Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 10/2014

01-10-2014 | Physics

Automatic exposure control in CT: the effect of patient size, anatomical region and prescribed modulation strength on tube current and image quality

Authors: Antonios E. Papadakis, Kostas Perisinakis, John Damilakis

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 10/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To study the effect of patient size, body region and modulation strength on tube current and image quality on CT examinations that use automatic tube current modulation (ATCM).

Methods

Ten physical anthropomorphic phantoms that simulate an individual as neonate, 1-, 5-, 10-year-old and adult at various body habitus were employed. CT acquisition of head, neck, thorax and abdomen/pelvis was performed with ATCM activated at weak, average and strong modulation strength. The mean modulated mAs (mAsmod) values were recorded. Image noise was measured at selected anatomical sites.

Results

The mAsmod recorded for neonate compared to 10-year-old increased by 30 %, 14 %, 6 % and 53 % for head, neck, thorax and abdomen/pelvis, respectively, (P < 0.05). The mAsmod was lower than the preselected mAs with the exception of the 10-year-old phantom. In paediatric and adult phantoms, the mAsmod ranged from 44 and 53 for weak to 117 and 93 for strong modulation strength, respectively. At the same exposure parameters image noise increased with body size (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

The ATCM system studied here may affect dose differently for different patient habitus. Dose may decrease for overweight adults but increase for children older than 5 years old. Care should be taken when implementing ATCM protocols to ensure that image quality is maintained.

Key Points

ATCM efficiency is related to the size of the patient’s body.
ATCM should be activated without caution in overweight adult individuals.
ATCM may increase radiation dose in children older than 5 years old.
ATCM efficiency depends on the protocol selected for a specific anatomical region.
Modulation strength may be appropriately tuned to enhance ATCM efficiency.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mulkens TH, Bellinck P, Baeyaert M, Ghysen D, Van Dijck X, Mussen E, Venstermans C, Termote J (2005) Use of an automatic exposure control mechanism for dose optimization in multi–detector row CT examinations: clinical evaluation. Radiology 237:213–223PubMedCrossRef Mulkens TH, Bellinck P, Baeyaert M, Ghysen D, Van Dijck X, Mussen E, Venstermans C, Termote J (2005) Use of an automatic exposure control mechanism for dose optimization in multi–detector row CT examinations: clinical evaluation. Radiology 237:213–223PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Rizzo S, Kalra M, Schmidt B, Dalal T, Suess C, Flohr T, Blake M, Saini S (2006) Comparison of angular and combined automatic tube current modulation techniques with constant tube current CT of the abdomen and pelvis. Am J Roentgenol 186:673–679CrossRef Rizzo S, Kalra M, Schmidt B, Dalal T, Suess C, Flohr T, Blake M, Saini S (2006) Comparison of angular and combined automatic tube current modulation techniques with constant tube current CT of the abdomen and pelvis. Am J Roentgenol 186:673–679CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kalra M, Maher M, Toth T, Kamath R, Halpern E, Saini S (2004) Comparison of z-axis automatic tube current modulation technique with fixed tube current CT scanning of abdomen and pelvis. Radiology 232:347–353PubMedCrossRef Kalra M, Maher M, Toth T, Kamath R, Halpern E, Saini S (2004) Comparison of z-axis automatic tube current modulation technique with fixed tube current CT scanning of abdomen and pelvis. Radiology 232:347–353PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Papadakis AE, Perisinakis K, Damilakis J (2008) Automatic exposure control in pediatric and adult multi-detector CT examinations: a phantom study on dose reduction and image quality. Med Phys 35:4567–4576PubMedCrossRef Papadakis AE, Perisinakis K, Damilakis J (2008) Automatic exposure control in pediatric and adult multi-detector CT examinations: a phantom study on dose reduction and image quality. Med Phys 35:4567–4576PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Allen BC, Baker ME, Einstein DM, Remer EM, Herts BR, Achkar JP, Davros W, Novac E, Obuchowski N (2010) Effect of altering automatic exposure settings and image quality reference mAs on radiation dose, image quality, and diagnostic efficacy in MDCT enterography of active inflammatory Crohn’s disease. Am J Roentgenol 195:89–100CrossRef Allen BC, Baker ME, Einstein DM, Remer EM, Herts BR, Achkar JP, Davros W, Novac E, Obuchowski N (2010) Effect of altering automatic exposure settings and image quality reference mAs on radiation dose, image quality, and diagnostic efficacy in MDCT enterography of active inflammatory Crohn’s disease. Am J Roentgenol 195:89–100CrossRef
6.
go back to reference McCollough C, Bruesewitz M, Kofler JM (2006) CT dose reduction and dose management tools: overview of available options. Radiographics 26:503–512PubMedCrossRef McCollough C, Bruesewitz M, Kofler JM (2006) CT dose reduction and dose management tools: overview of available options. Radiographics 26:503–512PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kalra M, Maher M, Kamath R, Horiouchi T, Toth T, Halpern E, Saini S (2004) Sixteen-detector row CT of abdomen and pelvis: study for optimization of z-axis modulation technique performed in 153 patients. Radiology 233:241–249PubMedCrossRef Kalra M, Maher M, Kamath R, Horiouchi T, Toth T, Halpern E, Saini S (2004) Sixteen-detector row CT of abdomen and pelvis: study for optimization of z-axis modulation technique performed in 153 patients. Radiology 233:241–249PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Solomon JB, Li X, Samei E (2013) Relating noise to image quality indicators in CT examinations with tube current modulation. Am J Roentgenol 200:592–600CrossRef Solomon JB, Li X, Samei E (2013) Relating noise to image quality indicators in CT examinations with tube current modulation. Am J Roentgenol 200:592–600CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kalra M, Brady T (2006) CARE Dose4D new technique for radiation dose reduction. Siemens Somatom Session 19:28–31 Kalra M, Brady T (2006) CARE Dose4D new technique for radiation dose reduction. Siemens Somatom Session 19:28–31
10.
go back to reference Bredenholler C, Feuerlein U (2006) Somatom sensation 16 application guide. Siemens Medical, Forchheim Bredenholler C, Feuerlein U (2006) Somatom sensation 16 application guide. Siemens Medical, Forchheim
11.
go back to reference Sookpeng S, Martin CJ, Gentle DJ, Lopez-Gonzalez MR (2014) Relationships between patient size, dose and image noise under automatic tube current modulation systems. J Radiol Prot 34:103–123PubMedCrossRef Sookpeng S, Martin CJ, Gentle DJ, Lopez-Gonzalez MR (2014) Relationships between patient size, dose and image noise under automatic tube current modulation systems. J Radiol Prot 34:103–123PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Söderberg M, Gunnarsson M (2010) The effect of different adaptation strengths on image quality and radiation dose using Siemens Care Dose 4D. Radiat Prot Dosim 139:173–179CrossRef Söderberg M, Gunnarsson M (2010) The effect of different adaptation strengths on image quality and radiation dose using Siemens Care Dose 4D. Radiat Prot Dosim 139:173–179CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kalra M, Maher M, Toth T, Schmidt B, Westerman B, Morgan H, Saini S (2004) Techniques and applications of automatic tube current modulation for CT. Radiology 233:649–657PubMedCrossRef Kalra M, Maher M, Toth T, Schmidt B, Westerman B, Morgan H, Saini S (2004) Techniques and applications of automatic tube current modulation for CT. Radiology 233:649–657PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kalender W, Wolf H, Suess C (1999) Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. II. Phantom measurements. Med Phys 26:2248–2253PubMedCrossRef Kalender W, Wolf H, Suess C (1999) Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. II. Phantom measurements. Med Phys 26:2248–2253PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Papadakis AE, Perisinakis K, Oikonomou I, Damilakis J (2011) Automatic exposure control in pediatric and adult computed tomography examinations: can we estimate organ and effective dose from mean mAs reduction? Investig Radiol 46:654–662CrossRef Papadakis AE, Perisinakis K, Oikonomou I, Damilakis J (2011) Automatic exposure control in pediatric and adult computed tomography examinations: can we estimate organ and effective dose from mean mAs reduction? Investig Radiol 46:654–662CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Papadakis AE, Perisinakis K, Damilakis J (2007) Angular on-line tube current modulation in multidetector CT examinations of children and adults: the influence of different scanning parameters on dose reduction. Med Phys 34:2864–2874PubMedCrossRef Papadakis AE, Perisinakis K, Damilakis J (2007) Angular on-line tube current modulation in multidetector CT examinations of children and adults: the influence of different scanning parameters on dose reduction. Med Phys 34:2864–2874PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Brisse H, Robilliard M, Savignoni A, Pierrat N, Gaboriaud G, De Rycke Y, Neuenschwander S, Aubert B, Rosenwald J (2009) Assessment of organ absorbed doses and estimation of effective doses from pediatric anthropomorphic phantom measurements for multi-detector row CT with and without automatic exposure control. Health Phys 97:303–314PubMedCrossRef Brisse H, Robilliard M, Savignoni A, Pierrat N, Gaboriaud G, De Rycke Y, Neuenschwander S, Aubert B, Rosenwald J (2009) Assessment of organ absorbed doses and estimation of effective doses from pediatric anthropomorphic phantom measurements for multi-detector row CT with and without automatic exposure control. Health Phys 97:303–314PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference van Straten M, Deak P, Shrimpton P, Kalender W (2009) The effect of angular and longitudinal tube current modulations on the estimation of organ and effective doses in x-ray computed tomography. Med Phys 36:4881–4889PubMedCrossRef van Straten M, Deak P, Shrimpton P, Kalender W (2009) The effect of angular and longitudinal tube current modulations on the estimation of organ and effective doses in x-ray computed tomography. Med Phys 36:4881–4889PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Das M, Mahnken AH, Muhlenbruch G, Stargardt A, Weiss C, Sennst D, Flohr T, Gunther R, Wildberger J (2005) Individually adapted examination protocols for reduction of radiation exposure for 16-MDCT chest examinations. Am J Roentgenol 184:1437–1443CrossRef Das M, Mahnken AH, Muhlenbruch G, Stargardt A, Weiss C, Sennst D, Flohr T, Gunther R, Wildberger J (2005) Individually adapted examination protocols for reduction of radiation exposure for 16-MDCT chest examinations. Am J Roentgenol 184:1437–1443CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Tack D, De Maertelaer V, Gevenois P (2003) Dose reduction in multidetector CT using attenuation-based online tube current modulation. Am J Roentgenol 181:331–334CrossRef Tack D, De Maertelaer V, Gevenois P (2003) Dose reduction in multidetector CT using attenuation-based online tube current modulation. Am J Roentgenol 181:331–334CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Greess H, Lutze J, Nomayr A, Wolf H, Horhorn T, Kalender W, Bautz W (2004) Dose reduction in subsecond multislice spiral CT examination of children by on-line tube current modulation. Eur Radiol 14:995–999PubMedCrossRef Greess H, Lutze J, Nomayr A, Wolf H, Horhorn T, Kalender W, Bautz W (2004) Dose reduction in subsecond multislice spiral CT examination of children by on-line tube current modulation. Eur Radiol 14:995–999PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Papadakis AE, Perisinakis K, Raissaki M, Damilakis J (2013) Effect of x-ray tube parameters and iodine concentration on image quality and radiation dose in cerebral pediatric and adult CT angiography. Investig Radiol 48:192–199 Papadakis AE, Perisinakis K, Raissaki M, Damilakis J (2013) Effect of x-ray tube parameters and iodine concentration on image quality and radiation dose in cerebral pediatric and adult CT angiography. Investig Radiol 48:192–199
Metadata
Title
Automatic exposure control in CT: the effect of patient size, anatomical region and prescribed modulation strength on tube current and image quality
Authors
Antonios E. Papadakis
Kostas Perisinakis
John Damilakis
Publication date
01-10-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 10/2014
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3309-4

Other articles of this Issue 10/2014

European Radiology 10/2014 Go to the issue