Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 3/2011

01-03-2011 | Editorial

Paediatric cardiac computed tomography: a review of imaging techniques and radiation dose consideration

Authors: Carolyn Young, Andrew M. Taylor, Catherine M. Owens

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 3/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

The significant challenges involved in imaging the heart in small children (<15 kg) have been addressed by, and partially resolved with improvement in temporal and spatial resolution secondary to the advent of new multi-detector CT technology. This has enabled both retrospective and prospective ECG-gated imaging in children even at high heart rates (over 100 bpm) without the need for beta blockers. Recent studies have highlighted that the radiation burden associated with cardiac CT can be reduced using prospective ECG-gating. Our experience shows that the resultant dose reduction can be optimised to a level equivalent to that of a non-gated study. This article reviews the different aspects of ECG-gating and the preferred technique for cardiac imaging in the young child (<15 kg). We summarize our evidenced based recommendations for readers, referencing recent articles and using our in house data, protocols and dose measurements discussing the various methods available for dose calculations and their inherent bias.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lee T, Tsai IC, Fu YC (2006) Using multi-detector row CT in neonates with complex congenital heart disease to replace diagnostic cardiac catheterization for anatomical investigation—initial experiences in technical and clinical feasibility. Pediatr Radiol 36:1273–1282CrossRefPubMed Lee T, Tsai IC, Fu YC (2006) Using multi-detector row CT in neonates with complex congenital heart disease to replace diagnostic cardiac catheterization for anatomical investigation—initial experiences in technical and clinical feasibility. Pediatr Radiol 36:1273–1282CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Tsai IC, Chen MC, Jan SL, Wang CC, Fu YC, Lin PC, Lee T (2008) Neonatal cardiac multidetector row CT: why and how we do it. Pediatr Radiol 38:438–451CrossRefPubMed Tsai IC, Chen MC, Jan SL, Wang CC, Fu YC, Lin PC, Lee T (2008) Neonatal cardiac multidetector row CT: why and how we do it. Pediatr Radiol 38:438–451CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Goo HW, Park IS, Ko JK, Kim YH, Seo DM, Yun TJ, Park JJ (2005) Visibility of the origin and proximal course of coronary arteries on on-ECG-gated heart CT in patients with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Radiol 35:792–798CrossRefPubMed Goo HW, Park IS, Ko JK, Kim YH, Seo DM, Yun TJ, Park JJ (2005) Visibility of the origin and proximal course of coronary arteries on on-ECG-gated heart CT in patients with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Radiol 35:792–798CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Ou P, Celemajer DS, Calcagni G, Brunelle F, Bonnet D, Sidi D (2007) Three-dimensional CT scanning: a new diagnostic modality in congenital heart disease. Heart 93:908–913CrossRefPubMed Ou P, Celemajer DS, Calcagni G, Brunelle F, Bonnet D, Sidi D (2007) Three-dimensional CT scanning: a new diagnostic modality in congenital heart disease. Heart 93:908–913CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Ben Saad M, Rohnean A, Sigal-Cinqualbre A et al (2009) Evaluation of image quality and radiation dose of thoracic and coronary dual-source CT in 110 infants with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Radiol 39:668–676CrossRefPubMed Ben Saad M, Rohnean A, Sigal-Cinqualbre A et al (2009) Evaluation of image quality and radiation dose of thoracic and coronary dual-source CT in 110 infants with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Radiol 39:668–676CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Tsai IC, Lee T, Chen MC, Fu YC, Jan SL, Wang CC, Chang Y (2007) Visualisation of neo-natal coronary arteries on multi-detector row CT: ECG-gated versus non-ECG-gated technique. Pediatr Radiol 37:818–825CrossRefPubMed Tsai IC, Lee T, Chen MC, Fu YC, Jan SL, Wang CC, Chang Y (2007) Visualisation of neo-natal coronary arteries on multi-detector row CT: ECG-gated versus non-ECG-gated technique. Pediatr Radiol 37:818–825CrossRefPubMed
7.
8.
go back to reference Arnoldi E, Hohnson TR, Rist C, Wintersperger BJ, Sommer WH, Becker A, Becker CR, Reiser MF, Nikolaou K (2009) Adequate image quality with reduced radiation dose in prospectively triggered coronary CTA compared with retrospective techniques. Eur Radiol 19:2147–2155CrossRefPubMed Arnoldi E, Hohnson TR, Rist C, Wintersperger BJ, Sommer WH, Becker A, Becker CR, Reiser MF, Nikolaou K (2009) Adequate image quality with reduced radiation dose in prospectively triggered coronary CTA compared with retrospective techniques. Eur Radiol 19:2147–2155CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Stolzmann P, Goetti R, Baumueller S, Plass A, Falk V, Scheffel H, Feuchtner G, Marincek B, Alkadhi H, Leschka S (2010) Prospective and retrospective ECG-gating for CT coronary angiography perform similarly accurate at low heart rates. Eur J Radiol. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.12.016 Stolzmann P, Goetti R, Baumueller S, Plass A, Falk V, Scheffel H, Feuchtner G, Marincek B, Alkadhi H, Leschka S (2010) Prospective and retrospective ECG-gating for CT coronary angiography perform similarly accurate at low heart rates. Eur J Radiol. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ejrad.​2009.​12.​016
10.
go back to reference Wu W, Budovec J, Foley WD (2009) Prospective and retrospective ECG-gating for thoracic CT angiography: a comparative study. AJR 193:955–963CrossRefPubMed Wu W, Budovec J, Foley WD (2009) Prospective and retrospective ECG-gating for thoracic CT angiography: a comparative study. AJR 193:955–963CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Earls J, Berman EL, Urban BA, Curry CA, Lane JL, Jennings RS, McCulloch CC, Hsieh J, Londt JH (2008) Prospectively gated transverse coronary CTA versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose. Radiology 246(3):742–753CrossRefPubMed Earls J, Berman EL, Urban BA, Curry CA, Lane JL, Jennings RS, McCulloch CC, Hsieh J, Londt JH (2008) Prospectively gated transverse coronary CTA versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose. Radiology 246(3):742–753CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Hirai N, Horiguchi J, Fujioka C, Kiguchi M, Yamamoto H, Matsuura N, Kitagawa T, Teragawa H, Kohno N, Ito K (2008) Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality, stenosis and radiation dose. Radiology 248(2):424–430CrossRefPubMed Hirai N, Horiguchi J, Fujioka C, Kiguchi M, Yamamoto H, Matsuura N, Kitagawa T, Teragawa H, Kohno N, Ito K (2008) Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality, stenosis and radiation dose. Radiology 248(2):424–430CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Gopalan D, Raj V, Hoey ETD (2010) Cardiac CT: non-coronary applications. Postgrad Med J 86:165–173CrossRefPubMed Gopalan D, Raj V, Hoey ETD (2010) Cardiac CT: non-coronary applications. Postgrad Med J 86:165–173CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Goo HW (2010) State of the art CT imaging techniques for congenital heart disease. Korean J Radiol 11:4–18CrossRefPubMed Goo HW (2010) State of the art CT imaging techniques for congenital heart disease. Korean J Radiol 11:4–18CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Blanke P, Bulla S, Baumann T, Siepe M, Winterer JT, Eurynger W, Schaefer O, Kotter E, Langer M, Pache G (2010) Thoracic aorta: prospective ECG-triggered CT angiography with dual-source CT—feasibility and image quality and dose reduction. Radiology 255:207–217CrossRefPubMed Blanke P, Bulla S, Baumann T, Siepe M, Winterer JT, Eurynger W, Schaefer O, Kotter E, Langer M, Pache G (2010) Thoracic aorta: prospective ECG-triggered CT angiography with dual-source CT—feasibility and image quality and dose reduction. Radiology 255:207–217CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Blanke P, Baumann T, Langer M, Pache G (2010) Imaging of pulmonary vein anatomy using low-dose prospective ECG-triggered dual-source computed tomography. Eur Radiol 20:1851–1855CrossRefPubMed Blanke P, Baumann T, Langer M, Pache G (2010) Imaging of pulmonary vein anatomy using low-dose prospective ECG-triggered dual-source computed tomography. Eur Radiol 20:1851–1855CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Xu L, Yang L, Zhang Z, Li Y, Fan Z, Ma X, Lv B, Yu W (2009) Low-dose adaptive sequential scan for dual-source CT coronary angiography in patients with high heart rate: comparison with retrospective ECG gating. Eur J Radiol 76(2):183–187CrossRef Xu L, Yang L, Zhang Z, Li Y, Fan Z, Ma X, Lv B, Yu W (2009) Low-dose adaptive sequential scan for dual-source CT coronary angiography in patients with high heart rate: comparison with retrospective ECG gating. Eur J Radiol 76(2):183–187CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Cheng Z, Wang X, Duan Y, Wu L, Wu D, Chao B, Liu C, Xu Z, Li H, Liang F, Xu J, Chen J (2010) Low-dose prospective ECG-triggered dual-source CT angiography in infants and children with complex congenital heart disease: first experience. Eur Radiol 20:2503–2511CrossRefPubMed Cheng Z, Wang X, Duan Y, Wu L, Wu D, Chao B, Liu C, Xu Z, Li H, Liang F, Xu J, Chen J (2010) Low-dose prospective ECG-triggered dual-source CT angiography in infants and children with complex congenital heart disease: first experience. Eur Radiol 20:2503–2511CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Goo HW, Yang DH (2010) Coronary artery visibility in free-breathing young children with congenital heart disease on cardiac 64-slice CT: dual-source ECG-triggered sequential scan vs. single-source non-ECG-synchronised spiral scan. Pediatr Radiol 40(10):1670–1680, Epub 2010 May 13CrossRefPubMed Goo HW, Yang DH (2010) Coronary artery visibility in free-breathing young children with congenital heart disease on cardiac 64-slice CT: dual-source ECG-triggered sequential scan vs. single-source non-ECG-synchronised spiral scan. Pediatr Radiol 40(10):1670–1680, Epub 2010 May 13CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Jin KN, Park EA, Shin CI, Lee W, Chung JW, Park JH (2010) Retrospective versus prospective ECG-gated dual-source CT in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease: comparison of image quality and radiation dose. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 26:63–73CrossRefPubMed Jin KN, Park EA, Shin CI, Lee W, Chung JW, Park JH (2010) Retrospective versus prospective ECG-gated dual-source CT in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease: comparison of image quality and radiation dose. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 26:63–73CrossRefPubMed
21.
22.
go back to reference Goo HW, Park IS, Ko JK et al (2005) Computed tomography for the diagnosis of congenital heart disease in pediatric and adult patients. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 21:347–365CrossRefPubMed Goo HW, Park IS, Ko JK et al (2005) Computed tomography for the diagnosis of congenital heart disease in pediatric and adult patients. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 21:347–365CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference McCollough CH, Primak AN, Saba O, Bruder H, Stierstorfer K, Raupach R, Suess C, Schmidt B, Ohnesorge BM, Flohr TG (2007) Dose performance of a 64-channel dual-source CT scanner. Radiology 243:775–784CrossRefPubMed McCollough CH, Primak AN, Saba O, Bruder H, Stierstorfer K, Raupach R, Suess C, Schmidt B, Ohnesorge BM, Flohr TG (2007) Dose performance of a 64-channel dual-source CT scanner. Radiology 243:775–784CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Potana F, Pagniez J, Flohr T, Faivre J-B, Duhamel A, Remy J, Remy-Jardin M (2010) Chest computered tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (part 1): evaluation of image noise reduction in 32 patients. Eur Radiol. doi:10.1007/s00330-010-1990-5 Potana F, Pagniez J, Flohr T, Faivre J-B, Duhamel A, Remy J, Remy-Jardin M (2010) Chest computered tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (part 1): evaluation of image noise reduction in 32 patients. Eur Radiol. doi:10.​1007/​s00330-010-1990-5
26.
go back to reference Potana F, Duhamel A, Pagniez J, Flohr T, Faivre J-B, Hachulla A-L, Remy J, Remy-Jardin M (2010) Chest computered tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (part 2): image quality of low-dose CT examination in 80 patients. Eur Radiol. doi:10.1007/s00330-010-1991-4 Potana F, Duhamel A, Pagniez J, Flohr T, Faivre J-B, Hachulla A-L, Remy J, Remy-Jardin M (2010) Chest computered tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (part 2): image quality of low-dose CT examination in 80 patients. Eur Radiol. doi:10.​1007/​s00330-010-1991-4
27.
go back to reference Paul J-F, Rohnean A, Elfassy E, Sigal-Cinqualbre A (2010) Radiation dose for thoracic and coronary step-and-shoot CT using a 128-slice dual-source machine in infants and small children with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Radiol. doi:10.1007/s00247-010-1804-6 Paul J-F, Rohnean A, Elfassy E, Sigal-Cinqualbre A (2010) Radiation dose for thoracic and coronary step-and-shoot CT using a 128-slice dual-source machine in infants and small children with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Radiol. doi:10.​1007/​s00247-010-1804-6
28.
go back to reference Thomas K, Wang B (2008) Age-specific effective doses for pediatric MSCT examinations at a large children’s hospital using DLP conversion coefficients: a simple estimation method. Pediatr Radiol 38:645–656CrossRefPubMed Thomas K, Wang B (2008) Age-specific effective doses for pediatric MSCT examinations at a large children’s hospital using DLP conversion coefficients: a simple estimation method. Pediatr Radiol 38:645–656CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Hollingsworth CL, Yoshizumi TT, Frush D, Chan FP, Toncheva G, Nguyen G, Lowry CR, Hurwitz (2007) Pediatric cardiac-gated CT angiography: assessment of radiation dose. AJR 189:12–18CrossRefPubMed Hollingsworth CL, Yoshizumi TT, Frush D, Chan FP, Toncheva G, Nguyen G, Lowry CR, Hurwitz (2007) Pediatric cardiac-gated CT angiography: assessment of radiation dose. AJR 189:12–18CrossRefPubMed
30.
31.
go back to reference Lell M, Marwan M, Schepis T, Pflederer T, Anders K, Flohr T, Allmendinger T, Kalender W, Ertel D, Thierfelder C, Kuettner A, Ropers D, Daniel WG, Achenbach S (2009) Prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition for coronary CT angiography using dual source CT: technique and initial experience. Eur Radiol 19:2576–2583CrossRefPubMed Lell M, Marwan M, Schepis T, Pflederer T, Anders K, Flohr T, Allmendinger T, Kalender W, Ertel D, Thierfelder C, Kuettner A, Ropers D, Daniel WG, Achenbach S (2009) Prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition for coronary CT angiography using dual source CT: technique and initial experience. Eur Radiol 19:2576–2583CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Alkadhi H, Stolzman P, Desbiolles L et al (2010) Low dose, 128-slice, dual-source CT coronary angiography: accuracy and radiation dose of the high-pitch and the step-and -shoot mode. Heart 96:933–938CrossRefPubMed Alkadhi H, Stolzman P, Desbiolles L et al (2010) Low dose, 128-slice, dual-source CT coronary angiography: accuracy and radiation dose of the high-pitch and the step-and -shoot mode. Heart 96:933–938CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Ertel D, Lell MM, Hariq F, Flohr T, Schmidt B, Kalender WA (2009) Cardiac spiral dual-source CT with high pitch: a feasibility study. Eur Radiol 19:2357–2362CrossRefPubMed Ertel D, Lell MM, Hariq F, Flohr T, Schmidt B, Kalender WA (2009) Cardiac spiral dual-source CT with high pitch: a feasibility study. Eur Radiol 19:2357–2362CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference DeFrance T, Dubois E, Gebow D, Ramirez A, Wolf F, Feuchtner GM (2010) Helical prospective ECG-gating in cardiac computed tomography: radiation dose and image quality. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 26:99–107CrossRefPubMed DeFrance T, Dubois E, Gebow D, Ramirez A, Wolf F, Feuchtner GM (2010) Helical prospective ECG-gating in cardiac computed tomography: radiation dose and image quality. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 26:99–107CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Paediatric cardiac computed tomography: a review of imaging techniques and radiation dose consideration
Authors
Carolyn Young
Andrew M. Taylor
Catherine M. Owens
Publication date
01-03-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 3/2011
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-2036-8

Other articles of this Issue 3/2011

European Radiology 3/2011 Go to the issue