Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Rheumatology International 4/2014

01-04-2014 | Original Article

Efficacy of EMLA cream phonophoresis comparison with ultrasound therapy on myofascial pain syndrome of the trapezius: a single-blind, randomized clinical study

Authors: Nilgun Ustun, Fatma Arslan, Ayhan Mansuroglu, Deniz Inanoglu, Abdullah Erman Yagız, Hayal Guler, Ayse Dicle Turhanoglu

Published in: Rheumatology International | Issue 4/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate whether eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA) cream phonophoresis superior to conventional US over the trigger points (TPs) in terms of improvements of pain, range of motion and disability in myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). Fifty patients (42 female, 8 male) diagnosed with MPS were included in the study. Patients were randomly assigned into two treatment groups including phonophoresis (PH) group (n = 25) and ultrasound (US) group (n = 25). PH group received EMLA cream phonophoresis (2.5 % lidocaine, 2.5 % prilocaine); US group received conventional ultrasound therapy over the all active TPs on trapezius muscle for 10 min a day for 15 sessions. Outcome measures were performed before the treatment course and at the end of a 15-session course of treatment. Student T, Mann–Whitney U, chi-square and Wilcoxon tests were used for statistical analysis. At the end of the therapy, there was statistically significant decrease in both PH group and US group in terms of number of trigger point (NTP) (p = 0.001, p = 0.029), pain intensity on movement (p = 0.001 vs. 0.002) and right/left cervical lateral ROMs (p = 0.001/p = 0.001, p = 0.009/p = 0.020) relative to baseline. The NTP decrease in PH group was significantly higher than that in US group (1.84 ± 1.46 vs. 0.72 ± 1.45; p = 0.01). Pain intensity at rest (p = 0.001) and NPDI scores (p = 0.001) were statistically improvement in only PH group. EMLA cream phonophoresis is more effective than conventional ultrasound therapy in terms of pain and associated neck disability, and it seems the complementary treatment option for MPS.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Han SC, Harrison P (1997) Myofascial pain syndrome and trigger-point management. Reg Anesth 22:89–101PubMedCrossRef Han SC, Harrison P (1997) Myofascial pain syndrome and trigger-point management. Reg Anesth 22:89–101PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Simons DG (1988) Myofascial pain syndromes: where are we? Where are we going? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 69:207–212PubMed Simons DG (1988) Myofascial pain syndromes: where are we? Where are we going? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 69:207–212PubMed
5.
go back to reference Hong CZ (1994) Lidocaine injection versus dry needling to myofascial TP. Importance of the local twitch response. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 73:256–263PubMedCrossRef Hong CZ (1994) Lidocaine injection versus dry needling to myofascial TP. Importance of the local twitch response. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 73:256–263PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Affaitati G, Fabrizio A, Savini A, Lerza R, Tafuri E, Costantini R et al (2009) A randomized, controlled study comparing a lidocaine patch, a placebo patch, and anesthetic injection for treatment of TPs in patients with myofascial pain syndrome: evaluation of pain and somatic pain thresholds. Clin Ther 31:705–720PubMedCrossRef Affaitati G, Fabrizio A, Savini A, Lerza R, Tafuri E, Costantini R et al (2009) A randomized, controlled study comparing a lidocaine patch, a placebo patch, and anesthetic injection for treatment of TPs in patients with myofascial pain syndrome: evaluation of pain and somatic pain thresholds. Clin Ther 31:705–720PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Windt D, Heijden G, Berg S, Riet G, Winter A, Bouter L (1999) Ultrasound therapy for musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review. Pain 81:257–271PubMedCrossRef Windt D, Heijden G, Berg S, Riet G, Winter A, Bouter L (1999) Ultrasound therapy for musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review. Pain 81:257–271PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Byl NN (1995) The use of ultrasound as an enhancer for transcutaneous drug delivery: phonophoresis. Phys Ther 75:539–553PubMed Byl NN (1995) The use of ultrasound as an enhancer for transcutaneous drug delivery: phonophoresis. Phys Ther 75:539–553PubMed
9.
go back to reference Lee JJ, Rubin AP (1993) Emla cream and its current uses. Br J Hosp Med 50:463–466PubMed Lee JJ, Rubin AP (1993) Emla cream and its current uses. Br J Hosp Med 50:463–466PubMed
10.
go back to reference Argoff CE (2000) New analgesics for neuropathic pain: the lidocaine patch. Clin J Pain 16:62–66CrossRef Argoff CE (2000) New analgesics for neuropathic pain: the lidocaine patch. Clin J Pain 16:62–66CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Taddio A, Stevens B, Craig K, Rastogi P, Ben-David S, Shennan A et al (1997) Efficacy and safety of lidocaine-prilocaine cream for pain during circumcision. N Engl J Med 336:1197–1201PubMedCrossRef Taddio A, Stevens B, Craig K, Rastogi P, Ben-David S, Shennan A et al (1997) Efficacy and safety of lidocaine-prilocaine cream for pain during circumcision. N Engl J Med 336:1197–1201PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Simons DG (1990) Muscular pain syndromes. Adv Pain Res Ther 17:1–41 Simons DG (1990) Muscular pain syndromes. Adv Pain Res Ther 17:1–41
13.
go back to reference Bicer A, Yazici A, Camdeviren H, Erdogan C (2004) Assessment of pain and disability in patients with chronic neck pain: reliability and construct validity of the Turkish version of the neck pain and disability scale. Disabil Rehabil 26:959–962PubMedCrossRef Bicer A, Yazici A, Camdeviren H, Erdogan C (2004) Assessment of pain and disability in patients with chronic neck pain: reliability and construct validity of the Turkish version of the neck pain and disability scale. Disabil Rehabil 26:959–962PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Gam AN, Warning S, Larsen LH, Jensen B, Hoydalsmo O, Allon I et al (1998) Treatment of myofascial trigger-points with ultrasound combined with massage and exercise a randomised controlled trial. Pain 77:73–79PubMedCrossRef Gam AN, Warning S, Larsen LH, Jensen B, Hoydalsmo O, Allon I et al (1998) Treatment of myofascial trigger-points with ultrasound combined with massage and exercise a randomised controlled trial. Pain 77:73–79PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Robertson VJ, Baker KG (2001) A review of therapeutic ultrasound: effectiveness studies. Phys Ther 81:1339–1350PubMed Robertson VJ, Baker KG (2001) A review of therapeutic ultrasound: effectiveness studies. Phys Ther 81:1339–1350PubMed
16.
go back to reference Simons DG (2008) New views of myofascial TPs: etiology and diagnosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 89:157–159PubMedCrossRef Simons DG (2008) New views of myofascial TPs: etiology and diagnosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 89:157–159PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Dalpiaz AS, Lordon SP, Lipman AG (2004) Topical lidocaine patches therapy for myofascial pain. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother 18:15–34PubMedCrossRef Dalpiaz AS, Lordon SP, Lipman AG (2004) Topical lidocaine patches therapy for myofascial pain. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother 18:15–34PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hayden RJ, Louis DS, Doro C (2006) Fibromyalgia and myofascial pain syndromes and the workers’ compensation environment: an update. Clin Occup Environ Med 5:455–469PubMed Hayden RJ, Louis DS, Doro C (2006) Fibromyalgia and myofascial pain syndromes and the workers’ compensation environment: an update. Clin Occup Environ Med 5:455–469PubMed
19.
go back to reference Ay S, Doğan SK, Evcik D, Başer OC (2011) Comparison the efficacy of phonophoresis and ultrasound therapy in myofascial pain syndrome. Rheumatol Int 31:1203–1208PubMedCrossRef Ay S, Doğan SK, Evcik D, Başer OC (2011) Comparison the efficacy of phonophoresis and ultrasound therapy in myofascial pain syndrome. Rheumatol Int 31:1203–1208PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Cummings M, Baldry P (2007) Regional myofascial pain: diagnosis and management. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 21:367–387PubMedCrossRef Cummings M, Baldry P (2007) Regional myofascial pain: diagnosis and management. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 21:367–387PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Gammaltonl AR, Alvarez NA, Galer BS (2003) Safety and tolerability of the 5 % lidocaine patch, a targeted peripheral analgesic: a review of the literature. J Clin Pharmacal 43:111–117CrossRef Gammaltonl AR, Alvarez NA, Galer BS (2003) Safety and tolerability of the 5 % lidocaine patch, a targeted peripheral analgesic: a review of the literature. J Clin Pharmacal 43:111–117CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Davies PS, Galer BS (2004) Review of lidocaine patch 5 % studies in the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia. Drugs 64:937–947PubMedCrossRef Davies PS, Galer BS (2004) Review of lidocaine patch 5 % studies in the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia. Drugs 64:937–947PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Lin PL, Fan SZ, Huang CH et al (2008) Analgesic effect of lidocaine patch 5 % in the treatment of acute herpes zoster: a double-blind and vehicle-controlled study. Reg Anesth Pain Med 33:320–325PubMed Lin PL, Fan SZ, Huang CH et al (2008) Analgesic effect of lidocaine patch 5 % in the treatment of acute herpes zoster: a double-blind and vehicle-controlled study. Reg Anesth Pain Med 33:320–325PubMed
Metadata
Title
Efficacy of EMLA cream phonophoresis comparison with ultrasound therapy on myofascial pain syndrome of the trapezius: a single-blind, randomized clinical study
Authors
Nilgun Ustun
Fatma Arslan
Ayhan Mansuroglu
Deniz Inanoglu
Abdullah Erman Yagız
Hayal Guler
Ayse Dicle Turhanoglu
Publication date
01-04-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Rheumatology International / Issue 4/2014
Print ISSN: 0172-8172
Electronic ISSN: 1437-160X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-013-2881-2

Other articles of this Issue 4/2014

Rheumatology International 4/2014 Go to the issue