Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Digital Imaging 1/2006

01-12-2006

Analysis of the X-ray Work Flow in Two Diagnostic Imaging Departments With and Without a RIS/PACS System

Authors: Caterina Mariani, Antonella Tronchi, Luigi Oncini, Osvaldo Pirani, Roberto Murri

Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Special Issue 1/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

A traditional radiological workflow is compared with one based on radiology information system/picture archiving and communication system (RIS/PACS). X-ray workflow process was considered in both radiology departments. First, the study identified the main phases of the research work as follows: Process Analysis, Data Collection and Elaboration, Interpretation. Afterwards, the main steps of the whole image acquisition process were defined, and each step was divided into a number of elementary operations. Then, the time required to complete each of these was measured. Data collected were elaborated and synthesized to obtain time frequency distributions for each step and evaluation of the total time for the whole working flow. Statistical elaboration of the collected data shows that x-ray working time decreases, between 35% and 57%, when RIS/PACS is used. Detailed analysis of the whole working process allows identification of possible critical points to improve the image acquisition process.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Reneir, B, Siegel, E, Carrino, JA 2002Workflow optimization: current trends and future directionsJ Digit Imaging15141152CrossRef Reneir, B, Siegel, E, Carrino, JA 2002Workflow optimization: current trends and future directionsJ Digit Imaging15141152CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Reiner, BI, Siegel, EL 2002The cutting edge: strategies to enhance radiologist workflow in a filmless/paperless imaging departmentJ Digit Imaging15178190PubMedCrossRef Reiner, BI, Siegel, EL 2002The cutting edge: strategies to enhance radiologist workflow in a filmless/paperless imaging departmentJ Digit Imaging15178190PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Lepanto, L 2003Impact of electronic signature on radiology report turnaround timeJ Digit Imaging16306309PubMedCrossRef Lepanto, L 2003Impact of electronic signature on radiology report turnaround timeJ Digit Imaging16306309PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ramaswamy, MR, Chaljub, G, Esch, O, Fanning, DD, Sonnenberg, E 2000Continuous speech recognition in MR imaging reporting: advantages, disadvantages, and impactAJR174617622PubMed Ramaswamy, MR, Chaljub, G, Esch, O, Fanning, DD, Sonnenberg, E 2000Continuous speech recognition in MR imaging reporting: advantages, disadvantages, and impactAJR174617622PubMed
5.
go back to reference Cavagna, E, Berletti, R, Schiavon, F, Scarsi, B, Barbato, G 2003Optimized delivery of radiological reports: applying six sigma methodology to a radiology departmentRadiol Med105205214 Cavagna, E, Berletti, R, Schiavon, F, Scarsi, B, Barbato, G 2003Optimized delivery of radiological reports: applying six sigma methodology to a radiology departmentRadiol Med105205214
6.
go back to reference Andriole, KP 2002Productivity and cost assessment of computed radiography, digital radiography, and screen-film for outpatient chest examinationsJ Digit Imaging15161169PubMedCrossRef Andriole, KP 2002Productivity and cost assessment of computed radiography, digital radiography, and screen-film for outpatient chest examinationsJ Digit Imaging15161169PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Reiner, BI, Siegel, EL 2002Technologists’ productivity when using PACS: comparison of film-based versus filmless radiographyAJR1793337PubMed Reiner, BI, Siegel, EL 2002Technologists’ productivity when using PACS: comparison of film-based versus filmless radiographyAJR1793337PubMed
8.
go back to reference Palma, L, Grisi, G, Cuttin, R, Rimondini, A 1999Digital vs conventional radiography: cost and revenue analysisEur Radiol916821692PubMedCrossRef Palma, L, Grisi, G, Cuttin, R, Rimondini, A 1999Digital vs conventional radiography: cost and revenue analysisEur Radiol916821692PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Tolkki O, Ahovuo J, Kauppinen T, Fyhr N, Kujala J, Parvinen P: Patient in Process, Benefits of Reduced Throughtput Time-Case HUSpacs. EuroPACS-MIR (2004), Edizioni Università di Trieste, pp 155–158, 2004 Tolkki O, Ahovuo J, Kauppinen T, Fyhr N, Kujala J, Parvinen P: Patient in Process, Benefits of Reduced Throughtput Time-Case HUSpacs. EuroPACS-MIR (2004), Edizioni Università di Trieste, pp 155–158, 2004
10.
go back to reference Ralston, MD, Coleman, RM, Beaulieu, DM, Scrutchfield, K, Perkins, T 2004Progress toward paperless radiology in the digital environment: planning, implementation, and benefitsJ Digit Imaging17134143PubMedCrossRef Ralston, MD, Coleman, RM, Beaulieu, DM, Scrutchfield, K, Perkins, T 2004Progress toward paperless radiology in the digital environment: planning, implementation, and benefitsJ Digit Imaging17134143PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Reiner, BI, Siegel, EL, Flagle, C, Hooper, FJ, Cox, RE, Scanlon, M 2000Effect of filmless imaging on the utilization of radiologic servicesRadiology215163167PubMed Reiner, BI, Siegel, EL, Flagle, C, Hooper, FJ, Cox, RE, Scanlon, M 2000Effect of filmless imaging on the utilization of radiologic servicesRadiology215163167PubMed
Metadata
Title
Analysis of the X-ray Work Flow in Two Diagnostic Imaging Departments With and Without a RIS/PACS System
Authors
Caterina Mariani
Antonella Tronchi
Luigi Oncini
Osvaldo Pirani
Roberto Murri
Publication date
01-12-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Issue Special Issue 1/2006
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Electronic ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-006-0858-3

Other articles of this Special Issue 1/2006

Journal of Digital Imaging 1/2006 Go to the issue