Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 8/2018

01-08-2018 | Original Article

The transgluteal approach to shockwave lithotripsy to treat distal ureter stones: a prospective, randomized, and multicenter study

Authors: Min Soo Choo, Jun Hyun Han, Jong Keun Kim, Tae Young Shin, Won Ki Lee, Sang Kon Lee, Seong Ho Lee

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 8/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

We compared the outcomes of SWL to treat distal ureter stones with regard to the conventional prone and supine positions using the transgluteal approach through the greater sciatic foramen.

Methods

A prospective, randomized, single-blind, and multicenter study was conducted between October 2014 and July 2015. The inclusion criteria were radio-opaque distal ureter stones with a maximum diameter of 0.5−2 cm as measured on a CT scan. The included 160 patients were randomly assigned to two groups: the prone group (n = 80; treated in the conventional prone position) and the transgluteal group (n = 80; treated in the supine position using a transgluteal approach). In the latter group, the focused shock wave was transmitted through the greater sciatic foramen with the head positioned at a 40° angle to the vertical. “Stone-free” was defined as the complete clearance of stone fragments, assessed using a CT scan at 2 weeks after treatment. Overall satisfaction was self-reported using a 0–5 Likert scale.

Results

The overall efficacy was 66.9%. The stone-free rate was significantly higher in the transgluteal group (72.6%) than in the prone group (54.7%; odds ratio 2.413, 95% CI 1.010−5.761, P = 0.023). No serious adverse events due to treatment were observed in either group. The satisfaction score of the transgluteal group was 4.21 ± 0.81, and 83.6% were willing to repeat the same procedure if necessary.

Conclusions

SWL using the transgluteal approach via a supine position through the greater sciatic foramen was more effective than via the conventional prone position. Furthermore, this approach provided a comparably safe and satisfactory procedure.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, Monga M, Murad MH, Nelson CP, Pace KT, Pais VM Jr, Pearle MS, Preminger GM, Razvi H, Shah O, Matlaga BR (2016) Surgical management of stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society guideline, part i. J Urol 196:1153–1160CrossRefPubMed Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, Monga M, Murad MH, Nelson CP, Pace KT, Pais VM Jr, Pearle MS, Preminger GM, Razvi H, Shah O, Matlaga BR (2016) Surgical management of stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society guideline, part i. J Urol 196:1153–1160CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Turk C, Neisius A, Petrik A, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Tepeler A, Thomas K (2018) Guidelines on urolithiasis. European Association of Urology. http://www.uroweb.org/gls/pdf/%Urolithisis_LR.pdf. Last accessed on 05 Feb 2018 Turk C, Neisius A, Petrik A, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Tepeler A, Thomas K (2018) Guidelines on urolithiasis. European Association of Urology. http://​www.​uroweb.​org/​gls/​pdf/​%Urolithisis_LR.pdf. Last accessed on 05 Feb 2018
3.
go back to reference Tiselius HG, Chaussy CG (2012) Aspects on how extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy should be carried out in order to be maximally effective. Urol Res 40:433–446CrossRefPubMed Tiselius HG, Chaussy CG (2012) Aspects on how extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy should be carried out in order to be maximally effective. Urol Res 40:433–446CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Semins MJ, Matlaga BR (2015) Strategies to optimize shock wave lithotripsy outcome: patient selection and treatment parameters. World J Nephrol 4:230–234CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Semins MJ, Matlaga BR (2015) Strategies to optimize shock wave lithotripsy outcome: patient selection and treatment parameters. World J Nephrol 4:230–234CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Hara N, Koike H, Bilim V, Takahashi K, Nishiyama T (2006) Efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy with patients rotated supine or rotated prone for treating ureteral stones: a case-control study. J Endourol 20:170–174CrossRefPubMed Hara N, Koike H, Bilim V, Takahashi K, Nishiyama T (2006) Efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy with patients rotated supine or rotated prone for treating ureteral stones: a case-control study. J Endourol 20:170–174CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Phipps S, Stephenson C, Tolley D (2013) Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy to distal ureteric stones: the transgluteal approach significantly increases stone-free rates. BJU Int 112:E129–E133CrossRefPubMed Phipps S, Stephenson C, Tolley D (2013) Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy to distal ureteric stones: the transgluteal approach significantly increases stone-free rates. BJU Int 112:E129–E133CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kamel M, Salem EA, Maarouf A, Abdalla M, Ragab A, Shahin AM (2015) Supine transgluteal vs prone position in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of distal ureteric stones. Urology 85:51–54CrossRefPubMed Kamel M, Salem EA, Maarouf A, Abdalla M, Ragab A, Shahin AM (2015) Supine transgluteal vs prone position in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of distal ureteric stones. Urology 85:51–54CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Guntekin E, Kukul E, Kayacan Z, Baykara M, Sevuk M (1994) Morbidity associated with patient positioning in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of distal ureteral calculi. Int Urol Nephrol 26:13–16CrossRefPubMed Guntekin E, Kukul E, Kayacan Z, Baykara M, Sevuk M (1994) Morbidity associated with patient positioning in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of distal ureteral calculi. Int Urol Nephrol 26:13–16CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Lu J, Sun X, He L (2010) Sciaticum majus foramen and sciaticum minus foramen as the path of SWL in the supine position to treat distal ureteral stone. Urol Res 38:417–420CrossRefPubMed Lu J, Sun X, He L (2010) Sciaticum majus foramen and sciaticum minus foramen as the path of SWL in the supine position to treat distal ureteral stone. Urol Res 38:417–420CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Sun X, He L, Lu J, Cong X, Shen L, Wang Y, Zhu H (2010) Greater and lesser ischiadic foramina as path of shock wave lithotripsy for distal ureteral stone in children. J Urol 184:665–668CrossRefPubMed Sun X, He L, Lu J, Cong X, Shen L, Wang Y, Zhu H (2010) Greater and lesser ischiadic foramina as path of shock wave lithotripsy for distal ureteral stone in children. J Urol 184:665–668CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Istanbulluoglu MO, Hoscan MB, Tekin MI, Cicek T, Ozturk B, Ozkardes H (2011) Shock wave lithotripsy for distal ureteric stones: supine or prone. Urol Res 39:177–180CrossRefPubMed Istanbulluoglu MO, Hoscan MB, Tekin MI, Cicek T, Ozturk B, Ozkardes H (2011) Shock wave lithotripsy for distal ureteric stones: supine or prone. Urol Res 39:177–180CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Galli R, Sighinolfi MC, Micali S, Martorana E, Rosa M, Mofferdin A, Bianchi G (2017) Advantages of the supine transgluteal approach for distal ureteral stone extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: outcomes based on CT characteristics. Minerva Urol Nefrol 69:189–194PubMed Galli R, Sighinolfi MC, Micali S, Martorana E, Rosa M, Mofferdin A, Bianchi G (2017) Advantages of the supine transgluteal approach for distal ureteral stone extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: outcomes based on CT characteristics. Minerva Urol Nefrol 69:189–194PubMed
13.
go back to reference Eisner BH, Kambadakone A, Monga M, Anderson JK, Thoreson AA, Lee H, Dretler SP, Sahani DV (2009) Computerized tomography magnified bone windows are superior to standard soft tissue windows for accurate measurement of stone size: an in vitro and clinical study. J Urol 181:1710–1715CrossRefPubMed Eisner BH, Kambadakone A, Monga M, Anderson JK, Thoreson AA, Lee H, Dretler SP, Sahani DV (2009) Computerized tomography magnified bone windows are superior to standard soft tissue windows for accurate measurement of stone size: an in vitro and clinical study. J Urol 181:1710–1715CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference El-Nahas AR, El-Assmy AM, Mansour O, Sheir KZ (2007) A prospective multivariate analysis of factors predicting stone disintegration by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the value of high-resolution noncontrast computed tomography. Eur Urol 51:1688–1693 (discussion 1693−1684) CrossRefPubMed El-Nahas AR, El-Assmy AM, Mansour O, Sheir KZ (2007) A prospective multivariate analysis of factors predicting stone disintegration by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the value of high-resolution noncontrast computed tomography. Eur Urol 51:1688–1693 (discussion 1693−1684) CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Zomorrodi A, Elahian A, Ghorbani N, Tavoosi A (2006) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in prone and supine positions for patients with upper ureteral calculi. Urol J 3:130–133PubMed Zomorrodi A, Elahian A, Ghorbani N, Tavoosi A (2006) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in prone and supine positions for patients with upper ureteral calculi. Urol J 3:130–133PubMed
17.
go back to reference Cleveland RO, McAteer JA (2012) Physics of shock-wave Lithotripsy. In: Smith AD, Badlani GH, Preminger GM, Kavoussi LR (eds) Smith’s textbook of endourology. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK, pp 527–558 Cleveland RO, McAteer JA (2012) Physics of shock-wave Lithotripsy. In: Smith AD, Badlani GH, Preminger GM, Kavoussi LR (eds) Smith’s textbook of endourology. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK, pp 527–558
18.
go back to reference Delius M, Enders G, Heine G, Stark J, Remberger K, Brendel W (1987) Biological effects of shock waves: lung hemorrhage by shock waves in dogs—pressure dependence. Ultrasound Med Biol 13:61–67CrossRefPubMed Delius M, Enders G, Heine G, Stark J, Remberger K, Brendel W (1987) Biological effects of shock waves: lung hemorrhage by shock waves in dogs—pressure dependence. Ultrasound Med Biol 13:61–67CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Rush EC, Freitas I, Plank LD (2009) Body size, body composition and fat distribution: comparative analysis of European, Maori, Pacific Island and Asian Indian adults. Br J Nutr 102:632–641CrossRefPubMed Rush EC, Freitas I, Plank LD (2009) Body size, body composition and fat distribution: comparative analysis of European, Maori, Pacific Island and Asian Indian adults. Br J Nutr 102:632–641CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Honey RJ, Ray AA, Ghiculete D, Pace KT (2010) Shock wave lithotripsy: a randomized, double-blind trial to compare immediate versus delayed voltage escalation. Urology 75:38–43CrossRefPubMed Honey RJ, Ray AA, Ghiculete D, Pace KT (2010) Shock wave lithotripsy: a randomized, double-blind trial to compare immediate versus delayed voltage escalation. Urology 75:38–43CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Parr NJ, Pye SD, Ritchie AW, Tolley DA (1992) Mechanisms responsible for diminished fragmentation of ureteral calculi: an experimental and clinical study. J Urol 148:1079–1083CrossRefPubMed Parr NJ, Pye SD, Ritchie AW, Tolley DA (1992) Mechanisms responsible for diminished fragmentation of ureteral calculi: an experimental and clinical study. J Urol 148:1079–1083CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The transgluteal approach to shockwave lithotripsy to treat distal ureter stones: a prospective, randomized, and multicenter study
Authors
Min Soo Choo
Jun Hyun Han
Jong Keun Kim
Tae Young Shin
Won Ki Lee
Sang Kon Lee
Seong Ho Lee
Publication date
01-08-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 8/2018
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2244-4

Other articles of this Issue 8/2018

World Journal of Urology 8/2018 Go to the issue