Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 10/2010

01-10-2010 | Ultrasound

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the staging of acute pancreatitis

Authors: Tomás Ripollés, María J Martínez, Estela López, Inmaculada Castelló, Fructuoso Delgado

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 10/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To determine the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the assessment of acute pancreatitis, with computed tomography (CT) as the reference standard.

Methods

Fifty consecutive patients (mean age 58.4 years; range 23–86 years) with acute pancreatitis underwent prospectively both CT and ultrasonography, including CEUS, within a 24-h interval. Pancreatic vascularisation was evaluated with CEUS after injection of a second-generation US contrast-enhancing agent. Acute pancreatitis severity was graded according to the Balthazar index. The results were compared with CT severity index and clinical outcome by using Spearman’s correlation coefficient.

Results

A significant correlation between CT and CEUS was found for the CT severity index (r = 0.926), extent of necrosis (r = 0.893) and Balthazar grade (r = 0.884). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for detecting severe acute pancreatitis based on CT findings (severity index greater than 3 and/or presence of necrosis) were respectively 91%, 100%, 100% and 83%. A significant correlation between CEUS severity index and clinical variables was found: Ranson score (r = 0.442), C-reactive protein (CRP) levels 48 h after admission (r = 0.385) and length of hospital stay (r = 0.362).

Conclusion

CEUS is comparable to CT in detecting pancreatic necrosis as well as predicting its clinical course. Therefore, when CT is contraindicated CEUS may be a valid alternative.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bradley EL III (1993) A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, GA, September 11 through 13, 1992. Arch Surg 128:586–590PubMed Bradley EL III (1993) A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, GA, September 11 through 13, 1992. Arch Surg 128:586–590PubMed
3.
go back to reference Dervenis C, Johnson CD, Bassi C et al (1999) Diagnosis, objective assessment of severity, and management of acute pancreatitis. Santorini consensus conference. Int J Pancreatol 25:195–210PubMed Dervenis C, Johnson CD, Bassi C et al (1999) Diagnosis, objective assessment of severity, and management of acute pancreatitis. Santorini consensus conference. Int J Pancreatol 25:195–210PubMed
4.
go back to reference Working Party of the British Society of Gastroenterology (2005) UK guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Gut 54:1–9 Working Party of the British Society of Gastroenterology (2005) UK guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Gut 54:1–9
5.
go back to reference Balthazar EJ, Robinson DL, Megibow AJ, Ranson JHC (1990) Acute pancreatitis value of CT in establishing prognosis. Radiology 174:331–336PubMed Balthazar EJ, Robinson DL, Megibow AJ, Ranson JHC (1990) Acute pancreatitis value of CT in establishing prognosis. Radiology 174:331–336PubMed
6.
go back to reference Balthazar EJ (2002) Acute pancreatitis: assessment of severity with clinical and CT evaluation. Radiology 223:603–613CrossRefPubMed Balthazar EJ (2002) Acute pancreatitis: assessment of severity with clinical and CT evaluation. Radiology 223:603–613CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Mortelé KJ, Wiesner W, Intriere L et al (2004) A modified CT severity index for evaluating acute pancreatitis: improved correlation with patient outcome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:1261–1265PubMed Mortelé KJ, Wiesner W, Intriere L et al (2004) A modified CT severity index for evaluating acute pancreatitis: improved correlation with patient outcome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:1261–1265PubMed
8.
go back to reference Bollen TL, van Santvoort HC, Besselink MGH, van Es WH, Gooszen HG, van Leuwen MS (2007) Update of acute pancreatitis: ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging features. Semin Ultrasound CT MR :371–383 Bollen TL, van Santvoort HC, Besselink MGH, van Es WH, Gooszen HG, van Leuwen MS (2007) Update of acute pancreatitis: ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging features. Semin Ultrasound CT MR :371–383
9.
go back to reference Lankisch PG, Blum T, Maisonneuve P (2003) Lowenfels AB (2001) Severe acute pancreatitis: When to be concerned? Pancreatology 3:102–110CrossRefPubMed Lankisch PG, Blum T, Maisonneuve P (2003) Lowenfels AB (2001) Severe acute pancreatitis: When to be concerned? Pancreatology 3:102–110CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Piironen A (2001) Severe acute pancreatitis: contrast-enhanced CT and MRI features. Abdom Imaging 26:225–233 Piironen A (2001) Severe acute pancreatitis: contrast-enhanced CT and MRI features. Abdom Imaging 26:225–233
11.
go back to reference Arvanitakis M, Delhaye M, De Maertelaere V (2004) Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 126:715–723CrossRefPubMed Arvanitakis M, Delhaye M, De Maertelaere V (2004) Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 126:715–723CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Moreno-Osset E, Lopez A, de la Cueva L et al (2005) 99 m Tc-hexamethylpropylene amine oxime leukocyte scintigraphy in acute pancreatitis: an alternative to contrast-enhanced computed tomography? Am J Gastroenterol 100:153–161CrossRefPubMed Moreno-Osset E, Lopez A, de la Cueva L et al (2005) 99 m Tc-hexamethylpropylene amine oxime leukocyte scintigraphy in acute pancreatitis: an alternative to contrast-enhanced computed tomography? Am J Gastroenterol 100:153–161CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference López A, de la Cueva L, Martínez MJ et al (2007) Usefulness of technetium-99 m hexamethylpropylene amine oxime-labeled leukocyte scintigraphy to detect pancreatic necrosis in patients with acute pancreatitis. Prospective comparison with Ranson, Glasgow and APACHE-II scores and serum C-reactive protein. Pancreatology 7:470–478CrossRefPubMed López A, de la Cueva L, Martínez MJ et al (2007) Usefulness of technetium-99 m hexamethylpropylene amine oxime-labeled leukocyte scintigraphy to detect pancreatic necrosis in patients with acute pancreatitis. Prospective comparison with Ranson, Glasgow and APACHE-II scores and serum C-reactive protein. Pancreatology 7:470–478CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Merkle EM, Görich J (2002) Imaging of acute pancreatitis. Eur Radiol 12:1979–1992PubMed Merkle EM, Görich J (2002) Imaging of acute pancreatitis. Eur Radiol 12:1979–1992PubMed
15.
go back to reference D'Onofrio M, Zamboni G, Faccioli N, Capelli P, Pozzi Mucelli R (2007) Ultrasonography of the pancreas. 4. Contrast-enhanced imaging. Abdom Imaging 32:171–181CrossRefPubMed D'Onofrio M, Zamboni G, Faccioli N, Capelli P, Pozzi Mucelli R (2007) Ultrasonography of the pancreas. 4. Contrast-enhanced imaging. Abdom Imaging 32:171–181CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Rickes S, Uhle C, Kahl S (2006) Echo enhanced ultrasound: a new valid initial imaging approach for severe acute pancreatitis. Gut 55:74–78CrossRefPubMed Rickes S, Uhle C, Kahl S (2006) Echo enhanced ultrasound: a new valid initial imaging approach for severe acute pancreatitis. Gut 55:74–78CrossRefPubMed
17.
18.
go back to reference Benziane K, Azais O, Gasquet C (1992) A new computed tomography classification of acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 16:721–722PubMed Benziane K, Azais O, Gasquet C (1992) A new computed tomography classification of acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 16:721–722PubMed
Metadata
Title
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the staging of acute pancreatitis
Authors
Tomás Ripollés
María J Martínez
Estela López
Inmaculada Castelló
Fructuoso Delgado
Publication date
01-10-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 10/2010
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-1824-5

Other articles of this Issue 10/2010

European Radiology 10/2010 Go to the issue