Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 4/2019

01-04-2019 | Computed Tomography

Noninvasive CT-based hemodynamic assessment of coronary lesions derived from fast computational analysis: a comparison against fractional flow reserve

Authors: Panagiotis K. Siogkas, Constantinos D. Anagnostopoulos, Riccardo Liga, Themis P. Exarchos, Antonis I. Sakellarios, George Rigas, Arthur J. H. A. Scholte, M. I. Papafaklis, Dimitra Loggitsi, Gualtiero Pelosi, Oberdan Parodi, Teemu Maaniitty, Lampros K. Michalis, Juhani Knuuti, Danilo Neglia, Dimitrios I. Fotiadis

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 4/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

Application of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to three-dimensional CTCA datasets has been shown to provide accurate assessment of the hemodynamic significance of a coronary lesion. We aim to test the feasibility of calculating a novel CTCA-based virtual functional assessment index (vFAI) of coronary stenoses > 30% and ≤ 90% by using an automated in-house-developed software and to evaluate its efficacy as compared to the invasively measured fractional flow reserve (FFR).

Methods and results

In 63 patients with chest pain symptoms and intermediate (20–90%) pre-test likelihood of coronary artery disease undergoing CTCA and invasive coronary angiography with FFR measurement, vFAI calculations were performed after 3D reconstruction of the coronary vessels and flow simulations using the finite element method. A total of 74 vessels were analyzed. Mean CTCA processing time was 25(± 10) min. There was a strong correlation between vFAI and FFR, (R = 0.93, p < 0.001) and a very good agreement between the two parameters by the Bland–Altman method of analysis. The mean difference of measurements from the two methods was 0.03 (SD = 0.033), indicating a small systematic overestimation of the FFR by vFAI. Using a receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, the optimal vFAI cutoff value for identifying an FFR threshold of ≤ 0.8 was ≤ 0.82 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.88).

Conclusions

vFAI can be effectively derived from the application of computational fluid dynamics to three-dimensional CTCA datasets. In patients with coronary stenosis severity > 30% and ≤ 90%, vFAI performs well against FFR and may efficiently distinguish between hemodynamically significant from non-significant lesions.

Key Points

  • Virtual functional assessment index (vFAI) can be effectively derived from 3D CTCA datasets.
  • In patients with coronary stenoses severity > 30% and ≤ 90%, vFAI performs well against FFR.
  • vFAI may efficiently distinguish between functionally significant from non-significant lesions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference De Bruyne B, Fearon WF, Pijls NH et al (2014) Fractional flow reserve–guided PCI for stable coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 371:1208–1217CrossRefPubMed De Bruyne B, Fearon WF, Pijls NH et al (2014) Fractional flow reserve–guided PCI for stable coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 371:1208–1217CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH et al (2009) Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 360:213–224CrossRef Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH et al (2009) Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 360:213–224CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Johnson NP, Tóth GG, Lai D et al (2014) Prognostic value of fractional flow reserve: linking physiologic severity to clinical outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol 64:1641–1654CrossRefPubMed Johnson NP, Tóth GG, Lai D et al (2014) Prognostic value of fractional flow reserve: linking physiologic severity to clinical outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol 64:1641–1654CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Dehmer GJ, Weaver D, Roe MT et al (2012) A contemporary view of diagnostic cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States: a report from the CathPCI registry of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry, 2010 through June 2011. J Am Coll Cardiol 60:2017–2031CrossRefPubMed Dehmer GJ, Weaver D, Roe MT et al (2012) A contemporary view of diagnostic cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States: a report from the CathPCI registry of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry, 2010 through June 2011. J Am Coll Cardiol 60:2017–2031CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Menke J, Unterberg-Buchwald C, Staab W, Sohns JM, Seif Amir Hosseini A, Schwarz A (2013) Head-to-head comparison of prospectively triggered vs retrospectively gated coronary computed tomography angiography: meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy, image quality, and radiation dose. Am Heart J 165(154–163):e153 Menke J, Unterberg-Buchwald C, Staab W, Sohns JM, Seif Amir Hosseini A, Schwarz A (2013) Head-to-head comparison of prospectively triggered vs retrospectively gated coronary computed tomography angiography: meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy, image quality, and radiation dose. Am Heart J 165(154–163):e153
6.
go back to reference Vorre MM, Abdulla J (2013) Diagnostic accuracy and radiation dose of CT coronary angiography in atrial fibrillation: systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology 267:376–386CrossRefPubMed Vorre MM, Abdulla J (2013) Diagnostic accuracy and radiation dose of CT coronary angiography in atrial fibrillation: systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology 267:376–386CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Koo BK, Erglis A, Doh JH et al (2011) Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:1989–1997CrossRefPubMed Koo BK, Erglis A, Doh JH et al (2011) Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:1989–1997CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Renker M, Schoepf UJ, Wang R et al (2014) Comparison of diagnostic value of a novel noninvasive coronary computed tomography angiography method versus standard coronary angiography for assessing fractional flow reserve. Am J Cardiol 114:1303–1308CrossRefPubMed Renker M, Schoepf UJ, Wang R et al (2014) Comparison of diagnostic value of a novel noninvasive coronary computed tomography angiography method versus standard coronary angiography for assessing fractional flow reserve. Am J Cardiol 114:1303–1308CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kruk M, Wardziak Ł, Demkow M et al (2016) Workstation-based calculation of CTA-based FFR for intermediate stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 9:690–699CrossRefPubMed Kruk M, Wardziak Ł, Demkow M et al (2016) Workstation-based calculation of CTA-based FFR for intermediate stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 9:690–699CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference Norgaard BL, Leipsic J, Gaur S et al (2014) Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease the NXT trial (analysis of coronary blood flow using CT angiography: next steps). J Am Coll Cardiol 63:1145–1155CrossRefPubMed Norgaard BL, Leipsic J, Gaur S et al (2014) Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease the NXT trial (analysis of coronary blood flow using CT angiography: next steps). J Am Coll Cardiol 63:1145–1155CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Morris PD, Ryan D, Morton AC et al (2013) Virtual fractional flow reserve from coronary angiography: modeling the significance of coronary lesions: results from the VIRTU-1 (VIRTUal Fractional Flow Reserve From Coronary Angiography) study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 6:149–157CrossRefPubMed Morris PD, Ryan D, Morton AC et al (2013) Virtual fractional flow reserve from coronary angiography: modeling the significance of coronary lesions: results from the VIRTU-1 (VIRTUal Fractional Flow Reserve From Coronary Angiography) study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 6:149–157CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Douglas PS, Pontone G, Hlatky MA et al (2015) Clinical outcomes of fractional flow reserve by computed tomographic angiography-guided diagnostic strategies vs. usual care in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: the prospective longitudinal trial of FFR(CT): outcome and resource impacts study. Eur Heart J 36:3359–3367CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Douglas PS, Pontone G, Hlatky MA et al (2015) Clinical outcomes of fractional flow reserve by computed tomographic angiography-guided diagnostic strategies vs. usual care in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: the prospective longitudinal trial of FFR(CT): outcome and resource impacts study. Eur Heart J 36:3359–3367CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Lu MT, Ferencik M, Roberts RS et al (2017) Noninvasive FFR derived from coronary CT angiography: management and outcomes in the PROMISE trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 10:1350–1358CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lu MT, Ferencik M, Roberts RS et al (2017) Noninvasive FFR derived from coronary CT angiography: management and outcomes in the PROMISE trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 10:1350–1358CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Baumann S, Renker M, Hetjens S et al (2016) Comparison of coronary computed tomography angiography-derived vs invasive fractional flow reserve assessment: meta-analysis with subgroup evaluation of intermediate stenosis. Acad Radiol 23:1402–1411CrossRefPubMed Baumann S, Renker M, Hetjens S et al (2016) Comparison of coronary computed tomography angiography-derived vs invasive fractional flow reserve assessment: meta-analysis with subgroup evaluation of intermediate stenosis. Acad Radiol 23:1402–1411CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Gaur S, Taylor CA, Jensen JM et al (2017) FFR derived from coronary CT angiography in nonculprit lesions of patients with recent STEMI. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 10:424–433CrossRefPubMed Gaur S, Taylor CA, Jensen JM et al (2017) FFR derived from coronary CT angiography in nonculprit lesions of patients with recent STEMI. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 10:424–433CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Packard RR, Li D, Budoff MJ, Karlsberg RP (2017) Fractional flow reserve by computerized tomography and subsequent coronary revascularization. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 18:145–152CrossRefPubMed Packard RR, Li D, Budoff MJ, Karlsberg RP (2017) Fractional flow reserve by computerized tomography and subsequent coronary revascularization. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 18:145–152CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Yang DH, Kim YH, Roh JH et al (2017) Diagnostic performance of on-site CT-derived fractional flow reserve versus CT perfusion. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 18:432–440CrossRefPubMed Yang DH, Kim YH, Roh JH et al (2017) Diagnostic performance of on-site CT-derived fractional flow reserve versus CT perfusion. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 18:432–440CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Papafaklis MI, Muramatsu T, Ishibashi Y et al (2014) Fast virtual functional assessment of intermediate coronary lesions using routine angiographic data and blood flow simulation in humans: comparison with pressure wire - fractional flow reserve. EuroIntervention 10:574–583CrossRefPubMed Papafaklis MI, Muramatsu T, Ishibashi Y et al (2014) Fast virtual functional assessment of intermediate coronary lesions using routine angiographic data and blood flow simulation in humans: comparison with pressure wire - fractional flow reserve. EuroIntervention 10:574–583CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Athanasiou L, Rigas G, Sakellarios AI et al (2016) Three-dimensional reconstruction of coronary arteries and plaque morphology using CT angiography--comparison and registration with IVUS. BMC Med Imaging 16:9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Athanasiou L, Rigas G, Sakellarios AI et al (2016) Three-dimensional reconstruction of coronary arteries and plaque morphology using CT angiography--comparison and registration with IVUS. BMC Med Imaging 16:9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Neglia D, Rovai D, Caselli C et al (2015) Detection of significant coronary artery disease by noninvasive anatomical and functional imaging. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 8 Neglia D, Rovai D, Caselli C et al (2015) Detection of significant coronary artery disease by noninvasive anatomical and functional imaging. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 8
24.
go back to reference Kern MJ, Lerman A, Bech JW et al (2006) Physiological assessment of coronary artery disease in the cardiac catheterization laboratory - a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation 114:1321–1341CrossRefPubMed Kern MJ, Lerman A, Bech JW et al (2006) Physiological assessment of coronary artery disease in the cardiac catheterization laboratory - a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation 114:1321–1341CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Gould KL (1978) Pressure-flow characteristics of coronary stenoses in unsedated dogs at rest and during coronary vasodilation. Circ Res 43:242–253CrossRefPubMed Gould KL (1978) Pressure-flow characteristics of coronary stenoses in unsedated dogs at rest and during coronary vasodilation. Circ Res 43:242–253CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Young DF (1979) Fluid-mechanics of arterial stenoses. J Biomech Eng 101:157–175CrossRef Young DF (1979) Fluid-mechanics of arterial stenoses. J Biomech Eng 101:157–175CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Brown BG, Bolson E, Frimer M, Dodge HT (1977) Quantitative coronary arteriography - estimation of dimensions, hemodynamic resistance, and atheroma mass of coronary-artery lesions using arteriogram and digital computation. Circulation 55:329–337CrossRefPubMed Brown BG, Bolson E, Frimer M, Dodge HT (1977) Quantitative coronary arteriography - estimation of dimensions, hemodynamic resistance, and atheroma mass of coronary-artery lesions using arteriogram and digital computation. Circulation 55:329–337CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Kern MJ, Bach RG, Mechem CJ et al (1996) Variations in normal coronary vasodilatory reserve stratified by artery, gender, heart transplantation and coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 28:1154–1160CrossRefPubMed Kern MJ, Bach RG, Mechem CJ et al (1996) Variations in normal coronary vasodilatory reserve stratified by artery, gender, heart transplantation and coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 28:1154–1160CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Johnson NP, Kirkeeide RL, Gould KL (2013) Coronary anatomy to predict physiology: fundamental limits. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 6:817–832CrossRefPubMed Johnson NP, Kirkeeide RL, Gould KL (2013) Coronary anatomy to predict physiology: fundamental limits. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 6:817–832CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Taylor CA, Fonte TA, Min JK (2013) Computational fluid dynamics applied to cardiac computed tomography for noninvasive quantification of fractional flow reserve: scientific basis. J Am Coll Cardiol 61:2233–2241CrossRefPubMed Taylor CA, Fonte TA, Min JK (2013) Computational fluid dynamics applied to cardiac computed tomography for noninvasive quantification of fractional flow reserve: scientific basis. J Am Coll Cardiol 61:2233–2241CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Montalescot G, Sechtem U, Achenbach S et al (2013) 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease. The Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 34:2949–3003 Montalescot G, Sechtem U, Achenbach S et al (2013) 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease. The Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 34:2949–3003
33.
go back to reference Liga R, Vontobel J, Rovai D et al (2016) Multicentre multi-device hybrid imaging study of coronary artery disease: results from the EValuation of INtegrated Cardiac Imaging for the Detection and Characterization of Ischaemic Heart Disease (EVINCI) hybrid imaging population. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jew038 Liga R, Vontobel J, Rovai D et al (2016) Multicentre multi-device hybrid imaging study of coronary artery disease: results from the EValuation of INtegrated Cardiac Imaging for the Detection and Characterization of Ischaemic Heart Disease (EVINCI) hybrid imaging population. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​ehjci/​jew038
34.
go back to reference Kajander S, Joutsiniemi E, Saraste M et al (2010) Cardiac positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging accurately detects anatomically and functionally significant coronary artery disease. Circulation 122:603–613CrossRefPubMed Kajander S, Joutsiniemi E, Saraste M et al (2010) Cardiac positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging accurately detects anatomically and functionally significant coronary artery disease. Circulation 122:603–613CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Morris PD, van de Vosse FN, Lawford PV, Hose DR, Gunn JP (2015) “Virtual” (computed) fractional flow reserve: current challenges and limitations. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 8:1009–1017CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Morris PD, van de Vosse FN, Lawford PV, Hose DR, Gunn JP (2015) “Virtual” (computed) fractional flow reserve: current challenges and limitations. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 8:1009–1017CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Noninvasive CT-based hemodynamic assessment of coronary lesions derived from fast computational analysis: a comparison against fractional flow reserve
Authors
Panagiotis K. Siogkas
Constantinos D. Anagnostopoulos
Riccardo Liga
Themis P. Exarchos
Antonis I. Sakellarios
George Rigas
Arthur J. H. A. Scholte
M. I. Papafaklis
Dimitra Loggitsi
Gualtiero Pelosi
Oberdan Parodi
Teemu Maaniitty
Lampros K. Michalis
Juhani Knuuti
Danilo Neglia
Dimitrios I. Fotiadis
Publication date
01-04-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 4/2019
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5781-8

Other articles of this Issue 4/2019

European Radiology 4/2019 Go to the issue