Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 10/2019

01-10-2019 | Head and Neck

Distinguishing early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma from benign hyperplasia using intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRI

Authors: Qi-Yong Ai, Ann D. King, Janet S. M. Chan, Weitian Chen, K. C. Allen Chan, John K. S. Woo, Benny C. Y. Zee, Anthony T. C. Chan, Darren M. C. Poon, Brigette B. Y. Ma, Edwin P. Hui, Anil T. Ahuja, Alexander C. Vlantis, Jing Yuan

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 10/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

MRI can detect early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), but the detection is more challenging in early-stage NPCs because they must be distinguished from benign hyperplasia in the nasopharynx. This study aimed to determine whether intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (IVIM DWI) MRI could distinguish between these two entities.

Methods

Thirty-four subjects with early-stage NPC and 30 subjects with benign hyperplasia prospectively underwent IVIM DWI. The mean pure diffusion coefficient (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), perfusion fraction (f) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were calculated for all subjects and compared between the 2 groups using Student’s t test. Receiver operating characteristics with the area under the curve (AUC) was used to identify the optimal threshold for all significant parameters, and the corresponding diagnostic performance was calculated. A p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Compared with benign hyperplasia, early-stage NPC exhibited a significantly lower D mean (0.64 ± 0.06 vs 0.87 ± 0.11 × 10−3 mm2/s), ADC0–1000 mean (0.77 ± 0.08 vs 1.00 ± 0.13 × 10−3 mm2/s), ADC300–1000 (0.63 ± 0.05 vs 0.86 ± 0.10 × 10−3 mm2/s) and a higher D* mean (32.66 ± 4.79 vs 21.96 ± 5.21 × 10−3 mm2/s) (all p < 0.001). No significant difference in the f mean was observed between the two groups (p = 0.216). The D and ADC300–1000 mean had the highest AUC of 0.985 and 0.988, respectively, and the D mean of < 0.75 × 10−3 mm2/s yielded the highest sensitivity, specificity and accuracy (100%, 93.3% and 96.9%, respectively) in distinguishing early-stage NPC from benign hyperplasia.

Conclusion

DWI has potential to distinguish early-stage NPC from benign hyperplasia and D and ADC300–1000 mean were the most promising parameters.

Key Points

• Diffusion-weighted imaging has potential to distinguish early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma from benign hyperplasia in the nasopharynx.
• The pure diffusion coefficient, pseudo-diffusion coefficient from intravoxel incoherent motion model and apparent diffusion coefficient from conventional diffusion-weighted imaging were significant parameters for distinguishing these two entities in the nasopharynx.
• The pure diffusion coefficient, followed by apparent diffusion coefficient, may be the most promising parameters to be used in screening studies to help detect early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bhatia KSS, King AD, Vlantis AC et al (2012) Nasopharyngeal mucosa and adenoids: appearance at MR imaging. Radiology 263:437–443CrossRefPubMed Bhatia KSS, King AD, Vlantis AC et al (2012) Nasopharyngeal mucosa and adenoids: appearance at MR imaging. Radiology 263:437–443CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Chan KCA, Woo JKS, King A et al (2017) Analysis of plasma Epstein–Barr virus DNA to screen for nasopharyngeal Cancer. N Engl J Med 377:513–522CrossRefPubMed Chan KCA, Woo JKS, King A et al (2017) Analysis of plasma Epstein–Barr virus DNA to screen for nasopharyngeal Cancer. N Engl J Med 377:513–522CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference King AD, Vlantis AC, Bhatia KSS et al (2011) Primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma : diagnostic accuracy of MR imaging versus that of endoscopy and endoscopic biopsy. Radiology 258:531–537CrossRefPubMed King AD, Vlantis AC, Bhatia KSS et al (2011) Primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma : diagnostic accuracy of MR imaging versus that of endoscopy and endoscopic biopsy. Radiology 258:531–537CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference King AD, Wong LYS, Law BKH et al (2018) MR imaging criteria for the detection of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: discrimination of early-stage primary tumors from benign hyperplasia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 39:515–523 King AD, Wong LYS, Law BKH et al (2018) MR imaging criteria for the detection of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: discrimination of early-stage primary tumors from benign hyperplasia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 39:515–523
5.
go back to reference Thoeny HC, De Keyzer F, King AD (2012) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the head and neck. Radiology 263:19–32CrossRefPubMed Thoeny HC, De Keyzer F, King AD (2012) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the head and neck. Radiology 263:19–32CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Zhang SX, Jia QJ, Zhang ZP et al (2014) Intravoxel incoherent motion MRI: emerging applications for nasopharyngeal carcinoma at the primary site. Eur Radiol 24:1998–2004CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhang SX, Jia QJ, Zhang ZP et al (2014) Intravoxel incoherent motion MRI: emerging applications for nasopharyngeal carcinoma at the primary site. Eur Radiol 24:1998–2004CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D et al (1988) Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology 168:497–505CrossRefPubMed Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D et al (1988) Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology 168:497–505CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference King AD, Lam WWM, Leung SF et al (1999) MRI of local disease in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: tumour extent vs tumour stage. Br J Radiol 72:734–741CrossRefPubMed King AD, Lam WWM, Leung SF et al (1999) MRI of local disease in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: tumour extent vs tumour stage. Br J Radiol 72:734–741CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference King AD, Vlantis AC, Yuen TWC et al (2015) Detection of nasopharyngeal carcinoma by MR imaging: diagnostic accuracy of MRI compared with endoscopy and endoscopic biopsy based on long-term follow-up. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36:2380–2385CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral King AD, Vlantis AC, Yuen TWC et al (2015) Detection of nasopharyngeal carcinoma by MR imaging: diagnostic accuracy of MRI compared with endoscopy and endoscopic biopsy based on long-term follow-up. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36:2380–2385CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Yoshida T, Urikura A, Shirata K et al (2016) Image quality assessment of single-shot turbo spin echo diffusion-weighted imaging with parallel imaging technique: a phantom study. Br J Radiol 89:20160512CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yoshida T, Urikura A, Shirata K et al (2016) Image quality assessment of single-shot turbo spin echo diffusion-weighted imaging with parallel imaging technique: a phantom study. Br J Radiol 89:20160512CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Mikayama R, Yabuuchi H, Sonoda S et al (2018) Comparison of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging between turbo spin-echo and echo-planar imaging of the head and neck. Eur Radiol 26:316–324CrossRef Mikayama R, Yabuuchi H, Sonoda S et al (2018) Comparison of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging between turbo spin-echo and echo-planar imaging of the head and neck. Eur Radiol 26:316–324CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sakamoto J, Imaizumi A, Sasaki Y et al (2014) Comparison of accuracy of intravoxel incoherent motion and apparent diffusion coefficient techniques for predicting malignancy of head and neck tumors using half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin-echo diffusion-weighted imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 32:860–866CrossRefPubMed Sakamoto J, Imaizumi A, Sasaki Y et al (2014) Comparison of accuracy of intravoxel incoherent motion and apparent diffusion coefficient techniques for predicting malignancy of head and neck tumors using half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin-echo diffusion-weighted imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 32:860–866CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Liang L, Luo X, Lian Z et al (2017) Lymph node metastasis in head and neck squamous carcinoma: efficacy of intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging for the differential diagnosis. Eur J Radiol 90:159–165CrossRefPubMed Liang L, Luo X, Lian Z et al (2017) Lymph node metastasis in head and neck squamous carcinoma: efficacy of intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging for the differential diagnosis. Eur J Radiol 90:159–165CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Sumi M, Van Cauteren M, Sumi T et al (2012) Salivary gland tumors: use of Intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for assessment of diffusion and perfusion for the differentiation of benign from malignant tumors. Radiology 263:770–777CrossRefPubMed Sumi M, Van Cauteren M, Sumi T et al (2012) Salivary gland tumors: use of Intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for assessment of diffusion and perfusion for the differentiation of benign from malignant tumors. Radiology 263:770–777CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Shen J, Xu X, Su G, Hu H (2018) Intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging of the normal-appearing parotid glands in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer after radioiodine therapy. Acta Radiol 59:204–211CrossRefPubMed Shen J, Xu X, Su G, Hu H (2018) Intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging of the normal-appearing parotid glands in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer after radioiodine therapy. Acta Radiol 59:204–211CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Lai V, Li X, Ho V et al (2013) Intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging : comparison of diffusion and perfusion characteristics between nasopharyngeal carcinoma and post-chemoradiation fibrosis. Eur Radiol 23:2793–2801CrossRefPubMed Lai V, Li X, Ho V et al (2013) Intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging : comparison of diffusion and perfusion characteristics between nasopharyngeal carcinoma and post-chemoradiation fibrosis. Eur Radiol 23:2793–2801CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Mao J, Shen J, Yang Q (2016) Intravoxel incoherent motion MRI in differentiation between recurrent carcinoma and postchemoradiation fibrosis of the skull base in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Magn Reson Imaging 44:1556–1564CrossRefPubMed Mao J, Shen J, Yang Q (2016) Intravoxel incoherent motion MRI in differentiation between recurrent carcinoma and postchemoradiation fibrosis of the skull base in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Magn Reson Imaging 44:1556–1564CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Jia QJ, Zhang SX, Chen WB et al (2014) Initial experience of correlating parameters of intravoxel incoherent motion and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Eur Radiol 24:3076–3087CrossRefPubMed Jia QJ, Zhang SX, Chen WB et al (2014) Initial experience of correlating parameters of intravoxel incoherent motion and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Eur Radiol 24:3076–3087CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Lai V, Li X, Lee VHF et al (2014) Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: comparison of diffusion and perfusion characteristics between different tumour stages using intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Eur Radiol 24:176–183CrossRefPubMed Lai V, Li X, Lee VHF et al (2014) Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: comparison of diffusion and perfusion characteristics between different tumour stages using intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Eur Radiol 24:176–183CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Xiao Y, Pan J, Chen Y et al (2015) Intravoxel incoherent motionmagnetic resonance imaging as an early predictor of treatment response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Medicine (Baltimore) 94:e973 Xiao Y, Pan J, Chen Y et al (2015) Intravoxel incoherent motionmagnetic resonance imaging as an early predictor of treatment response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Medicine (Baltimore) 94:e973
23.
go back to reference Xiao-Ping Y, Jing H, Fei-Ping L et al (2016) Intravoxel incoherent motion MRI for predicting early response to induction chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Magn Reson Imaging 43:1179–1190CrossRefPubMed Xiao-Ping Y, Jing H, Fei-Ping L et al (2016) Intravoxel incoherent motion MRI for predicting early response to induction chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Magn Reson Imaging 43:1179–1190CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Yu X, Hou J, Li F et al (2016) Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI for differentiation between nasopharyngeal carcinoma and lymphoma at the primary site. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 45:20150317CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yu X, Hou J, Li F et al (2016) Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI for differentiation between nasopharyngeal carcinoma and lymphoma at the primary site. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 45:20150317CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Surov A, Ryl I, Bartel-Friedrich S et al (2015) Diffusion weighted imaging of nasopharyngeal adenoid hypertrophy. Acta Radiol 56:587–591CrossRefPubMed Surov A, Ryl I, Bartel-Friedrich S et al (2015) Diffusion weighted imaging of nasopharyngeal adenoid hypertrophy. Acta Radiol 56:587–591CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Noij DP, Martens RM, Marcus JT et al (2017) Intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging in head and neck cancer: a systematic review of the diagnostic and prognostic value. Oral Oncol 68:81–91CrossRefPubMed Noij DP, Martens RM, Marcus JT et al (2017) Intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging in head and neck cancer: a systematic review of the diagnostic and prognostic value. Oral Oncol 68:81–91CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Distinguishing early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma from benign hyperplasia using intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRI
Authors
Qi-Yong Ai
Ann D. King
Janet S. M. Chan
Weitian Chen
K. C. Allen Chan
John K. S. Woo
Benny C. Y. Zee
Anthony T. C. Chan
Darren M. C. Poon
Brigette B. Y. Ma
Edwin P. Hui
Anil T. Ahuja
Alexander C. Vlantis
Jing Yuan
Publication date
01-10-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 10/2019
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06133-8

Other articles of this Issue 10/2019

European Radiology 10/2019 Go to the issue