Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 9/2016

01-09-2016 | Breast

Combination of two-dimensional shear wave elastography with ultrasound breast imaging reporting and data system in the diagnosis of breast lesions: a new method to increase the diagnostic performance

Authors: Dan-Dan Li, Hui-Xiong Xu, Le-Hang Guo, Xiao-Wan Bo, Xiao-Long Li, Rong Wu, Jun-Mei Xu, Yi-Feng Zhang, Kun Zhang

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 9/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a new method of combined two-dimensional shear wave elastography (i.e. virtual touch imaging quantification, VTIQ) and ultrasound (US) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions.

Materials and methods

From September 2014 to December 2014, 276 patients with 296 pathologically proven breast lesions were enrolled in this study. The conventional US images were interpreted by two independent readers. The diagnosis performances of BI-RADS and combined BI-RADS and VTIQ were evaluated, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity and specificity. Observer consistency was also evaluated.

Results

Pathologically, 212 breast lesions were benign and 84 were malignant. Compared with BI-RADS alone, the AUROCs and specificities of the combined method for both readers increased significantly (AUROC: 0.862 vs. 0.693 in reader 1, 0.861 vs. 0.730 in reader 2; specificity: 91.5 % vs. 38.7 % in reader 1, 94.8 % vs. 47.2 % in reader 2; all P < .05). The Kappa value between the two readers for BI-RADS assessment was 0.614, and 0.796 for the combined method.

Conclusion

The combined VTIQ and BI-RADS had a better diagnostic performance in the diagnosis of breast lesions in comparison with BI-RADS alone.

Key Points

Combination of conventional ultrasound and elastography distinguishes breast cancers more effectively.
Combination of conventional ultrasound and elastography increases observer consistency.
BI-RADS weights more than the 2D-SWE with an increase in malignancy probability.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dey S, Soliman AS (2010) Cancer in the global health era: opportunities for the Middle East and Asia. Asia Pac J Public Health 22:75–82CrossRef Dey S, Soliman AS (2010) Cancer in the global health era: opportunities for the Middle East and Asia. Asia Pac J Public Health 22:75–82CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D (2011) Global Cancer Statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61:69–90CrossRefPubMed Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D (2011) Global Cancer Statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61:69–90CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Joe BN, Sickles EA (2014) The evolution of breast imaging: past to present. Radiology 273:23–44CrossRef Joe BN, Sickles EA (2014) The evolution of breast imaging: past to present. Radiology 273:23–44CrossRef
4.
go back to reference van Gils CH, Otten JD, Verbeek AL, Hendriks JH (1998) Mammographic breast density and risk of breast cancer: masking bias or causality? Eur J Epidemiol 14:315–320CrossRefPubMed van Gils CH, Otten JD, Verbeek AL, Hendriks JH (1998) Mammographic breast density and risk of breast cancer: masking bias or causality? Eur J Epidemiol 14:315–320CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Corsetti V, Ferrari A, Ghirardi M et al (2006) Role of ultrasonography in detecting mammographically occult breast carcinoma in women with dense breasts. Radiol Med 111:440–448CrossRefPubMed Corsetti V, Ferrari A, Ghirardi M et al (2006) Role of ultrasonography in detecting mammographically occult breast carcinoma in women with dense breasts. Radiol Med 111:440–448CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Harvey JA, Yaffe MJ, D'Orsi C, Sickles EA (2013) Density and breast cancer risk. Radiology 267:657–658CrossRefPubMed Harvey JA, Yaffe MJ, D'Orsi C, Sickles EA (2013) Density and breast cancer risk. Radiology 267:657–658CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Ianculescu V, Ciolovan LM, Dunant A et al (2014) Added value of Virtual Touch IQ shear wave elastography in the ultrasound assessment of breast lesions. Eur J Radiol 83:773–777CrossRefPubMed Ianculescu V, Ciolovan LM, Dunant A et al (2014) Added value of Virtual Touch IQ shear wave elastography in the ultrasound assessment of breast lesions. Eur J Radiol 83:773–777CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Tamaki K, Tamaki N, Kamada Y et al (2013) A non-invasive modality: The US Virtual Touch Tissue Quantification (VTTQ) for evaluation of breast cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 43:889–895CrossRefPubMed Tamaki K, Tamaki N, Kamada Y et al (2013) A non-invasive modality: The US Virtual Touch Tissue Quantification (VTTQ) for evaluation of breast cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 43:889–895CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Lee SH, Chang JM, Kim WH et al (2014) Added value of shear-wave elastography for evaluation of breast masses detected with screening US imaging. Radiology 273:61–69CrossRefPubMed Lee SH, Chang JM, Kim WH et al (2014) Added value of shear-wave elastography for evaluation of breast masses detected with screening US imaging. Radiology 273:61–69CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Jin ZQ, Li XR, Zhou HL et al (2012) Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography of breast imaging reporting and data system category 4 breast lesions. Clin Breast Cancer 12:420–427CrossRefPubMed Jin ZQ, Li XR, Zhou HL et al (2012) Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography of breast imaging reporting and data system category 4 breast lesions. Clin Breast Cancer 12:420–427CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Xu JM, Xu XH, Xu HX et al (2014) Conventional US, US elasticity imaging, and acoustic radiation force impulse imaging for prediction of malignancy in thyroid nodules. Radiology 272:577–586CrossRefPubMed Xu JM, Xu XH, Xu HX et al (2014) Conventional US, US elasticity imaging, and acoustic radiation force impulse imaging for prediction of malignancy in thyroid nodules. Radiology 272:577–586CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Berg WA, Cosgrove DO, Dore CJ et al (2012) Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses. Radiology 262:435–449CrossRefPubMed Berg WA, Cosgrove DO, Dore CJ et al (2012) Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses. Radiology 262:435–449CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Zhou J, Zhan W, Chang C et al (2014) Breast lesions: evaluation with shear wave elastography, with special emphasis on the "stiff rim" sign. Radiology 272:63–72CrossRefPubMed Zhou J, Zhan W, Chang C et al (2014) Breast lesions: evaluation with shear wave elastography, with special emphasis on the "stiff rim" sign. Radiology 272:63–72CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Golatta M, Schweitzer-Martin M, Harcos A et al (2013) Normal breast tissue stiffness measured by a new ultrasound technique: virtual touch tissue imaging quantification (VTIQ). Eur J Radiol 82:e676–e679CrossRefPubMed Golatta M, Schweitzer-Martin M, Harcos A et al (2013) Normal breast tissue stiffness measured by a new ultrasound technique: virtual touch tissue imaging quantification (VTIQ). Eur J Radiol 82:e676–e679CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Bai M, Du L, Gu J, Li F, Jia X (2012) Virtual touch tissue quantification using acoustic radiation force impulse technology: initial clinical experience with solid breast masses. J Ultrasound Med 31:289–294PubMed Bai M, Du L, Gu J, Li F, Jia X (2012) Virtual touch tissue quantification using acoustic radiation force impulse technology: initial clinical experience with solid breast masses. J Ultrasound Med 31:289–294PubMed
16.
go back to reference Tozaki M, Isobe S, Fukuma E (2011) Preliminary study of ultrasonographic tissue quantification of the breast using the acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) technology. Eur J Radiol 80:e182–e187CrossRefPubMed Tozaki M, Isobe S, Fukuma E (2011) Preliminary study of ultrasonographic tissue quantification of the breast using the acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) technology. Eur J Radiol 80:e182–e187CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Golatta M, Schweitzer-Martin M (2014) Evaluation of virtual touch tissue imaging quantification, a new shear wave velocity imaging method, for breast lesion assessment by ultrasound. Biomed Res Int 2014:96026CrossRef Golatta M, Schweitzer-Martin M (2014) Evaluation of virtual touch tissue imaging quantification, a new shear wave velocity imaging method, for breast lesion assessment by ultrasound. Biomed Res Int 2014:96026CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Tozaki M, Isobe S, Sakamoto M (2012) Combination of elastography and tissue quantification using the acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) technology for differential diagnosis of breast masses. Jpn J Radiol 30:659–670CrossRefPubMed Tozaki M, Isobe S, Sakamoto M (2012) Combination of elastography and tissue quantification using the acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) technology for differential diagnosis of breast masses. Jpn J Radiol 30:659–670CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Mendelson EB, Böhm-Vélez M, Berg WA, et al. (2013) ACR BI-RADS® ultrasound. In: ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. American College of Radiology, Reston, 121–132 Mendelson EB, Böhm-Vélez M, Berg WA, et al. (2013) ACR BI-RADS® ultrasound. In: ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. American College of Radiology, Reston, 121–132
20.
go back to reference Barr RG, Zhang Z (2015) Shear-wave elastography of the breast: value of a quality measure and comparison with strain elastography. Radiology 275:45–53CrossRefPubMed Barr RG, Zhang Z (2015) Shear-wave elastography of the breast: value of a quality measure and comparison with strain elastography. Radiology 275:45–53CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44:837–845CrossRefPubMed DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44:837–845CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Barr RG (2012) Sonographic breast elastography: a primer. J Ultrasound Med 31:773–783PubMed Barr RG (2012) Sonographic breast elastography: a primer. J Ultrasound Med 31:773–783PubMed
23.
go back to reference Fischer T, Peisker U, Fiedor S et al (2012) Significant differentiation of focal breast lesions: raw data-based calculation of strain ratio. Ultraschall Med 33:372–379CrossRefPubMed Fischer T, Peisker U, Fiedor S et al (2012) Significant differentiation of focal breast lesions: raw data-based calculation of strain ratio. Ultraschall Med 33:372–379CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Destounis S, Arieno A, Morgan R et al (2013) Clinical experience with elasticity imaging in a community-based breast center. J Ultrasound Med 32:297–302PubMed Destounis S, Arieno A, Morgan R et al (2013) Clinical experience with elasticity imaging in a community-based breast center. J Ultrasound Med 32:297–302PubMed
25.
go back to reference Barr RG, Destounis S, Lackey LB 2nd, Svensson WE, Balleyguier C, Smith C (2012) Evaluation of breast lesions using sonographic elasticity imaging: a multicenter trial. J Ultrasound Med 31:281–287PubMed Barr RG, Destounis S, Lackey LB 2nd, Svensson WE, Balleyguier C, Smith C (2012) Evaluation of breast lesions using sonographic elasticity imaging: a multicenter trial. J Ultrasound Med 31:281–287PubMed
26.
go back to reference Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E et al (2006) Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 239:341–350CrossRefPubMed Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E et al (2006) Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 239:341–350CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Balleyguier C, Ciolovan L, Ammari S et al (2013) Breast elastography: the technical process and its applications. Diagn Interv Imaging 94:503–513CrossRefPubMed Balleyguier C, Ciolovan L, Ammari S et al (2013) Breast elastography: the technical process and its applications. Diagn Interv Imaging 94:503–513CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Barr RG (2010) Real-time ultrasound elasticity of the breast: initial clinical results. Ultrasound Q 26:61–66CrossRefPubMed Barr RG (2010) Real-time ultrasound elasticity of the breast: initial clinical results. Ultrasound Q 26:61–66CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Sadigh G, Carlos RC, Neal CH, Dwamena BA (2012) Accuracy of quantitative ultrasound elastography for differentiation of malignant and benign breast abnormalities: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 134:923–931CrossRefPubMed Sadigh G, Carlos RC, Neal CH, Dwamena BA (2012) Accuracy of quantitative ultrasound elastography for differentiation of malignant and benign breast abnormalities: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 134:923–931CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Li G, Li DW, Fang YX et al (2013) Performance of shear wave elastography for differentiation of benign and malignant solid breast masses. PLoS One 8, e76322CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Li G, Li DW, Fang YX et al (2013) Performance of shear wave elastography for differentiation of benign and malignant solid breast masses. PLoS One 8, e76322CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Zhou J, Zhan W, Chang C et al (2013) Role of acoustic shear wave velocity measurement in characterization of breast lesions. J Ultrasound Med 32:285–294CrossRefPubMed Zhou J, Zhan W, Chang C et al (2013) Role of acoustic shear wave velocity measurement in characterization of breast lesions. J Ultrasound Med 32:285–294CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Barr RG (2012) Shear wave imaging of the breast: still on the learning curve. J Ultrasound Med 31:347–350PubMed Barr RG (2012) Shear wave imaging of the breast: still on the learning curve. J Ultrasound Med 31:347–350PubMed
33.
go back to reference Evans A, Whelehan P, Thomson K et al (2012) Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses: value of shear wave elastography according to lesion stiffness combined with greyscale ultrasound according to BI-RADS classification. Brit J Cancer 107:224–229CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Evans A, Whelehan P, Thomson K et al (2012) Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses: value of shear wave elastography according to lesion stiffness combined with greyscale ultrasound according to BI-RADS classification. Brit J Cancer 107:224–229CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Vinnicombe SJ, Whelehan P, Thomson K et al (2014) What are the characteristics of breast cancers misclassified as benign by quantitative ultrasound shear wave elastography? Eur Radiol 24:921–926CrossRefPubMed Vinnicombe SJ, Whelehan P, Thomson K et al (2014) What are the characteristics of breast cancers misclassified as benign by quantitative ultrasound shear wave elastography? Eur Radiol 24:921–926CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Combination of two-dimensional shear wave elastography with ultrasound breast imaging reporting and data system in the diagnosis of breast lesions: a new method to increase the diagnostic performance
Authors
Dan-Dan Li
Hui-Xiong Xu
Le-Hang Guo
Xiao-Wan Bo
Xiao-Long Li
Rong Wu
Jun-Mei Xu
Yi-Feng Zhang
Kun Zhang
Publication date
01-09-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 9/2016
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-4163-8

Other articles of this Issue 9/2016

European Radiology 9/2016 Go to the issue