Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 6/2008

01-12-2008 | Topic Paper

Analysis of complications from 600 retroperitoneoscopic procedures of the upper urinary tract during the last 10 years

Authors: Dimitri Liapis, Alexandre de la Taille, Guillaume Ploussard, Grégoire Robert, Laurence Bastien, Andras Hoznek, Dimitri Vordos, Claude Abbou, Laurent Salomon

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 6/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of this study is to review 10 years experience of retroperitoneoscopy procedures.

Methods

A total of 600 patients treated between 1995 and 2007 by retroperitoneoscopy (nephrectomy, partial and total nephrectomy, adrenalectomy, pyeloplasty, renal cyst, calyceal diverticulectomy) were reviewed for per, peri and postoperative complications including patients in the learning curve.

Results

The mean blood loss was 159 mL. Conversion to open surgery was required in 28 patients (4.6%) primarily due to technical problems during dissection (elective). There were 32 (5.3%) surgical complications, including bleeding or hematomas in 12 cases and 2 of them required reintervention, urinomas in 8 which were treated by installation of a ureteral drainage (JJ stent). Wound or deep abscesses happened in four, urinary fistula in one and pancreatic fistula in another. Evisceration (hernias) was seen in three patients. Intestinal injury occurred in two. The complication rate depended on the difficulty of the procedure and learning curve of the surgeon. A total of 28 patients (4.6%) presented medical postoperative complications (hyperthermias, deep venous thrombosis, pyelonephritis, pulmonary superinfections, pulmonary atelectasia and transient vascular ischemic accident). Mean postoperative hospital stay was 6.2 days (ranged from 2 to 20).

Conclusion

Retroperitoneoscopy can be the technique of choice for accessing and carrying out all the surgery of the upper urinary tract respecting the principles of oncological surgery. After experience with 600 cases during the last 10 years the technique has become safe, simplified, reproducible and effective although not easy. Most complications are minor and easily managed.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ, Dierks SM, Meretyk S, Darcy MD, Roemer FD, Pingleton ED, Thomson PG, Long SR (1991) Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J Urol 146:278–282PubMed Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ, Dierks SM, Meretyk S, Darcy MD, Roemer FD, Pingleton ED, Thomson PG, Long SR (1991) Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J Urol 146:278–282PubMed
2.
go back to reference Wittmoser R (1973) Die Retroperitoneoskopie als neue Methode der lumbalen Sympathikotomie. Fortschr Endoskopie 4:219 Wittmoser R (1973) Die Retroperitoneoskopie als neue Methode der lumbalen Sympathikotomie. Fortschr Endoskopie 4:219
3.
go back to reference Wickham JEA (1979) The surgical treatment of renal lithiasis. In: Wickham JEA (ed) Urinary calculus disease. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 145–198 Wickham JEA (1979) The surgical treatment of renal lithiasis. In: Wickham JEA (ed) Urinary calculus disease. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 145–198
4.
go back to reference Gaur D (1992) Laparoscopic operative retroperitoneoscopy: use of a new device. J Urol 148:1137–1138PubMed Gaur D (1992) Laparoscopic operative retroperitoneoscopy: use of a new device. J Urol 148:1137–1138PubMed
5.
go back to reference Gaur DD, Agarwal DK, Purohit KC (1993) Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J Urol 149:103–105PubMed Gaur DD, Agarwal DK, Purohit KC (1993) Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J Urol 149:103–105PubMed
7.
go back to reference Gaur DD, Agarwal DK, Purohit KC, Darshane AS (1994) Retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy. J Urol 151:927–930PubMed Gaur DD, Agarwal DK, Purohit KC, Darshane AS (1994) Retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy. J Urol 151:927–930PubMed
8.
go back to reference Kavoussi LR, Sosa E, Chandhoke P et al (1993) Complications of laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection. J Urol 149:322–325PubMed Kavoussi LR, Sosa E, Chandhoke P et al (1993) Complications of laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection. J Urol 149:322–325PubMed
9.
go back to reference Master JE, Fraundorfer MR, Gilling PJ (1994) Extraperitoneal laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection using the Gaur balloon technique. Br J Urol 74:128–129 Master JE, Fraundorfer MR, Gilling PJ (1994) Extraperitoneal laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection using the Gaur balloon technique. Br J Urol 74:128–129
10.
go back to reference Munch LC, Delworth MG, Gill IS (1993) Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. J Endourol 7:137–138 Munch LC, Delworth MG, Gill IS (1993) Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. J Endourol 7:137–138
11.
go back to reference Sinha R, Sharma N (1997) Retroperitoneal laparoscopic management of urolithiasis. Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 7:95–98CrossRef Sinha R, Sharma N (1997) Retroperitoneal laparoscopic management of urolithiasis. Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 7:95–98CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Rassweiler JJ, Seemann O, Frede T, Henkel TO, Alken P (1998) Retroperitoneoscopy: experience with 200 cases. J Urol 160:1265–1268PubMedCrossRef Rassweiler JJ, Seemann O, Frede T, Henkel TO, Alken P (1998) Retroperitoneoscopy: experience with 200 cases. J Urol 160:1265–1268PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference McDougall EM, Dayman RV, Fadden PT (1994) Retroperitoneoscopy: the Washington University Medical School experience. Urology 43:446–450PubMedCrossRef McDougall EM, Dayman RV, Fadden PT (1994) Retroperitoneoscopy: the Washington University Medical School experience. Urology 43:446–450PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Gill IS, Dayman RV, Albala DM, Aso Y et al (1998) Retroperitoneal and pelvic extraperitoneal laparoscopy: an international perspective. Urology 52:566–571PubMedCrossRef Gill IS, Dayman RV, Albala DM, Aso Y et al (1998) Retroperitoneal and pelvic extraperitoneal laparoscopy: an international perspective. Urology 52:566–571PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Gasman D, Saint F, Barthelemy Y, Antiphon P, Chopin D, Abbou CC (1996) Retroperitoneoscopy: a laparoscopic approach for adrenal and renal surgery. Urology 476:801–806CrossRef Gasman D, Saint F, Barthelemy Y, Antiphon P, Chopin D, Abbou CC (1996) Retroperitoneoscopy: a laparoscopic approach for adrenal and renal surgery. Urology 476:801–806CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Cicco A, Salomon L, Hoznek A, Saint F, Alame W, Gasman D, Antiphon P, Chopin DK, Abbou CC (2001) Results of retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Endourol 154:355–359CrossRef Cicco A, Salomon L, Hoznek A, Saint F, Alame W, Gasman D, Antiphon P, Chopin DK, Abbou CC (2001) Results of retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Endourol 154:355–359CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hoznek A, Salomon L, Antiphon P, Radier C, Hafiani M, Chopin DK, Abbou CC (1999) Partial nephrectomy with retroperitoneal laparoscopy. J Urol 1626:1922–1926CrossRef Hoznek A, Salomon L, Antiphon P, Radier C, Hafiani M, Chopin DK, Abbou CC (1999) Partial nephrectomy with retroperitoneal laparoscopy. J Urol 1626:1922–1926CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Salomon L, Soulie M, Mouly P, Saint F, Cicco A, Olsson E, Hoznek A, Antiphon P, Chopin D, Plante P, Abbou CC (2001) Experience with retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy in 115 procedures. J Urol 1661:38–41 Salomon L, Soulie M, Mouly P, Saint F, Cicco A, Olsson E, Hoznek A, Antiphon P, Chopin D, Plante P, Abbou CC (2001) Experience with retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy in 115 procedures. J Urol 1661:38–41
20.
go back to reference Yiou R, Delmas V, Chopin D, Abbou CC (2001) Anatomical basis of lumboscopy. Surg Radiol Anat 233:179–184CrossRef Yiou R, Delmas V, Chopin D, Abbou CC (2001) Anatomical basis of lumboscopy. Surg Radiol Anat 233:179–184CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Guillonneau B, Abbou CC, Doublet JD, Gaston R, Janetschek G, Mandressi A, Rassweiler JJ, Vallancien G (2001) Proposal for a “European Scoring System for Laparoscopic Operations in Urology”. Eur Urol 401:2–6CrossRef Guillonneau B, Abbou CC, Doublet JD, Gaston R, Janetschek G, Mandressi A, Rassweiler JJ, Vallancien G (2001) Proposal for a “European Scoring System for Laparoscopic Operations in Urology”. Eur Urol 401:2–6CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Chung HJ, Meng MV, Abrahams HM, Stoller ML (2000) Upper quadrant access for urologic laparoscopy. Urology 62:1117–1119CrossRef Chung HJ, Meng MV, Abrahams HM, Stoller ML (2000) Upper quadrant access for urologic laparoscopy. Urology 62:1117–1119CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Clayman RV, Ehrlich R, Evans R, Fuchs G, Gersham A, Hulbert JC, McDougall EM, Rosenthal T (1995) Complications of laparoscopic nephrectomy in 185 patients a multi-institutional review. J Urol 154:479–483PubMedCrossRef Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Clayman RV, Ehrlich R, Evans R, Fuchs G, Gersham A, Hulbert JC, McDougall EM, Rosenthal T (1995) Complications of laparoscopic nephrectomy in 185 patients a multi-institutional review. J Urol 154:479–483PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Fahlenkamp D, Rassweiler J, Fornara P, Frede T, Loening SA (1999) Complications of laparoscopic procedures in urology. Experience with 2407 procedures at 4 German centers. J Urol 162:765–768PubMedCrossRef Fahlenkamp D, Rassweiler J, Fornara P, Frede T, Loening SA (1999) Complications of laparoscopic procedures in urology. Experience with 2407 procedures at 4 German centers. J Urol 162:765–768PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Rassweiler J, Frede T, Henkel TO, Stock C, Alken P (1998) Nephrectomy: a comparative study between the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus the open approach. Eur Urol 33:489–496PubMedCrossRef Rassweiler J, Frede T, Henkel TO, Stock C, Alken P (1998) Nephrectomy: a comparative study between the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus the open approach. Eur Urol 33:489–496PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Keeley FX Jr, Tolley DA (1998) A review of our first 100 cases of laparoscopic nephrectomy: defining risk factors for complications. Br J Urol 82:615–618PubMed Keeley FX Jr, Tolley DA (1998) A review of our first 100 cases of laparoscopic nephrectomy: defining risk factors for complications. Br J Urol 82:615–618PubMed
28.
go back to reference Gill IS, Grune MT, Munch LC (1996) Access technique for retroperitoneoscopy. J Urol 156:1120–1124PubMedCrossRef Gill IS, Grune MT, Munch LC (1996) Access technique for retroperitoneoscopy. J Urol 156:1120–1124PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Sebe P, de la Taille A, Hoznek A, Chopin D, Abbou CC, Salomon L (2003) Simple nephrectomy with retroperitoneal laparoscopy. Prog Urol 13:577–580PubMed Sebe P, de la Taille A, Hoznek A, Chopin D, Abbou CC, Salomon L (2003) Simple nephrectomy with retroperitoneal laparoscopy. Prog Urol 13:577–580PubMed
30.
go back to reference Gill IS, Schweizer D, Hobart MG, Sung GT, Klein EA, Novick AC (2000) Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: the Cleveland clinic experience. J Urol 163:1665–1670PubMedCrossRef Gill IS, Schweizer D, Hobart MG, Sung GT, Klein EA, Novick AC (2000) Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: the Cleveland clinic experience. J Urol 163:1665–1670PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Kadji JF, Armand C, Gimbergues P, Blanc F, Tostain J (2001) Retrospective comparative study of extended nephrectomies by surgery and by retroperitoneal laparoscopy. Prog Urol 11:223–230PubMed Kadji JF, Armand C, Gimbergues P, Blanc F, Tostain J (2001) Retrospective comparative study of extended nephrectomies by surgery and by retroperitoneal laparoscopy. Prog Urol 11:223–230PubMed
32.
go back to reference Desai MM, Strzempkowski B, Matin SF, Steinberg AP, Ng C, Meraney AM, Kaouk JH, Gill IS (2005) Prospective randomized comparison of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 173:38–41PubMed Desai MM, Strzempkowski B, Matin SF, Steinberg AP, Ng C, Meraney AM, Kaouk JH, Gill IS (2005) Prospective randomized comparison of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 173:38–41PubMed
33.
go back to reference Thiel R, Adams JB, Schulam PG, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR (1996) Venous dissection injuries during laparoscopic urological surgery. J Urol 155:1874–1876PubMedCrossRef Thiel R, Adams JB, Schulam PG, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR (1996) Venous dissection injuries during laparoscopic urological surgery. J Urol 155:1874–1876PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Hoznek A, Salomon L, Gettman M, Stolzenburg JU, Abbou CC (2004) Justification of extraperitoneal laparoscopic access for surgery of the upper urinary tract. Curr Urol Rep 5:93–99PubMedCrossRef Hoznek A, Salomon L, Gettman M, Stolzenburg JU, Abbou CC (2004) Justification of extraperitoneal laparoscopic access for surgery of the upper urinary tract. Curr Urol Rep 5:93–99PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Parsons JK, Varkarakis I, Rha KH, Jarrett TW, Pinto PA, Kavoussi LR (2004) Complications of abdominal urologic laparoscopy: longitudinal five-years analysis. Urology 63:27–32PubMedCrossRef Parsons JK, Varkarakis I, Rha KH, Jarrett TW, Pinto PA, Kavoussi LR (2004) Complications of abdominal urologic laparoscopy: longitudinal five-years analysis. Urology 63:27–32PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Vallancien G, Cathelineau X, Baumert H, Doublet JD, Guillonneau B (2002) Complications of transperitoneal laparoscopic surgery in urology: review of 1,311 procedures at a single center. J Urol 168:23–26PubMedCrossRef Vallancien G, Cathelineau X, Baumert H, Doublet JD, Guillonneau B (2002) Complications of transperitoneal laparoscopic surgery in urology: review of 1,311 procedures at a single center. J Urol 168:23–26PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Bishoff JT, Allaf ME, Kirkels W, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR, Schroder F (1999) Laparoscopic bowel injury: incidence and clinical presentation. J Urol 161:887–890PubMedCrossRef Bishoff JT, Allaf ME, Kirkels W, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR, Schroder F (1999) Laparoscopic bowel injury: incidence and clinical presentation. J Urol 161:887–890PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Elashry OM, Giusti G, Nadler RB, McDoughall EM, Dayman RV (1997) Incisional hernia after laparoscopic nephrectomy with intact specimen removal: caveat emptor. J Urol 158:363–369PubMedCrossRef Elashry OM, Giusti G, Nadler RB, McDoughall EM, Dayman RV (1997) Incisional hernia after laparoscopic nephrectomy with intact specimen removal: caveat emptor. J Urol 158:363–369PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference McDougall EM, Clayman RV (1996) Laparoscopic nephrectomy for benign disease: comparison of the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approach. J Endourol 10:45–47PubMed McDougall EM, Clayman RV (1996) Laparoscopic nephrectomy for benign disease: comparison of the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approach. J Endourol 10:45–47PubMed
40.
go back to reference Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM (1997) Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery 111:518–526 Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM (1997) Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery 111:518–526
41.
go back to reference Permpongkosol S, Chan DY, Link RE, Sroka M, Allaf M, Varkarakis I, Lima G, Jarrett TW, Kavoussi LR (2005) Long-term survival analysis after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 174:1222–1225PubMedCrossRef Permpongkosol S, Chan DY, Link RE, Sroka M, Allaf M, Varkarakis I, Lima G, Jarrett TW, Kavoussi LR (2005) Long-term survival analysis after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 174:1222–1225PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Analysis of complications from 600 retroperitoneoscopic procedures of the upper urinary tract during the last 10 years
Authors
Dimitri Liapis
Alexandre de la Taille
Guillaume Ploussard
Grégoire Robert
Laurence Bastien
Andras Hoznek
Dimitri Vordos
Claude Abbou
Laurent Salomon
Publication date
01-12-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 6/2008
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-008-0319-3

Other articles of this Issue 6/2008

World Journal of Urology 6/2008 Go to the issue