Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 11/2019

01-11-2019 | Acute Coronary Syndrome | Cardiac

Relevance of anatomical, plaque, and hemodynamic characteristics of non-obstructive coronary lesions in the prediction of risk for acute coronary syndrome

Authors: Jiesuck Park, Joo Myung Lee, Bon-Kwon Koo, Gilwoo Choi, Doyeon Hwang, Tae-Min Rhee, Seokhun Yang, Jonghanne Park, Jinlong Zhang, Kyung-Jin Kim, Yaliang Tong, Joon-Hyung Doh, Chang-Wook Nam, Eun-Seok Shin, Young-Seok Cho, Eun Ju Chun, Jin-Ho Choi, Bjarne L. Norgaard, Evald H. Christiansen, Koen Niemen, Hiromasa Otake, Martin Penicka, Bernard de Bruyne, Takashi Kubo, Takashi Akasaka, Jagat Narula, Pamela S. Douglas, Charles A. Taylor

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 11/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

We explored the anatomical, plaque, and hemodynamic characteristics of high-risk non-obstructive coronary lesions that caused acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

Methods

From the EMERALD study which included ACS patients with available coronary CT angiography (CCTA) before the ACS, non-obstructive lesions (percent diameter stenosis < 50%) were selected. CCTA images were analyzed for lesion characteristics by independent CCTA and computational fluid dynamics core laboratories. The relative importance of each characteristic was assessed by information gain.

Results

Of the 132 lesions, 24 were the culprit for ACS. The culprit lesions showed a larger change in FFRCT across the lesion (ΔFFRCT) than non-culprit lesions (0.08 ± 0.07 vs 0.05 ± 0.05, p = 0.012). ΔFFRCT showed the highest information gain (0.051, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.050–0.052), followed by low-attenuation plaque (0.028, 95% CI 0.027–0.029) and plaque volume (0.023, 95% CI 0.022–0.024). Lesions with higher ΔFFRCT or low-attenuation plaque showed an increased risk of ACS (hazard ratio [HR] 3.25, 95% CI 1.31–8.04, p = 0.010 for ΔFFRCT; HR 2.60, 95% CI 1.36–4.95, p = 0.004 for low-attenuation plaque). The prediction model including ΔFFRCT, low-attenuation plaque and plaque volume showed the highest ability in ACS prediction (AUC 0.725, 95% CI 0.724–0.727).

Conclusion

Non-obstructive lesions with higher ΔFFRCT or low-attenuation plaque showed a higher risk of ACS. The integration of anatomical, plaque, and hemodynamic characteristics can improve the noninvasive prediction of ACS risk in non-obstructive lesions.

Key Points

• Change in FFR CT across the lesion (ΔFFR CT ) was the most important predictor of ACS risk in non-obstructive lesions.
• Non-obstructive lesions with higher ΔFFR CT or low-attenuation plaque were associated with a higher risk of ACS.
• The integration of anatomical, plaque, and hemodynamic characteristics can improve the noninvasive prediction of ACS risk.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ferencik M, Mayrhofer T, Bittner DO et al (2018) Use of high-risk coronary atherosclerotic plaque detection for risk stratification of patients with stable chest pain: a secondary analysis of the promise randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol 3:144–152CrossRef Ferencik M, Mayrhofer T, Bittner DO et al (2018) Use of high-risk coronary atherosclerotic plaque detection for risk stratification of patients with stable chest pain: a secondary analysis of the promise randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol 3:144–152CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Dey D, Gaur S, Ovrehus KA et al (2018) Integrated prediction of lesion-specific ischaemia from quantitative coronary CT angiography using machine learning: a multicentre study. Eur Radiol 28:2655–2664CrossRef Dey D, Gaur S, Ovrehus KA et al (2018) Integrated prediction of lesion-specific ischaemia from quantitative coronary CT angiography using machine learning: a multicentre study. Eur Radiol 28:2655–2664CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Coenen A, Lubbers MM, Kurata A et al (2017) Diagnostic value of transmural perfusion ratio derived from dynamic CT-based myocardial perfusion imaging for the detection of haemodynamically relevant coronary artery stenosis. Eur Radiol 27:2309–2316CrossRef Coenen A, Lubbers MM, Kurata A et al (2017) Diagnostic value of transmural perfusion ratio derived from dynamic CT-based myocardial perfusion imaging for the detection of haemodynamically relevant coronary artery stenosis. Eur Radiol 27:2309–2316CrossRef
4.
go back to reference van Hamersvelt RW, Zreik M, Voskuil M, Viergever MA, Isgum I, Leiner T (2019) Deep learning analysis of left ventricular myocardium in CT angiographic intermediate-degree coronary stenosis improves the diagnostic accuracy for identification of functionally significant stenosis. Eur Radiol 29:2350–2359CrossRef van Hamersvelt RW, Zreik M, Voskuil M, Viergever MA, Isgum I, Leiner T (2019) Deep learning analysis of left ventricular myocardium in CT angiographic intermediate-degree coronary stenosis improves the diagnostic accuracy for identification of functionally significant stenosis. Eur Radiol 29:2350–2359CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lee JM, Doh JH, Nam CW, Shin ES, Koo BK (2018) Functional approach for coronary artery disease: filling the gap between evidence and practice. Korean Circ J 48:179–190CrossRef Lee JM, Doh JH, Nam CW, Shin ES, Koo BK (2018) Functional approach for coronary artery disease: filling the gap between evidence and practice. Korean Circ J 48:179–190CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kim HJ, Vignon-Clementel IE, Coogan JS, Figueroa CA, Jansen KE, Taylor CA (2010) Patient-specific modeling of blood flow and pressure in human coronary arteries. Ann Biomed Eng 38:3195–3209CrossRef Kim HJ, Vignon-Clementel IE, Coogan JS, Figueroa CA, Jansen KE, Taylor CA (2010) Patient-specific modeling of blood flow and pressure in human coronary arteries. Ann Biomed Eng 38:3195–3209CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Min JK, Taylor CA, Achenbach S et al (2015) Noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT angiography: clinical data and scientific principles. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 8:1209–1222CrossRef Min JK, Taylor CA, Achenbach S et al (2015) Noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT angiography: clinical data and scientific principles. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 8:1209–1222CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Taylor CA, Fonte TA, Min JK (2013) Computational fluid dynamics applied to cardiac computed tomography for noninvasive quantification of fractional flow reserve scientific basis. J Am Coll Cardiol 61:2233–2241CrossRef Taylor CA, Fonte TA, Min JK (2013) Computational fluid dynamics applied to cardiac computed tomography for noninvasive quantification of fractional flow reserve scientific basis. J Am Coll Cardiol 61:2233–2241CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Siogkas PK, Anagnostopoulos CD, Liga R et al (2019) Noninvasive CT-based hemodynamic assessment of coronary lesions derived from fast computational analysis: a comparison against fractional flow reserve. Eur Radiol 29:2117–2126CrossRef Siogkas PK, Anagnostopoulos CD, Liga R et al (2019) Noninvasive CT-based hemodynamic assessment of coronary lesions derived from fast computational analysis: a comparison against fractional flow reserve. Eur Radiol 29:2117–2126CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Katritsis DG, Gersh BJ, Camm AJ (2016) A clinical perspective on sudden cardiac death. Arrhythmia Electrophysiol Rev 5:177–182CrossRef Katritsis DG, Gersh BJ, Camm AJ (2016) A clinical perspective on sudden cardiac death. Arrhythmia Electrophysiol Rev 5:177–182CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Myerburg RJ, Junttila MJ (2012) Sudden cardiac death caused by coronary heart disease. Circulation 125:1043–1052CrossRef Myerburg RJ, Junttila MJ (2012) Sudden cardiac death caused by coronary heart disease. Circulation 125:1043–1052CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Motoyama S, Ito H, Sarai M et al (2015) Plaque characterization by coronary computed tomography angiography and the likelihood of acute coronary events in mid-term follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol 66:337–346CrossRef Motoyama S, Ito H, Sarai M et al (2015) Plaque characterization by coronary computed tomography angiography and the likelihood of acute coronary events in mid-term follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol 66:337–346CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Maurovich-Horvat P, Ferencik M, Voros S, Merkely B, Hoffmann U (2014) Comprehensive plaque assessment by coronary CT angiography. Nat Rev Cardiol 11:390–402CrossRef Maurovich-Horvat P, Ferencik M, Voros S, Merkely B, Hoffmann U (2014) Comprehensive plaque assessment by coronary CT angiography. Nat Rev Cardiol 11:390–402CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Park JB, Choi G, Chun EJ et al (2016) Computational fluid dynamic measures of wall shear stress are related to coronary lesion characteristics. Heart 102:1655–1661CrossRef Park JB, Choi G, Chun EJ et al (2016) Computational fluid dynamic measures of wall shear stress are related to coronary lesion characteristics. Heart 102:1655–1661CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hall MA, Holmes G (2003) Benchmarking attribute selection techniques for discrete class data mining. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 15:1437–1447CrossRef Hall MA, Holmes G (2003) Benchmarking attribute selection techniques for discrete class data mining. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 15:1437–1447CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Bourantas CV, Garcia-Garcia HM, Farooq V et al (2013) Clinical and angiographic characteristics of patients likely to have vulnerable plaques: analysis from the PROSPECT study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 6:1263–1272CrossRef Bourantas CV, Garcia-Garcia HM, Farooq V et al (2013) Clinical and angiographic characteristics of patients likely to have vulnerable plaques: analysis from the PROSPECT study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 6:1263–1272CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kristensen TS, Kofoed KF, Kuhl JT, Nielsen WB, Nielsen MB, Kelbaek H (2011) Prognostic implications of nonobstructive coronary plaques in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a multidetector computed tomography study. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:502–509CrossRef Kristensen TS, Kofoed KF, Kuhl JT, Nielsen WB, Nielsen MB, Kelbaek H (2011) Prognostic implications of nonobstructive coronary plaques in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a multidetector computed tomography study. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:502–509CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Ferraro RA, Lin F, Peña J et al (2018) High-risk plaque in non-obstructive coronary artery disease confers risk similar to obstructive disease without high-risk features: the iconic study. J Am Coll Cardiol 71:A103CrossRef Ferraro RA, Lin F, Peña J et al (2018) High-risk plaque in non-obstructive coronary artery disease confers risk similar to obstructive disease without high-risk features: the iconic study. J Am Coll Cardiol 71:A103CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Samady H, Eshtehardi P, McDaniel MC et al (2011) Coronary artery wall shear stress is associated with progression and transformation of atherosclerotic plaque and arterial remodeling in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 124:779–788CrossRef Samady H, Eshtehardi P, McDaniel MC et al (2011) Coronary artery wall shear stress is associated with progression and transformation of atherosclerotic plaque and arterial remodeling in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 124:779–788CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Lee J, Choi G, Hwang D et al (2017) Impact of longitudinal lesion geometry on location of plaque rupture and clinical presentations. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 10:677–688CrossRef Lee J, Choi G, Hwang D et al (2017) Impact of longitudinal lesion geometry on location of plaque rupture and clinical presentations. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 10:677–688CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Lee JM, Koo BK, Shin ES et al (2017) Clinical outcomes of deferred lesions with angiographically insignificant stenosis but low fractional flow reserve. J Am Heart Assoc 6:e006071PubMedPubMedCentral Lee JM, Koo BK, Shin ES et al (2017) Clinical outcomes of deferred lesions with angiographically insignificant stenosis but low fractional flow reserve. J Am Heart Assoc 6:e006071PubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Ford TJ, Berry C, De Bruyne B et al (2017) Physiological predictors of acute coronary syndromes: emerging insights from the plaque to the vulnerable patient. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 10:2539–2547CrossRef Ford TJ, Berry C, De Bruyne B et al (2017) Physiological predictors of acute coronary syndromes: emerging insights from the plaque to the vulnerable patient. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 10:2539–2547CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Choi G, Lee JM, Kim HJ et al (2015) Coronary artery axial plaque stress and its relationship with lesion geometry: application of computational fluid dynamics to coronary CT angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 8:1156–1166CrossRef Choi G, Lee JM, Kim HJ et al (2015) Coronary artery axial plaque stress and its relationship with lesion geometry: application of computational fluid dynamics to coronary CT angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 8:1156–1166CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Gijsen FJ, Wentzel JJ, Thury A et al (2008) Strain distribution over plaques in human coronary arteries relates to shear stress. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 295:H1608–H1614CrossRef Gijsen FJ, Wentzel JJ, Thury A et al (2008) Strain distribution over plaques in human coronary arteries relates to shear stress. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 295:H1608–H1614CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Kaul S, Narula J (2014) In search of the vulnerable plaque: is there any light at the end of the catheter? J Am Coll Cardiol 64:2519–2524CrossRef Kaul S, Narula J (2014) In search of the vulnerable plaque: is there any light at the end of the catheter? J Am Coll Cardiol 64:2519–2524CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Koskinas KC, Ughi GJ, Windecker S, Tearney GJ, Raber L (2016) Intracoronary imaging of coronary atherosclerosis: validation for diagnosis, prognosis and treatment. Eur Heart J 37:524–535a-cCrossRef Koskinas KC, Ughi GJ, Windecker S, Tearney GJ, Raber L (2016) Intracoronary imaging of coronary atherosclerosis: validation for diagnosis, prognosis and treatment. Eur Heart J 37:524–535a-cCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Relevance of anatomical, plaque, and hemodynamic characteristics of non-obstructive coronary lesions in the prediction of risk for acute coronary syndrome
Authors
Jiesuck Park
Joo Myung Lee
Bon-Kwon Koo
Gilwoo Choi
Doyeon Hwang
Tae-Min Rhee
Seokhun Yang
Jonghanne Park
Jinlong Zhang
Kyung-Jin Kim
Yaliang Tong
Joon-Hyung Doh
Chang-Wook Nam
Eun-Seok Shin
Young-Seok Cho
Eun Ju Chun
Jin-Ho Choi
Bjarne L. Norgaard
Evald H. Christiansen
Koen Niemen
Hiromasa Otake
Martin Penicka
Bernard de Bruyne
Takashi Kubo
Takashi Akasaka
Jagat Narula
Pamela S. Douglas
Charles A. Taylor
Publication date
01-11-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 11/2019
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06221-9

Other articles of this Issue 11/2019

European Radiology 11/2019 Go to the issue