Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 2/2011

01-02-2011 | Gastrointestinal

Ascending colon rotation following patient positional change during CT colonography: a potential pitfall in interpretation

Authors: Ji Yeon Kim, Seong Ho Park, Seung Soo Lee, Ah Young Kim, Hyun Kwon Ha

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 2/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the degree and pattern of ascending colonic rotation as patients moved from supine to prone positions during CTC.

Methods

A search of our CTC and colonoscopy database found 37 patients (43 eligible lesions) who fulfilled the following criteria: colonoscopy-proven sessile polyps ≥6 mm in the straight mid-ascending colon, lesion visualisation in both supine and prone CTC, and optimal colonic distension. A coordinate system was developed to designate the polyp radial location (°) along the luminal circumference, unaffected by rotation of the torso. The degree/direction of polyp radial location change (i.e. ascending colonic rotation) between supine and prone positions correlated with anthropometric measurements.

Results

Movement from supine to prone positions resulted in a change in the radial polyp location of between −23° and 79° (median, 21°), demonstrating external rotation of the ascending colon in almost all cases (2° to 79° in 36/37 patients and 42/43 lesions). The degree/direction of rotation mildly correlated with the degree of abdominal compression in the anterior-posterior direction in prone position (r = 0.427 [P = 0.004] and r = 0.404 [P = 0.007]).

Conclusion

The ascending colon was usually found to rotate externally as patients moved from supine to prone positions, partly dependent on the degree of abdominal compression.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Graser A, Stieber P, Nagel D et al (2009) Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population. Gut 58:241–248CrossRefPubMed Graser A, Stieber P, Nagel D et al (2009) Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population. Gut 58:241–248CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Regge D, Laudi C, Galatola G et al (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomographic colonography for the detection of advanced neoplasia in individuals at increased risk of colorectal cancer. JAMA 301:2453–2461CrossRefPubMed Regge D, Laudi C, Galatola G et al (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomographic colonography for the detection of advanced neoplasia in individuals at increased risk of colorectal cancer. JAMA 301:2453–2461CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY et al (2008) Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med 359:1207–1217CrossRefPubMed Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY et al (2008) Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med 359:1207–1217CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ et al (2007) CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 357:1403–1412CrossRefPubMed Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ et al (2007) CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 357:1403–1412CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I et al (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349:2191–2200CrossRefPubMed Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I et al (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349:2191–2200CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Slater A, Taylor SA, Tam E et al (2006) Reader error during CT colonography: causes and implications for training. Eur Radiol 16:2275–2283CrossRefPubMed Slater A, Taylor SA, Tam E et al (2006) Reader error during CT colonography: causes and implications for training. Eur Radiol 16:2275–2283CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Chen SC, Lu DS, Hecht JR, Kadell BM (1999) CT colonography: value of scanning in both the supine and prone positions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172:595–599PubMed Chen SC, Lu DS, Hecht JR, Kadell BM (1999) CT colonography: value of scanning in both the supine and prone positions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172:595–599PubMed
8.
go back to reference Yee J, Kumar NN, Hung RK, Akerkar GA, Kumar PR, Wall SD (2003) Comparison of supine and prone scanning separately and in combination at CT colonography. Radiology 226:653–661CrossRefPubMed Yee J, Kumar NN, Hung RK, Akerkar GA, Kumar PR, Wall SD (2003) Comparison of supine and prone scanning separately and in combination at CT colonography. Radiology 226:653–661CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Welch TJ et al (2000) Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients. Radiology 216:704–711PubMed Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Welch TJ et al (2000) Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients. Radiology 216:704–711PubMed
10.
go back to reference Chen JC, Dachman AH (2006) Cecal mobility: a potential pitfall of CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:1086–1089CrossRefPubMed Chen JC, Dachman AH (2006) Cecal mobility: a potential pitfall of CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:1086–1089CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Laks S, Macari M, Bini EJ (2004) Positional change in colon polyps at CT colonography. Radiology 231:761–766CrossRefPubMed Laks S, Macari M, Bini EJ (2004) Positional change in colon polyps at CT colonography. Radiology 231:761–766CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Mang T, Maier A, Plank C, Mueller-Mang C, Herold C, Schima W (2007) Pitfalls in multi-detector row CT colonography: a systematic approach. Radiographics 27:431–454CrossRefPubMed Mang T, Maier A, Plank C, Mueller-Mang C, Herold C, Schima W (2007) Pitfalls in multi-detector row CT colonography: a systematic approach. Radiographics 27:431–454CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Saunders BP, Phillips RK, Williams CB (1995) Intraoperative measurement of colonic anatomy and attachments with relevance to colonoscopy. Br J Surg 82:1491–1493CrossRefPubMed Saunders BP, Phillips RK, Williams CB (1995) Intraoperative measurement of colonic anatomy and attachments with relevance to colonoscopy. Br J Surg 82:1491–1493CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Saunders BP, Masaki T, Sawada T et al (1995) A peroperative comparison of Western and Oriental colonic anatomy and mesenteric attachments. Int J Colorectal Dis 10:216–221CrossRefPubMed Saunders BP, Masaki T, Sawada T et al (1995) A peroperative comparison of Western and Oriental colonic anatomy and mesenteric attachments. Int J Colorectal Dis 10:216–221CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Punwani S, Halligan S, Tolan D, Taylor SA, Hawkes D (2009) Quantitative assessment of colonic movement between prone and supine patient positions during CT colonography. Br J Radiol 82:475–481CrossRefPubMed Punwani S, Halligan S, Tolan D, Taylor SA, Hawkes D (2009) Quantitative assessment of colonic movement between prone and supine patient positions during CT colonography. Br J Radiol 82:475–481CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Liedenbaum MH, de Vries AH, Halligan S et al (2009) CT colonography polyp matching: differences between experienced readers. Eur Radiol 19:1723–1730CrossRefPubMed Liedenbaum MH, de Vries AH, Halligan S et al (2009) CT colonography polyp matching: differences between experienced readers. Eur Radiol 19:1723–1730CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Lee SS, Park SH, Kim JK et al (2009) Panoramic endoluminal display with minimal image distortion using circumferential radial ray-casting for primary three-dimensional interpretation of CT colonography. Eur Radiol 19:1951–1959CrossRefPubMed Lee SS, Park SH, Kim JK et al (2009) Panoramic endoluminal display with minimal image distortion using circumferential radial ray-casting for primary three-dimensional interpretation of CT colonography. Eur Radiol 19:1951–1959CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Dachman AH (2006) Advice for optimizing colonic distention and minimizing risk of perforation during CT colonography. Radiology 239:317–321CrossRefPubMed Dachman AH (2006) Advice for optimizing colonic distention and minimizing risk of perforation during CT colonography. Radiology 239:317–321CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Huang A, Roy DA, Summers RM et al (2007) Teniae coli-based circumferential localization system for CT colonography: feasibility study. Radiology 243:551–560CrossRefPubMed Huang A, Roy DA, Summers RM et al (2007) Teniae coli-based circumferential localization system for CT colonography: feasibility study. Radiology 243:551–560CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Ascending colon rotation following patient positional change during CT colonography: a potential pitfall in interpretation
Authors
Ji Yeon Kim
Seong Ho Park
Seung Soo Lee
Ah Young Kim
Hyun Kwon Ha
Publication date
01-02-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 2/2011
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-1928-y

Other articles of this Issue 2/2011

European Radiology 2/2011 Go to the issue