Top

Published in:

01-09-2017 | Topic Paper

Update of the ICUD-SIU consultation on stone technology behind ureteroscopy

Authors: Jonathan Cloutier, Ken Anson, Guido Giusti, Michael Grasso, Guido Kamphuis, Sven Lahme, Evangelos Liatsikos, Anup Patel, Margaret S. Pearle, Luc Valiquette, Olivier Traxer

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 9/2017

Abstract

Introduction

Ureteroscopy is now the most frequent treatment used around the world for stone disease. Technological advancement, efficiency, safety, and minimally invasiveness of this procedure are some of the reasons for this change of trend.

Materials and methods

In this review of the literature, a search of the PubMed database was conducted to identify articles related to ureteroscopy and accessories. The committee assigned by the International Consultation on Urological Disease reviewed all the data and produced a consensus statement relating to the ureteroscopy and all the particularities around this procedure.

Conclusion

This manuscript provides literatures and recommendations for endourologists to keep them informed in regard to the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative consideration in regard of a ureteroscopy.

Scales CD Jr, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS (2012) Prevalence of kidney stones in United States. Eur Urol 62(1):160–165CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

de la Rosette J, Denstedt J, Geavlete P et al (2014) The clinical research office of the endourological society ureteroscopy global study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 11,885 patients. J Endourol 28(2):131–139CrossRefPubMed

Bourdoumis A, Stasinou T, Kachrilas S et al (2014) Thromboprophylaxis and bleeding diathesis in minimally invasive stone surgery. Nat Rev Urol 11(1):51–58CrossRefPubMed

Fulgham PF, Assimos DS, Pearle MS, Preminger GM (2013) Clinical effectiveness protocols for imaging in the management of ureteral calculous disease: AUA technology assessment. J Urol 189(4):1203–1213CrossRefPubMed

Giusti G, Proietti S, Peschechera R et al (2014) Sky is no limit for URS: extending the indications and special circumstances. World J Urol 33(2):257–273CrossRefPubMed

Kandasami SV, Mamoulakis C, El-Nahas AR et al (2014) Impact of case volume on outcomes of ureteroscopy for ureteral stones: the clinical research office of the endourological society ureteroscopy global study. Eur Urol 66(6):1046–1051CrossRefPubMed

Park HK, Paick SH, Oh SJ, Kim HH (2004) Ureteroscopic lithotripsy under local anesthesia: analysis of the effectiveness and patient tolerability. Eur Urol 45(5):670–673CrossRefPubMed

Grabe M, Bartoletti R, Johansen TEB, Cai T, Çek M, Köves B, Naber KG, Pickard RS, Tenke P, Wagenlehner F, Wullt B (2014) Guidelines on urological infections. Eur Assoc Urol. https://uroweb.org/wp-content/uploads/19-Urological-infections_LR2.pdf. Accessed 13 Nov 2015

Korkes F, Lopes-Neto AC, Mattos MH et al (2009) Patient position and semi-rigid ureteroscopy outcomes. Int Braz J Urol 35(5):542–547CrossRefPubMed

10.

Pan J, Xue W, Xia L et al (2014) Ureteroscopic lithotripsy in Trendelenburg position for proximal ureteral calculi: a prospective, randomized, comparative study. Int Urol Nephrol 46(10):1895–1901CrossRefPubMed

11.

Dickstein RJ, Kreshover JE, Babayan RK, Wang DS (2010) Is safety wire necessary during routine flexible ureteroscopy? J Endourol 24(10):1589–1592CrossRefPubMed

12.

Atis G, Arikan O, Gurbuz C et al (2013) Comparison of different ureteroscope sizes in treating ureteral calculi in adult patients. Urology 82:1231–1235CrossRefPubMed

13.

Deters LA, Dagrosa LM, Herrick BW et al (2014) Ultrasound guided ureteroscopy for the definitive management of ureteral stones: a randomized controlled trial. J Urol 192(6):1710–1713CrossRefPubMed

14.

Ng YH, Somani BK, Dennison A et al (2010) Irrigant flow and intrarenal pressure during flexible ureteroscopy: the effect of different access sheaths, working channel instruments, and hydrostatic pressure. J Endourol 24(12):1915–1920CrossRefPubMed

15.

Kourambas J, Byrne RR, Preminger GM (2001) Does a ureteral access sheath facilitate ureteroscopy? J Urol 165(3):789–793CrossRefPubMed

16.

Doizi S, Knoll T, Scoffone CM et al (2014) First clinical evaluation of a new innovative ureteral access sheath (Re-Trace): a European study. World J Urol 32:143–147CrossRefPubMed

17.

Cabrera FJ, Preminger GM, Lipkin ME (2014) Antiretropulsion devices. Curr Opin Urol 24(2):173–178CrossRefPubMed

18.

Ursiny M, Eisner BH (2013) Cost-effectiveness of anti-retropulsion devices for ureteroscopic lithotripsy. J Urol 189(5):1762–1766CrossRefPubMed

19.

Hendlin K, Weiland D, Monga M (2008) Impact of irrigation systems on stone migration. J Endourol 22(3):453–458CrossRefPubMed

20.

Shalaby E, Ahmed AF, Maarouf A et al (2013) Randomized controlled trial to compare the safety and efficacy of tamsulosin, solifenacin, and combination of both in treatment of double-j stent-related lower urinary symptoms. Adv Urol 2013:752382CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Haleblian G, Kijvikai K, de la Rosette J, Preminger G (2008) Ureteral stenting and urinary stone management: a systematic review. J Urol 179(2):424–430CrossRefPubMed

22.

Somani BK, Desai M, Traxer O, Lahme S (2014) Stone-free rate (SFR): a new proposal for defining levels of SFR. Urolithiasis 42(2):95CrossRefPubMed

23.

Pearle MS, Lingeman JE, Leveillee R et al (2008) Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less. J Urol 179(5 suppl):S69–S73CrossRefPubMed

24.

Sener NC, Imamoglu MA, Bas O et al (2014) Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower pole stones smaller than 1 cm. Urolithiasis 42(2):127–131CrossRefPubMed

25.

Kumar A, Kumar N, Vasudeva P et al (2015) A prospective randomized comparison between shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and miniperc for treatment of 1–2 cm radiolucent lower calyceal renal calculi: a single centre experience. J Urol 193(1):160–164CrossRefPubMed

26.

Aboumarzouk O, Monga M, Kat SG et al (2012) flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for stones >2 cm : a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol 26(10):1257–1263CrossRefPubMed

27.

Breda A, Ogunyemi O, Leppert J, Schulam P (2009) Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for multiple unilateral intrarenal stones. Eur Urol 55(5):1190–1196CrossRefPubMed

28.

Geavlete P, Georgescu D, Nita G et al (2006) Complications of 2735 retrograde semirigid ureteroscopy procedures: a single-center experience. J Endourol 20:179–185CrossRefPubMed

29.

Georgescu D, Mulţescu R, Geavlete B, Geavlete P (2014) Intraoperative complications after 8150 semirigid ureteroscopies for ureteral lithiasis: risk analysis and management. Chirurgia 109(3):369–374PubMed

30.

Castro Perez, Osther P, Jinga V et al (2014) Differences in ureteroscopic stone treatment and outcomes for distal, mid-, proximal, or multiple ureteral locations: the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Ureteroscopy Global Study. Eur Urol 66(1):102–109CrossRef

Title: Update of the ICUD-SIU consultation on stone technology behind ureteroscopy
Authors: Jonathan Cloutier
Ken Anson
Guido Giusti
Michael Grasso
Guido Kamphuis
Sven Lahme
Evangelos Liatsikos
Anup Patel
Margaret S. Pearle
Luc Valiquette
Olivier Traxer
Publication date: 01-09-2017
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: World Journal of Urology / Issue 9/2017
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-017-2073-x

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Update of the ICUD-SIU consultation on stone technology behind ureteroscopy

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

Conclusion

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 9/2017

Urolithiasis: evaluation, dietary factors, and medical management: an update of the 2014 SIU-ICUD international consultation on stone disease

Is there room for behavioral and modifiable health-related targets in the lower urinary tract symptoms’ scenario

Integration of MRI to clinical nomogram for predicting pathological stage before radical prostatectomy

Shockwave lithotripsy: techniques for improving outcomes

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: technique

Epidemiology of stone disease across the world