Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 5/2018

Open Access 01-11-2018 | Clinical Trial Report

A randomized, single-blind, single-dose study to assess the pharmacokinetic equivalence of the biosimilar ABP 215 and bevacizumab in healthy Japanese male subjects

Authors: Vladimir Hanes, Vincent Chow, Zhiying Pan, Richard Markus

Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology | Issue 5/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Analytic, pharmacokinetic (PK), and clinical similarity between the biosimilar ABP 215 and bevacizumab has previously been demonstrated in global studies. Here we present a phase 1 study in healthy adult Japanese men.

Methods

This study was a randomized, single-blind, single-dose, parallel-group study comparing PK parameters of ABP 215 versus EU-authorized bevacizumab in healthy Japanese men. Primary endpoints were maximum observed serum concentration (Cmax) and area under the serum concentration—time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUCinf). Secondary endpoints included AUC from time 0 to time of last quantifiable concentration (AUClast), safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity.

Results

Baseline characteristics were similar among study subjects (n = 24/group). After a 3-mg/kg intravenous infusion, the geometric means (GMs) of Cmax, AUCinf, and AUClast were 71.2 µg/mL, 25,259 µg h/mL, and 22,499.3 µg h/mL, respectively, for ABP 215 and 70.16 µg/mL, 25,801 µg h/mL, and 22,604.6 µg h/mL, respectively, for bevacizumab. The GM ratios (90% confidence interval; CI) for Cmax, AUCinf, and AUClast were 1.015 (0.946–1.088), 0.979 (0.914–1.049), and 0.995 (0.941–1.053) for ABP 215 versus bevacizumab. All CIs fell within the prespecified bioequivalence margin (0.80–1.25). Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 2/24 subjects receiving ABP 215 and 1/24 receiving bevacizumab. There were no deaths or AEs leading to study discontinuation; no subject was positive for binding anti-drug antibodies (ADAs).

Conclusions

ABP 215 and bevacizumab showed PK similarity in Japanese men. Safety profiles were comparable between the two groups. The pharmacokinetics in Japanese subjects were consistent with those in a previous global PK equivalence study.
Literature
3.
go back to reference MHLW (2009) Guidelines for the quality, safety and efficacy assurance of follow-on biologics (in Japanese). Yakshoku shinsahatu 0304007, 4 March 2009 MHLW (2009) Guidelines for the quality, safety and efficacy assurance of follow-on biologics (in Japanese). Yakshoku shinsahatu 0304007, 4 March 2009
5.
go back to reference Avastin (bevacizumab) (2012) Summary of product characteristics, roche pharma AG. Grenzach-Wyhlen, Germany Avastin (bevacizumab) (2012) Summary of product characteristics, roche pharma AG. Grenzach-Wyhlen, Germany
6.
go back to reference MVASI™ (bevacizumab-awwb) (2017) Prescribing information. Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks MVASI™ (bevacizumab-awwb) (2017) Prescribing information. Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks
7.
go back to reference MVASI™ (bevacizumab-awwb) (2017) Summary of product characteristics. Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks MVASI™ (bevacizumab-awwb) (2017) Summary of product characteristics. Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks
10.
go back to reference Thatcher N, Thomas M, Ostoros G, Pan J, Goldschmidt JH, Schenker M, Hanes V (2016) Randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study comparing biosimilar candidate ABP 215 with bevacizumab in patients with non-squamous NSCLC. In: Presented at 17th world conference on lung cancer, Vienna Austria; December 4–7 Thatcher N, Thomas M, Ostoros G, Pan J, Goldschmidt JH, Schenker M, Hanes V (2016) Randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study comparing biosimilar candidate ABP 215 with bevacizumab in patients with non-squamous NSCLC. In: Presented at 17th world conference on lung cancer, Vienna Austria; December 4–7
11.
go back to reference Arato T (2016) Japanese regulation of biosimilar products: past experience and current challenges. Br J Clin Pharmacol 82:30–40CrossRef Arato T (2016) Japanese regulation of biosimilar products: past experience and current challenges. Br J Clin Pharmacol 82:30–40CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (2009) Guideline for the quality, safety and efficacy assurance of follow-on biologics. PFSB/ELD notification. Provisional translation (as of April 19, 2013). Accessed 25 May 2018 Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (2009) Guideline for the quality, safety and efficacy assurance of follow-on biologics. PFSB/ELD notification. Provisional translation (as of April 19, 2013). Accessed 25 May 2018
13.
go back to reference Nagasaki M, Ando Y (2014) Clinical development and trial design of biosimilar products: a Japanese perspective. J Biopharm Stat 24:1165–1172CrossRef Nagasaki M, Ando Y (2014) Clinical development and trial design of biosimilar products: a Japanese perspective. J Biopharm Stat 24:1165–1172CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A randomized, single-blind, single-dose study to assess the pharmacokinetic equivalence of the biosimilar ABP 215 and bevacizumab in healthy Japanese male subjects
Authors
Vladimir Hanes
Vincent Chow
Zhiying Pan
Richard Markus
Publication date
01-11-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology / Issue 5/2018
Print ISSN: 0344-5704
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-018-3695-4

Other articles of this Issue 5/2018

Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 5/2018 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine