Top

Published in:

01-03-2011 | Ultrasound

Assessment of tissue perfusion by contrast-enhanced ultrasound

Author: Emilio Quaia

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 3/2011

Abstract

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with microbubble contrast agents is a new imaging technique for quantifying tissue perfusion. CEUS presents several advantages over other imaging techniques in assessing tissue perfusion, including the use of microbubbles as blood-pool agents, portability, availability and absence of exposure to radiation or nuclear tracers. Dedicated software packages are necessary to quantify the echo-signal intensity and allow the calculation of the degree of tissue contrast enhancement based on the accurate distinction between microbubble backscatter signals and native tissue background. The measurement of organ transit time after microbubble injection and the analysis of tissue reperfusion kinetics represent the two fundamental methods for the assessment of tissue perfusion by CEUS. Transit time measurement has been shown to be feasible and has started to become accepted as a clinical tool, especially in the liver. The loudness of audio signals from spectral Doppler analysis is used to generate time-intensity curves to follow the wash-in and wash-out of the microbubble bolus. Tissue perfusion may be quantified also by analysing the replenishment kinetics of the volume of microbubbles after their destruction in the imaged slice. This allows to obtain semiquantitative parameters related to local tissue perfusion, especially in the heart, brain, and kidneys.

Fredriksson I, Fors C, Johansson J (2007) Laser doppler flowmetry—a theoretical framework. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University. Available via www.imt.liu.se/bit/ldf/ldfmain.html. Accessed 13 Aug 2010

Green MA, Mathias CJ, Willis LR et al (2007) Assessment of Cu-ETS as a PET radiopharmaceutical for evaluation of regional renal perfusion. Nucl Med Biol 34:247–255CrossRefPubMed

Daghini E, Primak AN, Chade AR et al (2007) Assessment of renal hemodynamics and function in pigs with 64-section multidetector CT: comparison with electron beam CT. Radiology 243:405–412CrossRefPubMed

Martin DR, Sharma P, Salman K et al (2008) Individual kidney blood flow measured with contrast-enhanced first-pass perfusion MR imaging. Radiology 246:241–248PubMed

Kudomi N, Slimani L, Järvisalo MJ et al (2008) Non-invasive estimation of hepatic blood perfusion from H ₂ ¹⁵ O PET images using tissue-derived arterial and portal input functions. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 35:1899–1911CrossRefPubMed

Quaia E (2007) Microbubble ultrasound contrast agents: an update. Eur Radiol 17:1995–2008CrossRefPubMed

Qin S, Caskey CF, Ferrara KW (2009) Ultrasound contrast microbubbles in imaging and therapy: physical principles and engineering. Phys Med Biol 54:R27–R57CrossRefPubMed

Sboros V, Tang MX (2010) The assessment of microvascular flow and tissue perfusion using ultrasound imaging. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 224:273–290CrossRefPubMed

Cosgrove DO, Eckersley R, Blomley M, Harvery C (2001) Quantification of blood flow. Eur Radiol 11:1338–1344CrossRefPubMed

10.

Cosgrove DO, Harvey C (2009) Clinical uses of microbubbles in diagnosis and treatment. Med Biol Eng Comput 47:813–826CrossRefPubMed

11.

Quaia E, Blomley MJK, Patel S et al (2002) Initial observations on the effect of irradiation on the liver-specific uptake of Levovist. Eur J Radiol 41:192–199CrossRefPubMed

12.

Yanagisawa K, Moriyasu F, Miyahara T, Yuki M, Iijima H (2007) Phagocytosis of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles by Kupffer cells. Med Biol 33:318–325

13.

Piscaglia F, Bolondi L, Italian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (SIUMB) Study Group on Ultrasound Contrast Agents (2006) The safety of Sonovue in abdominal applications: retrospective analysis of 23188 investigations. Ultrasound Med Biol 32:1369–1375CrossRef

14.

Barnett SB, Duck F, Ziskin M (2007) WFUMB symposium on safety of ultrasound in medicine: conclusions and recommendations on biological effects and safety of ultrasound contrast agents, 2006. Ultrasound Med Biol 33:233–234CrossRefPubMed

15.

Dijkmans P, Visser C, Kamp O (2005) Adverse reactions to ultrasound contrast agents: is the risk worth the benefit? Eur J Echocardiogr 6:363–366CrossRefPubMed

16.

Kusnetzky L, Khalid A, Khumri T et al (2008) Acute mortality in hospitalized patients undergoing echocardiography with and without an ultrasound contrast agent: results in 18, 671 consecutive studies. J Am Coll Cardiol 51:1704–1706CrossRefPubMed

17.

Mulvagh SL, Vannan MA, Becher H et al (2008) American Society of Echocardiography consensus statement on the clinical applications of ultrasonic contrast agents in echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocard 21:1179–1201CrossRef

18.

Senior R, Becher H, Monaghan M et al (2009) Contrast echocardiography: evidence-based recommendations by European Association of Echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiogr 10:194–212CrossRefPubMed

19.

Harvey CJ, Lynch M, Blomley MJ, Cosgrove DO, Eckersley RJ, Warrens AN (2001) Can renal arteriovenous transit time measured using bolus injections of the ultrasound microbubble Levovist (SHU 508A) characterize the vasculopathy in acute renal allograft rejection? (abstract) In: Radiological Society of North America scientific assembly and annual meeting program. Oak Brook, Ill: Radiological Society of North America, 2001: 418

20.

Kedar RP, Cosgrove DO, McCready VR et al (1996) Microbubble contrast agent for color Doppler US: effect on breast masses. Work in progress. Radiology 198:679–686PubMed

21.

Winehouse J, Douek M, Holz K et al (1999) Contrast-enhanced colour Doppler ultrasonography in suspected breast cancer recurrence. Br J Surg 86:1198–1201CrossRefPubMed

22.

Baz E, Madjar H, Reuss C et al (2000) The role of enhanced Doppler ultrasound in differentiation of benign vs. malignant scar lesion after breast surgery for malignancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 15:377–382CrossRefPubMed

23.

Blomley MJ, Albrecht T, Cosgrove DO et al (1998) Liver vascular transit time analyzed with dynamic hepatic venography with bolus injections of an US contrast agent: early experience in seven patients with metastases. Radiology 209:862–866, Erratum in: Radiology 1999: 210:882PubMed

24.

Albrecht T, Blomley MJ, Cosgrove DO et al (1999) Non-invasive diagnosis of hepatic cirrhosis by transit-time analysis of an ultrasound contrast agent. Lancet 8(353):1579–1583CrossRef

25.

Blomley MJ, Lim AK, Harvey CJ et al (2003) Liver microbubble transit time compared with histology and Child-Pugh score in diffuse liver disease: a cross sectional study. Gut 52:1188–1193CrossRefPubMed

26.

Lim AK, Taylor-Robinson SD, Patel N et al (2005) Hepatic vein transit times using a microbubble agent can predict disease severity non-invasively in patients with hepatitis C. Gut 54:128–133CrossRefPubMed

27.

Lim AK, Patel N, Eckersley RJ et al (2006) Hepatic vein transit time of SonoVue: a comparative study with Levovist. Radiology 240:130–135CrossRefPubMed

28.

Hohmann J, Müller C, Oldenburg A et al (2009) Hepatic transit time analysis using contrast-enhanced ultrasound with BR1: a prospective study comparing patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer with healthy volunteers. Ultrasound Med Biol 35:1427–1435CrossRefPubMed

29.

Correas JM, Burns PN, Lai X, Qi X (2000) Infusion versus bolus of an ultrasound contrast agent: in vivo dose–response measurements of BR1. Invest Radiol 35:72–79CrossRefPubMed

30.

Mulè S, De Cesare A, Lucidarme O, Frouin F, Herment A (2008) Regularized estimation of contrast agent attenuation to improve the imaging of microbubbles in small animal studies. Ultrasound Med Biol 34:938–948CrossRefPubMed

31.

Mari J, Hibbs K, Stride E, Eckersley R, Tang M (2010) An approximate nonlinear model for time gain compensation of amplitude modulated images of ultrasound contrast agent perfusion. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 57:818–829CrossRefPubMed

32.

Phillips P, Gardner E (2004) Contrast-agent detection and quantification. Eur Radiol 14(Suppl 8):P4–P10PubMed

33.

Rognin NG, Frinking P, Costa M, Arditi M (2008) In-vivo perfusion quantification by contrast ultrasound: validation of the use of linearized video data vs raw RF data. IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings, 1690–1693

34.

Wiesmann M, Meyer K, Günter Seidel TA (2004) Parametric perfusion imaging with contrast-enhanced ultrasound in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 35:508–513CrossRefPubMed

35.

Gu X, Zhong H, Wan M, Hu X, Lv D, Shen L, Zhang X (2010) Parametric perfusion imaging based on low-cost ultrasound platform. Ultrasound Med Biol 36:130–144CrossRefPubMed

36.

Wei K, Jayaweera AR, Firoozan S, Linka A, Skyba DM, Kaul S (1998) Quantification of myocardial blood flow with ultrasound-induced destruction of microbubbles administered as a constant venous infusion. Circulation 97:473–483PubMed

37.

Potdevin TCU, Fowlkes JB, Moskalik AP, Carson PL (2004) Analysis of refill curve shape in ultrasound contrast agent studies. Med Phys 31:623–632CrossRefPubMed

38.

Potdevin TCU, Fowlkes JB, Moskalik AP, Carson PL (2006) Refill model of rabbit kidney vasculature. Ultrasound Med Biol 32:1331–1338CrossRefPubMed

39.

Metzler V, Seidel G, Wiesmann K et al (2003) Perfusion harmonic imaging of the human brain. SPIE 5035:337–348CrossRef

40.

Lucidarme O, Kono Y, Corbeil J, Choi SH, Mattrey RF (2003) Validation of ultrasound contrast destruction imaging for flow quantification. Ultrasound Med Biol 29:1697–1704CrossRefPubMed

41.

Porter TR, Xie F, Silver M, Kricsfeld D, Oleary E (2001) Real-time perfusion imaging with low mechanical index pulse inversion Doppler imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:748–753CrossRefPubMed

42.

Arditi M, Frinking PJ, Zhou X, Rognin NG (2006) A new formalism for the quantification of tissue perfusion by the destruction replenishment method in contrast ultrasound imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 53:1118–1129CrossRefPubMed

43.

Maier P, Zierler K (1954) On the theory of indicator dilution method for the measurement of blood flow and volume. J Appl Physiol 4:308–314

44.

Wei K, Ragosta M, Thorpe J, Coggins M, Moos S, Kaul S (2001) Non-invasive quantification of coronary blood flow reserve in humans using myocardial contrast echocardiography. Circulation 103:2560–2565PubMed

45.

Wei K, Le E, Bin JP, Coggins M, Thorpe J, Kaul S (2001) Quantification of renal blood flow with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:1135–1140CrossRefPubMed

46.

Krix M, Kiessling F, Farhan N, Schmidt K, Hoffend J, Delorme S (2003) A multivessel model describing replenishment kinetics of ultrasound contrast agent for quantification of tissue perfusion. Ultrasound Med Biol 29:1421–1430CrossRefPubMed

47.

Meyer-Wiethe K, Cangür H, Seidel G (2005) Comparison of different mathematical models to analyze diminution kinetics of ultrasound contrast enhancement in a flow phantom. Ultrasound Med Biol 31:93–98CrossRefPubMed

48.

Lucidarme O, Franchi-Abella S, Correas JM, Bridal SL, Kurtisovski E, Berger G (2003) Blood flow quantification with contrast-enhanced US: “entrance in the section” phenomenon—phantom and rabbit study. Radiology 228:473–479CrossRefPubMed

49.

Quaia E, Nocentini A, Torelli L (2009) Assessment of a new mathematical model for the computation of numerical parameters related to renal cortical blood flow and fractional blood volume by contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 35:616–627CrossRefPubMed

50.

Federlein J, Postert T, Meves S, Weber S, Przuntek H, Buttner T (2000) Ultrasonic evaluation of pathological brain perfusion in acute stroke using second harmonic imaging. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 69:616–622CrossRefPubMed

51.

Rim SJ, Leong-Poi H, Lindner JR et al (2001) Quantification of cerebral perfusion with real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Circulation 104:2582–2587CrossRefPubMed

52.

Eyding J, Wilkening W, Postert T (2002) Brain perfusion and ultrasonic imaging techniques. Eur J Ultrasound 1–2:91–104CrossRef

53.

Holsher T, Wilkening W, Draganski B et al (2005) Transcranial ultrasound brain perfusion assessment with a contrast agent-specific imaging mode: results of a two-center trial. Stroke 36:2283–2285CrossRef

54.

Seidel G, Meairs S (2009) Ultrasound contrast agents in ischemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis 27(Suppl 2):25–39CrossRefPubMed

55.

Wei K, Jayaweera AR, Firoozan S et al (1998) Basis for detection of stenosis using venous administration of microbubbles during myocardial contrast echocardiography: bolus or continuous infusion? J Am Coll Cardiol 32:252–260CrossRefPubMed

56.

Wei K, Tong KL, Belcik T, Rafter P, Ragosta M, Wang XQ, Kaul S (2005) Detection of coronary stenoses at rest with myocardial contrast echocardiography. Circulation 112:1154–1160CrossRefPubMed

57.

Kaufmann BA, Wei K, Lindner JR (2007) Contrast echocardiography. Curr Probl Cardiol 32:51–96CrossRefPubMed

58.

Abdelmoneim SS, Mulvagh SL (2009) Stress echocardiography—state of the art. US Cardiology 6:16–26

59.

Masugata H, Peters B, Lafitte S, Strachan GM, Ohmori K, De Maria AN (2001) Quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion during graded coronary stenosis by real-time myocardial contrast refilling curves. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:262–269CrossRefPubMed

60.

Dijkmans PA, Senior R, Becher H et al (2006) Myocardial contrast echocardiography evolving as a clinically feasible technique for accurate, rapid, and safe assessment of myocardial perfusion: the evidence so far. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:2168–2177CrossRefPubMed

61.

Marwick TH, Brunken R, Meland N, Brochet E, Baer FM, Binder T et al (1998) Nycomed NC100100 Investigators. Accuracy and feasibility of contrast echocardiography for detection of perfusion defects in routine practice: comparison with wall motion and technetium-99m sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 32:1260–1269CrossRefPubMed

62.

Porter TR, Xie F (2010) Myocardial perfusion imaging with contrast ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 3:176–187

63.

Shimoni S, Frangogiannis NG, Aggeli CJ et al (2003) Identification of hibernating myocardium with quantitative intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography: comparison with dobutamine echocardiography and thallium-201 scintigraphy. Circulation 107:538–544CrossRefPubMed

64.

Tousek P, Penicka M, Tintera J, Linkova H, Gregor P (2008) Identification of hibernating myocardium with myocardial contrast echocardiography: comparison with late gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance. Int J Cardiol 128:117–120CrossRefPubMed

65.

Lindner JR, Kaul S (1995) Insights into the assessment of myocardial perfusion offered by different cardiac imaging modalities. J Nucl Cardiol 2:446–460CrossRefPubMed

66.

Gaibazzi N, Reverberi C, Squeri A et al (2009) Contrast stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in patients with chest pain but without acute coronary syndrome: incremental value of myocardial perfusion. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 22:404–410CrossRefPubMed

67.

Kishimoto N, Mori Y, Nishiue T et al (2003) Renal blood flow measurement with contrast-enhanced harmonic ultrasonography: evaluation of dopamine-induced changes in renal cortical perfusion in humans. Clin Nephrol 59:423–428PubMed

68.

Kim JH, Eun HW, Lee HJ, Goo DE, Choi DL (2005) Clinical use of renal perfusion imaging by means of harmonic sonography with a microbubble contrast agent in patients after renal transplantation: preliminary study. J Ultrasound Med 24:755–762PubMed

69.

Schwenger V, Hinkel UP, Nahm AM, Morath C, Zeier M (2006) Real-time contrast-enhanced sonography in renal transplant recipients. Clin Transplant 20:51–54CrossRefPubMed

70.

Kihm LP, Hinkel UP, Michael K et al (2009) Contrast-enhanced sonography shows superior microvascular renal allograft perfusion in patients switched from cyclosporine A to everolimus. Transplantation 88:261–265CrossRefPubMed

71.

Taylor GA, Ecklund K, Dunning PS (1996) Renal cortical perfusion in rabbits: visualization with color amplitude imaging and an experimental microbubble-based US contrast agent. Radiology 201:125–129PubMed

72.

Taylor GA, Barnewolt CE, Adler BH, Dunning PS (1998) Renal cortical ischemia in rabbits revealed by contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:417–422PubMed

73.

Taylor GA, Barnewolt CE, Claudon M, Dunning P (1999) Depiction of renal perfusion defects with contrast-enhanced harmonic sonography in a porcine model. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173:757–760PubMed

74.

Claudon M, Barnewolt C, Taylor GA et al (1999) Renal blood flow in pigs: changes depicted with contrast-enhanced harmonic US imaging during acute urinary obstruction. Radiology 212:725–731PubMed

75.

Quaia E, Siracusano S, Palumbo A, Ciciliato S, Rossi S, Bruni S, Bussani R, Cova M (2006) Detection of focal renal perfusion defects in rabbits after sulfur hexafluoride-filled microbubble injection at low transmit power ultrasound insonation. Eur Radiol 16:166–172CrossRefPubMed

76.

Correas JM, Claudon M, Tranquart F, Hélenon O (2003) Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: renal applications. J Radiol 84:2041–2054PubMed

77.

Bertolotto M, Martegani A, Aiani L, Zappetti R, Cernic S, Cova MA (2008) Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for detecting renal infarcts proven by contrast-enhanced CT. A feasibility study. Eur Radiol 18:376–383CrossRefPubMed

78.

Hancock J, Dittrich H, Jewitt DE, Monaghan GE (1999) Evaluation of myocardial, hepatic, and renal perfusion in a variety of clinical conditions using an intravenous ultrasound contrast agent (Optison) and second harmonic imaging. Heart 81:636–641PubMed

79.

Gasparini C, Bertolotto M, Crocè SL, Perrone R, Quaia E, Tiribelli C (2003) Evaluation of liver parenchymal blood flow with contrast-enhanced US: preliminary results in healthy and cirrhotic patients. Acad Radiol 10:869–876CrossRefPubMed

80.

Lindner JR, Womack L, Barrett E, Weltman J, Price W, Harthun NL, Kaul S, Patrie JT (2008) Limb stress-rest perfusion imaging with contrast ultrasound for the assessment of peripheral arterial disease severity. J Am Coll Cardiol 1:343–350

81.

Weber MA, Krix M, Jappe U et al (2005) Pathologic skeletal muscle perfusion in patients with myositis: detection with quantitative contrast-enhanced US—Initial results. Radiology 238:640–649CrossRefPubMed

82.

Christiansen JP, Leong-Poi H, Amiss LR, Drake DB, Kaul S, Lindner JR (2002) Skin perfusion assessed by contrast ultrasound predicts tissue survival in a free flap model. Ultrasound Med Biol 28:315–320CrossRefPubMed

83.

Klauser A, Demharter J, De Marchi A et al (2005) Contrast enhanced gray-scale sonography in assessment of joint vascularity in rheumatoid arthritis: results from the IACUS study group. Eur Radiol 15:2404–2410CrossRefPubMed

84.

Paltiel HJ, Kalish LA, Susaeta RA, Frausher F, O’Kane PL, Freitas-Filho LG (2006) Pulse Inversion US imaging of testicular ischemia: quantitative and qualitative analyses in a rabbit model. Radiology 239:718–729CrossRefPubMed

85.

Chen L, Zhan WW, Shen ZJ et al (2009) Blood perfusion of the contralateral testis evaluated with contrast-enhanced ultrasound in rabbits with unilateral testicular torsion. Asian J Androl 11:253–260CrossRefPubMed

86.

Eckersley RJ, Sedelaar JP, Blomley MJK et al (2002) Quantitative microbubble enhanced transrectal ultrasound as a tool for monitoring hormonal treatment of prostate carcinoma. Prostate 51:256–267CrossRefPubMed

87.

Krix M, Kiessling F, Vosseler S et al (2003) Sensitive noninvasive monitoring of tumor perfusion during antiangiogenic therapy by intermittent bolus-contrast power Doppler sonography. Cancer Res 63:8264–8270PubMed

88.

Lassau N, Chami L, Benatsou B, Peronneau P, Roche A (2007) Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCE-US) with quantification of tumor perfusion: a new diagnostic tool to evaluate the early effects of antiangiogenic treatment. Eur Radiol 17(Suppl 6):F89–F98PubMed

89.

Lassau N, Lamuraglia M, Chami L et al (2006) Gastrointestinal stromal tumors treated with imatinib: monitoring response with contrast-enhanced sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:1267–1273CrossRefPubMed

90.

Yankeelov TE, Niermann KJ, Huamani J et al (2006) Correlation between estimates of tumor perfusion from microbubble contrast-enhanced sonography and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J Ultrasound Med 25:487–497PubMed

91.

Niermann KJ, Fleischer AC, Huamani J et al (2007) Measuring tumor perfusion in control and treated murine tumors: correlation of microbubble contrast-enhanced sonography to dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. J Ultrasound Med 26:749–756PubMed

92.

McCarville MB, Streck CJ, Dickson PV, Li CS, Nathwani AC, Davidoff AM (2006) Angiogenesis inhibitors in a murine neuroblastoma model: quantitative assessment of intratumoral blood flow with contrast-enhanced gray-scale US. Radiology 240:73–81CrossRefPubMed

93.

Stieger SM, Bloch SH, Foreman O, Wisner ER, Ferrara KW, Dayton PA (2006) Ultrasound assessment of angiogenesis in a matrigel model in rats. Ultrasound Med Biol 32:673–681CrossRefPubMed

94.

Guibal A, Taillade L, Mulè S et al (2010) Noninvasive contrast-enhanced US quantitative assessment of tumor microcirculation in a murine model: effect of discontinuing anti-VEGF therapy. Radiology 254:420–429CrossRefPubMed

95.

Ellegala DB, Leong-Poi H, Carpenter JE et al (2003) Imaging tumor angiogenesis with contrast ultrasound and microbubbles targeted to α_νβ₃. Circulation 108:336–341CrossRefPubMed

Title: Assessment of tissue perfusion by contrast-enhanced ultrasound
Author: Emilio Quaia
Publication date: 01-03-2011
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: European Radiology / Issue 3/2011
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-1965-6

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Assessment of tissue perfusion by contrast-enhanced ultrasound

Abstract

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2011

Recent hot topics in contrast media

Paediatric cardiac computed tomography: a review of imaging techniques and radiation dose consideration

Computer aided detection and diagnosis in radiology

Trends in head and neck radiology

The Holy Grail in diagnostic neuroradiology: 3T or 3D?

An unusual case of pancreatic and gastric neoplasms (2010: 12b)