Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 7/2010

01-07-2010 | Computer Applications

Liver tumour segmentation using contrast-enhanced multi-detector CT data: performance benchmarking of three semiautomated methods

Authors: Jia-Yin Zhou, Damon W. K. Wong, Feng Ding, Sudhakar K. Venkatesh, Qi Tian, Ying-Yi Qi, Wei Xiong, Jimmy J. Liu, Wee-Kheng Leow

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 7/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

Automatic tumour segmentation and volumetry is useful in cancer staging and treatment outcome assessment. This paper presents a performance benchmarking study on liver tumour segmentation for three semiautomatic algorithms: 2D region growing with knowledge-based constraints (A1), 2D voxel classification with propagational learning (A2) and Bayesian rule-based 3D region growing (A3).

Methods

CT data from 30 patients were studied, and 47 liver tumours were isolated and manually segmented by experts to obtain the reference standard. Four datasets with ten tumours were used for algorithm training and the remaining 37 tumours for testing. Three evaluation metrics, relative absolute volume difference (RAVD), volumetric overlap error (VOE) and average symmetric surface distance (ASSD), were computed based on computerised and reference segmentations.

Results

A1, A2 and A3 obtained mean/median RAVD scores of 17.93/10.53%, 17.92/9.61% and 34.74/28.75%, mean/median VOEs of 30.47/26.79%, 25.70/22.64% and 39.95/38.54%, and mean/median ASSDs of 2.05/1.41 mm, 1.57/1.15 mm and 4.12/3.41 mm, respectively. For each metric, we obtained significantly lower values of A1 and A2 than A3 (P < 0.01), suggesting that A1 and A2 outperformed A3.

Conclusions

Compared with the reference standard, the overall performance of A1 and A2 is promising. Further development and validation is necessary before reliable tumour segmentation and volumetry can be widely used clinically.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bosch FX, Ribes J, Borras J (1999) Epidemiology of primary liver cancer. Semin Liver Dis 19:271–285CrossRefPubMed Bosch FX, Ribes J, Borras J (1999) Epidemiology of primary liver cancer. Semin Liver Dis 19:271–285CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference El Serag HB, Mason AC (1999) Rising incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States. N Engl J Med 340:745–750CrossRefPubMed El Serag HB, Mason AC (1999) Rising incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States. N Engl J Med 340:745–750CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Bosch FX, Ribes J, Diaz M, Cleries R (2004) Primary liver cancer: worldwide incidence and trends. Gastroenterology 127(5 Suppl 1):S5–S16CrossRefPubMed Bosch FX, Ribes J, Diaz M, Cleries R (2004) Primary liver cancer: worldwide incidence and trends. Gastroenterology 127(5 Suppl 1):S5–S16CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Prasad SR, Jhaveri KS, Saini S, Hahn PF, Halpern EF, Sumner JE (2002) CT tumor measurement for therapeutic response assessment: comparison of unidimensional, bidimensional, and volumetric techniques - initial observations. Radiology 225:416–419CrossRefPubMed Prasad SR, Jhaveri KS, Saini S, Hahn PF, Halpern EF, Sumner JE (2002) CT tumor measurement for therapeutic response assessment: comparison of unidimensional, bidimensional, and volumetric techniques - initial observations. Radiology 225:416–419CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Hopper KD, Kasales CJ, Eggli KD et al (1996) The impact of 2D versus 3D quantitation of tumor bulk determination on current methods of assessing response to treatment. J Comput Assist Tomogr 20:930–937CrossRefPubMed Hopper KD, Kasales CJ, Eggli KD et al (1996) The impact of 2D versus 3D quantitation of tumor bulk determination on current methods of assessing response to treatment. J Comput Assist Tomogr 20:930–937CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Dachman AH, MacEneaney PM, Adedipe A, Carlin M, Schumm LP (2001) Tumor size on computed tomography scans: is one measurement enough? Cancer 91:555–560CrossRefPubMed Dachman AH, MacEneaney PM, Adedipe A, Carlin M, Schumm LP (2001) Tumor size on computed tomography scans: is one measurement enough? Cancer 91:555–560CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Mahr A, Levegrün S, Bahner ML, Kress J, Zuna J, Schlegel W (1999) Usability of semiautomatic segmentation algorithm for tumor volume determination. Invest Radiol 34:143–150CrossRefPubMed Mahr A, Levegrün S, Bahner ML, Kress J, Zuna J, Schlegel W (1999) Usability of semiautomatic segmentation algorithm for tumor volume determination. Invest Radiol 34:143–150CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Yim PJ, Foran DJ (2003) Volumetry of hepatic metastases in computed tomography using the watershed and active contour algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 16th IEEE symposium on computer-based medical systems. New York, NY, USA, pp 329–335 Yim PJ, Foran DJ (2003) Volumetry of hepatic metastases in computed tomography using the watershed and active contour algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 16th IEEE symposium on computer-based medical systems. New York, NY, USA, pp 329–335
10.
go back to reference Yim PJ, Vora AV, Raghavan D et al (2006) Volumetric analysis of liver metastases in computed tomography with the fuzzy c-means algorithm. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30:212–220CrossRefPubMed Yim PJ, Vora AV, Raghavan D et al (2006) Volumetric analysis of liver metastases in computed tomography with the fuzzy c-means algorithm. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30:212–220CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Seo KS (2005) Automatic hepatic tumor segmentation using composite hypotheses. Lect Notes Comput Sci 3656:922–929CrossRef Seo KS (2005) Automatic hepatic tumor segmentation using composite hypotheses. Lect Notes Comput Sci 3656:922–929CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Zhao B, Schwartz LH, Jiang L et al (2006) Shape-constraint region growing for delineation of hepatic metastases on contrast-enhanced computed tomograph scans. Invest Radiol 41:753–762CrossRefPubMed Zhao B, Schwartz LH, Jiang L et al (2006) Shape-constraint region growing for delineation of hepatic metastases on contrast-enhanced computed tomograph scans. Invest Radiol 41:753–762CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ray S, Hagge R, Gillen M et al (2008) Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional iterative watershed segmentation methods in hepatic tumor volumetrics. Med Phys 35:5869–5881CrossRefPubMed Ray S, Hagge R, Gillen M et al (2008) Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional iterative watershed segmentation methods in hepatic tumor volumetrics. Med Phys 35:5869–5881CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Keil S, Behrendt FF, Stanzel S et al (2008) Semi-automated measurement of hyperdense, hypodense and heterogeneous hepatic metastasis on standard MDCT slices. Comparison of semi-automated and manual measurement of RECIST and WHO criteria. Eur Radiol 18:2456–2465CrossRefPubMed Keil S, Behrendt FF, Stanzel S et al (2008) Semi-automated measurement of hyperdense, hypodense and heterogeneous hepatic metastasis on standard MDCT slices. Comparison of semi-automated and manual measurement of RECIST and WHO criteria. Eur Radiol 18:2456–2465CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Gerig G, Jomier M, Chakos M (2001) Valmet: a new validation tool for assessing and improving 3D object segmentation. Lect Notes Comput Sci 2208:516–523CrossRef Gerig G, Jomier M, Chakos M (2001) Valmet: a new validation tool for assessing and improving 3D object segmentation. Lect Notes Comput Sci 2208:516–523CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Van Ginneken B, Heimann T, Styner M (2007) 3D segmentation in the clinic: a grand challenge. In: Proceedings of MICCAI Workshop on 3D Segmentation in the clinic: a grand challenge. Brisbane, Australia, pp 7–15 Van Ginneken B, Heimann T, Styner M (2007) 3D segmentation in the clinic: a grand challenge. In: Proceedings of MICCAI Workshop on 3D Segmentation in the clinic: a grand challenge. Brisbane, Australia, pp 7–15
24.
go back to reference Massoptier L, Casciaro S (2008) A new fully automatic and robust algorithm for fast segmentation of liver tissue and tumors from CT scans. Eur Radiol 18:1658–1665CrossRefPubMed Massoptier L, Casciaro S (2008) A new fully automatic and robust algorithm for fast segmentation of liver tissue and tumors from CT scans. Eur Radiol 18:1658–1665CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Freiman M, Eliassaf O, Taieb Y, Joskowicz L, Sosna J (2008) A Bayesian approach for liver analysis: algorithm and validation study. Lect Notes Comput Sci 5241:85–92CrossRef Freiman M, Eliassaf O, Taieb Y, Joskowicz L, Sosna J (2008) A Bayesian approach for liver analysis: algorithm and validation study. Lect Notes Comput Sci 5241:85–92CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Esneault S, Hraiech N, Delabrousse E, Dillenseger JL (2007) Graph cut liver segmentation for interstitial ultrasound therapy. In: Proceedings of the 29th annual international conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Lyon, France, pp 5247–5250 Esneault S, Hraiech N, Delabrousse E, Dillenseger JL (2007) Graph cut liver segmentation for interstitial ultrasound therapy. In: Proceedings of the 29th annual international conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Lyon, France, pp 5247–5250
27.
go back to reference Armato SG 3rd, McLennan G, McNitt-Gray MF et al (2004) Lung image database consortium: developing a resource for the medical imaging research community. Radiology 232:739–748CrossRefPubMed Armato SG 3rd, McLennan G, McNitt-Gray MF et al (2004) Lung image database consortium: developing a resource for the medical imaging research community. Radiology 232:739–748CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Liver tumour segmentation using contrast-enhanced multi-detector CT data: performance benchmarking of three semiautomated methods
Authors
Jia-Yin Zhou
Damon W. K. Wong
Feng Ding
Sudhakar K. Venkatesh
Qi Tian
Ying-Yi Qi
Wei Xiong
Jimmy J. Liu
Wee-Kheng Leow
Publication date
01-07-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 7/2010
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-1712-z

Other articles of this Issue 7/2010

European Radiology 7/2010 Go to the issue