Top

European Radiology

Published in:

01-11-2011 | Cardiac

Step and shoot coronary CT angiography using 256-slice CT: effect of heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality

Authors: D. Muenzel, P. B. Noel, F. Dorn, M. Dobritz, E. J. Rummeny, A. Huber

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 11/2011

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the effect of heart rate variability (HRV) and heart rate (HR) on intra-image “motion” and inter-image “stairstep” artefacts in step-and-shoot coronary CT angiography (CCTA) using a wide detector CT scanner.

Methods

66 patients underwent step-and-shoot CCTA using 256-slice CT. Patients were divided into two groups (Group 1: HR <65 bpm, Group 2 ≥65bpm). Motion artefacts were quantified using a 5-point-scale. Stairstep artefacts were defined by measurements of misalignment. Image noise, contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR), signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR), and radiation dose were assessed.

Results

Mean HR was 66 ± 16.7 bpm (range: 45–125 bpm) and mean HRV was 10.7 ± 17.5 bpm. A significant correlation between HR and stairstep artefacts (r = 0.46, p < 0.001) and motion artefacts (r = 0.63, p < 0.001) was found. Group 2 showed significantly increased step artefacts with a mean misalignment of 1.4 mm compared to 0.4 mm in Group 1 (p < 0.001). There was no significant effect of HRV on stairstep artefacts (r = 0.15, p = 0.416) and motion artefacts (r = 0.13, p = 0.311). No significant differences in image noise, CNR, SNR, and radiation dose were seen.

Conclusions

Unlike CCTA using narrow CT detectors, HRV has no significant effect on motion and stairstep artefacts using a wide CT detector with high z-coverage. However, a higher HR still increases stairstep and motion artefacts.

Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Leschka S et al (2008) Low-dose CT coronary angiography in the step-and-shoot mode: diagnostic performance. Heart 94:1132–1137PubMedCrossRef

de Graaf FR, Schuijf JD, van Velzen JE et al (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in the non-invasive evaluation of significant coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 31:1908–1915PubMedCrossRef

Chao SP, Law WY, Kuo CJ et al (2010) The diagnostic accuracy of 256-row computed tomographic angiography compared with invasive coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 31:1916–1923PubMedCrossRef

Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG et al (2008) Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:1724–1732PubMedCrossRef

Earls JP, Berman EL, Urban BA et al (2008) Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose. Radiology 246:742–753PubMedCrossRef

Efstathopoulos EP, Kelekis NL, Pantos I et al (2009) Reduction of the estimated radiation dose and associated patient risk with prospective ECG-gated 256-slice CT coronary angiography. Phys Med Biol 54:5209–5222PubMedCrossRef

Klass O, Jeltsch M, Feuerlein S et al (2009) Prospectively gated axial CT coronary angiography: preliminary experiences with a novel low-dose technique. Eur Radiol 19:829–836PubMedCrossRef

Hou Y, Yue Y, Guo W et al (2010) Prospectively versus retrospectively ECG-gated 256-slice coronary CT angiography: image quality and radiation dose over expanded heart rates. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging

Stolzmann P, Goetti R, Baumueller S et al (2009) Prospective and retrospective ECG-gating for CT coronary angiography perform similarly accurate at low heart rates. Eur J Radiol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.12.016

10.

Hirai N, Horiguchi J, Fujioka C et al (2008) Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality, stenosis, and radiation dose. Radiology 248:424–430PubMedCrossRef

11.

Husmann L, Herzog BA, Burkhard N et al (2009) Body physique and heart rate variability determine the occurrence of stair-step artefacts in 64-slice CT coronary angiography with prospective ECG-triggering. Eur Radiol 19:1698–1703PubMedCrossRef

12.

Stolzmann P, Leschka S, Scheffel H et al (2008) Dual-source CT in step-and-shoot mode: noninvasive coronary angiography with low radiation dose. Radiology 249:71–80PubMedCrossRef

13.

Choi SI, George RT, Schuleri KH et al (2009) Recent developments in wide-detector cardiac computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 25:23–29PubMedCrossRef

14.

Hsiao EM, Rybicki FJ, Steigner M (2010) CT coronary angiography: 256-slice and 320-detector row scanners. Curr Cardiol Rep 12:68–75PubMedCrossRef

15.

Weustink AC, Mollet NR, Pugliese F et al (2008) Optimal electrocardiographic pulsing windows and heart rate: effect on image quality and radiation exposure at dual-source coronary CT angiography. Radiology 248:792–798PubMedCrossRef

16.

Wintersperger BJ, Nikolaou K, von Ziegler F et al (2006) Image quality, motion artifacts, and reconstruction timing of 64-slice coronary computed tomography angiography with 0.33-second rotation speed. Invest Radiol 41:436–442PubMedCrossRef

17.

Austen WG et al (1975) A reporting systm on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc committee for grading of coronary artery disease, council on cardiovascular surgery, American heart association. Circulation 51:5–40PubMed

18.

Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M et al (2006) Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates. Circulation 113:1305–1310PubMedCrossRef

19.

McCollough C, Cody D, Edyvean S et al (2008) The measurement, reporting, and management of radiation dose in CT. College Park, MD: American Association of Physicists in Medicine, AAPM report no. 96

20.

Leschka S, Husmann L, Desbiolles LM et al (2006) Optimal image reconstruction intervals for non-invasive coronary angiography with 64-slice CT. Eur Radiol 16:1964–1972PubMedCrossRef

21.

Leschka S, Wildermuth S, Boehm T et al (2006) Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. Radiology 241:378–385PubMedCrossRef

22.

Leschka S, Scheffel H, Desbiolles L et al (2007) Image quality and reconstruction intervals of dual-source CT coronary angiography: recommendations for ECG-pulsing windowing. Invest Radiol 42:543–549PubMedCrossRef

23.

Adler G, Meille L, Rohnean A et al (2010) Robustness of end-systolic reconstructions in coronary dual-source CT angiography for high heart rate patients. Eur Radiol 20:1118–1123PubMedCrossRef

24.

Brodoefel H, Burgstahler C, Tsiflikas I et al (2008) Dual-source CT: effect of heart rate, heart rate variability, and calcification on image quality and diagnostic accuracy. Radiology 247:346–355PubMedCrossRef

25.

Feuchtner G, Goetti R, Plass A et al (2010) Dual-step prospective ECG-triggered 128-slice dual-source CT for evaluation of coronary arteries and cardiac function without heart rate control: a technical note. Eur Radiol 20:2092–2099PubMedCrossRef

26.

Herzog BA, Husmann L, Burkhard N et al (2009) Low-dose CT coronary angiography using prospective ECG-triggering: impact of mean heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. Acad Radiol 16:15–21PubMedCrossRef

27.

Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H et al (2006) First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol 16:256–268PubMedCrossRef

Title: Step and shoot coronary CT angiography using 256-slice CT: effect of heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality
Authors: D. Muenzel
P. B. Noel
F. Dorn
M. Dobritz
E. J. Rummeny
A. Huber
Publication date: 01-11-2011
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: European Radiology / Issue 11/2011
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2185-4

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Step and shoot coronary CT angiography using 256-slice CT: effect of heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality

Abstract

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 11/2011

Quantitative in vivo MRI evaluation of lumbar facet joints and intervertebral discs using axial T2 mapping

Late adverse reactions to intravascular iodine based contrast media: an update

Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced 3.0 T MR imaging: quantitative and qualitative comparison of hepatocyte-phase images obtained 10 min and 20 min after injection for the detection of liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma

Diagnostic performance of 320-slice multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting

Diffusion tensor imaging and tractography for assessment of renal allograft dysfunction—initial results

Identification and further differentiation of subendocardial and transmural myocardial infarction by fast strain-encoded (SENC) magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla