fujiwara S, Honda T, Akasaka M, Kamei A, Ogasawara K (2012) Use of magnetic resonance imaging to identify the edge of a dural tear in an infant with growing skull fracture: a case study. Childs Nerv Syst 28:1951–1954. doi:10.1007/s00381-012-1891-9 CrossRefPubMed Matsuura H, Omama S, Yoshida Y, Fujiwara S, Honda T, Akasaka M, Kamei A, Ogasawara K (2012) Use of magnetic resonance imaging to identify the edge of a dural tear in an infant with growing skull fracture: a case study. Childs Nerv Syst 28:1951–1954. doi:10.​1007/​s00381-012-1891-9 CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Muhonen MG, Piper JG, Menezes AH (1995) Pathogenesis and treatment of growing skull fractures. Surg Neurol 43:367–372 discussion 372-363CrossRefPubMed Muhonen MG, Piper JG, Menezes AH (1995) Pathogenesis and treatment of growing skull fractures. Surg Neurol 43:367–372 discussion 372-363CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Oehmichen M, Meissner C, Saternus KS (2005) Fall or shaken: traumatic brain injury in children caused by falls or abuse at home—a review on biomechanics and diagnosis. Neuropediatrics 36:240–245. doi:10.1055/s-2005-872812 CrossRefPubMed Oehmichen M, Meissner C, Saternus KS (2005) Fall or shaken: traumatic brain injury in children caused by falls or abuse at home—a review on biomechanics and diagnosis. Neuropediatrics 36:240–245. doi:10.​1055/​s-2005-872812 CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Pinto PS, Meoded A, Poretti A, Tekes A, Huisman TA (2012) The unique features of traumatic brain injury in children. Review of the characteristics of the pediatric skull and brain, mechanisms of trauma, patterns of injury, complications, and their imaging findings—part 2. J Neuroimaging 22:e18–e41. doi:10.1111/j.1552-6569.2011.00690.x CrossRefPubMed Pinto PS, Meoded A, Poretti A, Tekes A, Huisman TA (2012) The unique features of traumatic brain injury in children. Review of the characteristics of the pediatric skull and brain, mechanisms of trauma, patterns of injury, complications, and their imaging findings—part 2. J Neuroimaging 22:e18–e41. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1552-6569.​2011.​00690.​x CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Pinto PS, Poretti A, Meoded A, Tekes A, Huisman TA (2012) The unique features of traumatic brain injury in children. Review of the characteristics of the pediatric skull and brain, mechanisms of trauma, patterns of injury, complications and their imaging findings—part 1. J Neuroimaging 22:e1–e17. doi:10.1111/j.1552-6569.2011.00688.x CrossRefPubMed Pinto PS, Poretti A, Meoded A, Tekes A, Huisman TA (2012) The unique features of traumatic brain injury in children. Review of the characteristics of the pediatric skull and brain, mechanisms of trauma, patterns of injury, complications and their imaging findings—part 1. J Neuroimaging 22:e1–e17. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1552-6569.​2011.​00688.​x CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Scarfo GB, Mariottini A, Tomaccini D, Palma L (1989) Growing skull fractures: progressive evolution of brain damage and effectiveness of surgical treatment. Childs Nerv Syst 5:163–167CrossRefPubMed Scarfo GB, Mariottini A, Tomaccini D, Palma L (1989) Growing skull fractures: progressive evolution of brain damage and effectiveness of surgical treatment. Childs Nerv Syst 5:163–167CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Delayed surgical repair of cranial burst fracture without strict dura closure: a prudent choice in selected patients?
Authors
Han-song Sheng
Nu Zhang
Jian Lin
Fen-chun Lin
Bo Yin
Mao-de Wang
Publication date
01-09-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Child's Nervous System / Issue 9/2016
Print ISSN: 0256-7040
Electronic ISSN: 1433-0350
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-016-3155-6

Other articles of this Issue 9/2016

Child's Nervous System 9/2016 Go to the issue