Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 6/2014

Open Access 01-06-2014 | Original Article

A phase II trial of Xeloda and oxaliplatin (XELOX) neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery for advanced gastric cancer patients with para-aortic lymph node metastasis

Authors: Yan Wang, Yi-yi Yu, Wei Li, Yi Feng, Jun Hou, Yuan Ji, Yi-hong Sun, Kun-tang Shen, Zhen-bin Shen, Xin-yu Qin, Tian-shu Liu

Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology | Issue 6/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Gastric cancer with para-aortic lymph node (PAN) involvement is regarded as advanced disease, and only chemotherapy is recommended from the guidelines. In unresectable cases, neoadjuvant chemotherapy could prolong survival if conversion to resectability could be achieved.

Methods

The study was a single-arm phase II trial. Patients who were diagnosed with gastric cancer and PAN involvement (Stations No. 16a2/16b1) were treated with capecitabine and oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy every 3 weeks for a maximum of six cycles. After every two cycles, abdominal computed tomographic scans were repeated to evaluate the response, and surgery was performed at the physicians discretion in patients with sufficient tumor response, followed by chemotherapy with the same regimen to complete a total of six cycles. The primary end point was the response rate of the preoperative chemotherapy. The secondary end points were R0 resection rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events.

Results

A total of 48 patients were enrolled. The response rate of the first-line chemotherapy was 49.0 %, and the clinical benefit response was 85.1 %. After a median of four cycles of chemotherapy, 28 patients received surgery (58.3 %). The median PFS and OS of all patients were 10.0 and 29.8 months, respectively. Patients in the surgery group had much longer PFS (18.1 vs. 5.6 mo, P = 0.001) and OS (not reached vs. 12.5 mo, P = 0.016) compared with those in the non-surgery group.

Conclusions

For gastric cancer patients with PAN involvement, neoadjuvant chemotherapy with XELOX demonstrated a good response rate, and a sufficient R0 resection rate, with acceptable toxicities. Further study is needed to confirm the effectiveness of this regimen.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Forman D, Burley VJ (2006) Gastric cancer: global pattern of the disease and an overview of environmental risk factors. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 20(4):633–639PubMedCrossRef Forman D, Burley VJ (2006) Gastric cancer: global pattern of the disease and an overview of environmental risk factors. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 20(4):633–639PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Baba M, Hokita S, Natsugoe S et al (2000) Paraaortic lymphadenectomy in patients with advanced carcinoma of the upper third of the stomach. Hepatogastroenterology 47(33):893–896PubMed Baba M, Hokita S, Natsugoe S et al (2000) Paraaortic lymphadenectomy in patients with advanced carcinoma of the upper third of the stomach. Hepatogastroenterology 47(33):893–896PubMed
3.
go back to reference Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2011) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer 14(2):101–112CrossRef Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2011) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer 14(2):101–112CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Edge SB, Compton CC (2010) The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol 17(6):1471PubMedCrossRef Edge SB, Compton CC (2010) The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol 17(6):1471PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Sasako M, Sano T, Yamamoto S et al (2008) D2 lymphadenectomy alone or with para-aortic nodal dissection for gastric cancer. N Engl J Med 359(5):453–462PubMedCrossRef Sasako M, Sano T, Yamamoto S et al (2008) D2 lymphadenectomy alone or with para-aortic nodal dissection for gastric cancer. N Engl J Med 359(5):453–462PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Park IH, Kim SY, Kim YW et al (2011) Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of gastric cancer patients with isolated para-aortic lymph node involvement. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 67(1):127–136PubMedCrossRef Park IH, Kim SY, Kim YW et al (2011) Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of gastric cancer patients with isolated para-aortic lymph node involvement. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 67(1):127–136PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP et al (2006) MAGIC trial participants. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 355(1):11–20PubMedCrossRef Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP et al (2006) MAGIC trial participants. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 355(1):11–20PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Nakajima T, Ota K, Ishihara S et al (1997) Combined intensive chemotherapy and radical surgery for incurable gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 4(3):203–208PubMedCrossRef Nakajima T, Ota K, Ishihara S et al (1997) Combined intensive chemotherapy and radical surgery for incurable gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 4(3):203–208PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Yonemura Y, Sawa T, Kinoshita K et al (1993) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-grade advanced gastric cancer. World J Surg 17(2):256–262PubMedCrossRef Yonemura Y, Sawa T, Kinoshita K et al (1993) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-grade advanced gastric cancer. World J Surg 17(2):256–262PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45(2):228–247PubMedCrossRef Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45(2):228–247PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Becker K, Mueller JD, Schulmacher C et al (2003) Histomorphology and grading of regression in gastric carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer 98(7):1521–1530PubMedCrossRef Becker K, Mueller JD, Schulmacher C et al (2003) Histomorphology and grading of regression in gastric carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer 98(7):1521–1530PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Trotti A, Colevas AD, Setser A et al (2003) CTCAE v3.0: development of a comprehensive grading system for the adverse effects of cancer treatment. Semin Radiat Oncol 13(3):176–181PubMedCrossRef Trotti A, Colevas AD, Setser A et al (2003) CTCAE v3.0: development of a comprehensive grading system for the adverse effects of cancer treatment. Semin Radiat Oncol 13(3):176–181PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Som PM (1992) Detection of metastasis in cervical lymph nodes: CT and MR criteria and differential diagnosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 158(5):771–773CrossRef Som PM (1992) Detection of metastasis in cervical lymph nodes: CT and MR criteria and differential diagnosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 158(5):771–773CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Marcus SG, Cohen D, Lin K et al (2003) Complication of gastrectomy following CPT-11-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 7(8):1015–1023PubMedCrossRef Marcus SG, Cohen D, Lin K et al (2003) Complication of gastrectomy following CPT-11-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 7(8):1015–1023PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Schuhmacher C, Gretschel S, Lordick F et al (2010) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for locally advanced cancer of the stomach and cardia: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer randomized trial 40954. J Clin Oncol 28(35):5210–5218PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Schuhmacher C, Gretschel S, Lordick F et al (2010) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for locally advanced cancer of the stomach and cardia: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer randomized trial 40954. J Clin Oncol 28(35):5210–5218PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Liao Y, Yang ZL, Peng JS, Xiang J, Wang JP (2013) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 28(5):777–782PubMedCrossRef Liao Y, Yang ZL, Peng JS, Xiang J, Wang JP (2013) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 28(5):777–782PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lowy AM, Mansfield PF, Leach SD et al (1999) Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy best predicts survival after curative resection of gastric cancer. Ann Surg 229(3):303–308PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Lowy AM, Mansfield PF, Leach SD et al (1999) Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy best predicts survival after curative resection of gastric cancer. Ann Surg 229(3):303–308PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hartgrink HH, van de Velde CJ, Putter H et al (2004) Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for operable gastric cancer: long term results of the Dutch randomized FAMTX trial Include. Eur J Surg Oncol 30(6):643–649PubMedCrossRef Hartgrink HH, van de Velde CJ, Putter H et al (2004) Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for operable gastric cancer: long term results of the Dutch randomized FAMTX trial Include. Eur J Surg Oncol 30(6):643–649PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Nio Y, Koike M, Omori H et al (2004) A randomized consent design trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with tegafur plus uracil (UFT) for gastric cancer-a single institute study. Anticancer Res 24(3b):1879–1887PubMed Nio Y, Koike M, Omori H et al (2004) A randomized consent design trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with tegafur plus uracil (UFT) for gastric cancer-a single institute study. Anticancer Res 24(3b):1879–1887PubMed
20.
go back to reference Luo HY, Xu RH, Wang F et al (2010) Phase II trial of XELOX as first-line treatment for patients with advanced gastric cancer. Chemotherapy 56(2):94–100PubMedCrossRef Luo HY, Xu RH, Wang F et al (2010) Phase II trial of XELOX as first-line treatment for patients with advanced gastric cancer. Chemotherapy 56(2):94–100PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Cunningham D, Okines AF, Ashley S (2008) Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer. N Engl J Med 358(1):36–46PubMedCrossRef Cunningham D, Okines AF, Ashley S (2008) Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer. N Engl J Med 358(1):36–46PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Van Meerten E, Eskens FA, Van Gameren EC, Van Der Gaast A (2007) First-line treatment with oxaliplatin and capecitabine in patients with advanced or metastatic oesophageal cancer: a phase II study. Br J Cancer 96(9):1348–1352PubMedCentralPubMed Van Meerten E, Eskens FA, Van Gameren EC, Van Der Gaast A (2007) First-line treatment with oxaliplatin and capecitabine in patients with advanced or metastatic oesophageal cancer: a phase II study. Br J Cancer 96(9):1348–1352PubMedCentralPubMed
23.
go back to reference Liu C, Sun Q, Hang X, Zhong B, Wang D (2008) Multicenter phase II study of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin as a first-line therapy in Chinese patients with advanced gastric cancer. Anticancer Drugs 19(8):825–831PubMedCrossRef Liu C, Sun Q, Hang X, Zhong B, Wang D (2008) Multicenter phase II study of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin as a first-line therapy in Chinese patients with advanced gastric cancer. Anticancer Drugs 19(8):825–831PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A phase II trial of Xeloda and oxaliplatin (XELOX) neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery for advanced gastric cancer patients with para-aortic lymph node metastasis
Authors
Yan Wang
Yi-yi Yu
Wei Li
Yi Feng
Jun Hou
Yuan Ji
Yi-hong Sun
Kun-tang Shen
Zhen-bin Shen
Xin-yu Qin
Tian-shu Liu
Publication date
01-06-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology / Issue 6/2014
Print ISSN: 0344-5704
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-014-2449-1

Other articles of this Issue 6/2014

Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 6/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine