Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 6/2017

01-06-2017 | Hepatobiliary-Pancreas

Fate of small pancreatic cysts (<3 cm) after long-term follow-up: analysis of significant radiologic characteristics and proposal of follow-up strategies

Authors: Heera Yoen, Jung Hoon Kim, Dong Ho Lee, Su Joa Ahn, Jeong Hee Yoon, Joon Koo Han

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 6/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To describe the natural history of pancreatic cysts after long-term follow-up, with an emphasis on the identifying indicators of indolent lesions.

Methods

We retrospectively sampled 95 patients with 149 cysts <3 cm detected by CT from 2003 to 2004, and followed them for more than five years (mean 117.5 ± 18.8 months). Two radiologists reviewed the initial CT images, then recorded changes after the follow-up. We compared the cysts’ initial characteristics between the surgery and non-surgery patient groups, and also between non-benign lesions and benign lesions.

Results

Twelve of the 95 patients, who among them had 16 cysts, underwent surgery. Of the 133 cysts in the 83 nonsurgical patients, 57 cysts (42.9 %) enlarged, although only five cysts increased to larger than 3 cm at the end of observation. The initial size of the cyst was significantly larger in the surgery group than non-surgery group. Also, according to cyst-based analysis, ductal communication, dilatation, and shape correlated with those of non-benign cysts and the non-surgical group. No cysts < 15 mm and without p-duct change showed a significant change within three years.

Conclusion

Small pancreatic cysts, without p-duct change, and without a pleomorphic or clubbed shape, may be followed for a longer interval than current consensus.

Key Points

Almost all small cysts < 3 cm were indolent in long term observation.
No cysts < 15 mm, without p-duct change showed significant change within 3 years.
Cyst size, ductal change and shape can be useful in predicting progress.
Only cysts with IPMN- like features and p-duct change need follow-up with cautions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nougaret S et al (2014) Incidental pancreatic cysts: natural history and diagnostic accuracy of a limited serial pancreatic cyst MRI protocol. Eur Radiol 24:1020–1029CrossRefPubMed Nougaret S et al (2014) Incidental pancreatic cysts: natural history and diagnostic accuracy of a limited serial pancreatic cyst MRI protocol. Eur Radiol 24:1020–1029CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Sahani DV et al (2013) Diagnosis and management of cystic pancreatic lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200:343–354CrossRefPubMed Sahani DV et al (2013) Diagnosis and management of cystic pancreatic lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200:343–354CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Handrich SJ et al (2005) The natural history of the incidentally discovered small simple pancreatic cyst: long-term follow-up and clinical implications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:20–23CrossRefPubMed Handrich SJ et al (2005) The natural history of the incidentally discovered small simple pancreatic cyst: long-term follow-up and clinical implications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:20–23CrossRefPubMed
5.
6.
go back to reference Brook OR et al (2015) Delayed growth in incidental pancreatic cysts: are the current American college of radiology recommendations for follow-up appropriate? Radiology 140972 Brook OR et al (2015) Delayed growth in incidental pancreatic cysts: are the current American college of radiology recommendations for follow-up appropriate? Radiology 140972
7.
go back to reference Vege SS et al (2015) American gastroenterological association institute guideline on the diagnosis and management of asymptomatic neoplastic pancreatic cysts. Gastroenterology 148:819CrossRefPubMed Vege SS et al (2015) American gastroenterological association institute guideline on the diagnosis and management of asymptomatic neoplastic pancreatic cysts. Gastroenterology 148:819CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Wu BU et al (2014) Prediction of malignancy in cystic neoplasms of the pancreas: a population-based cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol 109:121–129CrossRefPubMed Wu BU et al (2014) Prediction of malignancy in cystic neoplasms of the pancreas: a population-based cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol 109:121–129CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Tanaka M et al (2006) International consensus guidelines for management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. Pancreatology 6:17–32CrossRefPubMed Tanaka M et al (2006) International consensus guidelines for management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. Pancreatology 6:17–32CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Tanaka M et al (2012) International consensus guidelines 2012 for the management of IPMN and MCN of the pancreas. Pancreatology 12:183–197CrossRefPubMed Tanaka M et al (2012) International consensus guidelines 2012 for the management of IPMN and MCN of the pancreas. Pancreatology 12:183–197CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Ip IK et al (2011) Focal cystic pancreatic lesions: assessing variation in radiologists’ management recommendations. Radiology 259:136–141CrossRefPubMed Ip IK et al (2011) Focal cystic pancreatic lesions: assessing variation in radiologists’ management recommendations. Radiology 259:136–141CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Lee SH et al (2007) Outcomes of cystic lesions in the pancreas after extended follow-up. Dig Dis Sci 52:2653–2659CrossRefPubMed Lee SH et al (2007) Outcomes of cystic lesions in the pancreas after extended follow-up. Dig Dis Sci 52:2653–2659CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Sahani DV et al (2006) Pancreatic cysts 3 cm or smaller: how aggressive should treatment be? Radiology 238:912–919CrossRefPubMed Sahani DV et al (2006) Pancreatic cysts 3 cm or smaller: how aggressive should treatment be? Radiology 238:912–919CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Khannoussi W et al (2012) The long term risk of malignancy in patients with branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. Pancreatology 12:198–202CrossRefPubMed Khannoussi W et al (2012) The long term risk of malignancy in patients with branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. Pancreatology 12:198–202CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Kim SY et al (2006) Macrocystic neoplasms of the pancreas: CT differentiation of serous oligocystic adenoma from mucinous cystadenoma and intraductal papillary mucinous tumor. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:1192–1198CrossRefPubMed Kim SY et al (2006) Macrocystic neoplasms of the pancreas: CT differentiation of serous oligocystic adenoma from mucinous cystadenoma and intraductal papillary mucinous tumor. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:1192–1198CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Walter TC et al (2015) Implications of imaging criteria for the management and treatment of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms–benign versus malignant findings. Eur Radiol 25:1329–1338CrossRefPubMed Walter TC et al (2015) Implications of imaging criteria for the management and treatment of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms–benign versus malignant findings. Eur Radiol 25:1329–1338CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Fernandez-del Castillo C et al (2003) Incidental pancreatic cysts: clinicopathologic characteristics and comparison with symptomatic patients. Arch Surg 138:427-3, discussion 433-4 Fernandez-del Castillo C et al (2003) Incidental pancreatic cysts: clinicopathologic characteristics and comparison with symptomatic patients. Arch Surg 138:427-3, discussion 433-4
19.
go back to reference Matsumoto T et al (2003) Optimal management of the branch duct type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. J Clin Gastroenterol 36:261–265CrossRefPubMed Matsumoto T et al (2003) Optimal management of the branch duct type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. J Clin Gastroenterol 36:261–265CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Choi BS et al (2003) Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas: MR cholangiopancreatography and MR angiography. Korean J Radiol 4:157–162CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Choi BS et al (2003) Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas: MR cholangiopancreatography and MR angiography. Korean J Radiol 4:157–162CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Cahalane AM et al (2016) Which is the best current guideline for the diagnosis and management of cystic pancreatic neoplasms? An appraisal using evidence-based practice methods. Eur Radiol Cahalane AM et al (2016) Which is the best current guideline for the diagnosis and management of cystic pancreatic neoplasms? An appraisal using evidence-based practice methods. Eur Radiol
22.
go back to reference Italian Association of Hospital, G et al (2014) Italian consensus guidelines for the diagnostic work-up and follow-up of cystic pancreatic neoplasms. Dig Liver Dis 46:479–493CrossRef Italian Association of Hospital, G et al (2014) Italian consensus guidelines for the diagnostic work-up and follow-up of cystic pancreatic neoplasms. Dig Liver Dis 46:479–493CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Fate of small pancreatic cysts (<3 cm) after long-term follow-up: analysis of significant radiologic characteristics and proposal of follow-up strategies
Authors
Heera Yoen
Jung Hoon Kim
Dong Ho Lee
Su Joa Ahn
Jeong Hee Yoon
Joon Koo Han
Publication date
01-06-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 6/2017
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4589-7

Other articles of this Issue 6/2017

European Radiology 6/2017 Go to the issue