Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 9/2013

01-09-2013 | Hepatobiliary-Pancreas

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound features of histologically proven focal nodular hyperplasia: diagnostic performance compared with contrast-enhanced CT

Authors: Wei Wang, Li-Da Chen, Ming-De Lu, Guang-Jian Liu, Shun-Li Shen, Zuo-Feng Xu, Xiao-Yan Xie, Yan Wang, Lu-Yao Zhou

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 9/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate and compare contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the characterisation of histologically proven focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT).

Methods

CEUS was performed in 85 patients with 85 histologically proven FNHs. Enhancement, centrifugal filling, spoke-wheel arteries, feeding artery and central scarring were reviewed and correlated with lesion size or liver background. Independent factors for predicting FNH from other focal liver lesions (FLLs) were evaluated. Forty-seven FLLs with CECT were randomly selected for comparison of diagnostic performance with CEUS.

Results

Centrifugal filling was more common (P = 0.002) and the significant predictor (P = 0.003) in FNHs ≤3 cm. Lesion size or liver background has no significant influence on the detection rate of the spoke-wheel arteries and feeding artery (P > 0.05). Central scarring was found in 42.6 % of FNHs ≥3 cm (P = 0.000). The area under the ROC curve, sensitivity and specificity showed no significant differences between CEUS and CECT (P > 0.05), except that the sensitivity of CEUS was better for reader 1 (P = 0.041).

Conclusion

CEUS is valuable in characterising centrifugal filling signs or spoke wheels in small FNHs and should be employed as the first-line imaging technique for diagnosis of FNH.

Key Points

The confident diagnosis of focal nodular hyperplasia is important in liver imaging.
The centrifugal filling sign is useful for diagnosis of FNHs ≤3 cm.
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced CT have similar diagnostic performance for FNH.
CEUS should be the first-line imaging technique for the diagnosis of FNH.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hussain SM, Terkivatan T, Zondervan PE et al (2004) Focal nodular hyperplasia: findings at state-of-the-art MR imaging, US, CT, and pathologic analysis. Radiographics 24:3–17PubMedCrossRef Hussain SM, Terkivatan T, Zondervan PE et al (2004) Focal nodular hyperplasia: findings at state-of-the-art MR imaging, US, CT, and pathologic analysis. Radiographics 24:3–17PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Dietrich CF, Maddalena ME, Cui XW, Schreiber-Dietrich D, Ignee A (2012) Liver tumor characterization–review of the literature. Ultraschall Med 33:S3–S10PubMedCrossRef Dietrich CF, Maddalena ME, Cui XW, Schreiber-Dietrich D, Ignee A (2012) Liver tumor characterization–review of the literature. Ultraschall Med 33:S3–S10PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Quaia E, Calliada F, Bertolotto M et al (2004) Characterization of focal liver lesions with contrast-specific US modes and a sulfur hexafluoride-filled microbubble contrast agent: diagnostic performance and confidence. Radiology 232:420–430PubMedCrossRef Quaia E, Calliada F, Bertolotto M et al (2004) Characterization of focal liver lesions with contrast-specific US modes and a sulfur hexafluoride-filled microbubble contrast agent: diagnostic performance and confidence. Radiology 232:420–430PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Burns PN, Wilson SR (2007) Focal liver masses: enhancement patterns on contrast-enhanced images–concordance of US scans with CT scans and MR images. Radiology 242:162–174PubMedCrossRef Burns PN, Wilson SR (2007) Focal liver masses: enhancement patterns on contrast-enhanced images–concordance of US scans with CT scans and MR images. Radiology 242:162–174PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Claudon M, Cosgrove D, Albrecht T et al (2008) Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) - update 2008. Ultraschall Med 29:28–44PubMedCrossRef Claudon M, Cosgrove D, Albrecht T et al (2008) Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) - update 2008. Ultraschall Med 29:28–44PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Seitz K, Bernatik T, Strobel D et al (2010) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for the characterization of focal liver lesions in clinical practice (DEGUM Multicenter Trial): CEUS vs. MRI–a prospective comparison in 269 patients. Ultraschall Med 31:492–499PubMedCrossRef Seitz K, Bernatik T, Strobel D et al (2010) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for the characterization of focal liver lesions in clinical practice (DEGUM Multicenter Trial): CEUS vs. MRI–a prospective comparison in 269 patients. Ultraschall Med 31:492–499PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Seitz K, Strobel D, Bernatik T et al (2009) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for the characterization of focal liver lesions—prospective comparison in clinical practice: CEUS vs. CT (DEGUM multicenter trial). Parts of this manuscript were presented at the Ultrasound Dreilandertreffen 2008, Davos. Ultraschall Med 30:383–389PubMedCrossRef Seitz K, Strobel D, Bernatik T et al (2009) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for the characterization of focal liver lesions—prospective comparison in clinical practice: CEUS vs. CT (DEGUM multicenter trial). Parts of this manuscript were presented at the Ultrasound Dreilandertreffen 2008, Davos. Ultraschall Med 30:383–389PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Dietrich CF (2012) Liver tumor characterization—comments and illustrations regarding guidelines. Ultraschall Med 33:S22–S30PubMedCrossRef Dietrich CF (2012) Liver tumor characterization—comments and illustrations regarding guidelines. Ultraschall Med 33:S22–S30PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bartolotta TV, Taibbi A, Matranga D, Malizia G, Lagalla R, Midiri M (2010) Hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia: contrast-enhanced ultrasound findings with emphasis on lesion size, depth and liver echogenicity. Eur Radiol 20:2248–2256PubMedCrossRef Bartolotta TV, Taibbi A, Matranga D, Malizia G, Lagalla R, Midiri M (2010) Hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia: contrast-enhanced ultrasound findings with emphasis on lesion size, depth and liver echogenicity. Eur Radiol 20:2248–2256PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Yen YH, Wang JH, Lu SN et al (2006) Contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic spoke-wheel sign in hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia. Eur J Radiol 60:439–444PubMedCrossRef Yen YH, Wang JH, Lu SN et al (2006) Contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic spoke-wheel sign in hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia. Eur J Radiol 60:439–444PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Xu HX, Liu GJ, Lu MD et al (2006) Characterization of focal liver lesions using contrast-enhanced sonography with a low mechanical index mode and a sulfur hexafluoride-filled microbubble contrast agent. J Clin Ultrasound 34:261–272PubMedCrossRef Xu HX, Liu GJ, Lu MD et al (2006) Characterization of focal liver lesions using contrast-enhanced sonography with a low mechanical index mode and a sulfur hexafluoride-filled microbubble contrast agent. J Clin Ultrasound 34:261–272PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Rogers JV, Mack LA, Freeny PC, Johnson ML, Sones PJ (1981) Hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia: angiography, CT, sonography, and scintigraphy. Am J Roentgenol 137:983–990CrossRef Rogers JV, Mack LA, Freeny PC, Johnson ML, Sones PJ (1981) Hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia: angiography, CT, sonography, and scintigraphy. Am J Roentgenol 137:983–990CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Wang LY, Wang JH, Lin ZY et al (1997) Hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia: findings on color Doppler ultrasound. Abdom Imaging 22:178–181PubMedCrossRef Wang LY, Wang JH, Lin ZY et al (1997) Hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia: findings on color Doppler ultrasound. Abdom Imaging 22:178–181PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kim MJ, Lim HK, Kim SH et al (2004) Evaluation of hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia with contrast-enhanced gray scale harmonic sonography: initial experience. J Ultrasound Med 23:297–305PubMed Kim MJ, Lim HK, Kim SH et al (2004) Evaluation of hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia with contrast-enhanced gray scale harmonic sonography: initial experience. J Ultrasound Med 23:297–305PubMed
15.
go back to reference Liu GJ, Wang W, Xie XY et al (2010) Real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of focal liver lesions in fatty liver. Clin Imaging 34:211–221PubMedCrossRef Liu GJ, Wang W, Xie XY et al (2010) Real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of focal liver lesions in fatty liver. Clin Imaging 34:211–221PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Piscaglia F, Venturi A, Mancini M et al (2010) Diagnostic features of real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound in focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver. Ultraschall Med 31:276–282PubMedCrossRef Piscaglia F, Venturi A, Mancini M et al (2010) Diagnostic features of real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound in focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver. Ultraschall Med 31:276–282PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ungermann L, Elias P, Zizka J, Ryska P, Klzo L (2007) Focal nodular hyperplasia: spoke-wheel arterial pattern and other signs on dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Eur J Radiol 63:290–294PubMedCrossRef Ungermann L, Elias P, Zizka J, Ryska P, Klzo L (2007) Focal nodular hyperplasia: spoke-wheel arterial pattern and other signs on dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Eur J Radiol 63:290–294PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Dietrich CF, Schuessler G, Trojan J, Fellbaum C, Ignee A (2005) Differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma by contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Br J Radiol 78:704–707PubMedCrossRef Dietrich CF, Schuessler G, Trojan J, Fellbaum C, Ignee A (2005) Differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma by contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Br J Radiol 78:704–707PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kim TK, Jang HJ, Burns PN, Murphy-Lavallee J, Wilson SR (2008) Focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatic adenoma: differentiation with low-mechanical-index contrast-enhanced sonography. Am J Roentgenol 190:58–66CrossRef Kim TK, Jang HJ, Burns PN, Murphy-Lavallee J, Wilson SR (2008) Focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatic adenoma: differentiation with low-mechanical-index contrast-enhanced sonography. Am J Roentgenol 190:58–66CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Guang Y, Xie L, Ding H, Cai A, Huang Y (2011) Diagnosis value of focal liver lesions with SonoVue(R)-enhanced ultrasound compared with contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced MRI: a meta-analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 137:1595–1605PubMedCrossRef Guang Y, Xie L, Ding H, Cai A, Huang Y (2011) Diagnosis value of focal liver lesions with SonoVue(R)-enhanced ultrasound compared with contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced MRI: a meta-analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 137:1595–1605PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Van Hoe L, Baert AL, Gryspeerdt S et al (1997) Dual-phase helical CT of the liver: value of an early-phase acquisition in the differential diagnosis of noncystic focal lesions. Am J Roentgenol 168:1185–1192CrossRef Van Hoe L, Baert AL, Gryspeerdt S et al (1997) Dual-phase helical CT of the liver: value of an early-phase acquisition in the differential diagnosis of noncystic focal lesions. Am J Roentgenol 168:1185–1192CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Wilson SR, Kim TK, Jang HJ, Burns PN (2007) Enhancement patterns of focal liver masses: discordance between contrast-enhanced sonography and contrast-enhanced CT and MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:W7–W12PubMedCrossRef Wilson SR, Kim TK, Jang HJ, Burns PN (2007) Enhancement patterns of focal liver masses: discordance between contrast-enhanced sonography and contrast-enhanced CT and MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:W7–W12PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Kudo M, Tomita S, Tochio H, Kashida H, Hirasa M, Todo A (1991) Hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia: specific findings at dynamic contrast-enhanced US with carbon dioxide microbubbles. Radiology 179:377–382PubMed Kudo M, Tomita S, Tochio H, Kashida H, Hirasa M, Todo A (1991) Hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia: specific findings at dynamic contrast-enhanced US with carbon dioxide microbubbles. Radiology 179:377–382PubMed
24.
go back to reference Strobel D, Bernatik T, Blank W et al (2011) Diagnostic accuracy of CEUS in the differential diagnosis of small (</= 20 mm) and subcentimetric (</= 10 mm) focal liver lesions in comparison with histology. Results of the DEGUM multicenter trial. Ultraschall Med 32:593–597PubMedCrossRef Strobel D, Bernatik T, Blank W et al (2011) Diagnostic accuracy of CEUS in the differential diagnosis of small (</= 20 mm) and subcentimetric (</= 10 mm) focal liver lesions in comparison with histology. Results of the DEGUM multicenter trial. Ultraschall Med 32:593–597PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound features of histologically proven focal nodular hyperplasia: diagnostic performance compared with contrast-enhanced CT
Authors
Wei Wang
Li-Da Chen
Ming-De Lu
Guang-Jian Liu
Shun-Li Shen
Zuo-Feng Xu
Xiao-Yan Xie
Yan Wang
Lu-Yao Zhou
Publication date
01-09-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 9/2013
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-2849-3

Other articles of this Issue 9/2013

European Radiology 9/2013 Go to the issue