Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 6/2008

01-12-2008 | Original Article

Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: Intermediate oncological results

Authors: Stéphane Larré, Chaker Kanso, Alexandre De La Taille, Andras Hoznek, Dimitrios Vordos, René Yiou, Clément-Claude Abbou, Laurent Salomon

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 6/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To report the intermediate oncological results of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy by retroperitoneal approach.

Methods

From 1995 to 2006, 146 consecutive patients with removal of a malignant kidney tumor by laparoscopic retroperitoneal radical nephrectomy were analysed retrospectively. The patients were followed clinically, biologically and radiologically every 6 months. Disease-free survival and specific survival were determined among patients free of metastasis at surgery.

Results

Patient’s average age was 61.1 years (25–85). The pathology of these cancers were: 108 clear cell carcinomas, 26 papillary carcinomas, 10 chromophobe carcinomas, and 2 miscellaneous. The T stage were: 105 pT1, 12 pT2, and 29 pT3 (TNM 2002). The Fuhrman grade were: I in 23 cases, II in 70 cases, III in 40 cases, and IV in 9 cases. The surgical margins were positive in 2. No port site recurrence occurred. The average follow-up was 35.4 months (1–137). Five patients had metastatic disease at presentation. Tumor progression was observed among 19 patients, in the form of a local (1) or remote recurrence (18). Fourteen patients died, including 7 because of their tumor. The disease-free survival at 5 and 10 years, were respectively 87.3 and 73.2%, and the cancer-specific survival were 96.2 and 92.0%, respectively.

Conclusions

The laparoscopic retroperitoneal radical nephrectomy offers intermediate oncological results compatible with appropriate carcinological efficacy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Robson CJ, Churchill BM, Anderson W (1969) The results of radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 101:297–301PubMed Robson CJ, Churchill BM, Anderson W (1969) The results of radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 101:297–301PubMed
2.
go back to reference Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ et al (1991) Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J Urol 146:278–282PubMed Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ et al (1991) Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J Urol 146:278–282PubMed
3.
go back to reference Gaur DD, Agarwal DK, Purohit KC (1993) Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J Urol 149:103–105PubMed Gaur DD, Agarwal DK, Purohit KC (1993) Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J Urol 149:103–105PubMed
4.
go back to reference Dillenburg W, Poulakis V, Skriapas K et al (2006) Retroperitoneoscopic versus open surgical radical nephrectomy for large renal cell carcinoma in clinical stage cT2 or cT3a: quality of life, pain and reconvalescence. Eur Urol 49:314–322 Discussion 22-3PubMedCrossRef Dillenburg W, Poulakis V, Skriapas K et al (2006) Retroperitoneoscopic versus open surgical radical nephrectomy for large renal cell carcinoma in clinical stage cT2 or cT3a: quality of life, pain and reconvalescence. Eur Urol 49:314–322 Discussion 22-3PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Abbou CC, Cicco A, Gasman D et al (1999) Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy. J Urol 161:1776–1780PubMedCrossRef Abbou CC, Cicco A, Gasman D et al (1999) Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy. J Urol 161:1776–1780PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Cicco A, Salomon L, Hoznek A et al (2001) Results of retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Endourol 15:355–359 Discussion 75-6PubMedCrossRef Cicco A, Salomon L, Hoznek A et al (2001) Results of retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Endourol 15:355–359 Discussion 75-6PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gill IS, Meraney AM, Schweizer DK et al (2001) Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in 100 patients: a single center experience from the United States. Cancer 92:1843–1855PubMedCrossRef Gill IS, Meraney AM, Schweizer DK et al (2001) Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in 100 patients: a single center experience from the United States. Cancer 92:1843–1855PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Dunn MD, Portis AJ, Shalhav AL et al (2000) Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: a 9-year experience. J Urol 164:1153–1159PubMedCrossRef Dunn MD, Portis AJ, Shalhav AL et al (2000) Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: a 9-year experience. J Urol 164:1153–1159PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Chan DY, Cadeddu JA, Jarrett TW, Marshall FF, Kavoussi LR (2001) Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: cancer control for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 166:2095–2099 Discussion 9-100PubMedCrossRef Chan DY, Cadeddu JA, Jarrett TW, Marshall FF, Kavoussi LR (2001) Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: cancer control for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 166:2095–2099 Discussion 9-100PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Desai MM, Strzempkowski B, Matin SF et al (2005) Prospective randomized comparison of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 173:38–41PubMed Desai MM, Strzempkowski B, Matin SF et al (2005) Prospective randomized comparison of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 173:38–41PubMed
11.
go back to reference Nambirajan T, Jeschke S, Al-Zahrani H, Vrabec G, Leeb K, Janetschek G (2004) Prospective, randomized controlled study: transperitoneal laparoscopic versus retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy. Urology 64:919–924PubMedCrossRef Nambirajan T, Jeschke S, Al-Zahrani H, Vrabec G, Leeb K, Janetschek G (2004) Prospective, randomized controlled study: transperitoneal laparoscopic versus retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy. Urology 64:919–924PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Permpongkosol S, Chan DY, Link RE et al (2005) Long-term survival analysis after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 174:1222–1225PubMedCrossRef Permpongkosol S, Chan DY, Link RE et al (2005) Long-term survival analysis after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 174:1222–1225PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Portis AJ, Yan Y, Landman J et al (2002) Long-term followup after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 167:1257–1262PubMedCrossRef Portis AJ, Yan Y, Landman J et al (2002) Long-term followup after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 167:1257–1262PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Saika T, Ono Y, Hattori R et al (2003) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for pathologic T1 renal cell carcinoma. Urology 62:1018–1023PubMedCrossRef Saika T, Ono Y, Hattori R et al (2003) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for pathologic T1 renal cell carcinoma. Urology 62:1018–1023PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM (1992) Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery 111:518–526PubMed Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM (1992) Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery 111:518–526PubMed
16.
go back to reference Vogeli TA, Burchardt M, Fornara P, Rassweiler J, Sulser T (2002) Current laparoscopic practice patterns in urology: results of a survey among urologists in Germany and Switzerland. Eur Urol 42:441–446PubMedCrossRef Vogeli TA, Burchardt M, Fornara P, Rassweiler J, Sulser T (2002) Current laparoscopic practice patterns in urology: results of a survey among urologists in Germany and Switzerland. Eur Urol 42:441–446PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ficarra V, Novara G, Galfano A, Novella G, Schiavone D, Artibani W (2004) Application of TNM, 2002 version, in localized renal cell carcinoma: is it able to predict different cancer-specific survival probability? Urology 63:1050–1054PubMedCrossRef Ficarra V, Novara G, Galfano A, Novella G, Schiavone D, Artibani W (2004) Application of TNM, 2002 version, in localized renal cell carcinoma: is it able to predict different cancer-specific survival probability? Urology 63:1050–1054PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Javidan J, Stricker HJ, Tamboli P et al (1999) Prognostic significance of the 1997 TNM classification of renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 162:1277–1281PubMedCrossRef Javidan J, Stricker HJ, Tamboli P et al (1999) Prognostic significance of the 1997 TNM classification of renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 162:1277–1281PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Tsui KH, Shvarts O, Smith RB, Figlin RA, deKernion JB, Belldegrun A (2000) Prognostic indicators for renal cell carcinoma: a multivariate analysis of 643 patients using the revised 1997 TNM staging criteria. J Urol 163:1090–1095 Quiz 295PubMedCrossRef Tsui KH, Shvarts O, Smith RB, Figlin RA, deKernion JB, Belldegrun A (2000) Prognostic indicators for renal cell carcinoma: a multivariate analysis of 643 patients using the revised 1997 TNM staging criteria. J Urol 163:1090–1095 Quiz 295PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Harano M, Eto M, Omoto K et al (2005) Long-term outcome of hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for localized stage T1/T2 renal-cell carcinoma. J Endourol 19:803–807PubMedCrossRef Harano M, Eto M, Omoto K et al (2005) Long-term outcome of hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for localized stage T1/T2 renal-cell carcinoma. J Endourol 19:803–807PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Lam JS, Shvarts O, Pantuck AJ (2004) Changing concepts in the surgical management of renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 45:692–705PubMedCrossRef Lam JS, Shvarts O, Pantuck AJ (2004) Changing concepts in the surgical management of renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 45:692–705PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Cicco A, Salomon L, Hoznek H et al (2000) Carcinological risks and retroperitoneal laparoscopy. Eur Urol 38:606–612PubMedCrossRef Cicco A, Salomon L, Hoznek H et al (2000) Carcinological risks and retroperitoneal laparoscopy. Eur Urol 38:606–612PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: Intermediate oncological results
Authors
Stéphane Larré
Chaker Kanso
Alexandre De La Taille
Andras Hoznek
Dimitrios Vordos
René Yiou
Clément-Claude Abbou
Laurent Salomon
Publication date
01-12-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 6/2008
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-008-0306-8

Other articles of this Issue 6/2008

World Journal of Urology 6/2008 Go to the issue