Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Rheumatology International 11/2020

Open Access 01-11-2020 | Osteoarthrosis | Systematic Review

Risk factors for the progression of finger interphalangeal joint osteoarthritis: a systematic review

Authors: Karishma Shah, Xiaotian Yang, Jennifer C. E. Lane, Gary S. Collins, Nigel K. Arden, Dominic Furniss, Stephanie R. Filbay

Published in: Rheumatology International | Issue 11/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Progressive hand interphalangeal joint (IPJ) osteoarthritis is associated with pain, reduced function and impaired quality of life. However, the evidence surrounding risk factors for IPJ osteoarthritis progression is unclear. Identifying risk factors for IPJ osteoarthritis progression may inform preventative strategies and early interventions to improve long-term outcomes for individuals at risk of IPJ osteoarthritis progression. The objectives of the study were to describe methods used to measure the progression of IPJ osteoarthritis and identify risk factors for IPJ osteoarthritis progression. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and The Cochrane Library were searched from inception to 19th February 2020 (PROSPERO CRD42019121034). Eligible studies assessed potential risk factor/s associated with IPJ osteoarthritis progression. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified QUIPS Tool, and a best evidence synthesis was performed. Of eight eligible studies, all measured osteoarthritis progression radiographically, and none considered symptoms. Eighteen potential risk factors were assessed. Diabetes (adjusted mean difference between 2.06 and 7.78), and larger finger epiphyseal index in males (regression coefficient β = 0.202) and females (β = 0.325) were identified as risk factors (limited evidence). Older age in men and women showed mixed results; 13 variables were not risk factors (all limited evidence). Patients with diabetes and larger finger epiphyseal index might be at higher risk of radiographic IPJ osteoarthritis progression, though evidence is limited and studies are biased. Studies assessing symptomatic IPJ osteoarthritis progression are lacking.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Neogi T (2013) The epidemiology and impact of pain in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 21(9):1145–1153 Neogi T (2013) The epidemiology and impact of pain in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 21(9):1145–1153
2.
3.
go back to reference Buckwalter JA, Martin J, Mankin HJ (2000) Synovial joint degeneration and the syndrome of osteoarthritis. Instr Course Lect 49:481–489PubMed Buckwalter JA, Martin J, Mankin HJ (2000) Synovial joint degeneration and the syndrome of osteoarthritis. Instr Course Lect 49:481–489PubMed
4.
go back to reference Zhang W et al (2009) EULAR evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis of hand osteoarthritis: report of a task force of ESCISIT. Ann Rheum Dis 68(1):8–17CrossRefPubMed Zhang W et al (2009) EULAR evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis of hand osteoarthritis: report of a task force of ESCISIT. Ann Rheum Dis 68(1):8–17CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference UK AR (2013) Osteoarthritis of the hand and wrist, A.R. UK, Editor UK AR (2013) Osteoarthritis of the hand and wrist, A.R. UK, Editor
6.
go back to reference Harris CA et al (2018) Understanding patient preferences in proximal interphalangeal joint surgery for osteoarthritis: a conjoint analysis. J Hand Surg Am 43(7):615–624.e4PubMed Harris CA et al (2018) Understanding patient preferences in proximal interphalangeal joint surgery for osteoarthritis: a conjoint analysis. J Hand Surg Am 43(7):615–624.e4PubMed
7.
go back to reference Visser AW et al (2014) Radiographic scoring methods in hand osteoarthritis—a systematic literature search and descriptive review. Osteoarthr Cartil 22(10):1710–1723 Visser AW et al (2014) Radiographic scoring methods in hand osteoarthritis—a systematic literature search and descriptive review. Osteoarthr Cartil 22(10):1710–1723
8.
go back to reference Maheu E et al (2006) Design and conduct of clinical trials in patients with osteoarthritis of the hand: recommendations from a task force of the Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Osteoarthr Cartil 14(4):303–322 Maheu E et al (2006) Design and conduct of clinical trials in patients with osteoarthritis of the hand: recommendations from a task force of the Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Osteoarthr Cartil 14(4):303–322
9.
go back to reference Egger P et al (1995) Patterns of joint involvement in osteoarthritis of the hand: the Chingford Study. J Rheumatol 22(8):1509–1513PubMed Egger P et al (1995) Patterns of joint involvement in osteoarthritis of the hand: the Chingford Study. J Rheumatol 22(8):1509–1513PubMed
10.
go back to reference Kalichman L, Hernandez-Molina G (2010) Hand osteoarthritis: an epidemiological perspective. Semin Arthritis Rheum 39(6):465–476PubMed Kalichman L, Hernandez-Molina G (2010) Hand osteoarthritis: an epidemiological perspective. Semin Arthritis Rheum 39(6):465–476PubMed
11.
go back to reference Dahaghin S et al (2006) Clinical burden of radiographic hand osteoarthritis: a systematic appraisal. Arthritis Rheum 55(4):636–647PubMed Dahaghin S et al (2006) Clinical burden of radiographic hand osteoarthritis: a systematic appraisal. Arthritis Rheum 55(4):636–647PubMed
12.
go back to reference Bozic KJ et al (2013) Shared decision making in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and knee: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Jt Surg Am 95(18):1633–1639 Bozic KJ et al (2013) Shared decision making in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and knee: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Jt Surg Am 95(18):1633–1639
14.
go back to reference Kwok WY et al (2013) Risk factors for progression in hand osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 65(4):552–562 Kwok WY et al (2013) Risk factors for progression in hand osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 65(4):552–562
15.
go back to reference Kloppenburg M et al (2007) Research in hand osteoarthritis: time for reappraisal and demand for new strategies. An opinion paper. Ann Rheum Dis 66(9):1157–1161PubMedPubMedCentral Kloppenburg M et al (2007) Research in hand osteoarthritis: time for reappraisal and demand for new strategies. An opinion paper. Ann Rheum Dis 66(9):1157–1161PubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Moher D et al (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151(4):264–269 (w64)PubMed Moher D et al (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151(4):264–269 (w64)PubMed
18.
go back to reference Methley AM et al (2014) PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. BMC Health Serv Res 14:579–579PubMedPubMedCentral Methley AM et al (2014) PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. BMC Health Serv Res 14:579–579PubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Maheu E et al (2007) Reproducibility and sensitivity to change of four scoring methods for the radiological assessment of osteoarthritis of the hand. Ann Rheum Dis 66(4):464–469PubMed Maheu E et al (2007) Reproducibility and sensitivity to change of four scoring methods for the radiological assessment of osteoarthritis of the hand. Ann Rheum Dis 66(4):464–469PubMed
21.
go back to reference Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Vol. 6.0. 2019: Cochrane Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Vol. 6.0. 2019: Cochrane
22.
go back to reference Iansavichene AE et al (2008) Should systematic reviewers search for randomized, controlled trials published as letters? Ann Intern Med 148(9):714–715PubMed Iansavichene AE et al (2008) Should systematic reviewers search for randomized, controlled trials published as letters? Ann Intern Med 148(9):714–715PubMed
23.
go back to reference Li G et al (2017) A scoping review of comparisons between abstracts and full reports in primary biomedical research. BMC Med Res Methodol 17(1):181PubMedPubMedCentral Li G et al (2017) A scoping review of comparisons between abstracts and full reports in primary biomedical research. BMC Med Res Methodol 17(1):181PubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Hayden JA, Cote P, Bombardier C (2006) Evaluation of the quality of prognosis studies in systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med 144(6):427–437PubMed Hayden JA, Cote P, Bombardier C (2006) Evaluation of the quality of prognosis studies in systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med 144(6):427–437PubMed
25.
go back to reference Huguet A et al (2013) Judging the quality of evidence in reviews of prognostic factor research: adapting the GRADE framework. Syst Rev 2:71PubMedPubMedCentral Huguet A et al (2013) Judging the quality of evidence in reviews of prognostic factor research: adapting the GRADE framework. Syst Rev 2:71PubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Grooten WJA et al (2019) Elaborating on the assessment of the risk of bias in prognostic studies in pain rehabilitation using QUIPS-aspects of interrater agreement. Diagn Progn Res 3:5PubMedPubMedCentral Grooten WJA et al (2019) Elaborating on the assessment of the risk of bias in prognostic studies in pain rehabilitation using QUIPS-aspects of interrater agreement. Diagn Progn Res 3:5PubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Sheehan KJ et al (2018) Prognostic factors of functional outcome after hip fracture surgery: a systematic review. Age Ageing 47(5):661–670PubMed Sheehan KJ et al (2018) Prognostic factors of functional outcome after hip fracture surgery: a systematic review. Age Ageing 47(5):661–670PubMed
28.
go back to reference Valentin GH et al (2016) Prognostic factors for disability and sick leave in patients with subacute non-malignant pain: a systematic review of cohort studies. BMJ Open 6(1):e007616PubMedPubMedCentral Valentin GH et al (2016) Prognostic factors for disability and sick leave in patients with subacute non-malignant pain: a systematic review of cohort studies. BMJ Open 6(1):e007616PubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Burton CL et al (2016) Clinical course and prognostic factors in conservatively managed carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 97(5):836–852.e1PubMed Burton CL et al (2016) Clinical course and prognostic factors in conservatively managed carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 97(5):836–852.e1PubMed
30.
go back to reference Lobatto DJ et al (2018) Preoperative risk factors for postoperative complications in endoscopic pituitary surgery: a systematic review. Pituitary 21(1):84–97PubMed Lobatto DJ et al (2018) Preoperative risk factors for postoperative complications in endoscopic pituitary surgery: a systematic review. Pituitary 21(1):84–97PubMed
31.
go back to reference The Cochrane collaboration (2014) Review Manager (RevMan). The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen The Cochrane collaboration (2014) Review Manager (RevMan). The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen
32.
go back to reference GRADE Working Group (2013) Quality of evidence, in GRADE handbook for grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations, H. Schünemann, et al., Editors GRADE Working Group (2013) Quality of evidence, in GRADE handbook for grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations, H. Schünemann, et al., Editors
33.
go back to reference Lievense AM et al (2002) Prognostic factors of progress of hip osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Arthritis Rheum 47(5):556–562PubMed Lievense AM et al (2002) Prognostic factors of progress of hip osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Arthritis Rheum 47(5):556–562PubMed
34.
go back to reference Belo JN et al (2007) Prognostic factors of progression of osteoarthritis of the knee: a systematic review of observational studies. Arthritis Rheum 57(1):13–26PubMed Belo JN et al (2007) Prognostic factors of progression of osteoarthritis of the knee: a systematic review of observational studies. Arthritis Rheum 57(1):13–26PubMed
35.
go back to reference Bastick AN et al (2015) Prognostic factors for progression of clinical osteoarthritis of the knee: a systematic review of observational studies. Arthritis Res Ther 17(1):152PubMedPubMedCentral Bastick AN et al (2015) Prognostic factors for progression of clinical osteoarthritis of the knee: a systematic review of observational studies. Arthritis Res Ther 17(1):152PubMedPubMedCentral
36.
go back to reference Teirlinck CH et al (2019) Prognostic factors for progression of osteoarthritis of the hip: a systematic review. Arthritis Res Ther 21(1):192PubMedPubMedCentral Teirlinck CH et al (2019) Prognostic factors for progression of osteoarthritis of the hip: a systematic review. Arthritis Res Ther 21(1):192PubMedPubMedCentral
37.
go back to reference Kallman DA et al (1990) The longitudinal course of hand osteoarthritis in a male population. Arthritis Rheum 33(9):1323–1332PubMed Kallman DA et al (1990) The longitudinal course of hand osteoarthritis in a male population. Arthritis Rheum 33(9):1323–1332PubMed
38.
go back to reference Busby J et al (1991) A longitudinal study of osteoarthritis of the hand: the effect of age. Ann Hum Biol 18(5):417–424PubMed Busby J et al (1991) A longitudinal study of osteoarthritis of the hand: the effect of age. Ann Hum Biol 18(5):417–424PubMed
39.
go back to reference Plato CC, Norris AH (1979) Osteoarthritis of the hand: longitudinal studies. Am J Epidemiol 110(6):740–746PubMed Plato CC, Norris AH (1979) Osteoarthritis of the hand: longitudinal studies. Am J Epidemiol 110(6):740–746PubMed
40.
go back to reference Hoeven TA et al (2013) Association of atherosclerosis with presence and progression of osteoarthritis: the Rotterdam Study. Ann Rheum Dis 72(5):646–651PubMed Hoeven TA et al (2013) Association of atherosclerosis with presence and progression of osteoarthritis: the Rotterdam Study. Ann Rheum Dis 72(5):646–651PubMed
41.
go back to reference Haugen IK et al (2017) The prevalence, incidence, and progression of hand osteoarthritis in relation to body mass index, smoking, and alcohol consumption. J Rheumatol 44(9):1402–1409PubMedPubMedCentral Haugen IK et al (2017) The prevalence, incidence, and progression of hand osteoarthritis in relation to body mass index, smoking, and alcohol consumption. J Rheumatol 44(9):1402–1409PubMedPubMedCentral
42.
go back to reference Marshall M et al (2019) Metabolic risk factors and the incidence and progression of radiographic hand osteoarthritis: a population-based cohort study. Scand J Rheumatol 48(1):52–63PubMed Marshall M et al (2019) Metabolic risk factors and the incidence and progression of radiographic hand osteoarthritis: a population-based cohort study. Scand J Rheumatol 48(1):52–63PubMed
43.
go back to reference Kalichman L et al (2005) Repeated measurement study of hand osteoarthritis in an apparently healthy Caucasian population. Am J Hum Biol 17(5):611–621PubMed Kalichman L et al (2005) Repeated measurement study of hand osteoarthritis in an apparently healthy Caucasian population. Am J Hum Biol 17(5):611–621PubMed
44.
go back to reference Kalichman L et al (2008) Epiphyseal expansion in hand bones: association with age, sex, and hand osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 16(5):560–565 Kalichman L et al (2008) Epiphyseal expansion in hand bones: association with age, sex, and hand osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 16(5):560–565
46.
go back to reference The epidemiology of chronic rheumatism (1963) Atlas of standard radiographs. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford The epidemiology of chronic rheumatism (1963) Atlas of standard radiographs. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford
47.
go back to reference Lawrence JS (1977) Rheumatism in populations. William Heinemann Medical Books, London, pp 98–155 Lawrence JS (1977) Rheumatism in populations. William Heinemann Medical Books, London, pp 98–155
48.
go back to reference Lawrence RC et al (2008) Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States Part II. Arthritis Rheum 58(1):26–35PubMedPubMedCentral Lawrence RC et al (2008) Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States Part II. Arthritis Rheum 58(1):26–35PubMedPubMedCentral
49.
go back to reference Cvijetic S, Kurtagic N, Ozegovic DD (2004) Osteoarthritis of the hands in the rural population: a follow-up study. Eur J Epidemiol 19(7):687–691PubMed Cvijetic S, Kurtagic N, Ozegovic DD (2004) Osteoarthritis of the hands in the rural population: a follow-up study. Eur J Epidemiol 19(7):687–691PubMed
50.
go back to reference Courties A et al (2015) Metabolic stress-induced joint inflammation and osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 23(11):1955–1965 Courties A et al (2015) Metabolic stress-induced joint inflammation and osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 23(11):1955–1965
51.
go back to reference Shah K, van Santen J, Furniss D (2019) Delphi consensus of risk factors for development and progression of finger interphalangeal joint osteoarthritis. J Hand Surg Eur 2019:1753193419865872 Shah K, van Santen J, Furniss D (2019) Delphi consensus of risk factors for development and progression of finger interphalangeal joint osteoarthritis. J Hand Surg Eur 2019:1753193419865872
52.
go back to reference Arokoski JP et al (2002) Increased bone mineral content and bone size in the femoral neck of men with hip osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 61(2):145–150PubMedPubMedCentral Arokoski JP et al (2002) Increased bone mineral content and bone size in the femoral neck of men with hip osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 61(2):145–150PubMedPubMedCentral
53.
go back to reference Wluka AE et al (2005) Tibial plateau size is related to grade of joint space narrowing and osteophytes in healthy women and in women with osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 64(7):1033–1037PubMed Wluka AE et al (2005) Tibial plateau size is related to grade of joint space narrowing and osteophytes in healthy women and in women with osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 64(7):1033–1037PubMed
54.
go back to reference Cicuttini FM et al (2003) Comparison of tibial cartilage volume and radiologic grade of the tibiofemoral joint. Arthritis Rheum 48(3):682–688PubMed Cicuttini FM et al (2003) Comparison of tibial cartilage volume and radiologic grade of the tibiofemoral joint. Arthritis Rheum 48(3):682–688PubMed
55.
go back to reference Altman DG, Lyman GH (1998) Methodological challenges in the evaluation of prognostic factors in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 52(1–3):289–303PubMed Altman DG, Lyman GH (1998) Methodological challenges in the evaluation of prognostic factors in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 52(1–3):289–303PubMed
56.
go back to reference Hayden JA et al (2008) Identifying phases of investigation helps planning, appraising, and applying the results of explanatory prognosis studies. J Clin Epidemiol 61(6):552–560PubMed Hayden JA et al (2008) Identifying phases of investigation helps planning, appraising, and applying the results of explanatory prognosis studies. J Clin Epidemiol 61(6):552–560PubMed
Metadata
Title
Risk factors for the progression of finger interphalangeal joint osteoarthritis: a systematic review
Authors
Karishma Shah
Xiaotian Yang
Jennifer C. E. Lane
Gary S. Collins
Nigel K. Arden
Dominic Furniss
Stephanie R. Filbay
Publication date
01-11-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Rheumatology International / Issue 11/2020
Print ISSN: 0172-8172
Electronic ISSN: 1437-160X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-020-04687-1

Other articles of this Issue 11/2020

Rheumatology International 11/2020 Go to the issue