Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 1/2014

01-02-2014 | Original Article

First clinical evaluation of a new innovative ureteral access sheath (Re-Trace™): a European study

Authors: Steeve Doizi, Thomas Knoll, Cesare M. Scoffone, Alberto Breda, Marianne Brehmer, Evangelos Liatsikos, Jean-Nicolas Cornu, Olivier Traxer

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The use of a ureteral access sheath (UAS) during flexible retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) has become increasingly popular. Our aim was to evaluate the accessibility of a new UAS device, allowing the transformation of the working guidewire into a safety guidewire.

Methods

A prospective, multicenter study was conducted between January and February 2010 in six European tertiary reference centers. Patients needing flexible RIRS were eligible to participate in the study. In all cases, insertion of the Re-Trace™ (12/14Fr, Coloplast, Denmark) was attempted at the beginning of the procedure. Insertion success was defined as placement of the UAS in the lumbar ureter with successful disengagement of the working guidewire, which turned into a safety guidewire. Influence of gender and pre-stenting status was analyzed by univariate analysis.

Results

137 UASs were used in 75 male and 62 female patients. 25.5 % of ureters were pre-stented: men were 2.17 more often pre-stented than women. The overall Re-Trace™ insertion rate was 82.5 %. Success rate was not significantly different between men and women (77.3 vs. 88.7 %, respectively, p = 0.11). Pre-stenting status did not significantly influence the success rate (p = 0.31). When analyzing the combined influence of pre-stenting status and gender, the worst success rates seemed to be obtained in men without pre-stenting, but no significant differences were found between groups.

Conclusions

Re-Trace™ UAS showed good overall insertion rates. This evaluation validated the new concept of guidewire disengagement: A single wire automatically switches from working to safety role.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Newman RC, Hunter PT, Hawkins IF et al (1985) A general ureteral dilator-sheathing system. Urology 25:287–288PubMedCrossRef Newman RC, Hunter PT, Hawkins IF et al (1985) A general ureteral dilator-sheathing system. Urology 25:287–288PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Vanlangendonck R, Landman J (2004) Ureteral access strategies: pro-access sheath. Urol Clin North Am 31:71–81PubMedCrossRef Vanlangendonck R, Landman J (2004) Ureteral access strategies: pro-access sheath. Urol Clin North Am 31:71–81PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Rich M, Lee WJ, Smith AD (1987) Applications of the peelaway introducer sheath. J Urol 137:452–454PubMed Rich M, Lee WJ, Smith AD (1987) Applications of the peelaway introducer sheath. J Urol 137:452–454PubMed
4.
go back to reference Takayasu H, Aso Y (1974) Recent development for pyeloureteroscopy: guide tube method for its introduction into the ureter. J Urol 112:176–178PubMed Takayasu H, Aso Y (1974) Recent development for pyeloureteroscopy: guide tube method for its introduction into the ureter. J Urol 112:176–178PubMed
5.
go back to reference Auge BK, Pietrow PK, Lallas CD et al (2004) Ureteral access sheath provides protection against elevated renal pressures during routine flexible ureteroscopic stone manipulation. J Endourol 18:33–36PubMedCrossRef Auge BK, Pietrow PK, Lallas CD et al (2004) Ureteral access sheath provides protection against elevated renal pressures during routine flexible ureteroscopic stone manipulation. J Endourol 18:33–36PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kourambas J, Byrne RR, Preminger GM (2001) Does a ureteral access sheath facilitate ureteroscopy ? J Urol 165:789–793PubMedCrossRef Kourambas J, Byrne RR, Preminger GM (2001) Does a ureteral access sheath facilitate ureteroscopy ? J Urol 165:789–793PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference L’Esperance JO, Ekeruo WO, Scales CD Jr et al (2005) Effect of ureteral access sheath on stone-free rates in patients undergoing ureteroscopic management of renal calculi. Urology 66:252–255PubMedCrossRef L’Esperance JO, Ekeruo WO, Scales CD Jr et al (2005) Effect of ureteral access sheath on stone-free rates in patients undergoing ureteroscopic management of renal calculi. Urology 66:252–255PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Stern JM, Yiee J, Park S (2007) Safety and efficacy of ureteral access sheaths. J Endourol 21:119–123PubMedCrossRef Stern JM, Yiee J, Park S (2007) Safety and efficacy of ureteral access sheaths. J Endourol 21:119–123PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Traxer O, Thomas A (2012) Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery. J Urol (in press) Traxer O, Thomas A (2012) Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery. J Urol (in press)
10.
go back to reference Zelenko N, Coll D, Rosenfeld AT et al (2004) Normal ureter size on unenhanced helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:1039–1041PubMedCrossRef Zelenko N, Coll D, Rosenfeld AT et al (2004) Normal ureter size on unenhanced helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:1039–1041PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Shields JM, Tunuguntla HS, Bhalani VK et al (2009) Construction-related differences seen in ureteral access sheaths: comparison of reinforced versus nonreinforced ureteral access sheaths. Urology 73:241–244PubMedCrossRef Shields JM, Tunuguntla HS, Bhalani VK et al (2009) Construction-related differences seen in ureteral access sheaths: comparison of reinforced versus nonreinforced ureteral access sheaths. Urology 73:241–244PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ayyathurai R, Kanagarajah P, Shields J et al (2012) Single-center clinical comparison of two reinforced ureteral access sheaths for retrograde ureteroscopic treatment of urinary lithiasis. Int Urol Nephrol 44:409–414PubMedCrossRef Ayyathurai R, Kanagarajah P, Shields J et al (2012) Single-center clinical comparison of two reinforced ureteral access sheaths for retrograde ureteroscopic treatment of urinary lithiasis. Int Urol Nephrol 44:409–414PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
First clinical evaluation of a new innovative ureteral access sheath (Re-Trace™): a European study
Authors
Steeve Doizi
Thomas Knoll
Cesare M. Scoffone
Alberto Breda
Marianne Brehmer
Evangelos Liatsikos
Jean-Nicolas Cornu
Olivier Traxer
Publication date
01-02-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-013-1094-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

World Journal of Urology 1/2014 Go to the issue