Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 1/2009

01-01-2009 | Computer Applications

Do clinicians read our reports? Integrating the radiology information system with the electronic patient record: experiences from the first 2 years

Authors: Petter Hurlen, Truls Østbye, Arne Borthne, Fredrik A. Dahl, Pål Gulbrandsen

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

This study aimed to determine how clinicians adapted to and utilized new routines for accessing radiology reports after the integration of an electronic patient record (EPR) with a radiology information system (RIS). Activity-related data describing the availability and receipt of radiology reports were collected from the EPR and the RIS over a period of 2 years. Twelve percent of the final radiology reports had not been opened 4 weeks after they had been entered into the EPR. For opened reports, the median time after a report was available in the EPR until it was first opened by a clinician was less than 1 h for preliminary reports and less than 4 h for final radiology reports. The use of radiology reports was stable during the second observation year. Some reports were not opened for professional as well as technical reasons. The integrated information systems offered a potential for improving routines related to the transmission of radiology reports. Clinicians did not fully take advantage of this potential in the 2 years after its introduction.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gunderman RB (2005) The medical community’s changing vision of the patient: the importance of radiology. Radiology 234:339–342PubMedCrossRef Gunderman RB (2005) The medical community’s changing vision of the patient: the importance of radiology. Radiology 234:339–342PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Smith PC, Araya-Guerra R, Bublitz C et al (2005) Missing clinical information during primary care visits. JAMA 293:565–571PubMedCrossRef Smith PC, Araya-Guerra R, Bublitz C et al (2005) Missing clinical information during primary care visits. JAMA 293:565–571PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Levin DC (1994) Merrill C. Sosman Lecture. The practice of radiology by nonradiologists: cost, quality, and utilization issues. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162:513–518PubMed Levin DC (1994) Merrill C. Sosman Lecture. The practice of radiology by nonradiologists: cost, quality, and utilization issues. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162:513–518PubMed
4.
go back to reference Pilling JR (2003) Picture archiving and communication systems: the users’ view. Br J Radiol 76:519–524PubMedCrossRef Pilling JR (2003) Picture archiving and communication systems: the users’ view. Br J Radiol 76:519–524PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Espinosa JA, Nolan TW (2000) Reducing errors made by emergency physicians in interpreting radiographs: longitudinal study. BMJ 320:737–740PubMedCrossRef Espinosa JA, Nolan TW (2000) Reducing errors made by emergency physicians in interpreting radiographs: longitudinal study. BMJ 320:737–740PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Berlin L (1997) Radiology reports. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:943–946PubMed Berlin L (1997) Radiology reports. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:943–946PubMed
8.
go back to reference Kim SA, Park WS, Chun TJ et al (2002) Association of the implementation of PACS with hospital revenue. J Digit Imaging 15:247–253PubMedCrossRef Kim SA, Park WS, Chun TJ et al (2002) Association of the implementation of PACS with hospital revenue. J Digit Imaging 15:247–253PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Nitrosi A, Borasi G, Nicoli F et al (2007) A filmless radiology department in a full digital regional hospital: quantitative evaluation of the increased quality and efficiency. J Digit Imaging 20(2):140–148, Epub 2007 Feb 23PubMedCrossRef Nitrosi A, Borasi G, Nicoli F et al (2007) A filmless radiology department in a full digital regional hospital: quantitative evaluation of the increased quality and efficiency. J Digit Imaging 20(2):140–148, Epub 2007 Feb 23PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Siegel EL, Reiner BI (2003) Filmless radiology at the Baltimore VA Medical Center: a 9 year retrospective. Comput Med Imaging Graph 27:101–109PubMedCrossRef Siegel EL, Reiner BI (2003) Filmless radiology at the Baltimore VA Medical Center: a 9 year retrospective. Comput Med Imaging Graph 27:101–109PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bryan S, Weatherburn G, Buxton M et al (1999) Evaluation of a hospital picture archiving and communication system. J Health Serv Res Policy 4:204–209PubMed Bryan S, Weatherburn G, Buxton M et al (1999) Evaluation of a hospital picture archiving and communication system. J Health Serv Res Policy 4:204–209PubMed
12.
go back to reference Mariani C, Tronchi A, Oncini L et al (2006) Analysis of the X-ray work flow in two diagnostic imaging departments with and without a RIS/PACS system. J Digit Imaging 19(Suppl 1):18–28PubMedCrossRef Mariani C, Tronchi A, Oncini L et al (2006) Analysis of the X-ray work flow in two diagnostic imaging departments with and without a RIS/PACS system. J Digit Imaging 19(Suppl 1):18–28PubMedCrossRef
13.
14.
go back to reference Reiner B, Siegel E, Protopapas Z et al (1999) Impact of filmless radiology on frequency of clinician consultations with radiologists. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173:1169–1172PubMed Reiner B, Siegel E, Protopapas Z et al (1999) Impact of filmless radiology on frequency of clinician consultations with radiologists. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173:1169–1172PubMed
15.
go back to reference Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Flagle C et al (2000) Effect of filmless imaging on the utilization of radiologic services. Radiology 215:163–167PubMed Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Flagle C et al (2000) Effect of filmless imaging on the utilization of radiologic services. Radiology 215:163–167PubMed
17.
go back to reference Goddard P, Leslie A, Jones A et al (2001) Error in radiology. Br J Radiol 74:949–951PubMed Goddard P, Leslie A, Jones A et al (2001) Error in radiology. Br J Radiol 74:949–951PubMed
18.
go back to reference Cohen MD (2008) Making preliminary radiographic reports available to referring clinicians: current status. Acad Radiol 15:127–131PubMedCrossRef Cohen MD (2008) Making preliminary radiographic reports available to referring clinicians: current status. Acad Radiol 15:127–131PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Holman BL, Aliabadi P, Silverman SG et al (1994) Medical impact of unedited preliminary radiology reports. Radiology 191:519–521PubMed Holman BL, Aliabadi P, Silverman SG et al (1994) Medical impact of unedited preliminary radiology reports. Radiology 191:519–521PubMed
20.
go back to reference Landsberger HA (1958) Hawthorne revisited. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York Landsberger HA (1958) Hawthorne revisited. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York
21.
go back to reference Dahl FA, Grotle M, Saltyte BJ et al (2008) Data splitting as a countermeasure against hypothesis fishing: with a case study of predictors for low back pain. Eur J Epidemiol 23:237–242PubMedCrossRef Dahl FA, Grotle M, Saltyte BJ et al (2008) Data splitting as a countermeasure against hypothesis fishing: with a case study of predictors for low back pain. Eur J Epidemiol 23:237–242PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Do clinicians read our reports? Integrating the radiology information system with the electronic patient record: experiences from the first 2 years
Authors
Petter Hurlen
Truls Østbye
Arne Borthne
Fredrik A. Dahl
Pål Gulbrandsen
Publication date
01-01-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 1/2009
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1098-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

European Radiology 1/2009 Go to the issue