Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 8/2018

Open Access 01-08-2018 | Interventional

The relationship between applied energy and ablation zone volume in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal liver metastasis

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 8/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To study the ratio of ablation zone volume to applied energy in computed tomography (CT)-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a cirrhotic liver and in patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM).

Methods

In total, 90 liver tumors, 45 HCCs in a cirrhotic liver and 45 CRLMs were treated with RFA or with one of two MWA devices (MWA_A and MWA_B), resulting in 15 procedures for each tumor type, per device. Device settings were recorded and the applied energy was calculated. Ablation volumes were segmented on the contrast-enhanced CT scans obtained 1 week after the procedure. The ratio of ablation zone volume in milliliters to applied energy in kilojoules was determined for each procedure and compared between HCC (RHCC) and CRLM (RCRLM), stratified according to ablation device.

Results

With RFA, RHCC and RCRLM were 0.22 mL/kJ (0.14–0.45 mL/kJ) and 0.15 mL/kJ (0.14–0.22 mL/kJ; p = 0.110), respectively. With MWA_A, RHCC was 0.81 (0.61–1.07 mL/kJ) and RCRLM was 0.43 (0.35–0.61 mL/kJ; p = 0.001). With MWA_B, RHCC was 0.67 (0.41–0.85 mL/kJ) and RCRLM was 0.43 (0.35–0.61 mL/kJ; p = 0.040).

Conclusions

With RFA, there was no significant difference in energy deposition ratio between tumor types. With both MWA devices, the ratios were higher for HCCs. Tailoring microwave ablation device protocols to tumor type might prevent incomplete ablations.

Key Points

• HCCs and CRLMs respond differently to microwave ablation
• For MWA, CRLMs required more energy to achieve a similar ablation volume
• Tailoring ablation protocols to tumor type might prevent incomplete ablations
Literature
1.
go back to reference Curley SA, Izzo F, Delrio P et al (1999) Radiofrequency ablation of unresectable primary and metastatic hepatic malignancies: results in 123 patients. Ann Surg. 230:1–8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Curley SA, Izzo F, Delrio P et al (1999) Radiofrequency ablation of unresectable primary and metastatic hepatic malignancies: results in 123 patients. Ann Surg. 230:1–8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Tanis E, Nordlinger B, Mauer M et al (2014) Local recurrence rates after radiofrequency ablation or resection of colorectal liver metastases. Analysis of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer #40004 and #40983. Eur J Cancer. 50:912–919CrossRefPubMed Tanis E, Nordlinger B, Mauer M et al (2014) Local recurrence rates after radiofrequency ablation or resection of colorectal liver metastases. Analysis of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer #40004 and #40983. Eur J Cancer. 50:912–919CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Seror O, N’Kontchou G, Nault J-C et al (2016) Hepatocellular carcinoma within Milan criteria: no-touch multibipolar radiofrequency ablation for treatment – long-term results. Radiology. 280:611–621CrossRefPubMed Seror O, N’Kontchou G, Nault J-C et al (2016) Hepatocellular carcinoma within Milan criteria: no-touch multibipolar radiofrequency ablation for treatment – long-term results. Radiology. 280:611–621CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kao W-Y, Chiou Y-Y, Hung H-H et al (2011) Risk factors for long-term prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation therapy: the clinical implication of aspartate aminotransferase-platelet ratio index. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 23:528–536PubMed Kao W-Y, Chiou Y-Y, Hung H-H et al (2011) Risk factors for long-term prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation therapy: the clinical implication of aspartate aminotransferase-platelet ratio index. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 23:528–536PubMed
5.
go back to reference Lam VW-T, Ng KK, Chok KS-H et al (2008) Incomplete ablation after radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of risk factors and prognostic factors. Ann Surg Oncol. 15:782–790CrossRefPubMed Lam VW-T, Ng KK, Chok KS-H et al (2008) Incomplete ablation after radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of risk factors and prognostic factors. Ann Surg Oncol. 15:782–790CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Hof J, Wertenbroek MW, Peeters PM et al (2016) Outcomes after resection and/or radiofrequency ablation for recurrences after treatment of colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg. 103:1055–1062CrossRefPubMed Hof J, Wertenbroek MW, Peeters PM et al (2016) Outcomes after resection and/or radiofrequency ablation for recurrences after treatment of colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg. 103:1055–1062CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Lam VW-T, Ng KK-C, Chok KS-H et al (2008) Risk factors and prognostic factors of local recurrence after radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 207:20–29CrossRefPubMed Lam VW-T, Ng KK-C, Chok KS-H et al (2008) Risk factors and prognostic factors of local recurrence after radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 207:20–29CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Lu DSK, Raman SS, Limanond P et al (2003) Influence of large peritumoral vessels on outcome of radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 14:1267–1274CrossRefPubMed Lu DSK, Raman SS, Limanond P et al (2003) Influence of large peritumoral vessels on outcome of radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 14:1267–1274CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kim Y, Rhim H, Cho OK et al (2006) Intrahepatic recurrence after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of the pattern and risk factors. Eur J Radiol. 59:432–441CrossRefPubMed Kim Y, Rhim H, Cho OK et al (2006) Intrahepatic recurrence after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of the pattern and risk factors. Eur J Radiol. 59:432–441CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Ahmed M, Solbiati L, Brace CL et al (2014) Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria—a 10-year update. Radiology. 273:241–260CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ahmed M, Solbiati L, Brace CL et al (2014) Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria—a 10-year update. Radiology. 273:241–260CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Deshazer G, Merck D, Hagmann M et al (2016) Physical modeling of microwave ablation zone clinical margin variance. Med Phys. 43:1764CrossRefPubMed Deshazer G, Merck D, Hagmann M et al (2016) Physical modeling of microwave ablation zone clinical margin variance. Med Phys. 43:1764CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference McAvoy NC, Semple S, Richards JM et al (2016) Differential visceral blood flow in the hyperdynamic circulation of patients with liver cirrhosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 43:947–954CrossRefPubMed McAvoy NC, Semple S, Richards JM et al (2016) Differential visceral blood flow in the hyperdynamic circulation of patients with liver cirrhosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 43:947–954CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Van Beers BE, Leconte I, Materne R et al (2001) Hepatic perfusion parameters in chronic liver disease: dynamic CT measurements correlated with disease severity. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 176:667–673CrossRefPubMed Van Beers BE, Leconte I, Materne R et al (2001) Hepatic perfusion parameters in chronic liver disease: dynamic CT measurements correlated with disease severity. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 176:667–673CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Hashimoto K, Murakami T, Dono K et al (2006) Assessment of the severity of liver disease and fibrotic change: the usefulness of hepatic CT perfusion imaging. Oncol Rep. 16:677–683PubMed Hashimoto K, Murakami T, Dono K et al (2006) Assessment of the severity of liver disease and fibrotic change: the usefulness of hepatic CT perfusion imaging. Oncol Rep. 16:677–683PubMed
16.
go back to reference Amabile C, Ahmed M, Solbiati L et al (2017) Microwave ablation of primary and secondary liver tumours: ex vivo, in vivo, and clinical characterisation. Int J Hyperthermia. 33:34–42CrossRefPubMed Amabile C, Ahmed M, Solbiati L et al (2017) Microwave ablation of primary and secondary liver tumours: ex vivo, in vivo, and clinical characterisation. Int J Hyperthermia. 33:34–42CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Berber E (2016) Laparoscopic microwave thermosphere ablation of malignant liver tumors : an initial clinical evaluation. Surg Endosc. 30:692–698CrossRefPubMed Berber E (2016) Laparoscopic microwave thermosphere ablation of malignant liver tumors : an initial clinical evaluation. Surg Endosc. 30:692–698CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Simo KA, Tsirline VB, Sindram D et al (2013) Microwave ablation using 915-MHz and 2.45-GHz systems: what are the differences? HPB (Oxford) 15:991–996CrossRef Simo KA, Tsirline VB, Sindram D et al (2013) Microwave ablation using 915-MHz and 2.45-GHz systems: what are the differences? HPB (Oxford) 15:991–996CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Liu F-Y, Yu X-L, Liang P et al (2010) Comparison of percutaneous 915 MHz microwave ablation and 2450 MHz microwave ablation in large hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Hyperthermia. 26:448–455CrossRefPubMed Liu F-Y, Yu X-L, Liang P et al (2010) Comparison of percutaneous 915 MHz microwave ablation and 2450 MHz microwave ablation in large hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Hyperthermia. 26:448–455CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Zaidi N, Okoh A, Yigitbas H et al (2016) Laparoscopic microwave thermosphere ablation of malignant liver tumors: an analysis of 53 cases. J Surg Oncol. 113:130–134CrossRefPubMed Zaidi N, Okoh A, Yigitbas H et al (2016) Laparoscopic microwave thermosphere ablation of malignant liver tumors: an analysis of 53 cases. J Surg Oncol. 113:130–134CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The relationship between applied energy and ablation zone volume in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal liver metastasis
Publication date
01-08-2018
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 8/2018
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5266-1

Other articles of this Issue 8/2018

European Radiology 8/2018 Go to the issue