Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 8/2009

01-08-2009 | Gastrointestinal

Panoramic endoluminal display with minimal image distortion using circumferential radial ray-casting for primary three-dimensional interpretation of CT colonography

Authors: Seung Soo Lee, Seong Ho Park, Jin Kook Kim, Namkug Kim, Jeongjin Lee, Beom Jin Park, Young Jun Kim, Min Woo Lee, Ah Young Kim, Hyun Kwon Ha

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 8/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop a panoramic endoluminal display technique, the band view, which causes minimal image distortion, and to determine its feasibility as a time-efficient primary three-dimensional review method of CT colonography (CTC). Image distortion was compared between the band view and four other three-dimensional review modes using ten 10-mm and ten 20-mm electronically generated polyps. Diagnostic performance and interpretation time were compared between the band view and the conventional endoluminal view by two independent readers in 52 patients who underwent CTC and colonoscopy on the same day. Mean image distortion index values, in which 1 indicates no distortion and the larger value represents greater distortion, were significantly smaller with the band view (1.03 and 1.01 for 10-mm and 20-mm polyps, respectively) than with the filet view (1.65 and 1.55) or the virtual colon dissection (3.27 and 3.85) (P ≤ 0.004). The sensitivity and specificity for detecting adenomatous polyps ≥6 mm did not differ, but the mean interpretation time was significantly shorter with the band view than with the conventional endoluminal view by 1.8 and 4.5 minutes in readers 1 and 2, respectively (P < 0.0001). The band view can be a time-efficient alternative for primary three-dimensional review of CTC.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B et al (2008) Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous Polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin 58:130–160PubMedCrossRef Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B et al (2008) Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous Polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin 58:130–160PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Park SH, Yee J, Kim SH, Kim YH (2007) Fundamental elements for successful performance of CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy). Korean J Radiol 8:264–275PubMedCrossRef Park SH, Yee J, Kim SH, Kim YH (2007) Fundamental elements for successful performance of CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy). Korean J Radiol 8:264–275PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Dachman AH, Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S, Morin M (2007) CT colonography: visualization methods, interpretation, and pitfalls. Radiol Clin North Am 45:347–359PubMedCrossRef Dachman AH, Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S, Morin M (2007) CT colonography: visualization methods, interpretation, and pitfalls. Radiol Clin North Am 45:347–359PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Pickhardt PJ (2003) Three-dimensional endoluminal CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy): comparison of three commercially available systems. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:1599–1606PubMed Pickhardt PJ (2003) Three-dimensional endoluminal CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy): comparison of three commercially available systems. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:1599–1606PubMed
5.
go back to reference Pickhardt PJ (2004) Differential diagnosis of polypoid lesions seen at CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy). Radiographics 24:1535–1556 discussion 1557–1539PubMedCrossRef Pickhardt PJ (2004) Differential diagnosis of polypoid lesions seen at CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy). Radiographics 24:1535–1556 discussion 1557–1539PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Pickhardt PJ, Lee AD, Taylor AJ et al (2007) Primary 2D versus primary 3D polyp detection at screening CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:1451–1456PubMedCrossRef Pickhardt PJ, Lee AD, Taylor AJ et al (2007) Primary 2D versus primary 3D polyp detection at screening CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:1451–1456PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, Gopal DV (2006) Surface visualization at 3D endoluminal CT colonography: degree of coverage and implications for polyp detection. Gastroenterology 130:1582–1587PubMedCrossRef Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, Gopal DV (2006) Surface visualization at 3D endoluminal CT colonography: degree of coverage and implications for polyp detection. Gastroenterology 130:1582–1587PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Yasumoto T, Murakami T, Yamamoto H et al (2006) Assessment of two 3D MDCT colonography protocols for observation of colorectal polyps. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:85–89PubMedCrossRef Yasumoto T, Murakami T, Yamamoto H et al (2006) Assessment of two 3D MDCT colonography protocols for observation of colorectal polyps. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:85–89PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Neri E, Vannozzi F, Vagli P, Bardine A, Bartolozzi C (2006) Time efficiency of CT colonography: 2D vs 3D visualization. Comput Med Imaging Graph 30:175–180PubMedCrossRef Neri E, Vannozzi F, Vagli P, Bardine A, Bartolozzi C (2006) Time efficiency of CT colonography: 2D vs 3D visualization. Comput Med Imaging Graph 30:175–180PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Carrascosa P, Capunay C, Martin Lopez E, Ulla M, Castiglioni R, Carrascosa J (2007) Multidetector CT colonoscopy: evaluation of the perspective-filet view virtual colon dissection technique for the detection of elevated lesions. Abdom Imaging 32(5):582–588PubMedCrossRef Carrascosa P, Capunay C, Martin Lopez E, Ulla M, Castiglioni R, Carrascosa J (2007) Multidetector CT colonoscopy: evaluation of the perspective-filet view virtual colon dissection technique for the detection of elevated lesions. Abdom Imaging 32(5):582–588PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hoppe H, Quattropani C, Spreng A, Mattich J, Netzer P, Dinkel HP (2004) Virtual colon dissection with CT colonography compared with axial interpretation and conventional colonoscopy: preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:1151–1158PubMed Hoppe H, Quattropani C, Spreng A, Mattich J, Netzer P, Dinkel HP (2004) Virtual colon dissection with CT colonography compared with axial interpretation and conventional colonoscopy: preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:1151–1158PubMed
12.
go back to reference Johnson KT, Johnson CD, Fletcher JG, MacCarty RL, Summers RL (2006) CT colonography using 360-degree virtual dissection: a feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:90–95PubMedCrossRef Johnson KT, Johnson CD, Fletcher JG, MacCarty RL, Summers RL (2006) CT colonography using 360-degree virtual dissection: a feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:90–95PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Juchems MS, Fleiter TR, Pauls S, Schmidt SA, Brambs HJ, Aschoff AJ (2006) CT colonography: comparison of a colon dissection display versus 3D endoluminal view for the detection of polyps. Eur Radiol 16:68–72PubMedCrossRef Juchems MS, Fleiter TR, Pauls S, Schmidt SA, Brambs HJ, Aschoff AJ (2006) CT colonography: comparison of a colon dissection display versus 3D endoluminal view for the detection of polyps. Eur Radiol 16:68–72PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kim SH, Lee JM, Eun HW et al (2007) Two- versus three-dimensional colon evaluation with recently developed virtual dissection software for CT colonography. Radiology 244:852–864PubMedCrossRef Kim SH, Lee JM, Eun HW et al (2007) Two- versus three-dimensional colon evaluation with recently developed virtual dissection software for CT colonography. Radiology 244:852–864PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Silva AC, Wellnitz CV, Hara AK (2006) Three-dimensional virtual dissection at CT colonography: unraveling the colon to search for lesions. Radiographics 26:1669–1686PubMedCrossRef Silva AC, Wellnitz CV, Hara AK (2006) Three-dimensional virtual dissection at CT colonography: unraveling the colon to search for lesions. Radiographics 26:1669–1686PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I et al (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349:2191–2200PubMedCrossRef Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I et al (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349:2191–2200PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Zhang Z, Wang G, Brown BP, Vannier MW (2000) Distortion reduction for fast soft straightening of the colon. Acad Radiol 7:506–515PubMedCrossRef Zhang Z, Wang G, Brown BP, Vannier MW (2000) Distortion reduction for fast soft straightening of the colon. Acad Radiol 7:506–515PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Beaulieu CF, Jeffrey RB Jr., Karadi C, Paik DS, Napel S (1999) Display modes for CT colonography. Part II. Blinded comparison of axial CT and virtual endoscopic and panoramic endoscopic volume-rendered studies. Radiology 212:203–212PubMed Beaulieu CF, Jeffrey RB Jr., Karadi C, Paik DS, Napel S (1999) Display modes for CT colonography. Part II. Blinded comparison of axial CT and virtual endoscopic and panoramic endoscopic volume-rendered studies. Radiology 212:203–212PubMed
19.
go back to reference Karadi C, Beaulieu CF, Jeffrey RB Jr., Paik DS, Napel S (1999) Display modes for CT colonography. Part I. Synthesis and insertion of polyps into patient CT data. Radiology 212:195–201PubMed Karadi C, Beaulieu CF, Jeffrey RB Jr., Paik DS, Napel S (1999) Display modes for CT colonography. Part I. Synthesis and insertion of polyps into patient CT data. Radiology 212:195–201PubMed
20.
go back to reference Lee SS, Park SH, Choi EK et al (2007) Colorectal polyps on portal phase contrast-enhanced CT colonography: lesion attenuation and distinction from tagged feces. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:35–40PubMedCrossRef Lee SS, Park SH, Choi EK et al (2007) Colorectal polyps on portal phase contrast-enhanced CT colonography: lesion attenuation and distinction from tagged feces. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:35–40PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Oto A, Gelebek V, Oguz BS et al (2003) CT attenuation of colorectal polypoid lesions: evaluation of contrast enhancement in CT colonography. Eur Radiol 13:1657–1663PubMedCrossRef Oto A, Gelebek V, Oguz BS et al (2003) CT attenuation of colorectal polypoid lesions: evaluation of contrast enhancement in CT colonography. Eur Radiol 13:1657–1663PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Park SH, Lee SS, Kim JK et al (2008) Volume rendering with color coding of tagged stool during endoluminal fly-through CT colonography: effect on reading efficiency. Radiology 248:1018–1027PubMedCrossRef Park SH, Lee SS, Kim JK et al (2008) Volume rendering with color coding of tagged stool during endoluminal fly-through CT colonography: effect on reading efficiency. Radiology 248:1018–1027PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Choi JR, Schindler WR (2004) Flat colorectal lesions in asymptomatic adults: implications for screening with CT virtual colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:1343–1347PubMed Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Choi JR, Schindler WR (2004) Flat colorectal lesions in asymptomatic adults: implications for screening with CT virtual colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:1343–1347PubMed
24.
go back to reference Johnson CD, Fletcher JG, MacCarty RL et al (2007) Effect of slice thickness and primary 2D versus 3D virtual dissection on colorectal lesion detection at CT colonography in 452 asymptomatic adults. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:672–680PubMedCrossRef Johnson CD, Fletcher JG, MacCarty RL et al (2007) Effect of slice thickness and primary 2D versus 3D virtual dissection on colorectal lesion detection at CT colonography in 452 asymptomatic adults. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:672–680PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Nugent PA, Schindler WR (2004) The effect of diagnostic confidence on the probability of optical colonoscopic confirmation of potential polyps detected on CT colonography: prospective assessment in 1,339 asymptomatic adults. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:1661–1665PubMed Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Nugent PA, Schindler WR (2004) The effect of diagnostic confidence on the probability of optical colonoscopic confirmation of potential polyps detected on CT colonography: prospective assessment in 1,339 asymptomatic adults. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:1661–1665PubMed
26.
go back to reference Glick SG, Johnson CD, Macari M, Yee J ACR practice guideline for the performance of computed tomography (CT) colonography in adults. ACR Practice Guidelines and Technical Standards 2005–2006:295–299 Glick SG, Johnson CD, Macari M, Yee J ACR practice guideline for the performance of computed tomography (CT) colonography in adults. ACR Practice Guidelines and Technical Standards 2005–2006:295–299
Metadata
Title
Panoramic endoluminal display with minimal image distortion using circumferential radial ray-casting for primary three-dimensional interpretation of CT colonography
Authors
Seung Soo Lee
Seong Ho Park
Jin Kook Kim
Namkug Kim
Jeongjin Lee
Beom Jin Park
Young Jun Kim
Min Woo Lee
Ah Young Kim
Hyun Kwon Ha
Publication date
01-08-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 8/2009
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1362-1

Other articles of this Issue 8/2009

European Radiology 8/2009 Go to the issue