Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 1/2020

01-01-2020 | Computed Tomography | Nuclear Medicine

The clinical value of F-18 FDG PET/CT in differentiating malignant from benign lesions in pneumoconiosis patients

Authors: Eun Kyoung Choi, Hye Lim Park, Ie Ryung Yoo, Seung Joon Kim, Young Kyoon Kim

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

We reviewed PET/CT findings of pneumoconiosis and determined the ability of PET/CT to differentiate lung cancer from progressive massive fibrosis (PMF), and metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) from underlying reactive LN hyperplasia.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of patients with pneumoconiosis and suspected lung cancer. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), long- and short-axis diameters (DL and DS), ratio of DL to DS (DL/S), and Hounsfield unit (HU) from the lung mass and mediastinal LNs were measured. The cutoff values of each parameter were obtained by ROC analysis, and we evaluated the diagnostic sensitivity.

Results

Forty-nine pneumoconiosis patients were included. Eighty-three lung masses were detected, of which 42 were confirmed as lung cancer (23 squamous cell carcinomas, 12 adenocarcinomas, and 7 small cell carcinomas) and 41 were PMF. There were significant differences between lung cancer and PMF in terms of SUVmax, DS, DL/S, and HU (all p < 0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for diagnosis of lung cancer were 81.0%, 73.2%, and 77.1%, respectively, with an SUVmax cutoff value of 7.4; and 92.8%, 87.8%, and 90.4%, respectively, with a HU cutoff value of 45.5. Among the 40 LNs with available pathological results, 7 were metastatic. Metastatic LNs showed higher SUVmax, larger DS, and lower HU than benign lesions (all p < 0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for predicting metastatic LNs by PET/CT were 85.7%, 93.9%, and 92.5%, respectively.

Conclusion

By applying PET and CT parameters in combination, the accuracy for differentiating malignant from benign lesions could be increased. PET/CT can play a central role in the discrimination of lung cancer and PMF.

Key Points

• Lung cancer showed significantly higher SUVmax than PMF.
• Lung cancer showed similar D L but longer D S , resulting in a smaller D L/S than PMF.
• SUVmax demonstrated additive value in differentiating lung cancer from PMF, compared with HU alone.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Choi BS, Park SY, Lee JO (2010) Current status of pneumoconiosis patients in Korea. J Korean Med Sci 25:S13–S19CrossRef Choi BS, Park SY, Lee JO (2010) Current status of pneumoconiosis patients in Korea. J Korean Med Sci 25:S13–S19CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Choi BS (1996) Development of coalworkers’ pneumoconiosis in Korea: risk factors and incidence density. Korean J Occup Environ Med 8:137–152CrossRef Choi BS (1996) Development of coalworkers’ pneumoconiosis in Korea: risk factors and incidence density. Korean J Occup Environ Med 8:137–152CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Jun JS, Jung JI, Kim HR et al (2013) Complications of pneumoconiosis: radiologic overview. Eur J Radiol 82:1819–1830CrossRef Jun JS, Jung JI, Kim HR et al (2013) Complications of pneumoconiosis: radiologic overview. Eur J Radiol 82:1819–1830CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Garg K, Lynch DA (2002) Imaging of thoracic occupational and environmental malignancies. J Thorac Imaging 17:198–210CrossRef Garg K, Lynch DA (2002) Imaging of thoracic occupational and environmental malignancies. J Thorac Imaging 17:198–210CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Chong S, Lee KS, Chung MJ, Han J, Kwon OJ, Kim TS (2006) Pneumoconiosis: comparison of imaging and pathologic findings. Radiographics 26:59–77CrossRef Chong S, Lee KS, Chung MJ, Han J, Kwon OJ, Kim TS (2006) Pneumoconiosis: comparison of imaging and pathologic findings. Radiographics 26:59–77CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gould MK, Maclean CC, Kuschner WG, Rydzak CE, Owens DK (2001) Accuracy of positron emission tomography for diagnosis of pulmonary nodules and mass lesions: a meta-analysis. JAMA 285:914–924CrossRef Gould MK, Maclean CC, Kuschner WG, Rydzak CE, Owens DK (2001) Accuracy of positron emission tomography for diagnosis of pulmonary nodules and mass lesions: a meta-analysis. JAMA 285:914–924CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Weber WA (2006) Positron emission tomography as an imaging biomarker. J Clin Oncol 24:3282–3292CrossRef Weber WA (2006) Positron emission tomography as an imaging biomarker. J Clin Oncol 24:3282–3292CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hurbánková M, Kaiglová A (1993) The changes of some immunological parameters in subjects exposed to asbestos in dependence on age, duration of exposure, radiological findings and smoking habits. Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed 195:55–65PubMed Hurbánková M, Kaiglová A (1993) The changes of some immunological parameters in subjects exposed to asbestos in dependence on age, duration of exposure, radiological findings and smoking habits. Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed 195:55–65PubMed
10.
go back to reference Madsen PH, Holdgaard PC, Christensen JB, Hoilund-Carlsen PF (2016) Clinical utility of F-18 FDG PET-CT in the initial evaluation of lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 43:2084–2097CrossRef Madsen PH, Holdgaard PC, Christensen JB, Hoilund-Carlsen PF (2016) Clinical utility of F-18 FDG PET-CT in the initial evaluation of lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 43:2084–2097CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Sachpekidis C, Thieke C, Askoxylakis V et al (2015) Combined use of (18)F-FDG and (18)F-FMISO in unresectable non-small cell lung cancer patients planned for radiotherapy: a dynamic PET/CT study. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 5:127–142PubMedPubMedCentral Sachpekidis C, Thieke C, Askoxylakis V et al (2015) Combined use of (18)F-FDG and (18)F-FMISO in unresectable non-small cell lung cancer patients planned for radiotherapy: a dynamic PET/CT study. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 5:127–142PubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Yamamoto Y, Nishiyama Y, Ishikawa S et al (2007) Correlation of 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG uptake on PET with Ki-67 immunohistochemistry in non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34:1610–1616CrossRef Yamamoto Y, Nishiyama Y, Ishikawa S et al (2007) Correlation of 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG uptake on PET with Ki-67 immunohistochemistry in non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34:1610–1616CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kaira K, Oriuchi N, Shimizu K et al (2009) 18F-FMT uptake seen within primary cancer on PET helps predict outcome of non-small cell lung cancer. J Nucl Med 50:1770–1776CrossRef Kaira K, Oriuchi N, Shimizu K et al (2009) 18F-FMT uptake seen within primary cancer on PET helps predict outcome of non-small cell lung cancer. J Nucl Med 50:1770–1776CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Reichert M, Bensadoun ES (2009) PET imaging in patients with coal workers pneumoconiosis and suspected malignancy. J Thorac Oncol 4:649–651CrossRef Reichert M, Bensadoun ES (2009) PET imaging in patients with coal workers pneumoconiosis and suspected malignancy. J Thorac Oncol 4:649–651CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Yu H, Zhang H, Wang Y, Cui X, Han J (2013) Detection of lung cancer in patients with pneumoconiosis by fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography: four cases. Clin Imaging 37:769–771CrossRef Yu H, Zhang H, Wang Y, Cui X, Han J (2013) Detection of lung cancer in patients with pneumoconiosis by fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography: four cases. Clin Imaging 37:769–771CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Saydam O, Gokce M, Kilicgun A, Tanriverdi O (2012) Accuracy of positron emission tomography in mediastinal node assessment in coal workers with lung cancer. Med Oncol 29:589–594CrossRef Saydam O, Gokce M, Kilicgun A, Tanriverdi O (2012) Accuracy of positron emission tomography in mediastinal node assessment in coal workers with lung cancer. Med Oncol 29:589–594CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lee JW, Kim EY, Kim DJ et al (2016) The diagnostic ability of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for mediastinal lymph node staging using (18)F-FDG uptake and volumetric CT histogram analysis in non-small cell lung cancer. Eur Radiol 26:4515–4523CrossRef Lee JW, Kim EY, Kim DJ et al (2016) The diagnostic ability of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for mediastinal lymph node staging using (18)F-FDG uptake and volumetric CT histogram analysis in non-small cell lung cancer. Eur Radiol 26:4515–4523CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Rusch VW, Asamura H, Watanabe H, Giroux DJ, Rami-Porta R, Goldstraw P (2009) The IASLC lung cancer staging project: a proposal for a new international lymph node map in the forthcoming seventh edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 4:568–577CrossRef Rusch VW, Asamura H, Watanabe H, Giroux DJ, Rami-Porta R, Goldstraw P (2009) The IASLC lung cancer staging project: a proposal for a new international lymph node map in the forthcoming seventh edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 4:568–577CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lee JW, Kim BS, Lee DS et al (2009) 18F-FDG PET/CT in mediastinal lymph node staging of non-small-cell lung cancer in a tuberculosis-endemic country: consideration of lymph node calcification and distribution pattern to improve specificity. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 36:1794–1802CrossRef Lee JW, Kim BS, Lee DS et al (2009) 18F-FDG PET/CT in mediastinal lymph node staging of non-small-cell lung cancer in a tuberculosis-endemic country: consideration of lymph node calcification and distribution pattern to improve specificity. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 36:1794–1802CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kanegae K, Nakano I, Kimura K et al (2007) Comparison of MET-PET and FDG-PET for differentiation between benign lesions and lung cancer in pneumoconiosis. Ann Nucl Med 21:331–337CrossRef Kanegae K, Nakano I, Kimura K et al (2007) Comparison of MET-PET and FDG-PET for differentiation between benign lesions and lung cancer in pneumoconiosis. Ann Nucl Med 21:331–337CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Chung SY, Lee JH, Kim TH, Kim SJ, Kim HJ, Ryu YH (2010) 18F-FDG PET imaging of progressive massive fibrosis. Ann Nucl Med 24:21–27CrossRef Chung SY, Lee JH, Kim TH, Kim SJ, Kim HJ, Ryu YH (2010) 18F-FDG PET imaging of progressive massive fibrosis. Ann Nucl Med 24:21–27CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Bergin CJ, Müller NL, Vedal S, Chan-Yeung M (1986) CT in silicosis: correlation with plain films and pulmonary function tests. AJR Am J Roentgenol 146:477–483CrossRef Bergin CJ, Müller NL, Vedal S, Chan-Yeung M (1986) CT in silicosis: correlation with plain films and pulmonary function tests. AJR Am J Roentgenol 146:477–483CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Lapp NL, Parker JE (1992) Coal workers’ pneumoconiosis. Clin Chest Med 13:243–252PubMed Lapp NL, Parker JE (1992) Coal workers’ pneumoconiosis. Clin Chest Med 13:243–252PubMed
24.
go back to reference Alavi A, Gupta N, Alberini JL et al (2002) Positron emission tomography imaging in nonmalignant thoracic disorders. Semin Nucl Med 32:293–321CrossRef Alavi A, Gupta N, Alberini JL et al (2002) Positron emission tomography imaging in nonmalignant thoracic disorders. Semin Nucl Med 32:293–321CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Kavanagh PV, Stevenson AW, Chen MY, Clark PB (2004) Nonneoplastic diseases in the chest showing increased activity on FDG PET. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:1133–1141CrossRef Kavanagh PV, Stevenson AW, Chen MY, Clark PB (2004) Nonneoplastic diseases in the chest showing increased activity on FDG PET. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:1133–1141CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Robertson DD Jr, Huang HK (1986) Quantitative bone measurements using x-ray computed tomography with second-order correction. Med Phys 13:474–479CrossRef Robertson DD Jr, Huang HK (1986) Quantitative bone measurements using x-ray computed tomography with second-order correction. Med Phys 13:474–479CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The clinical value of F-18 FDG PET/CT in differentiating malignant from benign lesions in pneumoconiosis patients
Authors
Eun Kyoung Choi
Hye Lim Park
Ie Ryung Yoo
Seung Joon Kim
Young Kyoon Kim
Publication date
01-01-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06342-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

European Radiology 1/2020 Go to the issue