Published in:
01-02-2014 | Topic Paper
The ineligible patient: how to treat patients not included in clinical studies
Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 1/2014
Login to get accessAbstract
Purpose
Targeted therapies are currently the standard of care for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Five VEGF pathway inhibitors (sorafenib, sunitinib, bevacizumab in combination with interferon-alpha, pazopanib, and axitinib) and two mTOR inhibitors (everolimus and temsirolimus) are now FDA approved for mRCC based on results from phase III randomized clinical trials (RCTs). However, several subgroups of patients are excluded from enrollment due to strict eligibility criteria. The toxicity and efficacy of targeted therapies in these populations are unknown.
Methods
PubMed was searched for citations of the pivotal phase III RCTs leading to FDA approval. These publications were cross-referenced with their associated entries on www.ClinicalTrials.gov, and both were abstracted for eligibility criteria for patient enrollment. Based on this data, PubMed was searched for both prospective and retrospective studies evaluating toxicity and efficacy of targeted therapies for mRCC in these ineligible patient subgroups.
Results
We reviewed published toxicity and efficacy data in several ineligible patient subgroups, including patients with non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma, poor performance status, poor renal function, CNS metastases, significant cardiac comorbidities, and prior systemic therapy.
Conclusions
Targeted therapies appear to be safe in most ineligible patient populations, including patients with poor renal function. However, patients with preexisting cardiac comorbidities are at greater risk of developing cardiac toxicity on sunitinib. Targeted therapies appear to have some efficacy in maintaining stable disease in these subgroups, but are limited to rare partial responses. Prospective cohort studies are needed to accurately assess the safety and efficacy of targeted therapies in ineligible patient subgroups.