Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 5/2014

01-10-2014 | Original Article

Transperineal reanastomosis for the treatment for highly recurrent anastomotic strictures as a last option before urinary diversion

Authors: Christoph Philip Reiss, Daniel Pfalzgraf, Luis Alex Kluth, Armin Soave, Margit Fisch, Roland Dahlem

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 5/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate safety and efficacy of open transperineal reanastomosis (TPRA) for highly recurrent anastomotic strictures (AS) after radical prostatectomy. While the majority of AS can be managed successfully by endoscopic treatment, in highly recurrent AS, open reanastomosis represents a viable therapeutic option.

Methods

Retrospective analysis by standardized questionnaire, inquiring for recurrence, incontinence, sexual function, satisfaction and changes in quality of life (QoL) in 15 patients undergoing TPRA 08/2007–03/2010.

Results

Mean patient age was 65 years (51–75) and mean follow-up 20.5 months (5.8–37.0). Success rate was 93.3 % (14/15). The single recurrence was successfully treated by cold knife incision. Incontinence was found in 93.3 % (14/15) preoperatively and aggravated in 60 % (9/15) after surgery; no de novo incontinence occurred. Implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) has been performed successfully in 10 patients, 2 refused implantation and 2 are scheduled for surgery. Erectile dysfunction was present in 86.7 % (13/15); 13.3 % (2/15) reported a severely declined rigidity. Compared to preoperative status, 33.3 % (5/15) complained about impaired erectile function after TPRA. A good or very good subjective overall health status and an improvement in QoL were noted in 86.7 % (13/15). Patient satisfaction with the outcome of TPRA was high or very high in 13; two were undecided.

Conclusions

After repeated endoscopic treatment, TPRA is a valuable therapeutic option in selected patients with an overall success rate of 93.3 % (14/15) for anastomotic patency, which can even be raised to 100 % by further transurethral surgery. Incontinence can be easily treated by implantation of an AUS.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
3.
go back to reference Kao TC, Cruess DF, Garner D, Foley J, Seay T, Friedrichs P, Thrasher JB, Mooneyhan RD, McLeod DG, Moul JW (2000) Multicenter patient self-reporting questionnaire on impotence, incontinence and stricture after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 163(3):858–864PubMedCrossRef Kao TC, Cruess DF, Garner D, Foley J, Seay T, Friedrichs P, Thrasher JB, Mooneyhan RD, McLeod DG, Moul JW (2000) Multicenter patient self-reporting questionnaire on impotence, incontinence and stricture after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 163(3):858–864PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Surya BV, Provet J, Johanson KE, Brown J (1990) Anastomotic strictures following radical prostatectomy: risk factors and management. J Urol 143(4):755–758PubMed Surya BV, Provet J, Johanson KE, Brown J (1990) Anastomotic strictures following radical prostatectomy: risk factors and management. J Urol 143(4):755–758PubMed
6.
go back to reference Tomschi W, Suster G, Holtl W (1998) Bladder neck strictures after radical retropubic prostatectomy: still an unsolved problem. Br J Urol 81(6):823–826PubMedCrossRef Tomschi W, Suster G, Holtl W (1998) Bladder neck strictures after radical retropubic prostatectomy: still an unsolved problem. Br J Urol 81(6):823–826PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Popken G, Sommerkamp H, Schultze-Seemann W, Wetterauer U, Katzenwadel A (1998) Anastomotic stricture after radical prostatectomy: incidence, findings and treatment. Eur Urol 33(4):382–386.PubMedCrossRef Popken G, Sommerkamp H, Schultze-Seemann W, Wetterauer U, Katzenwadel A (1998) Anastomotic stricture after radical prostatectomy: incidence, findings and treatment. Eur Urol 33(4):382–386.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Theodoros C, Katsifotis C, Stournaras P, Moutzouris G, Katsoulis A, Floratos D (2000) Abdomino-perineal repair of recurrent and complex bladder neck-prostatic urethra contractures. Eur Urol 38 (6):734–740. discussion 740–731 Theodoros C, Katsifotis C, Stournaras P, Moutzouris G, Katsoulis A, Floratos D (2000) Abdomino-perineal repair of recurrent and complex bladder neck-prostatic urethra contractures. Eur Urol 38 (6):734–740. discussion 740–731
12.
go back to reference Simonato A, Gregori A, Lissiani A, Carmignani G (2007) Two-stage transperineal management of posterior urethral strictures or bladder neck contractures associated with urinary incontinence after prostate surgery and endoscopic treatment failures. Eur Urol 52(5):1499–1504. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2007.03.053 PubMedCrossRef Simonato A, Gregori A, Lissiani A, Carmignani G (2007) Two-stage transperineal management of posterior urethral strictures or bladder neck contractures associated with urinary incontinence after prostate surgery and endoscopic treatment failures. Eur Urol 52(5):1499–1504. doi:10.​1016/​j.​eururo.​2007.​03.​053 PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Agota Szende MOaFdC (2007) Comparative review of Time Trade-Off value sets Springer Agota Szende MOaFdC (2007) Comparative review of Time Trade-Off value sets Springer
15.
go back to reference Tsutsumi M, Ishikawa S, Hinotsu S (2004) Bladder neck contraction after radical prostatectomy: morbidity and risk factors. Hinyokika Kiyo 50(6):397–400PubMed Tsutsumi M, Ishikawa S, Hinotsu S (2004) Bladder neck contraction after radical prostatectomy: morbidity and risk factors. Hinyokika Kiyo 50(6):397–400PubMed
16.
go back to reference Ramchandani P, Banner MP, Berlin JW, Dannenbaum MS, Wein AJ (1994) Vesicourethral anastomotic strictures after radical prostatectomy: efficacy of transurethral balloon dilation. Radiology 193(2):345–349PubMedCrossRef Ramchandani P, Banner MP, Berlin JW, Dannenbaum MS, Wein AJ (1994) Vesicourethral anastomotic strictures after radical prostatectomy: efficacy of transurethral balloon dilation. Radiology 193(2):345–349PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Giannarini G, Manassero F, Mogorovich A, Valent F, De Maria M, Pistolesi D, De Antoni P, Selli C (2008) Cold-knife incision of anastomotic strictures after radical retropubic prostatectomy with bladder neck preservation: efficacy and impact on urinary continence status. Eur Urol 54(3):647–656. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2007.12.013 PubMedCrossRef Giannarini G, Manassero F, Mogorovich A, Valent F, De Maria M, Pistolesi D, De Antoni P, Selli C (2008) Cold-knife incision of anastomotic strictures after radical retropubic prostatectomy with bladder neck preservation: efficacy and impact on urinary continence status. Eur Urol 54(3):647–656. doi:10.​1016/​j.​eururo.​2007.​12.​013 PubMedCrossRef
18.
19.
20.
go back to reference Mundy A AD (2012) The surgical correction of bladder neck contracture (BNC) following the treatment of prostate cancer. J Urol 187 (4S (supplement)):e38 Mundy A AD (2012) The surgical correction of bladder neck contracture (BNC) following the treatment of prostate cancer. J Urol 187 (4S (supplement)):e38
21.
go back to reference Mark S, Perez LM, Webster GD (1994) Synchronous management of anastomotic contracture and stress urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy. J Urol 151(5):1202–1204PubMed Mark S, Perez LM, Webster GD (1994) Synchronous management of anastomotic contracture and stress urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy. J Urol 151(5):1202–1204PubMed
Metadata
Title
Transperineal reanastomosis for the treatment for highly recurrent anastomotic strictures as a last option before urinary diversion
Authors
Christoph Philip Reiss
Daniel Pfalzgraf
Luis Alex Kluth
Armin Soave
Margit Fisch
Roland Dahlem
Publication date
01-10-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 5/2014
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-013-1180-6

Other articles of this Issue 5/2014

World Journal of Urology 5/2014 Go to the issue