Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 6/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Prostate Cancer | Original Article

A prospective phase I multicentre randomized cross-over pharmacokinetic study to determine the effect of food on abiraterone pharmacokinetics

Authors: Floor J. E. Lubberman, Guillemette E. Benoist, Winald Gerritsen, David M. Burger, Niven Mehra, Paul Hamberg, Inge van Oort, Nielka P. van Erp

Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology | Issue 6/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Abiraterone acetate is used at a fixed oral dose of 1000 mg once daily (OD) taken fasted. By administering abiraterone acetate with food, a reduced dose can potentially be given while maintaining equivalent abiraterone exposure. Moreover, administering abiraterone acetate with a breakfast is considered more patient friendly. The aim of this study was to establish the bio-equivalent lower dose of abiraterone when taken with a continental breakfast (CB) compared to the standard intake of 1000 mg OD fasted.

Methods

In this phase I, randomized cross-over, multi-center study, abiraterone pharmacokinetics (PK) were evaluated in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who were treated for 14 days with 1000 mg abiraterone acetate taken fasted, followed by 14 days of treatment with 500 mg taken with a CB.

Results

14 patients were enrolled into the study, of whom 12 were eligible for PK analysis. The geometric mean ratio (GMR) (fed/fasted) was 0.88 (90% CI 0.73–1.07) for area-under-the-curve (AUC0–24h), 1.03 (90% CI 0.79–1.34) for Cmax and 0.81 (90% CI 0.60–1.10) for Ctrough, respectively. High inter-patient variability (> 50%) was found for all PK parameters under both intake conditions. Patients seemed to be slightly more satisfied about the intake of 500 mg abiraterone acetate when taken with a CB compared to 1000 mg fasted.

Conclusion

In conclusion, a bioequivalent lower dose of abiraterone taken with food could not be established in our study. Although based on the absence of a exposure–toxicity relationship, the strict bioequivalence margins as defined by the FDA guidelines could be applied more flexible for abiraterone. Information on the effect of food on abiraterone pharmacokinetics as presented in our study can be used for patients with difficulties taken their medication fasted.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kang SP, Ratain MJ (2010) Inconsistent labeling of food effect for oral agents across therapeutic areas: differences between oncology and non-oncology products. Clin Cancer Res 16(17):4446–4451CrossRef Kang SP, Ratain MJ (2010) Inconsistent labeling of food effect for oral agents across therapeutic areas: differences between oncology and non-oncology products. Clin Cancer Res 16(17):4446–4451CrossRef
2.
go back to reference James ND, de Bono JS, Spears MR, Clarke NW, Mason MD, Dearnaley DP, Ritchie AWS, Amos CL, Gilson C, Jones RJ, Matheson D, Millman R, Attard G, Chowdhury S, Cross WR, Gillessen S, Parker CC, Russell JM, Berthold DR, Brawley C, Adab F, Aung S, Birtle AJ, Bowen J, Brock S, Chakraborti P, Ferguson C, Gale J, Gray E, Hingorani M, Hoskin PJ, Lester JF, Malik ZI, McKinna F, McPhail N, Money-Kyrle J, O’Sullivan J, Parikh O, Protheroe A, Robinson A, Srihari NN, Thomas C, Wagstaff J, Wylie J, Zarkar A, Parmar MKB, Sydes MR, Investigators S (2017) Abiraterone for prostate cancer not previously treated with hormone therapy. N Engl J Med 377:338–351CrossRef James ND, de Bono JS, Spears MR, Clarke NW, Mason MD, Dearnaley DP, Ritchie AWS, Amos CL, Gilson C, Jones RJ, Matheson D, Millman R, Attard G, Chowdhury S, Cross WR, Gillessen S, Parker CC, Russell JM, Berthold DR, Brawley C, Adab F, Aung S, Birtle AJ, Bowen J, Brock S, Chakraborti P, Ferguson C, Gale J, Gray E, Hingorani M, Hoskin PJ, Lester JF, Malik ZI, McKinna F, McPhail N, Money-Kyrle J, O’Sullivan J, Parikh O, Protheroe A, Robinson A, Srihari NN, Thomas C, Wagstaff J, Wylie J, Zarkar A, Parmar MKB, Sydes MR, Investigators S (2017) Abiraterone for prostate cancer not previously treated with hormone therapy. N Engl J Med 377:338–351CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Fizazi K, Scher HI, Molina A, Logothetis CJ, Chi KN, Jones RJ, Staffurth JN, North S, Vogelzang NJ, Saad F, Mainwaring P, Harland S, Goodman OB Jr, Sternberg CN, Li JH, Kheoh T, Haqq CM, de Bono JS, Investigators C-A (2012) Abiraterone acetate for treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: final overall survival analysis of the COU-AA-301 randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 13(10):983–992CrossRef Fizazi K, Scher HI, Molina A, Logothetis CJ, Chi KN, Jones RJ, Staffurth JN, North S, Vogelzang NJ, Saad F, Mainwaring P, Harland S, Goodman OB Jr, Sternberg CN, Li JH, Kheoh T, Haqq CM, de Bono JS, Investigators C-A (2012) Abiraterone acetate for treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: final overall survival analysis of the COU-AA-301 randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 13(10):983–992CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Fizazi K, Tran N, Fein L, Matsubara N, Rodriguez-Antolin A, Alekseev BY, Ozguroglu M, Ye D, Feyerabend S, Protheroe A, Sulur G, Luna Y, Li S, Mundle S, Chi KN (2019) Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in patients with newly diagnosed high-risk metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (LATITUDE): final overall survival analysis of a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 20(5):686–700CrossRef Fizazi K, Tran N, Fein L, Matsubara N, Rodriguez-Antolin A, Alekseev BY, Ozguroglu M, Ye D, Feyerabend S, Protheroe A, Sulur G, Luna Y, Li S, Mundle S, Chi KN (2019) Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in patients with newly diagnosed high-risk metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (LATITUDE): final overall survival analysis of a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 20(5):686–700CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Chi KN, Spratlin J, Kollmannsberger C, North S, Pankras C, Gonzalez M, Bernard A, Stieltjes H, Peng L, Jiao J, Acharya M, Kheoh T, Griffin TW, Yu MK, Chien C, Tran NP (2015) Food effects on abiraterone pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects and patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Clin Pharmacol 55(12):1406–1414CrossRef Chi KN, Spratlin J, Kollmannsberger C, North S, Pankras C, Gonzalez M, Bernard A, Stieltjes H, Peng L, Jiao J, Acharya M, Kheoh T, Griffin TW, Yu MK, Chien C, Tran NP (2015) Food effects on abiraterone pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects and patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Clin Pharmacol 55(12):1406–1414CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Attard G, Reid AH, Yap TA, Raynaud F, Dowsett M, Settatree S, Barrett M, Parker C, Martins V, Folkerd E, Clark J, Cooper CS, Kaye SB, Dearnaley D, Lee G, de Bono JS (2008) Phase I clinical trial of a selective inhibitor of CYP17, abiraterone acetate, confirms that castration-resistant prostate cancer commonly remains hormone driven. J Clin Oncol 26(28):4563–4571CrossRef Attard G, Reid AH, Yap TA, Raynaud F, Dowsett M, Settatree S, Barrett M, Parker C, Martins V, Folkerd E, Clark J, Cooper CS, Kaye SB, Dearnaley D, Lee G, de Bono JS (2008) Phase I clinical trial of a selective inhibitor of CYP17, abiraterone acetate, confirms that castration-resistant prostate cancer commonly remains hormone driven. J Clin Oncol 26(28):4563–4571CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Szmulewitz RZ, Peer CJ, Ibraheem A, Martinez E, Kozloff MF, Carthon B, Harvey RD, Fishkin P, Yong WP, Chiong E, Nabhan C, Karrison T, Figg WD, Stadler WM, Ratain MJ (2018) Prospective international randomized phase II study of low-dose abiraterone with food versus standard dose abiraterone in castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 36:1389–1395CrossRef Szmulewitz RZ, Peer CJ, Ibraheem A, Martinez E, Kozloff MF, Carthon B, Harvey RD, Fishkin P, Yong WP, Chiong E, Nabhan C, Karrison T, Figg WD, Stadler WM, Ratain MJ (2018) Prospective international randomized phase II study of low-dose abiraterone with food versus standard dose abiraterone in castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 36:1389–1395CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lubberman F (2019) A reduced pazopanib dose with food: is it more patient-friendly and does it reduce drug costs? J Clin Oncol 37(suppl):abstr 4564CrossRef Lubberman F (2019) A reduced pazopanib dose with food: is it more patient-friendly and does it reduce drug costs? J Clin Oncol 37(suppl):abstr 4564CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Trask PC, Tellefsen C, Espindle D, Getter C, Hsu MA (2008) Psychometric validation of the cancer therapy satisfaction questionnaire. Value Health 11(4):669–679CrossRef Trask PC, Tellefsen C, Espindle D, Getter C, Hsu MA (2008) Psychometric validation of the cancer therapy satisfaction questionnaire. Value Health 11(4):669–679CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Abetz L, Coombs JH, Keininger DL, Earle CC, Wade C, Bury-Maynard D, Copley-Merriman K, Hsu MA (2005) Development of the cancer therapy satisfaction questionnaire: item generation and content validity testing. Value Health 8(Suppl 1):S41–S53CrossRef Abetz L, Coombs JH, Keininger DL, Earle CC, Wade C, Bury-Maynard D, Copley-Merriman K, Hsu MA (2005) Development of the cancer therapy satisfaction questionnaire: item generation and content validity testing. Value Health 8(Suppl 1):S41–S53CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Benoist GE, van der Meulen E, Lubberman FJE, Gerritsen WR, Smilde TJ, Schalken JA, Beumer JH, Burger DM, van Erp NP (2017) Analytical challenges in quantifying abiraterone with LC-MS/MS in human plasma. Biomed Chromatogr 31(11):e3986CrossRef Benoist GE, van der Meulen E, Lubberman FJE, Gerritsen WR, Smilde TJ, Schalken JA, Beumer JH, Burger DM, van Erp NP (2017) Analytical challenges in quantifying abiraterone with LC-MS/MS in human plasma. Biomed Chromatogr 31(11):e3986CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Diletti E, Hauschke D, Steinijans VW (1991) Sample size determination for bioequivalence assessment by means of confidence intervals. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol 29(1):1–8PubMed Diletti E, Hauschke D, Steinijans VW (1991) Sample size determination for bioequivalence assessment by means of confidence intervals. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol 29(1):1–8PubMed
15.
go back to reference Altman DG (1991) Practical statistics for medical Research, 1st edn. Chapman & Hall, London Altman DG (1991) Practical statistics for medical Research, 1st edn. Chapman & Hall, London
16.
go back to reference Xu XS, Ryan CJ, Stuyckens K, Smith MR, Saad F, Griffin TW, Park YC, Yu MK, De Porre P, Vermeulen A, Poggesi I, Nandy P (2017) Modeling the relationship between exposure to abiraterone and prostate-specific antigen dynamics in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin Pharmacokinet 56(1):55–63CrossRef Xu XS, Ryan CJ, Stuyckens K, Smith MR, Saad F, Griffin TW, Park YC, Yu MK, De Porre P, Vermeulen A, Poggesi I, Nandy P (2017) Modeling the relationship between exposure to abiraterone and prostate-specific antigen dynamics in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin Pharmacokinet 56(1):55–63CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Williams RL, Chen ML, Hauck WW (2002) Equivalence approaches. Clin Pharmacol Ther 72(3):229–237CrossRef Williams RL, Chen ML, Hauck WW (2002) Equivalence approaches. Clin Pharmacol Ther 72(3):229–237CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Arasaratnam M, Crumbaker M, Bhatnagar A, McKay MJ, Molloy MP, Gurney H (2019) Inter- and intra-patient variability in pharmacokinetics of abiraterone acetate in metastatic prostate cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 84:139–146CrossRef Arasaratnam M, Crumbaker M, Bhatnagar A, McKay MJ, Molloy MP, Gurney H (2019) Inter- and intra-patient variability in pharmacokinetics of abiraterone acetate in metastatic prostate cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 84:139–146CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Mateo J, Moreno V, Gupta A, Kaye SB, Dean E, Middleton MR, Friedlander M, Gourley C, Plummer R, Rustin G, Sessa C, Leunen K, Ledermann J, Swaisland H, Fielding A, Bannister W, Nicum S, Molife LR (2016) An adaptive study to determine the optimal dose of the tablet formulation of the PARP inhibitor olaparib. Target Oncol 11(3):401–415CrossRef Mateo J, Moreno V, Gupta A, Kaye SB, Dean E, Middleton MR, Friedlander M, Gourley C, Plummer R, Rustin G, Sessa C, Leunen K, Ledermann J, Swaisland H, Fielding A, Bannister W, Nicum S, Molife LR (2016) An adaptive study to determine the optimal dose of the tablet formulation of the PARP inhibitor olaparib. Target Oncol 11(3):401–415CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Solymosi T, Otvos Z, Angi R, Ordasi B, Jordan T, Molnar L, McDermott J, Zann V, Church A, Mair S, Filipcsei G, Heltovics G, Glavinas H (2017) Novel formulation of abiraterone acetate might allow significant dose reduction and eliminates substantial positive food effect. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 80(4):723–728CrossRef Solymosi T, Otvos Z, Angi R, Ordasi B, Jordan T, Molnar L, McDermott J, Zann V, Church A, Mair S, Filipcsei G, Heltovics G, Glavinas H (2017) Novel formulation of abiraterone acetate might allow significant dose reduction and eliminates substantial positive food effect. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 80(4):723–728CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A prospective phase I multicentre randomized cross-over pharmacokinetic study to determine the effect of food on abiraterone pharmacokinetics
Authors
Floor J. E. Lubberman
Guillemette E. Benoist
Winald Gerritsen
David M. Burger
Niven Mehra
Paul Hamberg
Inge van Oort
Nielka P. van Erp
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology / Issue 6/2019
Print ISSN: 0344-5704
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-019-03952-w

Other articles of this Issue 6/2019

Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 6/2019 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine