Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 7/2016

01-07-2016 | Original Article

A national benchmark for the initial assessment of men with LUTS: data from the 2010 Royal College of Physicians National Audit of Continence Care

Authors: W. Gibson, D. Harari, J. Husk, D. Lowe, A. Wagg

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 7/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To assess the degree of adherence to the current National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines on the management of urinary incontinence (UI) in men.

Design

Retrospective survey of male patients with UI in primary and acute hospital (AH) care as part of a national audit.

Setting

NHS AH and primary care (PC) trusts.

Sample

Twenty-five men <65 years old and 25 men ≥65 years old from each participating site.

Methods

All NHS trusts in England, Wales Northern Ireland and Channel Islands were eligible to participate. A web-based data collection form aligned to the NICE guidelines was constructed for the study. All data submitted to the audit were anonymous, and access to the web tool was password protected for confidentiality.

Results

Data were returned by 80 % (128/161) of acute trusts and 52 % (75/144) of PC trusts in England, and 71 % (10/14) of combined trusts from Northern Ireland, Wales and the Channel Islands including data on 559 men <65 and 1271 65+ from 141 sites within acute hospitals and 445 men <65 and 826 men 65+ in PC, a total of 3101 participants.

Conclusion

The majority of men seen within the NHS with LUTS do not receive management according to evidence-informed NICE guidelines; in general, older men are less likely to receive care that meets guideline standards than younger men.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Irwin DE, Milsom I, Hunskaar S et al (2006) Population-based survey of urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, and other lower urinary tract symptoms in five countries: results of the EPIC study. Eur Urol 50(6):1306–1314 (discussion 1314–1305) CrossRefPubMed Irwin DE, Milsom I, Hunskaar S et al (2006) Population-based survey of urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, and other lower urinary tract symptoms in five countries: results of the EPIC study. Eur Urol 50(6):1306–1314 (discussion 1314–1305) CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Billington A (2010) How to ensure effective management of lower urinary tract symptoms in adult men. Nurs Times 106(24):22–28 Billington A (2010) How to ensure effective management of lower urinary tract symptoms in adult men. Nurs Times 106(24):22–28
4.
go back to reference Rees J (2010) Nice guideline on lower urinary tract symptoms in men. Trends Urol Men’s Health 1(2):34–37CrossRef Rees J (2010) Nice guideline on lower urinary tract symptoms in men. Trends Urol Men’s Health 1(2):34–37CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Jones C, Hill J, Chapple C (2010) Management of lower urinary tract symptoms in men: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 340:c2354CrossRefPubMed Jones C, Hill J, Chapple C (2010) Management of lower urinary tract symptoms in men: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 340:c2354CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Oelke M, Bachmann A, Descazeaud A et al (2013) EAU guidelines on the treatment and follow-up of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms including benign prostatic obstruction. Eur Urol 64(1):118–140CrossRefPubMed Oelke M, Bachmann A, Descazeaud A et al (2013) EAU guidelines on the treatment and follow-up of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms including benign prostatic obstruction. Eur Urol 64(1):118–140CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Good Practice in Continence Services (2000). In: Health Do (ed). HMSO, London Good Practice in Continence Services (2000). In: Health Do (ed). HMSO, London
8.
go back to reference Wagg A, Potter J, Peel P, Irwin P, Lowe D, Pearson M (2008) National audit of continence care for older people: management of urinary incontinence. Age Ageing 37(1):39–44CrossRefPubMed Wagg A, Potter J, Peel P, Irwin P, Lowe D, Pearson M (2008) National audit of continence care for older people: management of urinary incontinence. Age Ageing 37(1):39–44CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Potter J, Peel P, Mian S et al (2007) National audit of continence care for older people: management of faecal incontinence. Age Ageing 36(3):268–273CrossRefPubMed Potter J, Peel P, Mian S et al (2007) National audit of continence care for older people: management of faecal incontinence. Age Ageing 36(3):268–273CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Wagg A, Duckett J, McClurg D, Harari D, Lowe D (2011) To what extent are national guidelines for the management of urinary incontinence in women adhered? Data from a national audit. BJOG 118(13):1592–1600CrossRefPubMed Wagg A, Duckett J, McClurg D, Harari D, Lowe D (2011) To what extent are national guidelines for the management of urinary incontinence in women adhered? Data from a national audit. BJOG 118(13):1592–1600CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Wagg A, Lowe D, Peel P, Potter J (2008) Continence care for older people in England and Wales: data from a national audit. J Wound Ostomy Cont Nurs 35(2):215–220CrossRef Wagg A, Lowe D, Peel P, Potter J (2008) Continence care for older people in England and Wales: data from a national audit. J Wound Ostomy Cont Nurs 35(2):215–220CrossRef
13.
go back to reference The essence of care: patient-focused benchmarking for health care practitioners (2001). In: Health Do (ed). HMSO The essence of care: patient-focused benchmarking for health care practitioners (2001). In: Health Do (ed). HMSO
14.
go back to reference All Party Parliamentary Group For Continence Care (2012) All Party Parliamentary Group for Continence Care Survey Report 2012. London, UK All Party Parliamentary Group For Continence Care (2012) All Party Parliamentary Group for Continence Care Survey Report 2012. London, UK
15.
go back to reference Department of Health (2000) Good practice in continence services. London, UK Department of Health (2000) Good practice in continence services. London, UK
16.
go back to reference Wagg AS, Newman DK, Leichsenring K, van Houten P (2014) Developing an internationally-applicable service specification for continence care: systematic review, evidence synthesis and expert consensus. PLoS One 9(8):e104129CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wagg AS, Newman DK, Leichsenring K, van Houten P (2014) Developing an internationally-applicable service specification for continence care: systematic review, evidence synthesis and expert consensus. PLoS One 9(8):e104129CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Burgio KL, Ives DG, Locher JL, Arena VC, Kuller LH (1994) Treatment seeking for urinary incontinence in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 42(2):208–212CrossRefPubMed Burgio KL, Ives DG, Locher JL, Arena VC, Kuller LH (1994) Treatment seeking for urinary incontinence in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 42(2):208–212CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Horrocks S, Somerset M, Stoddart H, Peters TJ (2004) What prevents older people from seeking treatment for urinary incontinence? A qualitative exploration of barriers to the use of community continence services. Fam Pract 21(6):689–696CrossRefPubMed Horrocks S, Somerset M, Stoddart H, Peters TJ (2004) What prevents older people from seeking treatment for urinary incontinence? A qualitative exploration of barriers to the use of community continence services. Fam Pract 21(6):689–696CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Teunissen D, van Weel C, Lagro-Janssen T (2005) Urinary incontinence in older people living in the community: examining help-seeking behaviour. Br J Gen Pract 55(519):776–782PubMedPubMedCentral Teunissen D, van Weel C, Lagro-Janssen T (2005) Urinary incontinence in older people living in the community: examining help-seeking behaviour. Br J Gen Pract 55(519):776–782PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
A national benchmark for the initial assessment of men with LUTS: data from the 2010 Royal College of Physicians National Audit of Continence Care
Authors
W. Gibson
D. Harari
J. Husk
D. Lowe
A. Wagg
Publication date
01-07-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 7/2016
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1702-5

Other articles of this Issue 7/2016

World Journal of Urology 7/2016 Go to the issue